SINTA

2.5

Impact

Google Scholar

10

h-index

Indonesian Journal of Education Research (IJoER)

Open Access Journal

Extent of Utilization, Perceived Advantages and Disadvantages and Effect on Teacher Productivity of Generative AI Tools

Jake M Laguador
Bicol State College of Applied Sciences and Technology
Philippines
jmlaguador@astean.biscast.edu.ph
Share

  • Purpose of the study: Generative AI is now reshaping either positively or negatively the nature of instructional and administrative work of teachers which makes its effect on productivity an important matter for consideration. This study explores on the utilization, perceived pros and cons and the effects on teacher productivity of Gen AI tools.

    Methodology: Quantitative descriptive type of research was utilized in the study involving 101 Filipino teachers teaching in the primary and secondary levels with major fields of specialization in Science, Math, English and Technology and Livelihood Education. A survey questionnaire using Google Form was used to collect data for one month with focus group discussion for validation of the results.

    Main Findings: Result showed that ChatGPT, Grammarly and Quillbot are the most commonly used Gen AI tools by teachers. The use of Gen AI tools has positive effect on productivity in terms of preparing lessons, content materials, strategies and assessments which describes their intention to continue utilizing it towards achieving certain level of productivity regardless of sex and field of specialization. Teachers who expressed high level of Gen AI utilization are also those who perceived high advantages and observed higher effect on productivity.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: The study provides an empirical evidence and multi-dimensional analysis on utilization of Generative AI tools among teachers who are considered developing users that will be used by educational managers to inform policy development, capacity-building programs, and strategic decision-making for the effective, ethical and responsible integration of Generative AI tools to enhance teacher productivity and instructional quality.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    J. M. Laguador, “Extent of Utilization, Perceived Advantages and Disadvantages and Effect on Teacher Productivity of Generative AI Tools”, Ind. Jou. Edu. Rsc, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 35–55, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.37251/ijoer.v7i1.2562.

