SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

6

H-Index

Journal of Chemical Learning Innovation

an Open Access Journal

The Use of Flash Media as an Innovation in Chemistry Learning to Improve Student Learning Achievement in Atomic Structure Material

I Made Krisna Budi
University of Mataram ROR
Indonesia
ikrsnabdmadee@gmail.com
Ni Nyoman Nuryani
State Senior High School 2 Mataram
Indonesia
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to determine the effect of using Flash-based learning media on students’ learning achievement in chemistry, specifically on the topic of atomic structure, compared to conventional teaching methods.

    Methodology: This study employed a quasi-experimental design using a pretest-posttest control group design. The instrument used was a multiple-choice test consisting of 20 items. Data were collected through pretest and posttest. Data analysis included validity and reliability testing, homogeneity test using F-test, and hypothesis testing using t-test with pooled variance.

    Main Findings: The results showed that students taught using Flash media achieved higher learning outcomes compared to those taught using conventional methods. The experimental group demonstrated better average scores and higher classical completeness. Statistical analysis indicated a significant difference between both groups, confirming that Flash media positively affects students’ achievement in atomic structure learning.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study introduces the application of specifically designed Flash media for atomic structure learning, integrating interactive animation and conceptual visualization. It provides empirical evidence of its effectiveness, offering a more focused approach compared to previous general multimedia studies and contributing to innovation in chemistry learning media development.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    I. M. K. Budi and N. N. . Nuryani, “The Use of Flash Media as an Innovation in Chemistry Learning to Improve Student Learning Achievement in Atomic Structure Material”, Jor. Chem. Lea. Inn, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 68–74, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.37251/jocli.v1i2.2997.

