SINTA

2.5

Impact

Google Scholar

10

h-index

Indonesian Journal of Education Research (IJoER)

Open Access Journal

Curriculum Evaluation of Entrepreneurship Education: Employers’ Feedback on Business Graduates’ Job Performance

Gretchen Dawaton Bangguiyac ORCID
Kalinga State University ROR
Philippines
gcdawaton@ksu.edu.ph
Daniel Pannogan ORCID
Kalinga State University ROR
Philippines
Sonia Belinan ORCID
Kalinga State University ROR
Philippines
Karen Razelle Duyan ORCID
Kalinga State University ROR
Philippines
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aimed to evaluate employers’ feedback on the job performance of Bachelor of Science in Entrepreneurship graduates of Kalinga State University (KSU) to identify strengths and areas for improvement across four competency domains: personal, interpersonal, intellectual, and technical. The findings serve as a basis for curriculum enhancement, instructional innovation, and career development initiatives, thereby reinforcing educational accountability and employability outcomes within the ASEAN context.

    Methodology: The study employed a mixed-method research design integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches. A descriptive survey using a structured questionnaire distributed via Google Forms and in-person administration was utilized. Data was encoded in Microsoft Excel and analyzed using descriptive statistics such as frequency, percentage, weighted mean, and ranking, complemented by thematic analysis of employers’ qualitative feedback.

    Main Findings: Quantitative results indicated that graduates performed very satisfactorily in all four domains: personal abilities (M = 4.32), interpersonal abilities (M = 4.15), intellectual abilities (M = 4.19), and generic and specific knowledge and skills (M = 3.92). Employers commended graduates’ persistence, teamwork, and creativity but emphasized the need to improve communication, leadership, and digital literacy. The qualitative results revealed four major themes: practical and experiential learning, communication and interpersonal development, technological and digital skills enhancement, and leadership and professional competence.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study provides empirical evidence linking employer feedback with curriculum evaluation through the CIPP (Context–Input–Process–Product) Model, a framework rarely applied in Philippine entrepreneurship education research. It advances discourse on educational assessment and accountability by positioning employer perspectives as outcome-based indicators of curricular effectiveness. Moreover, it contributes to the ASEAN goal of promoting quality-assured, outcome-based, and employability-driven higher education that prepares graduates to be innovative, globally competent, and industry-responsive.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    G. D. Bangguiyac, D. Pannogan, S. Belinan, and K. R. Duyan, “Curriculum Evaluation of Entrepreneurship Education: Employers’ Feedback on Business Graduates’ Job Performance”, Ind. Jou. Edu. Rsc, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 578–589, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.37251/ijoer.v6i6.2255.

