SINTA

3.2

Impact

Scholar

11

H-Index

Journal of Social Knowledge Education (JSKE)

an Open Access Journal

Digital Public Services and Community Access: Effectiveness of the Digital Village Application (DIGIDES) in Waiheru Village, Ambon City

Galih Dito Kuncoro
University of Pattimura ROR
Indonesia
dito52235@gmail.com
pieter sammy Soselisa
University of Pattimura ROR
Indonesia
Ivonny Yeany Rahanra
University of Pattimura ROR
Indonesia
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study analyzes the effectiveness of the Digital Village Application (DIGIDES) in improving administrative public services, service access, citizen participation, and community satisfaction in Waiheru Village, Baguala District, Ambon City.

    Methodology: This study employed a descriptive qualitative approach. Data were collected through direct observation, semi-structured interviews, and documentation involving village officials, the application operator, and community beneficiaries. Data were analyzed through reduction, display, verification, and interpretation based on public service effectiveness indicators.

    Main Findings: The findings show that DIGIDES has improved service accuracy, administrative efficiency, population data management, and transparency for village officials and digitally capable residents. However, its community-level use remains limited because of uneven digital literacy, inadequate socialization, operator dependency, and unstable internet connectivity. These constraints affect service access, restrict citizen participation, and create uneven changes in village governance: residents who are digitally literate benefit from faster services, while older residents, low-literacy groups, and people with limited internet access remain dependent on face-to-face assistance.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study combines effectiveness analysis with a social impact perspective by treating village digitalization not merely as a technological innovation but as a public service process that shapes inclusion, access, participation, and relations between village officials and citizens.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    G. D. Kuncoro, pieter sammy Soselisa, and I. Y. Rahanra, “Digital Public Services and Community Access: Effectiveness of the Digital Village Application (DIGIDES) in Waiheru Village, Ambon City”, Jo. Soc. Know. Ed, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 236–244, May 2026, doi: 10.37251/jske.v7i3.2719.