    More Citation Formats

  • 291
    Abstract views
    238
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. A. Güneyli, N. S. Burgul, S. Dericioğlu, N. Cenkova, S. Becan, Ş. E. Şimşek and H. Güneralp. “Exploring teacher awareness of artificial intelligence in education: A case study from Northern Cyprus,” Euro. J. of Invest. in Heal., Psych. and Educ., vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 2358–2376, 2024. doi:10.3390/ejihpe14080156 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14080156
    2. N. U. Emelogu, C. K. Nwafor, G. U. Chigbu, N. G. Okoyeukwu, and K. O. Eze, “Awareness, proficiency and challenges in the use of emerging technologies by ESL university lecturers in the post COVID-19 ERA,” Cog. Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, Jun. 2022. doi:10.1080/2331186x.2022.2084962. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2084962
    3. K. Tzafilkou, M. Perifanou, and A. A. Economides, “Assessing teachers’ digital competence in primary and secondary education: Applying a new instrument to integrate pedagogical and professional elements for digital education,” Educ. and Infor. Tech., vol. 28, pp. 16017–16040, 2023. doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11848-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11848-9
    4. J. V. Cubio, “The Influence of Privacy, Bias, and Surveillance Concerns on Teachers’ Willingness to Use Artificial Intelligence in Education,” Inter. J. of Res. and Innov. in So. Sci., vol. IX, no. IIIS, pp. 3192–3208, Jan. 2025. doi:10.47772/ijriss.2025.903sedu0240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0240
    5. E. Meivawati, H. Khatimah and R. A. Shilla. “Perceptions, Attitudes, and AI Adoption Readiness: A Study of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Teachers in Polewali Mandar, Indonesia,” Indo. J. of Educ’l Sci., vol. 7, no. 2, 2025. doi:10.31605/ijes.v7i2.4954
    6. I. H. Y. Yim and J. Su, “Artificial intelligence (AI) learning tools in K 12 education: A scoping review,” J. of Comp. in Educ., vol. 12, pp. 93–131, 2025. doi:10.1007/s40692-023-00304-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00304-9
    7. G. S. Semwaiko, W.-H. Chao, and C.-Y. Yang, “Transforming K-12 education: A systematic review of AI integration,” Inter. J. of Educ’l Tech. and Lear., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 43–63, Nov. 2024. doi: 10.55217/101.v17i2.847 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55217/101.v17i2.847
    8. F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Quar., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340, 1989, doi:10.2307/249008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
    9. D. L. Goodhue and R. L. Thompson, “Task-technology fit and individual performance,” MIS Quar, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 213–236, 1995. doi:10.2307/249689 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249689
    10. M. A. G. De Guzman, P. P. P. Tenedero, W. G. A. Gapas and A. M. Deabanico, “AI anxiety and readiness of English language teachers and students: a Philippine university case study,” As. J. of Engl. Lang. Stud., vol., 12, no. 2, pp. 1-26, 2024. doi:10.59960/12.2.a1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59960/12.2.a1
    11. M. R. Delos Reyes and Juanita Corre, “Generative Artificial Intelligence Utilization and Productivity Among English Teachers in Selected Private Higher Education Institutions in Laguna,” Int. J. on Integ. Educ,, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 310–316, May 2025. doi:10.31149/ijie.v8i4.5454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31149/ijie.v8i4.5454
    12. S. Othman, N. M. Nik Ismail Azlan, D. S. Mohamad Shah, E. Sulaiman and M. A. Azhari, “ChatGPT: Examining language lecturers’ perspectives on its integration in teaching and learning,” J. of Crea. Prac. in Lang. Lear. and Teach., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 49-67, 2024. doi: 10.24191/cplt.v12i3.2637
    13. A. A. Al-Zahrani, “Exploring the Role of ChatGPT in English Teaching and Learning: Educators’ and Language Learners’ Perspectives,” Educ’l Proc. Int. J., vol. 17, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.22521/edupij.2025.17.330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.17.330
    14. M. M. Stan, C. Dumitru, and F. Bucuroiu, “Investigating teachers’ attitude toward integration of ChatGPT in language teaching and learning in higher education,” Educ. and Info. Techn., vol. 30, pp. 15281–15298, Feb. 2025. doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13396-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13396-w
    15. K. L. R. Chan, “Exploring generative artificial intelligence-aided language learning tools in language classrooms: Insights from language teachers of English in Hong Kong,” Tech. in Lang. Teach. & Learn., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 103217, Sep. 2025. doi:10.29140/tltl.v7n2.103217 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29140/tltl.v7n2.103217
