The Effect of Two Stay-Two Stray Cooperative Learning Methods and Think Pair Share on Student Learning Outcomes of Geography
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to find out: 1) differences in student learning outcomes of Geography after using the Two Stay Two Stray, Think Pair Share and Discussion learning methods. 2) differences in Geography learning outcomes for students after using the Two Stay Two Stray and Discussion learning methods. 3) differences in student learning outcomes of Geography after using the Think Pair Share learning method with Discussion. 4) differences in student learning outcomes of Geography after using the Two Stay Two Stray and Think Pair Share learning methods in (material Distribution of Natural Disaster Prone Areas in Indonesia) class X IPS SMA Negeri 1 Sukoharjo Academic Year 2015/2016. This study uses a Quasi-Experimental research method with the design "Postest-Only Control Group Design". The population in this study were all class X social studies students at SMA Negeri 1 Sukoharjo in the 2015/2016 academic year. Samples were taken using the Cluster Random Sampling technique. The selected sample is class X IPS 2, X IPS 3 and X IPS 4. The technique of collecting data on learning outcomes uses a test technique in the form of essay questions. The data analysis technique used was One Way Anava and post Anava test (Scheffe' method) with a significance level of 5%. The results of the study show that: (1) there are differences in the learning outcomes of Geography students who use the Two Stay Two Stray, Think Pair Share, and Discussion learning methods with the acquisition of Fobs > Fα scores; (2) the learning outcomes of Geography using the Two Stay Two Stray learning method are better than the Discussion learning method; (3) the learning outcomes of Geography using the Think Pair Share learning method are better than the Discussion learning method; (4) the learning outcomes of Geography using the Two Stay Two Stray learning method are better than the Think Pair Share learning method. Based on these data, it can be seen that the learning method that has the greatest influence is the Two Stay Two Stray method, followed by the Think Pair Share method, and the Discussion method.
References
D. Darmaji, A. Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, and F. T. Aldila, “Students’ Perceptions in the Use of Web-Based Character Assessment: A View from Gender Perspective,” J. Pendidik. Progresif, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 362–383, 2021, doi: 10.23960/jpp.v.
Asrial, Syahrial, D. A. Kurniawan, F. T. Aldila, and M. Iqbal, “Implementation of Web-based Character Assessment on Students’ Character Outcomes: A Review on Perception and Gender,” J. Technol. Sci. Educ., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 301–328, 2023, doi: 10.29333/iji.2022.15418a.
F. T. Aldila, M. M. Matondang, and L. Wicaksono, “Identifikasi Minat Belajar Siswa terhadap Mata Pelajaran Fisika di SMAN 1 Muaro Jambi,” J. Sci. Educ. Pract., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 22–31, 2020.
A. Sanova, A. Bakar, A. Afrida, D. A. Kurniawan, and F. T. Aldila, “Digital Literacy on the Use of E-Module Towards Students’ Self-Directed Learning on Learning Process and Outcomes Evaluation Cources,” JPI (Jurnal Pendidik. Indones., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 154–164, 2022, doi: 10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v11i1.36509.
D. Darmaji, A. Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, F. T. Aldila, and H. Pathoni, “Gender and Perception: Implementation of Web-based Character Assessment in Science Learning,” J. Educ. Res. Eval., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 131–142, 2022, doi: 10.23887/jere.v6i1.37737.
Y. I. Suhara, N. D. Kiska, and F. T. Aldila, “Hubungan Karakter Gemar Membaca terhadap Hasil Belajar Tematik Peserta Didik Sekolah Dasar,” Integr. Sci. Educ. J., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 11–15, 2022, doi: 10.37251/isej.v3i1.182.
A. Asrial, S. Syahrial, D. A. Kurniawan, F. T. Aldila, and M. Iqbal, “Gender and Perception: Implementation of Web-based Character Assessment on Students’ Character Outcomes,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 311–338, 2022, doi: 10.29333/iji.2022.15418a.
F. T. Aldila, R. P. W. Yuda, M. Wulandari, and A. P. Ningsi, “Deskripsi Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa SMAN 10 Muaro Jambi pada Materi Kesetimbangan pada Tali,” J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 112–119, 2020.
E. F. S. Rini and F. T. Aldila, “Practicum Activity: Analysis of Science Process Skills and Students ’ Critical Thinking Skills,” Integr. Sci. Educ. J., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 54–61, 2023, doi: 10.37251/isej.v4i2.322.