    More Citation Formats

  • 74
    Abstract views
    38
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. Republic of Indonesia, Law No. 25 of 2009 concerning Public Services. Jakarta, Indonesia, 2009.
    2. Republic of Indonesia, Presidential Regulation No. 95 of 2018 concerning Electronic-Based Government System. Jakarta, Indonesia, 2018.
    3. World Bank, World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank, 2016.
    4. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations E-Government Survey 2024: Accelerating Digital Transformation for Sustainable Development. New York, NY, USA: United Nations, 2024.
    5. I. Mergel, N. Edelmann, and N. Haug, “Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 4, Art. no. 101385, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
    6. T. Janowski, “Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 221–236, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.001
    7. J. R. Gil-Garcia, S. S. Dawes, and T. A. Pardo, “Digital government and public management research: Finding the crossroads,” Public Management Review, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 633–646, 2018, doi: 10.1080/14719037.2017.1327181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1327181
    8. F. Bannister and R. Connolly, “ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 119–128, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.06.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.06.002
    9. P. Norris, Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164887
    10. J. A. G. M. van Dijk, The Digital Divide. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2020.
    11. M. Warschauer, Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6699.001.0001
    12. N. Selwyn, “Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide,” New Media & Society, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 341–362, 2004, doi: 10.1177/1461444804042519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804042519
    13. R. Heeks, Implementing and Managing eGovernment: An International Text. London, UK: SAGE Publications, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446220191
    14. M. Castells, The Rise of the Network Society, 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.
    15. OECD, The OECD Digital Government Policy Framework: Six Dimensions of a Digital Government. Paris, France: OECD Publishing, 2020.
    16. I. Zavratnik, A. Kos, and E. Duh, “Smart villages: Comprehensive review of initiatives and practices,” Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 7, Art. no. 2559, 2018, doi: 10.3390/su10072559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072559
    17. A. Visvizi and M. D. Lytras, “It’s not a fad: Smart cities and smart villages research in European and global contexts,” Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 8, Art. no. 2727, 2018, doi: 10.3390/su10082727. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082727
    18. E. A. M. Sampetoding and Mahendrawathi ER, “Digital transformation of smart village: A systematic literature review,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 239, pp. 1336–1343, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2024.06.304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.06.304
    19. DigitalDesa.id, “Aplikasi sistem informasi desa,” DigitalDesa.id, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://digitaldesa.id/. Accessed: May 18, 2026.
    20. PT Digital Desa Indonesia, “Digital Desa App by DIGIDES,” Google Play, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.upanastudio.digitaldesa. Accessed: May 18, 2026.
    21. Normawati, A. R. Sakir, and H. Almahdali, “Digitalization of village administration to improve public service efficiency in Waiheru Village, Baguala District, Ambon City,” Community Services: Sustainability Development, vol. 2, no. 2, 2025, doi: 10.61857/cssdev.v2i2.102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61857/cssdev.v2i2.102
    22. S. Agastha and R. Fikri, “Implementasi pelayanan publik berbasis aplikasi Digital Desa (DIGIDES) di Kantor Desa Pandau Jaya Kecamatan Siak Hulu,” Jurnal Mahasiswa Pemerintahan, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 400–408, 2024, doi: 10.25299/jmp.18259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25299/jmp..18259
    23. S. Aisyah and E. Suriyani, “Implementasi Program Digitalisasi Desa (DIGIDES) dalam meningkatkan pelayanan publik di Desa Kapar,” Jurnal Administrasi Publik dan Bisnis, vol. 7, no. 2, 2025, doi: 10.35722/japb.v7i2.1139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35722/japb.v7i2.1139
    24. B. Jhon, M. Warbal, and P. Wokanubun, “Evaluasi implementasi aplikasi Digital Desa (DIGIDES) dalam menyelenggarakan administrasi desa,” JIMAD: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 163–174, 2025, doi: 10.59585/jimad.v2i3.665. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59585/jimad.v2i3.665
    25. R. Kusumawati, “Digital village development strategy to improve literacy, public service, and community self-reliance,” Jurnal Governansi, vol. 10, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.30997/jgs.v10i1.9790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30997/jgs.v10i1.9790
    26. M. Ikbal, E. Erfina, H. Lawelai, S. Lubis, and M. A. A. Darlis, “Digital transformation in rural areas: Directions for digital village development in developing countries,” Journal of Public Sector Innovations, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 58–72, 2025, doi: 10.26740/jpsi.v9n2.p58-72.
    27. A. N. P. Fatmala, A. R. Sakir, and A. D. Mayasari, “The influence of human resource quality and infrastructure support on digital village public service innovation (DIGIDES) in Ambon City,” E-SOSPOL, vol. 12, no. 2, 2025, doi: 10.19184/e-sospol.v12i2.53880. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19184/e-sospol.v12i2.53880
    28. J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2018.
    29. M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldana, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2014.
    30. M. Q. Patton, Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2015.
    31. N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, Eds., The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2018.
    32. R. K. Yin, Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2018.
    33. S. P. Siagian, Filsafat Administrasi. Jakarta, Indonesia: Bumi Aksara, 2016.
    34. W. H. DeLone and E. R. McLean, “The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 9–30, 2003, doi: 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
    35. A. Parasuraman, V. A. Zeithaml, and A. Malhotra, “E-S-QUAL: A multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality,” Journal of Service Research, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 213–233, 2005, doi: 10.1177/1094670504271156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670504271156
    36. V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425–478, 2003, doi: 10.2307/30036540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
    37. F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340, 1989, doi: 10.2307/249008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
    38. E. M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed. New York, NY, USA: Free Press, 2003.
    39. L. Carter and F. Belanger, “The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors,” Information Systems Journal, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 5–25, 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x
    40. J. C. Bertot, P. T. Jaeger, and J. M. Grimes, “Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 264–271, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001
    41. D. Linders, “From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 446–454, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003
    42. A. Meijer and M. P. R. Bolivar, “Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance,” International Review of Administrative Sciences, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 392–408, 2016, doi: 10.1177/0020852314564308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564308
    43. J. Hartley, “Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present,” Public Money & Management, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 27–34, 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9302.2005.00447.x.
    44. S. P. Osborne, Ed., The New Public Governance? Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance. London, UK: Routledge, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203861684
    45. J. Millard, “ICT-enabled public sector innovation: Trends and prospects,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 2013, pp. 77–86, doi: 10.1145/2591888.2591901. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2591888.2591901
    46. T. Nam, “Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 12–20, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2011.07.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.07.005
    47. A. Cordella and N. Tempini, “E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 279–286, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.03.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.03.005
    48. J. Schou and M. Hjelholt, Digitalization and Public Sector Transformations. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76291-3
    49. R. M. Walker, “An empirical evaluation of innovation types and organizational and environmental characteristics: Towards a configuration framework,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 591–615, 2008, doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum026
    50. J. D. Twizeyimana and A. Andersson, “The public value of e-government: A literature review,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 167–178, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001