Antibacterial Activity Test of Sungkai Leaf Endophytes (Peronema canescens J) Against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus Bacteria as Antidiarrheal Probiotic Candidates
-
Purpose of the study: This study aims to test the antibacterial activity of endophytic bacterial isolates from sungkai leaves against the two test bacteria as antidiarrheal probiotic candidates.
Methodology: The research stages included isolation, morphological characterization, Gram staining, motility testing, catalase testing, and antibacterial activity testing using the well diffusion method. Data were analyzed using Shapiro-Wilk, ANOVA, and Tukey's advanced test.
Main Findings: The results of the study obtained five isolates (S-1, S-2, S-3, S-4, S-5) with Gram-positive characteristics, bacilli, and positive in motility and catalase tests. Isolates S-1 and S-2 did not have antibacterial activity. In contrast, isolates S-3, S-4, and S-5 were able to inhibit the test bacteria with moderate to strong categories. The highest activity against Escherichia coli was shown by isolate S-3 (10.3 mm), while against Staphylococcus aureus by isolate S-4 (12.08 mm). Statistical analysis showed a significant difference in antibacterial activity between treatments (p<0.001). It was concluded that isolates S-3 and S-4 have the most potential to be developed as antidiarrheal probiotic candidates and natural antibacterial sources.
Novelty/Originality of this study: The originality of this study lies in integrating endophytic bacterial exploration from Peronema canescens leaves with antibacterial screening against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus to identify potential probiotic candidates for antidiarrheal applications.
-
How to cite
[1]“Antibacterial Activity Test of Sungkai Leaf Endophytes (Peronema canescens J) Against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus Bacteria as Antidiarrheal Probiotic Candidates”, In. Sci. Ed. J, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 719–730, Jul. 2026, doi: 10.37251/isej.v7i4.3606. -
14Abstract views6Downloads
Metrics — Badges
-
- [1] M. Xie et al., “Global trends, age-period-cohort analysis, and future projections of diarrhea burden: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021,” Biosaf. Heal., vol. 7, no. 05, pp. 295–305, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.bsheal.2025.09.005.
- [2] C. Thystrup et al., “Etiology-specific incidence and mortality of diarrheal diseases in the African region: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” BMC Public Health, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1864, 2024 doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19334-8.
- [3] I. Siramaneerat, F. Agushybana, and P. Sunthrayuth, “A mixed-effects multilevel Poisson regression analysis of diarrhea prevalence among under-five children in Indonesia,” J. Health. Popul. Nutr., vol. 45, 2026, doi: 10.1186/s41043-026-01244-7.
- [4] W. Arief and P. A. Arif, “Sanitation, drinking water access and diarrhea in Indonesia,” Russ. J. Agric. Socio-Economic Sci., vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 142–152, 2019, doi: 10.18551/rjoas.2019-01.17.
- [5] Kemenkes, Profil Kesehatan Indonesia 2023. Jalan HR. Rasuna Said Blox X-5 Kav 4-9, Jakarta 12950: Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia, 2023.
- [6] V. P. Chavda et al., “Combatting infectious diarrhea: innovations in treatment and vaccination strategies,” Expert Rev. Vaccines, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 246–265, 2024, doi: 10.1080/14760584.2023.2295015.
- [7] E. U. Alum, E. I. Obeagu, and O. P.-C. Ugwu, “Enhancing quality water, good sanitation, and proper hygiene is the panacea to diarrhea control and the attainment of some related sustainable development goals: A review,” Medicine (Baltimore)., vol. 103, no. 38, p. e39578, 2024, doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039578.
- [8] M. Wei et al., “A mechanistic approach to replacing antibiotics with natural products in the treatment of bacterial diarrhea,” Biomolecules, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 1045, 2025, doi: 10.3390/biom15071045.
- [9] K. Kopacz and S. Phadtare, “Probiotics for the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea,” in Healthcare, MDPI, 2022, pp. 1450, doi: 10.3390/healthcare10081450.
- [10] M. A. Salam et al., “Antimicrobial resistance: a growing serious threat for global public health,” in Healthcare, MDPI, 2023, pp. 1946, doi: 10.3390/healthcare11131946.
- [11] J. A. Alara and O. R. Alara, “An overview of the global alarming increase of multiple drug resistant: a major challenge in clinical diagnosis,” Infect. Disord. TargetsDisorders), vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 26–42, 2024, doi: 10.2174/1871526523666230725103902.
