SINTA

3.2

Impact

Scholar

11

H-Index

Journal of Social Knowledge Education (JSKE)

an Open Access Journal

Edutech For Sustainability: Digital Innovation In Social And Environmental Learning

Nurhayati Nurhayati
Universitas Wirahusada Medan
Indonesia
nurhayatiregf@gmail.com
Weni Sarbaini
Universitas Wirahusada Medan
Indonesia
Atania Rosbina Br Bangun
Universitas Wirahusada Medan
Indonesia
Razid Ananda Siregar
Syiah Kuala University ROR
Indonesia
Damenta Br Ginting
Universitas Wirahusada Medan
Indonesia
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of digital innovation in EduTech platforms in improving elementary students' cognitive understanding and socio-environmental behavioral intention, comparing EduTech-based learning with conventional methods within an Education for Sustainable Development framework.

    Methodology: This study used a quantitative quasi-experimental Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design involving 50 fourth-grade students (25 experimental, 25 control) at UPTD SD Inpres Oelmasi, selected through cluster random sampling. Data were collected using validated comprehension tests and Likert-scale questionnaires, then analyzed using N-Gain scores, Shapiro-Wilk normality test, Levene's homogeneity test, Mann-Whitney U test, and rank-biserial correlation (effect size).

    Main Findings: Both groups showed improved post-test scores, but the experimental group using EduTech achieved a higher mean N-Gain than the control group. Shapiro-Wilk and Q-Q plot results indicated non-normal data distribution, so hypothesis testing used the Mann-Whitney U test (U = 169.5, p < .05), confirming a statistically significant difference favoring EduTech. The rank-biserial correlation (r = .445) indicated a moderate practical effect, demonstrating EduTech's meaningful contribution to students' understanding of social and environmental sustainability..

    Novelty/Originality of this study: Unlike prior studies that mostly focus on general academic achievement or specific subjects, this study specifically evaluates EduTech's effectiveness in supporting integrated social and environmental sustainability learning at the elementary level. By empirically testing the Connectivism theory and TPACK framework together, it extends evidence on early-age digital pedagogy for Education for Sustainable Development and offers practical guidance for teachers implementing ESD-based digital learning strategies.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    N. Nurhayati, W. Sarbaini, A. R. B. Bangun, R. A. Siregar, and D. B. Ginting, “Edutech For Sustainability: Digital Innovation In Social And Environmental Learning”, Jo. Soc. Know. Ed, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 443–454, Jul. 2026, doi: 10.37251/jske.v7i4.3555.

