SINTA

2.5

Impact

Google Scholar

10

h-index

Indonesian Journal of Education Research (IJoER)

Open Access Journal

Associations of Digital Learning Strategy Management and Digital Tool Utilization with Teachers’ Teaching Performance

Sisca Septiani
Universitas Ngudi Waluyo
Indonesia
siscaseptiani@unw.ac.id
Wiwik Hidayati
Universitas Ivet ROR
Indonesia
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study examines the individual and joint associations of digital learning strategy management and digital tool utilization with teachers’ self-reported teaching performance at public senior high school XY, an anonymized public senior high school in Purwakarta Regency, Indonesia.

    Methodology: A quantitative cross-sectional correlational survey was conducted using a five-point Likert-scale questionnaire. Complete responses from 37 teachers were analyzed using multiple linear regression in SPSS. The design examines statistical associations and does not establish causality.

    Main Findings: Digital learning strategy management was not statistically associated with teaching performance after accounting for digital tool utilization (t = −1.482, p = 0.147). Digital tool utilization showed a positive association after accounting for strategy management (t = 2.618, p = 0.013). The overall model was statistically significant (F = 3.453, p = 0.043), with R² = 0.169 and adjusted R² = 0.120. These findings apply to the teachers analyzed at the study site.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: The study examines managerial perceptions and perceived digital resource quality and support within one regression model of self-reported teaching performance at an anonymized public senior high school. Its contribution is context-specific, exploratory evidence concerning these associations.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    S. Septiani and W. Hidayati, “Associations of Digital Learning Strategy Management and Digital Tool Utilization with Teachers’ Teaching Performance”, Ind. Jou. Edu. Rsc, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 637–646, Oct. 2026, doi: 10.37251/ijoer.v7i5.3792.