- [12] M. M. Aljeldah, “Antimicrobial resistance and its spread is a global threat,” Antibiotics, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1082, 2022, doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11081082.
- [13] R. Retnaningsih, “Uji daya hambat antibakteri air seduhan bunga rosella (Hibiscus sabdariffa L) terhadap bakteri Staphylococcus aureus secara difusi agar[ Antibacterial inhibition test of rosella flower (Hibiscus sabdariffa L) infusion against Staphylococcus aureus bacteria by agar diffusion],” J. Kebidanan V, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 143–146, 2016, doi: 10.33024/jkm.v2i3.585.
- [14] H. Duan, L. Yu, F. Tian, Q. Zhai, L. Fan, and W. Chen, “Antibiotic-induced gut dysbiosis and barrier disruption and the potential protective strategies,” Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 1427–1452, 2022, doi: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1843396.
- [15] D. Kesavelu and P. Jog, “Current understanding of antibiotic-associated dysbiosis and approaches for its management,” Ther. Adv. Infect. Dis., vol. 10, 2023, doi: 10.1177/20499361231154443.
- [16] Z. Peng, D. Wang, Y. He, Z. Wei, M. Xie, and T. Xiong, “Gut distribution, impact factor, and action mechanism of bacteriocin-producing beneficial microbes as promising antimicrobial agents in gastrointestinal infection,” Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1516–1527, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s12602-024-10222-6.
- [17] J. Zhu et al., “Mechanisms of probiotic Bacillus against enteric bacterial infections,” One Heal. Adv., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 21, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s44280-023-00020-0.
- [18] K. Teng et al., “Food and gut originated bacteriocins involved in gut microbe-host interactions,” Crit. Rev. Microbiol., vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 515–527, 2023, doi: 10.1080/1040841X.2022.2082860.
- [19] P. Chandrasekaran, S. Weiskirchen, and R. Weiskirchen, “Effects of probiotics on gut microbiota: an overview,” Int. J. Mol. Sci., vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 6022, 2024, doi: 10.3390/ijms25116022.
- [20] Y. Fei et al., “Role of prebiotics in enhancing the function of next-generation probiotics in gut microbiota,” Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., vol. 63, no. 8, pp. 1037–1054, 2023, doi: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1958744.
- [21] M. Asaduzzaman, “Endophytic bacteria are potential source of medicinal plant therapeutics and bioactive compound synthesis,” Aust. Herb. Insight, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2024, doi: 10.25163/ahi.719985.
- [22] T.-D. Nguyen et al., “Relationships between endophytic bacteria and medicinal plants on bioactive compounds production,” Rhizosphere, vol. 27, pp. 100720, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.rhisph.2023.100720.
- [23] T. Wijesekara and B. Xu, “Health-promoting effects of bioactive compounds from plant endophytic fungi,” J. Fungi, vol. 9, no. 10, p. 997, 2023, doi: 10.3390/jof9100997.
- [24] S. B. Zotchev, “Unlocking the potential of bacterial endophytes from medicinal plants for drug discovery,” Microb. Biotechnol., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 14382, 2024, doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.14382.
- [25] Z. Narayanan and B. R. Glick, “Secondary metabolites produced by plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes,” Microorganisms, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 2008, 2022, doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10102008.
- [26] N. Kartikasari and Y. A. Purwestri, “Kemampuan antibakteri senyawa metabolit sekunder bakteri endofit tanaman purwoceng terhadap escherechia coli [Antibacterial ability of secondary metabolite compounds of endophytic bacteria of the Purwoceng plant against Escherichia coli],” J. Ilmu Hayati, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 17–24, 2021, doi: 10.17977/um061v5i12021p17-24.
- [27] P. Tiwari, S. Thakkar, and L. Dufossé, “Antimicrobials from endophytes as novel therapeutics to counter drug-resistant pathogens,” Crit. Rev. Biotechnol., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 164–190, 2025, doi: 10.1080/07388551.2024.2342979.
- [28] G. Semenzato and R. Fani, “Endophytic bacteria: a sustainable strategy for enhancing medicinal plant cultivation and preserving microbial diversity,” Front. Microbiol., vol. 15, pp. 1477465, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1477465.