    16. T. W. Shean, M. Md Yunus, and H. Hanim Ismail, “A Systematic Literature Review: Teachers’ Perceptions on the usage of ChatGPT in English Language Teaching (ELT),” Int. J. of Acad. Res. in Prog. Educ. and Dev., vol. 14, no. 1, Feb. 2025. doi:10.6007/ijarped/v14-i1/24781. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v14-i1/24781
    17. Mohd Alif Aineh and Wirawati Ngui, “Teachers’ And Students’ perceptions Towards the Use of ChatGPT to Improve Writing in the Malaysian Secondary School Context,” Int. J. on E-Learn. Prac. (IJELP), vol. 7, no. 1, Nov. 2024. doi:10.51200/ijelp.v7i1.5399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51200/ijelp.v7i1.5399
    18. S. Ling Jen and A. R. Salam, “Teaching Secondary School Essay Writing Using Generative AI,” Int. J. of Res. and Inno. in Soc. Sci., vol. IX, no. IIIS, pp. 6065–6070, 2025. doi:10.47772/ijriss.2025.903sedu0438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0438
    19. A. S. Espartinez, “Exploring student and teacher perceptions of ChatGPT use in higher education: A Q-Methodology study,” Comp. and educ. Art. Intel., vol. 7, no. 100264, pp. 100264–100264, Dec. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100264
    20. L. Giray, P. Y. De Silos, A. Adornado, R. J. V. Buelo, E. Galas, E. Reyes-Chua, ... & M. L. Ulanday, “Use and Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Philippine Higher Education: Reflections from Instructors and Administrators,” Inter. Ref. Ser. Quar., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 315-338, Jun. 2024. doi:10.1080/10875301.2024.2352746. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2024.2352746
    21. J. V. Aliazas, R. dela Cruz, J. F. Panoy and R. Andrade, “Faculty Performance in the Age of Generative AI: The Role of Organizational Support Systems and Task-Technology Fit in Higher Education,” Adv. in Con. Res., vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 1960-1970, Nov. 2025.
    22. J. Diadid-Reyes, “The Cultural and Historical Dimensions of Generative AI in Higher Education: Impacts on Workforce Productivity and Job Satisfaction in a Philippine State University,” Int. J. on Cul. Hist. and Rel., vol. 7, no. SI3, pp. 44–59, Oct. 2025. doi:10.63931/ijchr.v7isi3.302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v7iSI3.302
    23. J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2017.
    24. M. Sebastian, R. Banate, & M. Saquin, “Gender roles among public elementary teachers: Basis for gender-responsive intervention activities,” Gender Roles among Public Elementary Teachers: Basis for Gender-Responsive Intervention Activities. Int. Onl. J. of Pri. Educ., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 401-411, 2022. doi:10.55020/iojpe.1222199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55020/iojpe.1222199
    25. F. S. Javiña, S. M. S. Aycardo, and E. A. Sunico, “Teachers’ professional growth and gender issues,” As. J. of Hum. and Soc. Sci. Res., vol. 08, no. 10, pp. 200-208, 2024.
    26. L. Cauilan, “Gender roles and teaching performance of faculty members in a state higher education institution,” J. of Sey. Rep., vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1-9, 2019.
    27. S. Yeşilyurt, R. Dündar, R. Z. Demir and A. G. Yeşilyurt. “Teaching Social Studies with Generative Artificial İntelligence Tools: Advantages and Disadvantages”, J. of Interdisc. Educ’l Res., vol. 9, no. 20, pp. 1-16, 2025. doi: 10.57135/jier.1594253 DOI: https://doi.org/10.57135/jier.1594253
    28. M. Sadeghpour, A. Arakala, and A. Rao. “Generative AI in Collaborative Academic Report Writing: Advantages, Disadvantages, and Ethical Considerations”. 2025. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.08832.
    29. S. T. Palpanadan and R. Eliana, “Potential Benefits and Challenges of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tool, ChatGPT,” Dev. in Lang. Stud., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 7-15, 2025.
    30. P.A.M. Gapol, E.O. Alieto, E.A. Capacio, A.H. Dumagay, C.I. Francisco and R.G. Vallejo, “Preservice Teachers’ Extent of Knowledge and Willingness to Adopt Generative AI in Higher Education,” In: González Vallejo, R., Moukhliss, G., Schaeffer, E., Paliktzoglou, V. (eds) The Second International Symposium on Generative AI and Education (ISGAIE’2025). ISGAIE 2025. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 262, Springer, Cham, 2025. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-98476-1_6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-98476-1_6
    31. Kong, S. C., Yang, Y., & Hou, C. (2024). Examining teachers’ behavioural intention of using generative artificial intelligence tools for teaching and learning based on the extended technology acceptance model. Comp. and Educ.: Artif Intel., 7, Dec. 2024. 100328. doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100328 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100328
