SINTA

2.5

Impact

Google Scholar

10

h-index

Indonesian Journal of Education Research (IJoER)

Open Access Journal

Filipino Senior High School Students’ Perceived Stress and Coping Strategies in the Post-Pandemic Context

Celosteo A Villaceran
Cebu Technological University ROR
Philippines
celosteo.villaceran@deped.gov.ph
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aimed to determine the levels of perceived stress and coping strategies among Filipino senior high school students in the post-pandemic context and to examine the relationships between their stress and coping strategies.

    Methodology: The study employed a descriptive-correlational design using validated survey instruments, namely the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) and the Filipino Coping Strategies Scale (FCS). Data were collected through an online self-administered questionnaire among senior high school students in Central Visayas, Philippines, following ethical and consent procedures. The data were analyzed using SPSS, applying descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) and Pearson product–moment correlation to examine the relationship between perceived stress and coping strategies.

    Main Findings: Students reported high levels of perceived stress and generally high coping strategies, with religiosity being very high. Moderate coping strategies included overactivity and emotional release, while substance use was low. Correlations showed negligible but significant positive relationships between stress and most coping strategies, except religiosity, which was not significant.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study integrates the Transactional Theory of Stress and Coping with the Grounded Theory of Filipino Well-Being (Kaginhawaan), providing culturally contextualized insights into student stress and coping in the post-pandemic era. It advances knowledge by highlighting Filipino-specific coping mechanisms and their relevance in educational and guidance practices, offering practical implications for supporting student resilience.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    C. A. Villaceran, “Filipino Senior High School Students’ Perceived Stress and Coping Strategies in the Post-Pandemic Context”, Ind. Jou. Edu. Rsc, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–13, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.37251/ijoer.v7i1.2120.