- [29] N. Sari, M. Latief, and Elisma, “The activity of sungkai leaf ethanol extract (peronema canescens jack) against the healing of burns in male rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus),” Indones. J. Pharma Sci, vol. 4, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.22437/ijps.v4i1.18201.
- [30] A. H. Ahkam, Y. Susilawati, and S. A. Sumiwi, “Peronema canescens as a source of immunomodulatory agents: A new opportunity and perspective,” Biology (Basel)., vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 744, 2024, doi: 10.3390/biology13090744.
- [31] M. Kanedi, “Therapeutic potentials of sungkai (Peronema canescens Jack.) an Indonesian luxurious woody plant,” World J. Biol. Pharm. Heal. Sci., vol. 11, no. 01, pp. 69–71, 2022, doi: 10.30574/wjbphs.2022.11.1.0110.
- [32] I. Rahayu, S. E. Sudrajat, S. Sancnia, M. Puspasari, and K. H. Timotius, “The Phytochemical constituents and biological activities of sungkai (Peronema canescens Jack) leaves hydroethanolic extracts,” JPBIO (Jurnal Pendidik. Biol., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 123–132, 2024, doi: 10.31932/jpbio.v9i1.3398.
- [33] R. Novita, B. Suhartanto, and D. T. Widayati, “Determination of Sungkai Leaf (Peronema canescens Jack) As a Natural Antioxidant Using Different Polarities Solvents,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing, pp. 12038, 2025, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1482/1/012038.
- [34] A. E. Suryani et al., “Phytochemical screening and antibacterial properties of Sungkai (Peronema canescens Jack.) leaf extract and fraction,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing, pp. 12060, 2024, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1377/1/012060.
- [35] R. Oktiansyah, E. Elfita, H. Widjajanti, A. Setiawan, M. Mardiyanto, and S. S. A. Nasution, “Antioxidant and antibacterial activity of endophytic fungi isolated from the leaves of Sungkai (Peronema canescens).,” Trop. J. Nat. Prod. Res., vol. 7, no. 3, 2023, doi: 10.26538/tjnpr/v7i3.20.
- [36] R. Oktiansyah, H. Widjajanti, and A. Setiawan, “Antioxidant and antibacterial activity of endophytic fungi isolated from fruit of Sungkai (Peronema canescens),” Sci. Technol. Indones., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 17–27, 2024, doi: 10.26554/sti.2024.9.1.17-27.
- [37] R. Oktiansyah, H. Widjajanti, A. Setiawan, S. S. A. Nasution, and E. Elfita, “Antibacterial and antioxidant activity of endophytic fungi extract isolated from leaves of sungkai (Peronema canescens),” Sci. Technol. Indones., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 170–177, 2023, doi: 10.26554/sti.2023.8.2.170-177.
- [38] N. Sadrati, A. Zerroug, R. Demirel, and D. Harzallah, “Anti-multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and anti-dermatophyte activities of secondary metabolites of the endophytic fungus Penicillium brevicompactum ANT13 associated with the Algerian endemic plant Abies numidica,” Arch. Microbiol., vol. 205, no. 4, pp. 110, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00203-023-03452-9.
- [39] B. Triadi, S. Suwarno, S. Sarudji, R. Damayanti, R. Sugihartuti, and A. T. S. Estoepangesti, “Antibiotic sensitivity test of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus isolated from the reproductive tract of dairy cows,” Ovozoa J. Anim. Reprod., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 72–80, 2022, doi: 10.20473/ovz.v11i2.2022.72-80.
- [40] E. N. Zainuddin, A. Massinai, and R. Wulandari, “Isolation and characterization of beneficial bacteria from the gut of tilapia (oreochromis niloticus) for probiotic properties against fish pathogens,” Egypt. J. Aquat. Biol. Fish., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1937–1957, 2026, doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2026.441742.6986.
- [41] K. Pandey et al., “Bael (Aegle marmelos) fermentation enriches probiotic bacteria producing postbiotic exopolysaccharides: linking structure to functional properties,” Food Biosci., pp. 109120, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2026.109120.
- [42] H.-Y. Zhu, F. Xu, W.-Z. Zhao, H.-X. Wang, and H.-G. Wang, “The global burden of childhood diarrhea and its epidemiological characteristics from 1990 to 2021,” Front. Pediatr., vol. 13, pp. 1656234, 2025, doi: /10.3389/fped.2025.1656234.