    32. Miranda, F. J., & Chamorro-Mera, A. (2025). The Impact of Gender and Age on HEI Teachers' intentions to Use Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools. Info. Tech. and Learn. Tools, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 112-128, 2025. doi: 10.33407/itlt.v108i4.6046 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v108i4.6046
    33. J. A. Amado, C. J. P. Dayson, P. N. Gipaya, A. M. G. Hipos, F. F. Ortile and G. S. Digo, “Assessing the impact of AI generative tools on administrative and supervisory practices in education,” As. Pac. J. of Mgnt and Sust. Dev., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 32-40, 2024.
    34. J. A. Echave, V. J. P. Donato and O. D. Acosta, “Embracing Generative AI in Education: Exploring Teachers' Perceptions, Practices, and Potential Impact,” J. Pend. Indo. Gem., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 211-232, 2024. doi. 10.52889/jpig.v4i2.458 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53889/jpig.v4i2.458
    35. R. M. David and A. P. Maroma, “Exploring the Integration of ChatGPT in Pre-Service Teacher Education: Benefits, Challenges and Pedagogical Implications,” Int. J. of Multid. Appl. Buss. and Educ. Res., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1333–1342, Mar. 2025, doi:10.11594/ijmaber.06.03.24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.03.24
    36. R. A. Mabuan, “ChatGPT and ELT: Exploring Teachers’ Voices,” Int. J. of Tech. in Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 128–153, Feb. 2024, doi:10.46328/ijte.523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.523
    37. S.J. Thong and I.F. Kamsin, “The Perception of Low-Enrolment School Teachers About the Use of ChatGPT,” Int. J. of Adv. Res. in Educ. and Soc., vol. 7, no. 6, 371-385, 2025. doi:10.55057/ijares.2025.7.6.31 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55057/ijares.2025.7.6.31
    38. M. Zaim et al., “AI-powered EFL pedagogy: Integrating generative AI into university teaching preparation through UTAUT and activity theory,” Comp. and Educ.: Artif. Intel., vol. 7, p. 100335, Dec. 2024, doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100335
    39. W. M. Ampo, A. R. Ayuban, S. L. A. Avellaneda, and D. T. Go, “Exploring Teachers’ Lived Experiences in Integrating ChatGPT in Classroom Practices,” Int. J. of Educ. and Emerg. Prac., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 17-28, 2025. doi:10.63236/injeep.1.1.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.63236/injeep.1.1.2
    40. J. N. D. Umali, “Artificial intelligence technology management of teachers, learners motivation and challenges encountered,” Int. J. of Multidisc. and Cur. Educ’l Res., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 821-880, 2024.
    41. G. Magtoto, F. Bagnol, and Rica Abunda, “ChatGPT — A Threat or an Aid in Teaching and Learning,” Int. J.on Op. and Dist. e-Lear., vol. 9, no. 2, May 2024, doi:10.58887/ijodel.v9i2.250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58887/ijodel.v9i2.250
    42. W. N. Okafor, and A. N. Anyanwu. “Teachers’ Awareness and Utilization of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools for Curriculum Implementation in Secondary Schools in Anambra State”. J. of Guid. & Counsel. Stud., vol. 9, no. 1, 152-161, 2025.
    43. L. Kok Wei and S. Abdul Rahim, “Using Chatgpt In English Language Learning: How Malaysian Polytechnic Students View It,” 2025 EdTec – International Conference on Education & Learning Technology, 05-06 May, Kuala Lumpur. Proc. of Teach. & Educ. Res. Assoc. (TERA), pp.165-176, 2025. doi:10.20319/ictel.2025.165176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20319/ictel.2025.165176
    44. C. S. Rochmad, I. Nasar and M. Mujiono. “The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Utilization on Work Efficiency and Productivity of Secondary School Teachers”. J. of Innov. in Educ. & Learn., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 163-172, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.66031/jinea.v1i3.37
    45. R. Qodri, D. D. Setiawan, A. Putra, & P. Nababan. “Utilization Of Artificial Intelligence (AI) as A Source of Teaching Materials for Teachers: Analysis of Potential, Challenges, and Content Accuracy”. Multidisc. Indo. Cent. J., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 4622-4629, 2025. doi:10.62567/micjo.v2i4.1410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62567/micjo.v2i4.1410
    46. Z. A. Traga Philippakos and L. Rocconi. “AI literacy: Elementary and secondary teachers’ use of AI tools, reported confidence, and professional development needs,” Educ. Sci., vol. 15, no. 9, p. 1186, 2025. doi:10.3390/educsci15091186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15091186
    47. I. Dringó-Horváth, Z. Rajki, and Nagy, J. T. (2025). “University teachers’ digital competence and AI literacy: Moderating role of gender, age, experience, and discipline,” Educ. Sci., vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 868, 2025. doi:10.3390/educsci15070868 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15070868