    More Citation Formats

  • 32
    Abstract views
    6
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. J. Julio, "Education for sustainable development: Instruments for equipping the young generation," J. Educ. Sustain. Dev., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 115–123, 2018.
    2. M. Ahmed and A. Saleh, "Obstacles of conventional teaching methods in socio-environmental issues," Int. J. Educ. Pract., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 201–214, 2017.
    3. National Council for the Social Studies, National Curriculum Standards for Social Studies: A Framework for Teaching, Learning, and Assessment. Silver Spring, MD, USA: National Council for the Social Studies, 2010.
    4. S. Gretz et al., "The potential of educational technology in simulating ecosystem impacts," EduTech Res. Q., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 45–58, 2017.
    5. R. Fowler et al., "Connectivism and dynamic networks of information in the digital age," J. Digital Learn., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 89–102, 2018.
    6. R. Fowler et al., "Collaborative digital platforms as cognitive facilitators for sustainability," Technol. Pedagogy, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 175–188, 2018.
    7. A. Joe et al., "Integrating technology, active pedagogy, and digital instruments in elementary education," J. Technol. Teach. Educ., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 63–77, 2014.
    8. T. Dexler, "The harmonized integration of the TPACK framework in primary schools," Comput. Educ. Trends, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 310–322, 2016.
    9. E. Adams, "Targeted educational technology design as a catalyst for ecological behavior change," Environ. Behav. J., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 142–155, 2018.
    10. A. C. Hadjichambis and P. Reis, Eds., Conceptualizing Environmental Citizenship for 21st Century Education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2020, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-20249-1.
    11. A. Bandura, Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, 1977.
    12. M. Rieckmann, "Learning to transform the world: Key competencies in education for sustainable development," in Issues and Trends in Education for Sustainable Development, A. Leicht, J. Heiss, and W. J. Byun, Eds. Paris, France: UNESCO, 2018, pp. 39–59.
    13. J. Mezirow, Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass, 1991.
    14. R. M. Tamim, R. M. Bernard, E. Borokhovski, P. C. Abrami, and R. F. Schmid, "What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: A second-order meta-analysis and validation study," Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 4–28, 2011, doi: 10.3102/0034654310393361.
    15. R. R. Hake, "Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses," Am. J. Phys., vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 64–74, 1998, doi: 10.1119/1.18809.
    16. M. S. Hollstein and G. A. Smith, "Civic environmentalism: Integrating social studies and environmental education through curricular models," J. Soc. Stud. Educ. Res., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 223–250, 2020.
    17. C. Kuehl, A. C. Sparks, H. Hodges, and E. R. A. N. Smith, "Exploring sustainability literacy: Developing and assessing a bottom-up measure of what students know about sustainability," Front. Sustain., vol. 4, Art. no. 1167041, 2023, doi: 10.3389/frsus.2023.1167041.
    18. E. Hamilton and L. Marckini-Polk, "The impact of place-based education on middle school students' environmental literacy and stewardship," Cogent Educ., vol. 10, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2022.2163789.
    19. Y.-H. Shih, "Children's learning for sustainability in social studies education: A case study from Taiwanese elementary school," Front. Educ., vol. 9, Art. no. 1353420, 2024, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1353420.
    20. A. Z. Muthi and Sujarwo, "The relationship between social studies education and environmental education: Implications for elementary school students' environmental awareness," Heritage: J. Soc. Stud., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 53–58, 2025.
    21. H. Levene, "Robust tests for equality of variances," in Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling, I. Olkin, Ed. Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford Univ. Press, 1960, pp. 278–292.
    22. H. Im, "Affective and social competencies of elementary school students in the use of digital textbooks: A longitudinal study," Behav. Sci., vol. 14, no. 3, Art. no. 179, 2024, doi: 10.3390/bs14030179.
    23. G. Siemens, "Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age," Int. J. Instr. Technol. Distance Learn., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 3–10, 2005.
    24. S. Downes, Connectivism and Connective Knowledge: Essays on Meaning and Learning Networks. Ottawa, ON, Canada: National Research Council Canada, 2012.
    25. R. Kop and A. Hill, "Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past?," Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1–13, 2008, doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v9i3.523.
    26. F. Bell, "Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning," Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 98–118, 2011, doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.902.
    27. P. Mishra and M. J. Koehler, "Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge," Teach. Coll. Rec., vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 1017–1054, 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.
    28. M. J. Koehler, P. Mishra, and W. Cain, "What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?," J. Educ., vol. 193, no. 3, pp. 13–19, 2013, doi: 10.1177/002205741319300303.
    29. M. J. Koehler and P. Mishra, "What is technological pedagogical content knowledge?," Contemp. Issues Technol. Teach. Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 60–70, 2009.
    30. J. B. Harris, M. J. Hofer, M. R. Blanchard, N. F. Grandgenett, D. A. Schmidt, M. van Olphen, and C. A. Young, "Grounded technology integration: Instructional planning using curriculum-based activity type taxonomies," J. Technol. Teach. Educ., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 573–605, 2010.
    31. C.-S. Chai, J. H.-L. Koh, and C.-C. Tsai, "A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge," Educ. Technol. Soc., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 31–51, 2013.
    32. UNESCO, Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives. Paris, France: UNESCO Publishing, 2017.
    33. A. E. J. Wals and J. Huckle, "The UN decade of education for sustainable development: Business as usual in the end," Environ. Educ. Res., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 491–505, 2015, doi: 10.1080/13504622.2015.1027564.
    34. Y. A. Feriandi, D. Budimansyah, and K. Komalasari, "Developing measurement instrument of students' citizenship ecological behavior on citizenship education course in middle school," J. Hum. Behav. Soc. Environ., 2022, doi: 10.1080/10911359.2022.2120590.
    35. D. Rakhmawati, H. Haryanto, M. Murdiono, and S. P. Kawuryan, "Development of ecological citizenship-based character education model to improve environmental naturalistic intelligence of elementary school students," Proc. Ser. Soc. Sci. Humanit., vol. 12, 2023.
    36. T. G. R. Hallatu et al., "Fostering environmental awareness character in elementary education through the economic green living approach," Indones. Values Character Educ. J., vol. 7, no. 2, 2024, doi: 10.23887/ivcej.v7i2.79057.
    37. P. C. I. C. Damanik, M. I. Chaled, F. D. Jayanti, R. A. Husaeni, and A. A. Uli, "The role of teachers in fostering digital literacy and citizenship among elementary school students," Takuana: J. Pendidik. Sains Human., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 414–421, 2025.
    38. Y. Cleovoulou, "21st century pedagogies and citizenship education: Enacting elementary school curriculum using critical inquiry-based learning," in 21st Century Skills Development Through Inquiry-Based Learning. London, U.K.: IntechOpen, 2021, doi: 10.5772/intechopen.96998.
    39. S. Choi, "Is intergroup contact alone enough to cultivate inclusive attitudes toward immigrants? Global citizenship education as a complementary tool," Int. J. Educ. Dev., vol. 104, Art. no. 102941, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102941.
    40. Partnership for 21st Century Learning, Framework for 21st Century Learning. Columbus, OH, USA: Battelle for Kids, 2019.
    41. OECD, OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030: OECD Learning Compass 2030. Paris, France: OECD Publishing, 2019.
    42. I. Naila, H. Suwono, and H. Susilo, "Trend research and future directions of environmental literacy education in elementary school: A systematic literature review," Multidiscip. Rev., vol. 9, no. 5, Art. no. 2026161, 2025, doi: 10.31893/multirev.2026161.