R. Rusdiana, “Penerapan Metode Pembelajaran Two Stay Two Stray (TS-TS) untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Siswa Kelas XI IPS SMA Negeri 1 Depok Tahun Ajaran 2016/2017,” J. Pendidik. dan Ekon., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 276–289, 2017.
H. Satria, “Pengaruh Teknik Cooperative Learning Berbasis Metode Think Pair Share untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Materi Dasar-Dasar Elektronika,” CIRCUIT J. Ilm. Pendidik. Tek. Elektro, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 17–23, 2021, doi: 10.22373/crc.v5i1.8085.
R. Fitriani et al., “Mendeskripsikan Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa melalui Kegiatan Praktikum Viskositas di SMAN 1 Muaro Jambi,” PENDIPA J. Sci. Educ., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 173–179, 2021, doi: 10.33369/pendipa.5.2.173-179.
F. T. Aldila, D. Darmaji, and D. A. Kurniawan, “Analisis Respon Pengguna terhadap Penerapan Web-based Assessment pada Penilaian Sikap Siswa terhadap Mata Pelajaran IPA dan Nilai-nilai Pendidikan Karakter,” Edukatif J. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1253–1262, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i1.2091.
B. C. Putri, F. T. Aldila, and M. M. Matondang, “Hubungan Antara Karakter Motivasi Belajar dengan Hasil Belajar Siswa,” Integr. Sci. Educ. J., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 45–49, 2022, doi: 10.37251/isej.v3i2.252.
M. Wulandari, R. P. Wirayuda, F. Aldila, and R. Wulandari, “Description of Students’ Integrated Science Process Skills on Friction Material on a Flat Field,” Lensa J. Kependidikan Fis., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 93–103, 2020, doi: 10.33394/j-lkf.v8i2.3206.
W. A. Putri, R. Fitrini, E. F. S. Rini, F. T. Aldila, and T. Ratnawati, “Pengaruh Motivasi Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa IPA di SMAN 6 Muaro Jambi,” SAP (Susunan Artik. Pendidikan), vol. 5, no. 3, 2021.
E. F. Setiya Rini, G. Wibisono, A. Ramadhanti, N. N. Simamora, and D. Chen, “Pengaruh Kemandirian Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa Kelas XI di SMA Negeri 11 Kota Jambi,” J. Pendidik. Fis. dan Teknol., vol. 6, no. 2, p. 256, 2020, doi: 10.29303/jpft.v6i2.2211.
F. T. Aldila and E. F. S. Rini, “Teacher’s Strategy in Developing Practical Values of the 5th Pancasila Preepts in Thematic Learning in Elementary School,” J. Basic Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 1, 2023.
M. Iqbal, A. A. B. Ginting, F. T. Aldila, W. A. Putri, S. Maryani, and T. Ratnawati, “Hubungan Persepsi Siswa dalam Penggunaan Web-Based Assessment dengan Karakter Siswa di SMPN 2 Batanghari,” J. Pendidik. Edutama, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 51–60, 2022.
F. T. Aldila, E. F. S. Rini, S. W. Octavia, N. N. Khaidah, F. P. Sinaga, and N. Septiani, “The Relationship of Teacher Teaching Skills and Learning Interests of Physics Students of Senior High School,” Edufisika J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 101–105, 2023, doi: 10.59052/edufisika.v8i1.24864.
S. Mundarti and F. T. Aldila, “Affective Assessment Instrument Based on Krathwohl-Anderson Taxonomy in Senior High School,” J. Eval. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 74–79, 2023, doi: 10.37251/jee.v4i2.323.
F. Yolviansyah, S. Suryanti, E. F. Setiya Rini, S. Wahyuni, and M. M. Matondang, “Hubungan Minat Belajar Siswa terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika di SMAN 3 Muaro Jambi,” Tunjuk Ajar J. Penelit. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 16–25, 2021.
S. Syahrial, D. A. Kurniawan, A. Asrial, H. Sabil, S. Maryani, and E. F. S. Rini, “Professional Teachers: Study of ICT Capabilities and Research Competencies in Urban and Rural?,” Cypriot J. Educ. Sci., vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 2247–2261, 2022, doi: 10.18844/cjes.v17i7.7590.
Copyright (c) 2023 Arif Srirahmad Isnain, Benedict Arko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Journal of social knowledge education (JSKE) is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
