The Relationship Between Teacher Professionalism And Student Success In Learning In Class V
Abstract
Purpose of the study: This research aims to determine the relationship between teacher professionalism and student success in studying at Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Al Ittihad Semowo.
Methodology: This research uses a quantitative approach with field research and the research subjects are 30 students from 30 members of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Al Ittihad Semowo, meaning 100% of the population was taken. This research uses a research instrument in the form of a questionnaire. Data collection techniques using observation, questionnaires and documentation. The data analysis uses the product moment coefficient formula.
Main Findings: Research findings show that there is a significant relationship between teacher professionalism and student learning success. This can be seen from the findings which show that the professional value of teachers is known to be in the high category as many as 1 student or (60%), the medium category as many as 11 students or (36.66%), while the low category as many as 1 student or (3.33%). Then the results of the student success questionnaire in learning showed that the high category was 3 students or (10%), the medium category was 20 students or (66.66%), while the low category was 7 students or (23.33%). Then, to find out the relationship or influence, it is calculated using the product moment coefficient formula which is known as the calculated rxy value = 0.236.
Novelty/Originality of this study: The novelty of this research lies in the local and specific context that has rarely been explored in previous research. Most previous studies tend to focus on public schools and higher levels of education, while this research provides insight into the dynamics at play in Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, which has unique characteristics and challenges.
References
T. Budiharso and B. Tarman, “Improving quality education through better working conditions of academic institutes,” J. Ethn. Cult. Stud., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 99–115, 2020, doi: 10.29333/ejecs/306.
P. S. Aithal and S. Aithal, “Analysis of the Indian National Education Policy 2020 towards Achieving its Objectives,” Int. J. Manag. Technol. Soc. Sci., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 19–41, 2020, doi: 10.47992/ijmts.2581.6012.0102.
Q. Q. Muhammad Wasif Zafar a, Muhammad Shahbaz b c d, Avik Sinha e, Tuhin Sengupta f, “How renewable energy consumption contribute to environmental quality? The role of education in OECD countries,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 268, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122149.
A. Nurhuda, T. E. S. Bin Engku Ab Rahman, and I. Hasan Ansori, “The Role of the Pancasila Student Profile in Building the Civilization of the Indonesian Nation,” J. Learn. Educ. Policy, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 5–11, 2023, doi: 10.55529/jlep.33.5.11.
S. Sazili, J. Ju’im, I. Sri, and E. Riyanto, “International Journal of Social Science Research and Review,” Int. J. Soc. Sci. Res. Rev., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 159–165, 2023, doi: 10.47814/ijssrr.v6i2.855.
K. S. M. and A. M. S. U.N. Khodjamkulov, “The Issue of Spiritual and Patriotic Education of Young Generation in the Scientific, Political and Literary Heritage of Central Asian Thinkers,” Int. J. Psychosoc. Rehabil., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 6694–6701, 2020, doi: 10.37200/ijpr/v24i5/pr2020657.
T. M. Luhrmann, “No TitleMind and Spirit: a comparative theory about representation of mind and the experience of spirit,” J. R. Anthropol. Inst., vol. 26, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1111/1467-9655.13238.
S. Wahyuni and S. Bhattacharya, “Strategy of Islamic Religious Education Teachers in Increasing Student Learning Motivation,” Tafkir Interdiscip. J. Islam. Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 229–249, 2021, doi: 10.31538/tijie.v2i2.22.
W. G. M. Waman, Suryaningsi, “Cypriot Journal of Educational,” Cypriot J. Educ., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 61–74, 2011, doi: 10.18844/cjes.v16i3.5770 Received.
J.-C. C. a Yenchun Jim Wu a b, “Stimulating innovation with an innovative curriculum: A curriculum design for a course on new product development,” Int. J. Manag. Educ., vol. 19, no. 3, 2021.
A. Ibrahim and W. El Zataari, “The teacher–student relationship and adolescents’ sense of school belonging,” Int. J. Adolesc. Youth, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 382–395, 2020, doi: 10.1080/02673843.2019.1660998.
M. A. Flores, “Feeling like a student but thinking like a teacher: a study of the development of professional identity in initial teacher education,” J. Educ. Teach., vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 145–158, 2020, doi: 10.1080/02607476.2020.1724659.
L. E. K. b Daniel J. Madigan a, “Does teacher burnout affect students? A systematic review of its association with academic achievement and student-reported outcomes,” Int. J. Educ. Res., vol. 105, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101714.
