SINTA

2.5

Impact

Google Scholar

10

h-index

Indonesian Journal of Education Research (IJoER)

Open Access Journal

Flouting Conversational Maxims: A Study on Student Communication in Grade 9 Maroon

Hanina M. Ali
University of Southern Mindanao ROR
Philippines
Herlen C. Namol
University of Southern Mindanao ROR
Philippines
herlennamol120497@gmail.com
Donnie M. Tulud
University of Southern Mindanao ROR
Philippines
Share

  • Purpose of the study: To investigate students' communication habits, know the causes of maxim flouting, and offer practical suggestions for enhancing class conversations.

    Methodology: This study used a qualitative research design, specifically discourse analysis, to investigate the flouting of conversational maxims in classroom interactions among Grade 9 Maroon students at Esperanza National High School. The study's participants comprised 30 Grade 9 students from Esperanza National High School's Maroon section. Purposive sampling was used and the data are collected through observation and audio recordings.

    Main Findings: The study revealed that flouting conversational maxims is widespread in classroom settings, especially among Grade 9 Maroon students. During discussions, students flouted all conversational maxims. The Maxim of Relationship (Relevance) is the most flouted maxim.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study contributes originality by examining the systematic flouting of Gricean maxims in real classroom interactions among Grade 9 students, a context underexplored in pragmatic research. Unlike previous studies focusing on teachers or digital platforms, it highlights how humor, indirectness, and over-explanation function as both challenges and learning opportunities, offering practical strategies to enhance classroom communication.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    H. M. . Ali, H. C. Namol, and D. M. Tulud, “Flouting Conversational Maxims: A Study on Student Communication in Grade 9 Maroon”, Ind. Jou. Edu. Rsc, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 456–463, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.37251/ijoer.v6i4.1689.