    More Citation Formats

  • 4443
    Abstract views
    730
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. C. J. Estrellado, “Transition to post-pandemic education in the Philippines,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Pub., vol. 11, pp. 2250-3153, 2021. doi: 10.29322/IJSRP.11.12.2021.p12074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.11.12.2021.p12074
    2. M. M. J. Olvido, J. M. P. Sanchez, and I. M. V. Alejandro, “Impact of distance learning on the university students’ academic performance and experiences,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 13, pp. 2116-2125, 2024. doi: 10.11591/ijere.v13i4.25847 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i4.25847
    3. R. Mohalik and S. Sahoo, “E-readiness and perception of student teachers’ towards online learning in the midst of COVID-19 pandemic,” SSRN. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3666914 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3666914
    4. C. B. Agaton and L. J. Cueto, “Learning at home: Parents’ lived experiences on distance learning during COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 10, pp. 901-911, 2021. doi: 10.11591/ijere.v10i3.21136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i3.21136
    5. C. Goles, J. M. Sanchez, G. Sumalinog, J. Mananay, and I. M. Alejandro, “Beyond the pandemic: The changing landscape of technology integration in higher education in Central Visayas, Philippines,” CTU J. Innov. Sustain. Dev., vol. 16, pp. 150-159, 2024. doi: 10.22144/ctujoisd.2024.262 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22144/ctujoisd.2024.262
    6. L. Elsalem, N. Al-Azzam, A. A. Jum’ah, N. Obeidat, A. M. Sindiani, and K. A. Kheirallah, “Stress and behavioral changes with remote E-exams during the Covid-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study among undergraduates of medical sciences,” Ann. Med. Surg., vol. 60, pp. 271-279, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.10.058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.10.058
    7. M. G. Acosta-Gómez, J. M. Dela Rosa-Chiapas, A. Zavala-Bervena, A. E. R. Cisneros, V. R. Péres, C. D. S. Rodrigues, and K. Novack, “Stress in high school students: A descriptive study,” J. Cogn. Behav. Ther., vol. 1, pp. 1-10, 2018.
    8. C. Fernandez, M. Balijon, and I. Ancho, “Career preferences of Filipino senior high school students,” CTU J. Innov. Sustain. Dev., vol. 15, pp. 81-91, 2023. doi: 10.22144/ctujoisd.2023.053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22144/ctujoisd.2023.053
    9. E. Gimarino, “Career choice and self-efficacy toward senior high school students’ career goals in the Philippines,” Indo. J. Educ. Res., vol. 5, pp. 187-195, 2024. doi: 10.37251/ijoer.v5i5.1079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/ijoer.v5i5.1079
    10. M. C. Pascoe, S. E. Hetrick, and A. G. Parker, “The impact of stress on students in secondary school and higher education,” Int. J. Adolesc. Youth, vol. 25, pp. 104-112, 2020. doi: 10.1080/02673843.2019.1596823 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2019.1596823
    11. S. Gamonal-Limcaoco, E. Montero-Mateos, M. T. Lozano-López, A. Maciá-Casas, J. Matías-Fernández, and C. Roncero, “Perceived stress in different countries at the beginning of the coronavirus pandemic,” Int. J. Psychiatry Med., vol. 57, pp. 309-322. doi: 10.1177/00912174211033710 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00912174211033710
    12. S. Y. Parvar, N. Ghamari, F. Pezeshkian, and R. Shahriarirad, “Prevalence of anxiety, depression, stress, and perceived stress and their relation with resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic, a cross-sectional study,” Int. J. Adolesc. Youth, vol. 25, pp. 104-112, 2022. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.460 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.460
    13. R. Tindle, A. Hemi, and A. A. Moustafa, “Social support, psychological flexibility and coping mediate the association between COVID-19 related stress exposure and psychological distress,” Sci. Rep., vol. 12, 2022. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12262-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12262-w
    14. H. M. Stallman, “Health theory of coping,” Austral. Psych., vol. 55, pp. 295-306, 2020. doi: 10.1111/ap.12465 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12465
    15. C. Xie and Y. Kim, “Post-traumatic growth during COVID-19: The role of perceived social support, personality, and coping strategies,” Healthcare, vol. 10, 2-22. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10020224
    16. M. O’Driscoll, L. J. Sahm, H. Byrne, S. Lambert, and S. Byrne, “Impact of a mindfulness-based intervention on undergraduate pharmacy students’ stress and distress: Quantitative results of a mixed-methods study,” Curr. Pharm. Teach. Learn., vol. 11, pp. 876-887, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2019.05.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2019.05.014
