SINTA

2.5

Impact

Google Scholar

10

h-index

Indonesian Journal of Education Research (IJoER)

Open Access Journal

Reinterpreting the Role of Teachers in the Digital Education Era: Between Technological Challenges and Humanistic

Yuni Kasih Purba
Pelita Harapan University ROR
Indonesia
yunikasihp@gmail.com
Graciella Yoseppin
Pelita Harapan University ROR
Indonesia
Johanes Herlijanto
Pelita Harapan University ROR
Indonesia
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to analyze how digital technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) have transformed teachers’ roles in contemporary educational environments.

    Methodology: A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Twenty-nine articles published between 2020 and 2025 were selected from the Scopus database and analyzed using qualitative synthesis and VOSviewer bibliometric mapping.

    Main Findings: The findings indicate that teachers are transitioning from traditional knowledge transmitters to facilitators, mentors, learning designers, and ethical guides. Although AI can support instructional tasks such as assessment, content generation, and personalized learning, it cannot fully replace the emotional, ethical, and interpersonal dimensions of teaching. The study also identifies major challenges, including digital competency gaps, unequal technological access, and ethical concerns associated with AI integration.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study contributes a comprehensive understanding of teacher role transformation by integrating findings from recent literature with Social Role Theory. The results emphasize that the future of education depends on balancing technological innovation with human-centered values, highlighting the continuing importance of teachers’ empathy, ethical judgment, and emotional support in AI-enhanced learning environments.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    Y. K. Purba, G. Yoseppin, and J. Herlijanto, “Reinterpreting the Role of Teachers in the Digital Education Era: Between Technological Challenges and Humanistic”, Ind. Jou. Edu. Rsc, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 356–364, Jun. 2026, doi: 10.37251/ijoer.v7i3.2215.