    More Citation Formats

  • 332
    Abstract views
    208
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. J. Karasova and G. Kleckova, “Supporting learners through effective communication: Student teachers’ communication strategies to address learner behaviour,” Australian Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 48, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14221/1835-517X.5910
    2. H. P. Grice, “Logic and conversation,” in Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, P. Cole and J. L. Morgan, Eds. New York: Academic Press, 1975, pp. 41–58. doi: 10.1163/9789004368811_003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003
    3. A. Wahyudi, S. Yusuf, and Z. W. Lestari, “Maxim’s flouting: An analysis of classroom interaction,” Journal of English Education and Teaching, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 219–231, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.4.2.219-231
    4. C. G. A. N. Ngo, J. H. Caballo, and A. L. N. N. Navarro, “Making sense of flouting conversation maxims of teacher-student interactions in movies: A mixed methods,” International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 131–149, 2023. doi: 10.36892/IJLLS.V5I4.1430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v5i4.1430
    5. A. Hitz, “Grice’s maxims: Rules for effective conversation,” Intellectual Takeout, Apr. 28, 2023.
    6. B. Corner, “Understanding Grice’s maxims: the foundation of effective communication,” Buka Corner, Sep. 24, 2024.
    7. F. E. Averina, “A pragmatic analysis of flouting maxims in classroom verbal interaction as seen in ‘Freedom Writers’ movie,” Sanata Dharma University Journal of Language and Literature, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 38–50, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52429/selju.v6i1.38
    8. M. Gultom, “Grice maxims breaking in the teacher and students’ online interaction,” Pioneer: Journal of Language and Literature, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36841/pioneer.v14i1.1658
    9. N. A. Dewi, “Conversational implicature based on maxim variation in EFL teaching during the Covid-19 pandemic,” 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211212.042
    10. M. Hossain, “The application of Grice maxims in conversation: A pragmatic study,” Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 32–40, 2021. doi: 10.32996/jeltal.2021.3.10.4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2021.3.10.4
    11. A. A. Goni, A. M. Galti, H. A. Sanusi, and A. B. Mustapha, “Contributions of the Gricean maxims in the understanding of meaning: A review.”
    12. C. Westby, “Understanding Grice’s maxims in conversation,” Word of Mouth, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 8–10, 2023. doi: 10.1177/10483950221150052B/ASSET/10483950221150052B.FP.PNG_V03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10483950221150052b
    13. Y. Wu, “A literature review on cooperative principle,” 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/iccessh-19.2019.219
    14. M. Eskritt, J. Whalen, and K. Lee, “Preschoolers can recognize violations of the Gricean maxims,” The British Journal of Developmental Psychology, vol. 26, no. 3, p. 435, 2008. doi: 10.1348/026151007X253260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/026151007X253260
    15. S. Hamdi, “Humour based on flouting Grice’s conversational maxims in Ali Douagi’s ‘The Star-Gazer’,” The European Journal of Humour Research, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 74–86, 2024. doi: 10.7592/EJHR.2024.12.2.844 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR.2024.12.2.844
    16. Levesque, “Grice’s ‘Conversational Maxims’: A framework to help you make your…,” Medium.
    17. C. T. Ceballos and R. V. Sosas, “On court proceedings: A forensic linguistic analysis on maxim violation,” Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), vol. 3, no. 2, p. 17, 2018. doi: 10.24200/JONUS.VOL3ISS2PP17-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol3iss2pp17-31
    18. L. W. Manurung, “Flouting and implementing maxims in Sarah Sechan talk show,” Genta Bahtera: Jurnal Ilmiah Kebahasaan dan Kesastraan, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 13–26, 2020. doi: 10.47269/GB.V6I1.99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47269/gb.v6i1.99
    19. R. Dogcol and V. Sayson Villanueva, “Examining online news: A Gricean maxim analysis of news outlet Facebook pages,” International Journal of Language and Education Research, 2024.: doi: 10.29329/ijler. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijler
    20. N. Febriyani and C. Rachmijati, “Analysis the violation of maxim in vlog JurnalRisa episode ‘TanyaRisa #11-Special Peter CS’,” vol. 4, no. 3, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v4i3.p402-408
    21. S. Nanda, D. Sukyadi, and M. I. Sudarsono, “Conversational implicature of the presenters in Take Me Out Indonesia.”
    22. R. H. Rosyidah, “The violation of cooperative principle in conversational of Presidential Debate Indonesia 2019,” English Learning Innovation, vol. 1, no. 1, 2020. doi: 10.22219/englie.v1i1.13165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/englie.v1i1.13165
    23. E. Hutabarat, “The flouting of Grice's conversational maxims in the classroom interaction,” Register Journal of English Language Teaching of FBS UNIMED, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 27–35, 2024.
    24. C. Valcarcel, J. Holmes, D. C. Berliner, and M. Koerner, "The value of student feedback in open forums: A natural language analysis of descriptions of poorly rated teachers," Education Policy Analysis Archives, vol. 29, no. 79, p. n79, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.29.6289
    25. X. Zhuang, H. Wu, X. Shen, P. Yu, G. Yi, X. Chen, and M. Lan, "TOREE: Evaluating topic relevance of student essays for Chinese primary and middle school education," in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024, Aug. 2024, pp. 5749–5765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.342
    26. B. Moore, A. G. Boardman, C. Smith, and A. Ferrell, "Enhancing collaborative group processes to promote academic literacy and content learning for diverse learners through video reflection," Sage Open, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 2158244019861480, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019861480
    27. E. Fokides and E. Peristeraki, "Comparing ChatGPT's correction and feedback comments with that of educators in the context of primary students' short essays written in English and Greek," Education and Information Technologies, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 2577–2621, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12912-8
    28. A. Liaqat, C. Munteanu, and C. Demmans Epp, "Collaborating with mature English language learners to combine peer and automated feedback: A user-centered approach to designing writing support," International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 638–679, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00204-4
    29. C. Reyes, "Demystifying students' observance and violation of Gricean maxims in online ESL classes," Journal of Professional Communication and English Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 32–45, 2025.
    30. C. J. Syting and P. J. Gildore, "Teachers’ linguistic politeness in classroom interaction: A pragmatic analysis," World Journal of English Language, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 133–141, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n8p133