    17. A. Riepenhausen, C. Wackerhagen, Z. C. Reppmann, H. C. Deter, R. Kalisch, I. M. Veer, and H. Walter, “Positive cognitive reappraisal in stress resilience, mental health, and well-being: A comprehensive systematic review,” Emot. Rev., vol. 14, pp. 310-331, 2022. doi: 10.1177/17540739221114642 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17540739221114642
    18. R. S. Lazarus and S. Folkman, “Cognitive theories of stress and the issue of circularity,” in Dynamics of Stress, Boston, MA: Springer, 1986, pp. 63-80 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5122-1_4
    19. M. C. F. Samaco-Zamora and K. T. G. Fernadez, “A grounded theory of Filipino wellness (kaginhawaan),” Psych. Stud., vol. 61, pp. 279-287, 2016. doi: 10.1007/s12646-016-0373-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-016-0373-7
    20. G. G. Sumalinog, V. Cortes, R. Alalid, T. M. Navarro, C. Cordova-Espera, and C. Bercede-Fernandez, “Experiences of school administrators during limited face-to-face classes,” Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res., vol. 23, pp. 309-328, 2024. doi: 10.26803/ijlter.23.8.16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.8.16
    21. J. M. Lappe, “Taking the mystery out of research: Descriptive correlational design,” Orthopaedic Nursing, vol. 19, 2000.
    22. E. Rahm and H. H. Do, “Data cleaning: Problems and current approaches,” IEE Data Eng. Bull., vol. 23, pp. 3-13, 2000.
    23. J. de Uña-Álvarez, “Testing for an ignorable sampling bias under random double truncation,” arXiv, 2023. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2301.03698 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.9828
    24. G. K. Mweshi and K. Sakyi, “Application of sampling methods for the research design,” Arch. Bus. Rev., vol. 8, pp. 180-193, 2020. doi: 10.14738/abr.811.9042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.811.9042
    25. R. Ismawati, S. Mulyono, and R. Astuti, “Influences of compensation and career improvement on teacher performance through work motivation,” Int. J. Soc. Sci. Res. Rev., vol. 6, pp. 193-203, 2023. doi: 10.47814/ijssrr.v6i1.887 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v6i1.887
    26. J. A. A. Domantay, “Health-related quality of life of future physicians at a medical school in the Philippines: A cross-sectional study,” Sage Open, vol. 4, 2014. doi: 10.1177/2158244014545459 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014545459
    27. R. M. Oducado, J. Rabacal, and K. Tamdag, “Perceived stress due to COVID-19 pandemic among employed professional teachers,” Int. J. Educ. Res. Innov., vol. 15, pp. 305-316, 2021. doi: 10.46661/ijeri.5284 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.5284
    28. J. R. Rilveria, “The development of the Filipino coping strategies scale,” Asia-Pac. Soc. Sci. Rev., vol. 18, pp. 111-126, 2018. doi: 10.59588/2350-8329.1151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59588/2350-8329.1151
    29. D. Mergel, “Data structures, excel and python basics,” In Physics with Excel and Python: Using the Same Data Structure Volume I: Basics, Exercies and Tasks, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023, pp. 15-73 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82325-2_2
    30. B. Djordjević, A. S. Mane, and E. Krmac, “Analysis of dependency and importance of key indicators of railway sustainability monitoring: A new integrated approach with DEA and Pearson correlation,” Res. Transport. Bus. Manage., vol. 41, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100650 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100650
    31. J. Benesty, J. Chen, and Y. Huang, “On the importance of the Pearson correlation coefficient in noise reduction,” IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process., vol. 16, pp. 757-765, 2008. doi: 10.1109/TASL.2008.919072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TASL.2008.919072
    32. B. Q. Ford, P. Lam, O. P. John, and I. B. Mauss, “The psychological health benefits of accepting negative emotions and thoughts: Laboratory, diary, and longitudinal evidence,” J. Person. Soc. Psych., vol. 119, pp. 1093-1115, 2020. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000157
    33. P. Maitra, “Schooling and educational attainment: Evidence from Bangladesh,” Educ. Econ., vol. 11, pp. 129-153, 2003. doi: 10.1080/09645290210131665 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09645290210131665
    34. A. Ardilla, M. Rosselli, M., E. Matute, and S. Guajardo, “The influence of the parents’ educational level on the development of executive functions,” Dev. Neuropsych., vol. 28, pp. 539-560, 2005. doi: 10.1207/s15326942dn2801_5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2801_5
    35. M. Shao, W. He, L. Zhao, & Y. Su, “The influence of parental involvement on parent satisfactiom: The moderating effect of parental educational level and the number of children,” Front. Psych., vol. 12, 2022. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.752802 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.752802
    36. H. Bras, and J. Mandemakers, “Maternal education and sibling inequalities in child nutritional status in Ethiopia,” SSM Pop. Health, vol. 17, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101041