F. Ortan, C. Simut, and R. Simut, “Self-efficacy, job satisfaction and teacher well-being in the K-12 educational system,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 18, no. 23, 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312763.
R. Alves, T. Lopes, and J. Precioso, “Teachers’ well-being in times of Covid-19 pandemic: factors that explain professional well-being,” Int. J. Educ. Res. Innov., vol. 2021, no. 15, pp. 203–217, 2021, doi: 10.46661/ijeri.5120.
and P. C. Leonie Rowan, Terri Bourke, “This figure will always be in the strategic spotlight when talking about educational issues, because teachers are always related to any component in the education system,” Sage Journal, J. Res. Nurs., vol. 91, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.3102/00346543209791.
M. Noordegraaf, “Protective or connective professionalism? How connected professionals can (still) act as autonomous and authoritative experts,” J. Prof. Organ., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 205–223, 2020, doi: 10.1093/jpo/joaa011.
K. Murkatik, E. Harapan, and D. Wardiah, “The Influence of Professional and Pedagogic Competence on Teacher’s Performance,” J. Soc. Work Sci. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 58–69, 2020, doi: 10.52690/jswse.v1i1.10.
L. Lorensius, N. Anggal, and S. Lugan, “Academic Supervision in the Improvement of Teachers’ Professional Competencies: Effective Practices on the Emergence,” EduLine J. Educ. Learn. Innov., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 99–107, 2022, doi: 10.35877/454ri.eduline805.
H. P. &Gerald K. L. Kristina F. BrezichaORCID Icon, Sakiko Ikoma, “The ownership perception gap: exploring teacher job satisfaction and its relationship to teachers’ and principals’ perception of decision-making opportunities,” Int. J. Leadersh. Educ., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 428–456, 2020, doi: 10.1080/13603124.2018.1562098.
S. L. and G. Phelps, “Does Teacher Learning Last? Understanding How Much Teachers Retain Their Knowledge After Professional Development,” J. Teach. Educ., vol. 71, no. 5, 2019, doi: 10.1177/0022487119886.
M. T. Tatto, “Professionalism in teaching and the role of teacher education,” Eur. J. Teach. Educ., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 20–44, 2021, doi: 10.1080/02619768.2020.1849130.
D. N. Bay, “Investigation of the relationship between self-efficacy belief and classroom management skills of preschool teachers with other variables,” Int. Electron. J. Elem. Educ., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 335–348, 2020, doi: 10.26822/iejee.2020459463.
C. G. R. and Jean-Louis Berger, “Vocational teachers’ classroom management style: the role of motivation to teach and sense of responsibility,” Eur. J. Teach. Educ., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 200–216, 2021, doi: 10.1080/02619768.2020.1764930.
J. T. Hancock and T. M. Khoshgoftaar, “CatBoost for big data: an interdisciplinary review,” J. Big Data, vol. 7, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s40537-020-00369-8.
T. R. Ramesh, U. K. Lilhore, M. Poongodi, S. Simaiya, A. Kaur, and M. Hamdi, “Predictive Analysis of Heart Diseases With Machine Learning Approaches,” Malaysian J. Comput. Sci., vol. 2022, no. Special Issue 1, pp. 132–148, 2022, doi: 10.22452/mjcs.sp2022no1.10.
V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher,” Int. J. Transgender Heal., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2023, doi: 10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597.
K. Mwita, “Strengths and weaknesses of qualitative research in social science studies,” SSRN Electron. J., vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 618–625, 2024, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4880484.
J. Bonache and M. Festing, “Research paradigms in international human resource management: An epistemological systematisation of the field,” Ger. J. Hum. Resour. Manag., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 99–123, 2020, doi: 10.1177/2397002220909780.
S. Rohma, E. Harapan, and D. Wardiah, “The Influence of School-Based Management and Teacher’s Professionalism toward Teacher’s Performance,” J. Soc. Work Sci. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 13–23, 2020, doi: 10.52690/jswse.v1i1.6.
A. Rochim, T. Herawati, and N. Nurwiani, “Deskripsi Pembelajaran Matematika Berbantuan Video Geogebra dan Pemahaman Matematis Siswa pada Materi Fungsi Kuadrat,” Mosharafa J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 269–280, 2021, doi: 10.31980/mosharafa.v10i2.996.
Copyright (c) 2024 Nabila Nur Rizqiyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Indonesian Journal of Education Research (IJoER) is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