    More Citation Formats

  • 28
    Abstract views
    15
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. OECD, Digital Education Outlook 2023. Paris, France: OECD Publishing, 2023.
    2. UNESCO, “Digital Learning: The Role of Teachers in the 21st Century,” UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education, Moscow, Russia, 2021.
    3. S. Rahayu, “The impact of artificial intelligence on education: Opportunities and challenges,” Educatio: Journal of Education, vol. 9, no. 4, 2024, doi: 10.31949/educatio.v9i4.6110.
    4. C. K. Y. Chan and L. H. Y. Tsi, “The AI revolution in education: Will AI replace or assist teachers in higher education?,” 2023.
    5. OECD, Teaching in the Digital Age: How Educators Use Technology to Improve Learning. Paris, France: OECD Publishing, 2020.
    6. M. O. Dei, “The impact of AI on the adaptation of educational materials and teaching methods to the needs of each student,” LatIA, vol. 3, p. 124, 2025, doi: 10.62486/latia2025124.
    7. S. Ahmad, S. Umirzakova, G. Mujtaba, M. S. Amin, and T. Whangbo, “Education 5.0: Requirements, enabling technologies, and future directions,” arXiv, 2023, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2307.15846.
    8. S. M. Hizam, H. Akter, I. Sentosa, and W. Ahmed, “Digital competency of educators in the virtual learning environment: A structural equation modeling analysis,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 704, no. 1, p. 012023, 2021, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2105.08927.
    9. Ministry of Education Kenya, Digital Learning in Kenya: Towards Equitable and Inclusive Digital Learning. Nairobi, Kenya: Ministry of Education Kenya, 2024.
    10. UKFIET, “Digital Education in Low-Income Countries: Challenges and Opportunities,” UKFIET Conference Proceedings, Oxford, U.K., 2024.
    11. M. Warschauer and T. Matuchniak, “New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes,” Review of Research in Education, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 179–225, 2018, doi: 10.3102/0091732X18759040.
    12. P. Mishra and M. J. Koehler, “Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge,” Teachers College Record, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2019, doi: 10.1177/016146811912100101.
    13. B. J. Biddle, “Recent Developments in Role Theory,” Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 12, pp. 67–92, 1986, doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.12.080186.000435.
    14. A. Hargreaves and M. Fullan, Professional Capital: Transforming Teaching in Every School. New York, NY, USA: Teachers College Press, 2019.
    15. D. R. Garrison and N. D. Vaughan, Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2008, doi: 10.1002/9781118269558.
    16. UNESCO, Reimagining Our Futures Together: A New Social Contract for Education. Paris, France: UNESCO Publishing, 2021.
    17. S. Yadav, “Leveraging AI to enhance teaching and learning in education: The role of artificial intelligence in modernizing classroom practices,” in Optimizing Research Techniques and Learning Strategies with Digital Technologies. Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2025, pp. 211–238, doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-7863-2.ch008.
    18. L. Yan, A. S. A. Alwabel, and U. H. Mohamad, “AI-powered education: Transforming teacher-student interactions and advancing sustainable learning practices,” European Journal of Education, vol. 60, no. 4, p. e70351, 2025, doi: 10.1111/ejed.70351.
    19. R. A. Rahimi and G. S. Oh, “Rethinking the role of educators in the 21st century: Navigating globalization, technology, and pandemics,” Journal of Marketing Analytics, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 182–197, 2024, doi: 10.1057/s41270-024-00303-4.
    20. I. Engeness and S. M. Gamlem, “Agency in digital education: Empowering students and teachers in technology-rich learning environments,” Education Sciences, vol. 15, no. 8, p. 1051, 2025, doi: 10.3390/educsci15081051.
    21. R. Ejjami, “The future of learning: AI-based curriculum development,” International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1–31, 2024.
    22. S. Rafiq, S. Iqbal, and A. Afzal, “The impact of digital tools and online learning platforms on higher education learning outcomes,” Al-Mahdi Research Journal (MRJ), vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 359–369, 2024.
    23. D. Bergmann, A. F. Alam, D. Kalbande, and A. L. Ayanlola, “German skilled labour in the context of digital transformation: Insights into technology readiness,” Apprenticeships in England–Initial or Continuing VET, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 150–166, 2025, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15364820.
    24. C. F. Rocha, C. Quandt, F. Deschamps, and G. Cruzara, “Digital transformation readiness in large manufacturing firms: A building block model proposition,” Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 45–68, 2025, doi: 10.1108/JMTM-12-2023-0544.
    25. E. A. Abedi, “Tensions between technology integration practices of teachers and ICT in education policy expectations: Implications for change in teacher knowledge, beliefs and teaching practices,” Journal of Computers in Education, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1215–1234, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s40692-023-00296-6.
    26. A. O. Theodorio, “Examining the support required by educators for successful technology integration in teacher professional development program,” Cogent Education, vol. 11, no. 1, Art. no. 2298607, 2024, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2023.2298607.
    27. R. Chugh, D. Turnbull, M. A. Cowling, R. Vanderburg, and M. A. Vanderburg, “Implementing educational technology in higher education institutions: A review of technologies, stakeholder perceptions, frameworks and metrics,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 16403–16429, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11846-x.
    28. J. Korostenskiene, “Toward the humanistic paradigm in education: A case study,” Journal of Education, Society & Multiculturalism, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 215–235, 2022, doi: 10.2478/jesm-2022-0028.
    29. V. Y. Koon, “Mobile learning and humanistic education: A science mapping approach,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 7122–7139, 2023, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2022.2061010.
    30. K. Rebecchi, L. Todd, and H. Hagège, “Teaching responsible creativity: A path to ethical innovation,” Discover Education, vol. 3, no. 1, Art. no. 103, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s44217-024-00164-0.
    31. L. Mphatsoane-Sesoane and L. C. Jita, “Analysing the role of ethical leadership in fostering teacher agency for inclusive digital pedagogical innovation,” Discover Education, vol. 4, no. 1, Art. no. 493, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s44217-025-00944-2.
    32. K. Wentzel and E. Skinner, “The other half of the story: The role of social relationships and social contexts in the development of academic motivation,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1865–1876, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10648-022-09713-1.
    33. B. Pourgharib and F. Shakki, “The interplay between English teachers’ rapport and immediacy and the students’ academic motivation,” Learning and Motivation, vol. 87, Art. no. 101991, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2024.101991.