    More Citation Formats

  • 4
    Abstract views
    4
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. S. Kumar, “Impact of Digital Transformation in Education Systems,” in AI, Ethics, and the Digital Shift in Education, New York: IGI Global, 2025, pp. 1–24. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3373-8857-1.ch001.
    2. L. K. Kalyani, “The Role of Technology in Education: Enhancing Learning Outcomes and 21st Century Skills,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Mod. Sci. Technol., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 05–10, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.59828/ijsrmst.v3i4.199.
    3. C. Fernandes and E. Vieira, “Introducing Digital Transformation in the Learning Process in a Finance Curricular Unit,” in IEEE International Conference on Advances in Data-Driven Analytics And Intelligent Systems (ADACIS), Sousse, Tunisia: IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/ADACIS65663.2025.1143645.
    4. S. Septiani, J. Sutarto, C. B. Utomo, and Widiyanto, “Happy teachers, quality schools: improving teacher performance through happiness, motivation and a good work life,” Perspect. Sci. Educ., vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 733–746, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.32744/pse.2024.6.46.
    5. A. Kožuh, J. Ž. Maksimović, and J. O. Zajić, “Fourth Industrial Revolution and digital competences of teachers,” World J. Educ. Technol. Curr. Issues, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 160–177, May 2021, doi: 10.18844/wjet.v13i2.5651.
    6. S. P. Han and B. Kumwenda, “Bridging the digital divide: Promoting equal access to online learning for health professions in an unequal world,” Med. Educ., vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 56–64, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1111/medu.15455.
    7. I. Ibrohim et al., “Possible links between Indonesian science teacher’s TPACK perception and demographic factors: Self-reported survey,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 18, no. 9, p. em2146, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/12282.
    8. M. Kafile, A. Ninana, and P. Makhetha, “The Digital Divide and E-Learning Participation: A Mixed-Methods Study of Extended Curriculum Programme Students in South Africa,” Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res., vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 769–784, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.26803/ijlter.24.9.37.
    9. S. K. Amemasor, S. O. Oppong, B. Ghansah, B.-B. Benuwa, and M. Agbeko, “The influence of digital professional development and professional learning communities in the relationship between school digital preparedness and digital instructional integration,” PLoS One, vol. 20, no. 7, p. e0328883, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328883.
    10. H. Al Nuaimi, S. Z. Ahmad, and K. Khalid, “The importance of the school principals’ role in the digital transformation of the education sector,” Int. J. Comp. Educ. Dev., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 17–37, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1108/IJCED-05-2023-0044.
    11. S. Chen, W. Chen, H. Gao, and Z. Zhuo, “More than a Buffer: The Amplifying Role of Organizational Support in Translating Teacher Digital Literacy into Pedagogical Innovation,” Sustainability, vol. 18, no. 4, p. 1836, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.3390/su18041836.
    12. F. Aburub, R. Abdel-Rahem, and M. Al-Remawi, “The Impact of Instructor Digital Competence on Student Engagement in Online Learning: Evidence from a Questionnaire-Based Study,” 2nd Int. Conf. Comput. Intell. Approaches Appl. (ICCIAA), Amman, Jordan, pp. 1–6, 2026, doi: 10.1109/ICCIAA68481.2026.11543677.
    13. H. Lei, F. Na, L. Lu, H. J. Soomro, and G. H. K. Zaigham, “A social cognitive perspective on teacher technology self-efficacy, inclusion, and student aspirations,” BMC Psychol., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 887, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.1186/s40359-026-04664-6.
    14. F. Pettersson, “On the issues of digital competence in educational contexts – a review of literature,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1005–1021, May 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10639-017-9649-3.
    15. R. Scherer, F. Siddiq, and J. Tondeur, “The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education,” Comput. Educ., vol. 128, pp. 13–35, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009.
    16. Rasdiana et al., “Elevating Teachers’ Professional Digital Competence: Synergies of Principals’ Instructional E-Supervision, Technology Leadership and Digital Culture for Educational Excellence in Digital-Savvy Era,” Educ. Sci., vol. 14, no. 3, p. 266, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.3390/educsci14030266.
    17. M. Claro, C. Castro-Grau, J. M. Ochoa, J. E. Hinostroza, and P. Cabello, “Systematic review of quantitative research on digital competences of in-service school teachers,” Comput. Educ., vol. 215, p. 105030, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105030.
    18. J. Barney, “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,” J. Manage., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 99–120, Mar. 1991, doi: 10.1177/014920639101700108.
    19. F. R. David, Strategic Management: A Competitive Advantage Approach, Concepts and Cases, Global Edition, 16th edition. University of Debrecen, 2017.
    20. W. H. DeLone and E. R. McLean, “The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update,” J. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 9–30, Apr. 2003, doi: 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748.
    21. C.Danielson, “The Framework for Teaching Evaluation Instrument,” The Danielson Group.
    22. A. Akhmad, “Digital Leadership Practices in Educational Management: A Narrative Literature Review on Trends and Challenges,” Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res., vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 112–135, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.26803/ijlter.24.8.6.
    23. A. J. Z. G. de Soriano, M. A. Montoro, and A. M. O. Colón, “Digital Teaching Competence and Educational Inclusion in Higher Education. A Systematic Review,” Electron. J. e-Learning, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 31–45, 2024, doi: 10.34190/ejel.22.1.3139.
    24. H. Aldabbas, A. M. Elamin, A. Z. E. Ahmed, and L. Gernal, “Assessing Learning Management System success in the UAE universities: how quality measures linked to students’ academic performance,” Front. Educ., vol. 10, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1554641.
    25. M. Alenezi, “Digital Learning and Digital Institution in Higher Education,” Educ. Sci., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 88, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.3390/educsci13010088.
    26. T. Dong, Y. Kong, R. Chen, and Z. Yang, “Beyond individual skill: How school innovation climate amplifies the pathway from Generative AI Adoption to deep pedagogical integration,” Front. Psychol., vol. 16, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1701051.
    27. A. A. Mazandarani and M. S. Taghaddomi, “A Systematic Review on Recent Pedagogical Principles for Designing Digital Learning Environments: Proposing the Model,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 42, no. 2, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.1002/jcal.70202.
    28. S. Bećirović, “Fostering Digital Competence in Teachers: A Review of Existing Frameworks,” Singapore: SpringerBriefs in Education, 2023, pp. 51–67. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-0444-0_5.
    29. D. M. Rawal, “Mapping of school teachers’ digital competency in the context of digital infrastructure: A systematic review and empirical study of India,” Journal of Professional Capital and Community, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 173–195, 2024, doi: 10.1108/JPCC-01-2024-0016.
    30. M. Gisbert Cervera and J. L. Lázaro Cantabrana, “Professional development in teacher digital competence and improving school quality from the teachers’ perspective: A case study,” Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 115–122, 2015, doi: 10.7821/naer.2015.7.123.