    More Citation Formats

  • 267
    Abstract views
    265
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. M. A. Bhatti, S. A. M. Saat, M. M. Aleidan, G. H. M. Al Murshidi, M. Alyahya, and A. S. Juhari, “Are business graduates’ employability skills and learning/teaching techniques universal? Exploring the role of culture: A comparative study among Australia, China, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 14, no. 5, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14053069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14053069
    2. A. K. Awadhiya, “Employability Skills in IT Sector: What matters most for graduate success?,” International Journal of Changes in Education, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.47852/bonviewijce52024010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52024010
    3. H. Tushar and N. Sooraksa, “Global employability skills in the 21st century workplace: A semi-systematic literature review,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 11, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21023
    4. D. L. Stufflebeam, “The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educational accountability,” 1971.
    5. S. Sankaran and N. Saad, “Evaluating the Bachelor of Education Program Based on the Context, Input, Process, and Product Model,” Front Educ (Lausanne), vol. 7, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.924374.
    6. F. K. Abbasi, A. Ali, and N. Bibi, “Analysis of skill gap for business graduates: managerial perspective from banking industry,” Education and Training, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 354–367, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1108/ET-08-2017-0120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-08-2017-0120
    7. Fathima Nasreen; Siti Hajar Halili; Rafiza Abdul Razak, “Employability skills of Malaysian university students for IR4.0: A systematic literature review,” vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 15–28, 2022.
    8. S. Sankaran and N. Saad, “Evaluating the Bachelor of Education Program Based on the Context, Input, Process, and Product Model,” Front Educ (Lausanne), vol. 7, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.924374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.924374
    9. N. Phan, “Bridging the Gap: A Framework for Experiential Learning in Higher Education,” Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 2024, doi: 10.1177/23294906241292009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906241292009
    10. F. Scheuring and J. Thompson, “Enhancing graduate employability–exploring the influence of experiential simulation learning on life skill development,” Studies in Higher Education, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 256–270, 2025, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2024.2334837. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2334837
    11. W. Rahmaningtyas, S. Joyoatmojo, C. D. S. Indrawati, and T. Murwaningsih, “Graduate Satisfaction: How Experiential Learning Supercharges Employability Skills,” Asian Journal of University Education, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 160–176, 2025, doi: 10.24191/ajue.v21i1.5447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v21i1.5447
    12. M. Koape and A. Mamabolo, “The effect of experiential learning on entrepreneurial competencies and business performance,” vol. 29, no. 2, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1142/S1084946724500109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1084946724500109
    13. E. Ontiveros -Mendoza, “Employers’ Feedback on the Quality of Work and Workplace Performance: Inputs to Career Development Strategies,” Asia Pacific Journal of Education Perspective, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 10–17, 2021.
    14. M. T. S. Alvarez and E. U. Cammayo, “A graduate’s employability study of bachelor of science in entrepreneurship of Isabela State University, Philippines,” International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 164–173, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v12i1.22841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i1.22841
    15. F. T. G. Gaite, R. A. Arroyo, P. J. Lim, P. M. E. Vergara, and J. A. Doria, “Employers’ Feedback on Job Performance of Hotel and Restaurant Management Graduates,” International Journal of Academe and Industry Research, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 129–144, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.53378/352944. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53378/352944
    16. B. P. Ping Yong and Y.-L. Ling, “Skills Gap: The Perceptions of Importance of Soft Skills in Graduate Employability Between Employers and Graduates,” Journal of Techno-Social, vol. 15, no. 1, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.30880/jts.2023.15.01.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30880/jts.2023.15.01.002
    17. J. M. Aquino and J. Garcia, “Feedback on Technical, Organizational, and Customer Service Skills of Employers of the Automotive Technology Graduates of One State University in the Philippines,” Journal of Mathematics Instruction, Social Research and Opinion, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 129–144, May 2023, doi: 10.58421/misro.v2i2.87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v2i2.87
    18. J. W. Creswell, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009.
    19. J. Schoonenboom and R. B. Johnson, “How to Construct a Mixed Methods Research Design,” Kolner Z Soz Sozpsychol, vol. 69, no. Suppl 2, p. 107, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1007/S11577-017-0454-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1
    20. M. Shah, L. Grebennikov, and C. Sid Nair, “A decade of study on employer feedback on the quality of university graduates,” Quality Assurance in Education, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 262–278, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1108/QAE-04-2014-0018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-04-2014-0018
    21. V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qual Res Psychol, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006, doi: 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    22. G. S. . Becker, Human capital : A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. NBER, 1975.
    23. L. Geng, M. Ma, R. Osei-Kyei, X. Jin, and S. Shrestha, “A review of employability skills for graduates in the construction sector,” 2025, Emerald Publishing. doi: 10.1108/HESWBL-08-2024-0242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-08-2024-0242
    24. A. Bandura, “Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change,” Psychol Rev, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 191–215, Mar. 1977, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
    25. N. S. Ahmad and A. A. M. Sulaiman, “The Influence of Personality Traits, Rationality, And Self-Efficacy Towards Decision-Making Styles Among Technical Trainees,” Journal of Technical Education and Training, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 60–67, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.30880/jtet.2022.14.03.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2022.14.03.006
    26. D. A. Kolb, “Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development,” J Organ Behav, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 359–360, 1984.
    27. B. I. N. Obi, T. I. Eze, and N. F. Chibuzo, “Experiential learning activities in business education for developing 21st century competencies,” Journal of Education for Business, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 36–42, 2022, doi: 10.1080/08832323.2021.1884521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2021.1884521
    28. G. Di Pietro, “International internships and skill development: A systematic review,” Review of Education, vol. 10, no. 2, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1002/rev3.3363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3363
    29. C. Whitsed, M. Burgess, and S. Ledger, “Editorial Advisory Board Members on Reimagining Higher Education Internationalization and Internationalization of the Curriculum,” J Stud Int Educ, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 348–368, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1177/1028315320984840. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315320984840
    30. D. Goleman Bloomsbury, Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More than IQ. New York: Bantam Books, 1995.
    31. Y. Shahab, Y. Chengang, A. D. Arbizu, and M. J. Haider, “Entrepreneurial self-efficacy and intention: do entrepreneurial creativity and education matter?,” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 259–280, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1108/IJEBR-12-2017-0522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-12-2017-0522
    32. G. Alsos et al., “Graduates of venture creation programs – where do they apply their entrepreneurial competencies?,” Small Business Economics, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 133–155, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11187-022-00641-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-022-00641-6
    33. J. Mezirow, “Transformative Learning: Theory to Practice,” New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, vol. 1997, no. 74, pp. 5–12, Jun. 1997, doi: 10.1002/ACE.7401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.7401
    34. A. Mehrotra and H. Elias, “Employer’s Feedback on Business Graduates,” Journal of WEI Business and Economics, vol. 6, no. 2, 2017.
    35. E. Obioha and Y. Sotshangane, “Perspectives on employers’ expectations on tertiary education graduates’ employability skills in Eastern Cape, South Africa,” International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 237–248, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i5.1832. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i5.1832
    36. W. Mainga, M. B. M. Braynen, R. Moxey, and S. A. Quddus, “Graduate Employability of Business Students,” Adm Sci, vol. 12, no. 3, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.3390/admsci12030072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12030072
    37. V. Chan, “Bridging the Gap: Examining the Discrepancies in Communication Skills Between University Education and Employer Expectations,” Honors Theses, vol. 3885, 2024.
    38. P. K. Tee, B. L. Song, M. K. Ho, L. C. Wong, and K. Y. Lim, “Bridging the gaps in digital skills: Employer insights on digital skill demands, micro-credentials, and graduate employability,” Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, vol. 8, no. 9, 2024, doi: 10.24294/jipd.v8i9.7313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i9.7313
    39. C. Smith, “Bridging the Digital Skills Gap with a Focused Student Initiative,” Pedagogy: LTEC Learning and Teaching Showcase, vol. 1, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.57898/pedagogy.267.
    40. B. Đorđević, S. Milanović Zbiljić, and M. Radosavljević, “Impact of the Digital Skills on Employability: Cross-Sectional Analysis,” Economies, vol. 13, no. 7, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.3390/economies13070196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/economies13070196
    41. ASEAN, “ASEAN Qualifications Reference Framework,” ASEAN Main Portal, Jul. 28, 2023.