SINTA

2.5

Impact

Google Scholar

10

h-index

Indonesian Journal of Education Research (IJoER)

Open Access Journal


Application of Discussion Methods and Memory Board Games to Increase Student Activity and Learning Outcomes in History Learning

Share
  • Purpose of the study: The aim of this research is to apply discussion methods and memory board games to increase student activity and learning outcomes in history learning.

    Methodology: This type of research is classroom action research. The samples in this research were class X history students and teachers in high school. The sampling technique uses purposive sampling. Data collection techniques through observation, interviews and tests. This research uses qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis.

    Main Findings: The results of the research can be concluded that the application of discussion methods and memory board games can increase the activity and learning outcomes of class X students in high school in learning history. Before the action was taken, the average activity level for class X was 36.16%. In cycle I the average percentage of student activity indicators was 79.46%, increasing in cycle II by 9.38% to 88.84%. The class average score in cycle I, namely the pretest, was 48.18 and increased in the posttest by 26.32 to 74.5. The average class score in cycle II, namely the pretest, was 46.82 and increased in the posttest by 33.72 to 80.54.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: As a novelty from previous research, this research will investigate the benefits of combining the use of discussion methods and memory board games in history learning. Then, through this research, the impact of memory board games on students in learning history will be known.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    E. Normalita, C. Svonni, and P. Maluleka, “Application of Discussion Methods and Memory Board Games to Increase Student Activity and Learning Outcomes in History Learning”, Ind. Jou. Edu. Rsc, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 147–154, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.37251/ijoer.v4i6.774.
  • 396
    Abstract views
    353
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. E. F. Setiya Rini, R. Fitriani, W. A. Putri, A. A. B. Ginting, and M. M. Matondang, “Analisis Kerja Keras dalam Mata Pelajaran Fisika di SMAN 1 Kota Jambi,” SAP (Susunan Artik. Pendidikan), vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 221–226, 2021, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/sap.v5i3.7764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/sap.v5i3.7764
    2. D. C. R. Novitasari, “Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Yang Beredar Pada Statistik Ekonomi Dan Keuangan Indonesia ( Seki ),” vol. 03, no. 02, pp. 105–111, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15642/mantik.2017.3.2.105-111
    3. M. Yuliandri, “Pembelajaran Inovatif di Sekolah Berdasarkan Paradigma Teori Belajar Humanistik,” J. Moral Civ. Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 101–115, 2017, doi: 10.24036/8851412020171264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/8851412020171264
    4. Y. Yuanita and F. Yuniarita, “Pengembangan Petunjuk Praktikum Ipa Berbasis Keterampilan Proses Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sekolah Dasar,” Profesi Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 139, 2018, doi: 10.23917/ppd.v1i2.6608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/ppd.v1i2.6608
    5. Darmaji, Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, and E. F. Setiya Rini, “Gender analysis in measurement materials : Critical thinking ability and science processing skills,” JIPF Al-Biruni, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 113–128, 2022, doi: 10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v11i1.11509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v11i1.11509
    6. W. Puspita Hadi, Y. Hidayati, and I. Rosidi, “Respon Guru Ipa Terhadap Pembelajaran Ipa Berintegrasi Etnosains: Studi Pendahuluan Di Kabupaten Bangkalan,” LENSA (Lentera Sains) J. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 46–53, 2020, doi: 10.24929/lensa.v10i1.92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v10i1.92
    7. Nurdyansyah and E. F. Fahyuni, Inovasi Model Pembelajaran. 2016.
    8. F. T. Aldila, E. F. S. Rini, S. W. Oktavia, N. N. Khaidah, F. P. Sinaga, and N. Sinaga, “The Relationship of Teacher Teaching Skills and Learning Interests of Physics Students of Senior High School,” EduFisika J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 8, no. 1, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v8i1.24864