- [43] W.-Z. Zhao et al., “Global burden of diarrhea disease in the older adult and its attributable risk factors from 1990 to 2021: a comprehensive analysis from the global burden of disease study 2021,” Front. Public Heal., vol. 13, pp. 1541492, 2025, doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1541492.
- [44] C. Zhang, X. Fu, Y. Liu, H. Zhao, and G. Wang, “Burden of infectious diseases and bacterial antimicrobial resistance in China: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019,” Lancet Reg. Heal. Pacific, vol. 43, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100972.
- [45] T. Kiros, S. M. Ebu, Y. Melaku, T. Tesfa, and A. Dekebo, “Isolation and identification of endophytic bacteria and associated compound from Gloriosa superba and their antibacterial activities,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 11, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22104.
- [46] M. Zafrin, S. Shamsi, and M. A. A. Noman, “Morpho-molecular charactrization of endophytic fungi associated with aquilaria malaccensis lam,” Bangladesh Journal of Plant Taxonomy, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 141-154, 2024, doi: 10.3329/bjpt.v31i1.74394.
- [47] H. Setianah, I. A. Nugraheni, and D. S. Wibowo, “Aktivitas antibakteri isolat bakteri endofit asal daun ciplukan (Physalis angulata L.) terhadap bakteri Escherichia coli dan Staphylococcus aureus [Antibacterial activity of endophyte bacteria isolates from ciplukan leafs (Physalis angulata L.) Against],” J. Heal. Stud., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 50–61, 2021, doi: 10.31101/jhes.1485.
- [48] R. Husain, F. Ester, F. Kandou, and J. J. Pelealu, “Uji aktivitas antibakteri dari bakteri endofit daun gedi (Abelmoschus manihot L.) terhadap pertumbuhan Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus [Antibacterial activity test of endophytic bacteria of gedi leaves (Abelmoschus manihot L.) on the growth of escherichia coli and staphylococcus aureus],” PHARMACON– Progr. Stud. Farm. FMIPA, Univ. SAM RATULANGI, vol. 11, pp. 1245–1254, 2022, doi: 10.35799/pha.11.2022.39130.
- [49] N. A. Rusli, S. Wahyuningsih, N. Farid, and M. P. J. R, “Isolasi dan uji aktivitas antibakteri dari bakteri endofit daun matoa (Pometia pinnata J. R. & G. Forst.) terhadap Staphylococcus aureus dan Escherichia coli [Isolation and antibacterial activity test of endophytic bacteria from matoa leaves (Pometia pinnata J. R. & G. Forst.) against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli],” J. Mandala Pharmacon Indones. (JMPI), vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 562–572, 2024, doi: 10.35311/jmpi.v10i2.590.
- [50] Y. Erna and N. Azizah, “Uji efektivitas penggunaan udara panas buatan pada pembuatan preparat bakteri dengan pewarnaan gram [Testing the effectiveness of using artificial hot air in making bacterial preparations with gram staining],” J. Pengelolaan Lab. Pendidikan, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 49–56, 2025, doi: 10.14710/jplp.7.1.49-56.
- [51] E. Moglad, E. Elekhnawy, W. A. Negm, D. Eliwa, S. S. Younis, B. M. Elmansory, et al, “Antibacterial and anti-Toxoplasma activities of Aspergillus niger endophytic fungus isolated from Ficus retusa: in vitro and in vivo approach,” Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 297-308, 2023, doi: 10.1080/21691401.2023.2215531.
- [52] M. Yunita, A. Mantong, and H. Rahawarin, “The potential of endophytic bacteria isolated from atung fruit seeds as antibacterial against skin pathogens,” JPBIO (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi), vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 115-123, 2023, doi: 10.31932/jpbio.v8i1.2271.
- [53] H. Laksono, A. A. Saputra, S. Raden, J. Farizal, and D. Dahrizal, “Inhibitory test of onion extract (Allium cepa L.) against the growth of trichophyton rubrum fungus causing tinea pedis”, SANITAS, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 283–293, 2022, doi: 10.36525/sanitas.2022.24.
- [54] R. Ridha et al., “Antibacterial activity of endophytic bacterial isolates from Kaempferia galanga leaves,” J. Sci. Appl. Chem., vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 538–548, 2024, doi: 10.14710/jksa.27.11.538-548.
