Improving Civics Learning Outcomes Through the Scramble Learning Model for Class V Students Elementary School
Abstract
Purpose of the study: This research aims to improve Civics (Citizenship Education) learning outcomes using the scramble learning model for fifth grade students at Prawirotaman Yogyakarta State Elementary School
Methodology: This research is ex-post researchThis type of research is classroom action research. The research subjects were 17 students in class V of Prawirotaman State Elementary School, Yogyakarta. Data collection methods in research include tests, observation and documentation. The research instruments are tests and learning implementation sheets. The data analysis technique used is quantitative and qualitative descriptive. The indicator of the success of the action is marked by ≥75% of the total number of students who took part in the learning process having obtained a score of ≥75.
Main Findings: The main finding of this research is improvementCivics learning outcomes for fifth grade students at Prawirotaman State Elementary School, Yogyakarta after using the scramble learning model in cycle I and cycle II.Based on test results in implementing learning with modelsscramble learning , students who achieved a score of ≥75 were 70.59% in cycle I and increased to 88.24% in cycle II. The increase in learning outcomes occurred after improvements in actions in cycle II, namely the teacher divided the groups more clearly, the number of group members was reduced, andgiving rewards to calm students. The action is dismissed on the cyclebecause it has achieved the success criteria.
Novelty/Originality of this study: The Scramble learning model is designed to improve understanding of concepts. Research can evaluate the extent to which Civics learning outcomes have improved, especially in understanding the concept of citizenship.
References
S. Nuere and L. de Miguel, “The Digital/Technological Connection with COVID-19: An Unprecedented Challenge in University Teaching,” Technol. Knowl. Learn., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 931–943, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10758-020-09454-6.
A. Selvaraj, V. Radhin, N. KA, N. Benson, and A. J. Mathew, “Effect of pandemic based online education on teaching and learning system,” Int. J. Educ. Dev., vol. 85, no. May, p. 102444, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102444.
T. Budiharso and B. Tarman, “Improving quality education through better working conditions of academic institutes,” J. Ethn. Cult. Stud., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 99–115, 2020, doi: 10.29333/ejecs/306.
M. D. B. Castro and G. M. Tumibay, “A literature review: efficacy of online learning courses for higher education institution using meta-analysis,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 1367–1385, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10639-019-10027-z.
W. Ayuningsih, S. Syafaruddin, and A. MS, “Implementation of Islamic Education Curriculum Development in Al-Ulum Islamic School Medan,” Budapest Int. Res. Critics Linguist. Educ. J., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1033–1044, 2020, doi: 10.33258/birle.v3i2.1031.
A. Syar’i, A. Akrim, and Hamdanah, “The Development of Madrasa Education in Indonesia,” Rev. Argentina Clínica Psicológica, vol. 29, no. 4, p. 513, 2020, doi: 10.24205/03276716.2020.858.
E. Akib et al., “Study on Implementation of Integrated Curriculum in Indonesia,” IJORER Int. J. Recent Educ. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 39–57, 2020, doi: 10.1063/1.4995218.
B. Mandasari, “The Impact of Online Learning toward Students’ Academic Performance on Business Correspondence Course,” EDUTEC J. Educ. Technol., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 98–110, 2020, doi: 10.29062/edu.v4i1.74.
P. I. Solikhah and P. Purnomo, “The Opportunity and Challenges of Implementing a Prototype Curriculum,” Nazhruna J. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 407–421, 2022, doi: 10.31538/nzh.v5i2.2130.
R. Rachmadtullah, H. Syofyan, and Rasmitadila, “The role of civic education teachers in implementing multicultural education in elementary school students,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 540–546, 2020, doi: 10.13189/ujer.2020.080225.
C. A. Torres and E. Bosio, “Global citizenship education at the crossroads: Globalization, global commons, common good, and critical consciousness,” Prospects, vol. 48, no. 3–4, pp. 99–113, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11125-019-09458-w.
M. Oliver, M. Gistered, and M. Liberty, “Pedagogical Challenges in Teaching Civic Education in Secondary Schools in Zambia,” Int. J. Sci. Res., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1483–1488, 2018, doi: 10.21275/SR20327121153.
S. Hartinah et al., “Teacher’s performance management: The role of principal’s leadership, work environment and motivation in Tegal City, Indonesia,” Manag. Sci. Lett., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 235–246, 2020, doi: 10.5267/j.msl.2019.7.038.
I. Supena, A. Darmuki, and A. Hariyadi, “The influence of 4C (constructive, critical, creativity, collaborative) learning model on students’ learning outcomes,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 873–892, 2021, doi: 10.29333/iji.2021.14351a.
H. J. Cho, K. Zhao, C. R. Lee, D. Runshe, and C. Krousgrill, “Active learning through flipped classroom in mechanical engineering: improving students’ perception of learning and performance,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s40594-021-00302-2.
N. Abdulsamee, A. Elkhadem, and P. Nagi, “Newer Dental Teaching Methods: Paradigm Shift from Teacher-Centered to Student-Centered Learning. Review,” EC Dent. Sci., vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1–13, 2021.
S. Rosanti, I. Zulkarnain, and L. A. Rangkuti, “The Effect Of Scramble Method On Students’ Achievement In Learning Vocabulary,” Excell. J. English English Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 10–15, 2022.
S. I. S. Zendrato, H. S. Harefa, A. T. Harefa, and Y. A. Telaumbanua, “Descriptive Analysis on Writing Exercises in The English Textbook on Students’ At The Tenth Grade of SMA Negeri 1 Gido in 2022/2023,” J. Educ., vol. 06, no. 01, pp. 8462–8475, 2023.
A. Acim, M. R. Fadli, and J. Sopacua, “The Influence of Scramble Method to Increase Students’ Interest in Learning History,” J. Innov. Educ. Cult. Res., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 19–25, 2023, doi: 10.46843/jiecr.v4i1.406.
A. S. Anisah and Z. Syafitra, “Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Probing Prompting Pada Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi,” J. PGMI UNIGA, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 09–19, 2022, doi: 10.25157/j-kip.v3i2.6253.
A. E. Nurhasanah, N. Nafiah, and S. Ghufron, “Meta analisis Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Scramble Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa di Sekolah Dasar,” Prim. J. Pendidik. Guru Sekol. Dasar, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 607–615, 2020, doi: 10.33578/jpfkip.v9i5.8007.
N. Nafiah and S. Hartatik, “Penerapan Manajemen Pembelajaran Berbasis Daring Dengan Menggunakan Aplikasi Google Classroom Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Mahasiswa Dalam Membuat Perangkat Pembelajaran,” Educ. Hum. Dev. J., vol. 5, no. April, pp. 9–23, 2020.
Copyright (c) 2024 Murjinah Murjinah, Siti Choerifki, Ming-Lun Chung
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Indonesian Journal of Education Research (IJoER) is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