    More Citation Formats

  • 53
    Abstract views
    17
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. N. S. Rusli, N. H. Ibrahim, C. Hanri, and J. Surif, “E-Module problem-based learning on chemical equilibria to improve students’ higher-order thinking skills: An analysis,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 454–465, 2024, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v13i1.25972. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i1.25972
    2. H. Tümay, “Systems thinking in chemistry and chemical education: A framework for meaningful conceptual learning and competence in chemistry,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 100, no. 10, pp. 3925–3933, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00474
    3. J. Laohapornchaiphan and P. Chenprakhon, “A review of research on Learning activities addressing the submicroscopic level in chemistry,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 101, no. 11, pp. 4552–4565, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00156
    4. M. Karonen, M. Murtonen, I. Södervik, M. Manninen, and M. Salomäki, “Heuristics hindering the development of understanding of molecular structures in university level chemistry education: The lewis structure as an example,” Educ. Sci., vol. 11, no. 258, pp. 1–25, 2021, doi: 10.3390/educsci11060258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060258
    5. S. E. and A. E. W. Benjamin, “Studying the student’s perceptions of engagement and problem-solving skills for academic achievement in chemistry at the higher secondary level,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 8347–8368, May 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-12165-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12165-x
    6. F. Febriani, H. Hayyun, R. Nilawati, and A. Abdullah, “Analysis of comprehension difficulties in chemistry and their impact on student interest in learning,” Jambura J. Educ. Chem., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 103–112, 2024, doi: 10.37905/jjec.v6i2.25748. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37905/jjec.v6i2.25748
    7. Y. Ding and Z. Qiao, “Carbon surface chemistry: New insight into the old story,” Adv. Mater., vol. 34, no. 42, pp. 1–15, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1002/adma.202206025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202206025
    8. C. Xie et al., “Defect chemistry in heterogeneous catalysis: Recognition, understanding, and utilization,” ACS Catal., vol. 10, no. 19, pp. 11082–11098, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c03034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c03034
    9. P. Doolittle, K. Wojdak, and A. Walters, “Defining active learning: A restricted systemic review,” Teach. Learn. Inq., vol. 11, pp. 1–24, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.20343/teachlearninqu.11.25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.11.25
    10. J. G. M. Kooloos, E. M. Bergman, M. A. G. P. Scheffers, A. N. Schepens-Franke, and M. A. T. M. Vorstenbosch, “The effect of passive and active education methods applied in repetition activities on the retention of anatomical knowledge,” Anat. Sci. Educ., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 458–466, 2020, doi: 10.1002/ase.1924. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1924
    11. P. Jadhav, H. Gaikwad, and K. S. Patil, “Teaching and learning with technology : Effectiveness of ICT integration in cchools,” ASEAN J. Sci. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 33–40, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.bumipublikasinusantara.id/index.php/ajsed
    12. M. H. Romli, M. S. Cheema, M. Z. Mehat, N. F. Md Hashim, and H. Abdul Hamid, “Exploring the effectiveness of technology-based learning on the educational outcomes of undergraduate healthcare students: an overview of systematic reviews protocol,” BMJ Open, vol. 10, no. 11, p. e041153, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041153
    13. E. W. Prastyaningtyas, A. M. Almaududi Ausat, L. F. Muhamad, M. I. Wanof, and S. Suherlan, “The role of information technology in improving human resources career development,” J. Teknol. Dan Sist. Inf. Bisnis, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 266–275, 2023, doi: 10.47233/jteksis.v5i3.870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47233/jteksis.v5i3.870
    14. O. Plakhotnik, V. Zlatnikov, I. Strazhnikova, N. Bidyuk, A. Shkodyn, and O. Kuchai, “Use of information technologies for quality training of future specialists,” Rev. Amaz. Investig., vol. 12, no. 65, pp. 49–58, 2023, doi: 10.34069/ai/2023.65.05.5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.65.05.5
    15. M. F. Arifin, A. Rahman, M. E. Hendriyani, and I. Rifqiawatia, “Developing multimedia-based learning media on the digestive system using Adobe Flash Professional CS6 application for class XI,” Res. Dev. Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 76–88, 2022, doi: 10.22219/raden.v2i2.19990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/raden.v2i2.19990
    16. L. Tuhuteru, D. Misnawati, A. Aslan, Z. Taufiqoh, and I. Imelda, “The effectiveness of multimedia-based learning to accelerate learning after the pandemic at the basic education level,” Tafkir Interdiscip. J. Islam. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 128–141, 2023, doi: 10.31538/tijie.v4i1.311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31538/tijie.v4i1.311
    17. R. S. Untari, W. Kamdi, A. Dardiri, S. Hadi, and D. Nurhadi, “The development and application of interactive multimedia in project-based learning to enhance students’ achievement for 2D animation making,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 15, no. 16, pp. 17–30, 2020, doi: 10.3991/ijet.v15i16.16521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i16.16521
    18. I. Syamsudin, K. A. Ningsih, S. Rachmah, and R. Rasilah, “IT-based media in mathematics learning in elementary schools,” J. Math. Instr. Soc. Res. Opin., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 285–296, 2024, doi: 10.58421/misro.v3i3.273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v3i3.273
    19. C. Y. Lin and H. K. Wu, “Effects of different ways of using visualizations on high school students’ electrochemistry conceptual understanding and motivation towards chemistry learning,” Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 786–801, 2021, doi: 10.1039/d0rp00308e. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00308E
    20. I. I. Salame and J. Makki, “Examining the use of PhET simulations on students’ attitudes and learning in general chemistry II,” Interdiscip. J. Environ. Sci. Educ., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1–9, 2021, doi: 10.21601/ijese/10966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/10966
    21. M. Widyaningsih, S. Samsudi, and E. Ellianawati, “Flash interactive media to improve the mastery of light properties concept,” J. Prim. Educ., vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 482–492, 2020, doi: 10.15294/jpe.v9i5.42991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpe.v9i5.42991