    9. E. Susanti, M. Jamhari, and S. M. Sulaeman, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning Terhadap Keterampilan Sains Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas Viii Tentang Ipa Smp Advent Palu,” J. Sains dan Teknol. Tadulako, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 36–41, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v5i1.13458
    10. E. B. Shahbana, F. K. Farizqi, and R. Satria, “Implementasi Teori Belajar Behavioristik Dalam Pembelajaran,” J. Serunai Adm., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 24–34, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37755/jsap.v9i1.249
    11. A. Ramadhanti, K. Kholilah, R. Fitriani, E. F. S. Rini, and M. R. Pratiwi, “Hubungan Motivasi Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Kelas X MIPA di SMAN 1 Kota Jambi,” J. Eval. Educ., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 60–65, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v3i2.246
    12. H. D. Lestari and D. P. Parmiti, “Pengembangan E-Modul Ipa Bermuatan Tes Online untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar,” J. Educ. Technol., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 73–79, 2020, doi: 10.23887/jet.v4i1.24095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v4i1.24095
    13. Astalini et al., “Impact of Science Process Skills on Thinking Skills in Rural and Urban Schools,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 803–822, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16242a
    14. W. A. Putri, R. Fitriani, E. F. Setya Rini, F. T. Aldila, and T. Ratnawati, “Pengaruh Motivasi terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama,” SAP (Susunan Artik. Pendidikan), vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 248–254, 2021, doi: 10.36987/jpms.v7i1.1942. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/sap.v5i3.7760
    15. Z. Phonna and Arusman, “pengaruh model Predict-Observe-Explain terhardap Keterampilan Proses Sains Peserta Didik,” J. Mimb. Akad., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 86–99, 2018.
    16. F. Rohim and H. Susanto, “Penerapan Model Discovery Terbimbing Pada Pembelajaran Fisika Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif,” Unnes Phys. Educ. J., vol. 1, no. 1, 2012, doi: 10.15294/upej.v1i1.775.
    17. F. T. Aldila and E. F. S. Rini, “Teacher’s Strategy in Developing Practical Values of the 5th Pancasila Preepts in Thematic Learning in Elementary School,” J. Basic Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 1, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jber.v4i1.301
    18. P. M. Purbosari, “Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Membuat Ensiklopedia Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (Ipa) Untuk Meningkatkan Academic Skill Pada Mahasiswa,” Sch. J. Pendidik. dan Kebud., vol. 6, no. 3, p. 231, 2016, doi: 10.24246/j.scholaria.2016.v6.i3.p231-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24246/j.scholaria.2016.v6.i3.p231-238
    19. A. Agustina, N. S. Maryati, and D. H. Altaftazani, “Application Of Discussion Methods To Improve Student Learning Outcomes In Class Iv Students In Sdn 084 Cikadut,” Journal of Elementary Education, vol. 01, no. 02, pp. 57-64, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22460/collase.v1i2.2257
    20. A. Prihantoro and F. Hidayat, “Melakukan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas,” Ulumuddin J. Ilmu-ilmu Keislam. /, vol. 9, no. 1, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47200/ulumuddin.v9i1.283
    21. E. F. Setiya Rini, D. Darmaji, and D. A. Kurniawan, “Identifikasi Kegiatan Praktikum dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains di SMPN Se-Kecamatan Bajubang,” Edukatif J. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 2476–2481, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i2.2360
    22. N. Ismi and A. Akmal, “Dampak Game Online Terhadap Perilaku Siswa di Lingkungan SMA Negeri 1 Bayang,” J. Civ. Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2020, doi: 10.24036/jce.v3i1.304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/jce.v3i1.304
    23. A. A. A.W. Putra and H. D. Surjono, “Staidear Board Game Model Application in Facilitating Vocational School Students Learning,” Journal of Education Technology, vol. 7, no.1, pp. 90-98, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v7i1.54025
    24. A. T. Kesuma, Harun, H. Putranta, J. Mailool, and H. C. A. Kistoro, “The Effects of MANSA Historical Board Game toward the Students’ Creativity and Learning Outcomes on Historical Subjects,” European Journal of Educational Research, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1689-1700, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.4.1689