- [55] F. Polandos, “Antibacterial Activity of Endophytic Bacteria from Butterfly Pea (Clitoria ternatea L.) Root against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli,” J. Bioeksperimen, vol. 1, no. 2460–1365, pp. 29–38, 2025, doi: 10.23917/bioeksperimen.v11i1.10346.
- [56] M. Muzaifa, Y. Abubakar, and A. Abubakar, “Exploration study of indigenous civet (Paradoxorus hermaphroditus) bacteria : isolates characterization and molecular identification,” J. Teknol. Ind. Pertan., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 78–85, 2023, doi: 10.21107/agrointek.v17i1.13841.
- [57] H. Harmileni, G. Saragih, T. R. Hidayani, and M. Mirnandaulia, “Aktivitas antibakteri bakteri endofit daun kelapa sawit (Elaeis guineensis) terhadap Escherichia coli dan Staphylococcus aureus [Antibacterial activity of endophytic bacteria from oil palm leaves (Elaeis guineensis) against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus],” J. Prima Med. Sains, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 42–47, 2023, doi: 10.34012/jpms.v5i1.3755.
- [58] I. A. Nugraheni et al., “Aktivitas antibakteri dari bakteri endofit asal akar ciplukan (Physalis angulata L.) terhadap Staphylococcus aureus dan Escherichia coli [Antibacterial activity of endophytic bacteria from the roots of ground cherry (Physalis angulata L.) against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli],” Biomedika, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 48–55, 2021, doi: 10.23917/biomedika.v13i1.11009.
- [59] S. R. Pohan, K. Manalu, and R. A. Nasution, “Isolasi dan identifikasi bakteri endofit penghasil hormon iaa (indole acetic acid) dari akar tanaman mangrove Avicennia marina,” J. Pendidik. Biol. dan Sains, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 294–308, 2024, doi: 10.31539/bioedusains.v7i1.9968.
- [60] R. Marlinda, P. Dafriani, and V. Irman, “Hubungan pola makan dan aktivitas fisik dengan penyakit jantung koroner [The relationship between diet and physical activity with coronary heart disease],” J. Kesehat. Med. Saintika, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 253–257, 2020, doi: 10.30633/jkms.v11i2.780.
- [61] G. Luisi, A. Stefanucci, G. Zengin, M. P. Dimmito, and A. Mollica, “Anti-Oxidant and tyrosinase inhibitory in vitro activity of amino acids and small peptides : new hints for the multifaceted treatment of neurologic and metabolic disfunctions,” Antioxidants, vol. 8, pp. 2–14, 2018, doi: 10.3390/antiox8010007.
- [62] S. Song and T. K. Wood, “The primary physiological roles of autoinducer 2 in Escherichia coli are chemotaxis and biofilm formation,” Microorganisms, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 386, 2021, doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9020386.
- [63] S. Fijan, “Probiotics and their antimicrobial effect,” Microorganisms, vol. 11, pp. 17–20, 2023, doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11020528.
- [64] B. Fu and Q. Yan, “Exopolysaccharide is required for motility , stress tolerance , and plant colonization by the endophytic bacterium Paraburkholderia phytofirmans PsJN,” Front. Microbiol., vol. 14, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1218653.
- [65] T. Phùng, L. Beney, S. Moundanga, and T. Karbowiak, “Heliyon Ex-vivo investigation of probiotic bacterial adhesion to the intestinal mucus,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 16, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36339.
- [66] L. V Hoyos, L. E. Vasquez-muñoz, Y. Osorio, D. Valencia-revelo, and D. Devia-cometa, “Tailored culture strategies to promote antimicrobial secondary metabolite production in Diaporthe caliensis : a metabolomic approach,” Microbial cell factories, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 328, 2024.
- [67] J. C. Leo and D. Linke, “A unified model for BAM function that takes into account type Vc secretion and species differences in BAM composition,” microbiol, vol. 4, pp. 455–468, 2018, doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.3.455.
- [68] T. K. Kim and J. H. Park, “More about the basic assumptions of t-test: normality and sample size,” Korean J. Anesthesiol., vol. 72, pp. 1–5, 2019, doi: 10.4097/kja.d.18.00292.
- [69] S. Tsipinana, S. Husseiny, and K. A. Alayande, “Contribution of endophytes towards improving plant bioactive metabolites : a rescue option against red-taping of medicinal plants,” Frontiers in plant science, vol. 14, pp. 1248319, pp. 1–20, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1248319.