    22. C. Dewi, “The effect of flash-based interactive learning multimedia on the thematic learning outcomes of grade 5 students in elementary school,” J. Pemikir. dan Pengemb. Sekol. Dasar, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 12–21, 2022, doi: 10.22219/jp2sd.v10i1.20026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/jp2sd.v10i1.20026
    23. N. Kerimbayev, Z. Umirzakova, R. Shadiev, and V. Jotsov, “A student-centered approach using modern technologies in distance learning: a systematic review of the literature,” Smart Learn. Environ., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–28, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40561-023-00280-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00280-8
    24. K. H. D. Tang, “Student-centered Approach in Teaching and Learning: What Does It Really Mean?,” Acta Pedagog. Asiana, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 72–83, 2023, doi: 10.53623/apga.v2i2.218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v2i2.218
    25. W. Hadi et al., “Enhancement of students’ learning outcomes through interactive multimedia,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 82–98, 2022, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v16i07.25825. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i07.25825
    26. S. E. Putri and F. Alyani, “Effect of using multimedia-based learning on motivation and learning outcomes,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 9921–9927, 2023, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.4396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.4396
    27. K. Kustyarini, S. Utami, and E. Koesmijati, “the importance of interactive learning media in a new civilization era,” Eur. J. Open Educ. E-learning Stud., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 48–60, 2020, doi: 10.46827/ejoe.v5i2.3298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v5i2.3298
    28. F. P. Rachmavita, “Interactive media-based video animation and student learning motivation in mathematics,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1663, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1663/1/012040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1663/1/012040
    29. M. Chi et al., “Implementation of the flipped classroom combined with problem-based learning in a medical nursing course: A Quasi-experimental design,” Healthc., vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 1–11, 2022, doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10122572
    30. R. Khatoon and E. Jones, “Flipped small group classes and peer marking: incentives, student participation and performance in a quasi-experimental approach,” Assess. Eval. High. Educ., vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 910–927, 2022, doi: 10.1080/02602938.2021.1981823. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1981823
    31. J. E. Rudolph, Y. Zhong, P. Duggal, S. H. Mehta, and B. Lau, “Defining representativeness of study samples in medical and population health research,” BMJ Med., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2023, doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000399
    32. M. M. Rahman, M. I. Tabash, A. Salamzadeh, S. Abduli, and M. S. Rahaman, “Sampling techniques (probability) for quantitative social science researchers: A conceptual guidelines with examples,” SEEU Rev., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 42–51, 2022, doi: 10.2478/seeur-2022-0023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/seeur-2022-0023
    33. Y. Touissi, G. Hjiej, A. Hajjioui, A. Ibrahimi, and M. Fourtassi, “Does developing multiple-choice Questioqs improve medical students’ learning? A systematic review,” Med. Educ. Online, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2022, doi: 10.1080/10872981.2021.2005505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.2005505
    34. P. Rintayati, H. Lukitasari, and A. Syawaludin, “Development of two-tier multiple choice test to sssess Indonesian elementary students’ higher-order thinking skills,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 555–566, 2020, doi: 10.29333/IJI.2021.14133A. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14133a
    35. A. Sa’diyah and A. Lutfi, “Atomic structure teaching Module with PhET simulation to increase student motivation and learning outcomes,” Hydrog. J. Kependidikan Kim., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 459–468, 2023, doi: 10.33394/hjkk.v11i4.8436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v11i4.8436
    36. W. Ramadanti and R. A. Fikroh, “Make a match assisted scramble learning model for learning motivation and student learning outcomes in atomic structure material,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 5749–5758, 2024, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v10i8.6768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i8.6768
    37. A. Yonar, H. Yonar, M. Demirsoz, and M. A. Tekindal, “A comparative analysis for homogeneity of variance tests,” J. Sci. Arts, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 305–328, 2023, doi: 10.46939/j.sci.arts-24.2-a06. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46939/J.Sci.Arts-24.2-a06
    38. A. N. Fazlin and M. Nora, “An overview of homogeneity of variance tests on various conditions based on Type 1 error rate and power of a test,” J. Qual. Meas. Anal., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 111–130, 2022, [Online]. Available: http://www.ukm.my/jqma
    39. N. Zarkadis, G. Papageorgiou, and A. Markos, “Understanding quantum numbers: students’ verbal descriptions and pictorial representations of the atomic structure,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 43, no. 13, pp. 2250–2269, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2021.1959080. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1959080
    40. E. Y. Harahap and Y. E. Saragih, “Improving student learning outcomes through the utilization of flash card learning media in slamic religious subjects at SD Negeri 0201 Binanga,” ETNOPEDAGOGI J. Pendidik. dan Kebud., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 170–181, 2024, doi: 10.62945/etnopedagogi.v1i1.590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62945/etnopedagogi.v1i1.590
    41. M. A. Alam, “From teacher-centered To student-centered learning: The role of constructivism and connectivism in pedagogical transformation,” CONFLUX J. Educ., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 154–167, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://cjoe.naspublishers.com
    42. A. Alam and A. Mohanty, “Educational technology: Exploring the convergence of technology and pedagogy through mobility, interactivity, AI, and learning tools,” Cogent Eng., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–37, 2023, doi: 10.1080/23311916.2023.2283282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2023.2283282
    43. T. Arochman and P. B. Fortinasari, “Implementation of technology-based learning by pre-service teachers during teaching practice program,” Premise J. English Educ., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 126–145, 2024, doi: 10.24127/pj.v13i1.8988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v13i1.8988