    37. Y. C. Her, J. Vergauwen, and D. Mortelmans, “Nest leaver or home stayer? Sibling influence on parental home leaving in the United Kingdom,” Adv. Life Course Res., vol. 52, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.alcr.2022.100464 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2022.100464
    38. U. Toseeb, “Sibling conflict during COVID-19 in families with special educational needs and disabilities,” Brit. J. Educ. Psych., vol. 92, pp. 319-339, 2022. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12451 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12451
    39. C. Xie and Y. Kim, “Post-traumatic growth during COVID-19: The role of perceived social support, personality, and coping strategies,” Healthcare, vol. 10, 2-22. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10020224
    40. L. P. Alampay and A. S. Garcia, “Education and parenting in the Philippines,” In School Systems, Parent Behavior, and Academic Achievement: Young People and Learning Processes in School and Everyday Life, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28277-6_7
    41. S. L. S. Daway-Ducanes, E. E. Pernia, and V. J. R. Ramos, “On the “income advantage” in course choices and admissions: Evidence from the University of the Philippines,” Int. J. Educ. Dev., vol. 91, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102578 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102578
    42. C. Ricciardi and A. Winsler, “Selection into advanced courses in middle and high school among low-income, ethnically diverse youth,” J. Adv. Acad., vol. 32, pp. 291-323, 2021. doi: 10.1177/1932202X21990096 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X21990096
    43. M. B. Bin Heyat, F. Akhtar, S. J. Abbas, M. Al-Sarem, A. Alqarafi, A. Stalin, R. Abbasi, A. Y. Muaad, D. Lai, and K. Wu, “Wearable flexible electronics based cardiac electrode for researcher mental stress detection system using machine learning models on single lead electrocardiogram signal,” Biosensors, vol. 12, 2022. doi: 10.3390/bios12060427 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12060427
    44. K I. Pargament, “Religion and coping: The current state of knowledge,” In The Oxford Handbook of Stress, Health, and Coping, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
    45. A. W. Braam, H. G. Koenig, and Religion, Spirituality, and Positive Pyschology Working Group, “Religion, spirituality, and mental health: Current controversies and future directions,” J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., vol. 207, pp. 838-842, 2019. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31826b6dle DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0b013e31826b6dle
    46. F. Del Castillo and M. A. Alino, “Religious coping of selected Filipino Catholic youth,” Relig, vol. 11, 2020. doi: 10.3390/rel11090462 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11090462
    47. M. D. Thompson, B. S. Draper, and C. M. Keitler, “The relationship between stress, coping strategies, and problem-solving skills among college students,” Inq. J., vol. 14, 2022.
    48. B. Ozgundondu and Z. G. Metin, “Effects of progressive muscle relaxation combined with music on stress, fatigue, and coping styles among intensive care nurses,” Intensive Crit. Care Nurs., vol. 54, pp. 54-63, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2019.07.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2019.07.007
    49. P. A. Rodel, Culture and Customs of the Philippines, Manila: Greenwood Publishing Group, 2002
    50. E. F. Acoba, “Social support and mental health: The mediating role of perceived stress,” Front. Psych., vol. 15,2024. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1330720 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1330720
    51. A. M. Cybulska, K. Rachubiňska, M. Stanislawska, S. Grochans, A. Cymbaluk-Ploska, and E. Grochans, “Analysis of factors related to mental health, suppression of emotions, and personality influencing coping with stress among nurses,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 19, 2022. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169777 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19169777
    52. L. J. Lazaro-Quilang and M. Palattao-Dayawon, “Academic rope to cope: Teachers’ coping strategy to academic anxiety,” J. Human Behav. Soc. Environ., vol. 34, pp. 684-692, 2024. doi: 10.1080/10911359.2023.2215271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2023.2215271
    53. M. L. Arellano-Carandang, Filipino Children Under Stress: Family Dynamics and Therapy, Manila: Ateneo de Manila University Press, 1995
    54. Rabago-Mingoa, T., “Filipino teachers’ stress levels and coping strategies,” DLSU Research Congress, 2017.
    55. L. K. Delgra, U. E. Dotimas, K. B. Dumas, E. R. Lumpay, and R. J. Guanco, “Mediating role of coping strategies on the symptoms of complicated grief and psychological well-being during COVID-19 pandemic,” 9th Int. Scholar’s Conf. Proceed., 2023
    56. A. López, R. Sanderman, and M. J. Schroevers, “A close examination of the relationship between self-compassion and depressive symptoms,” Mindfulness, vol. 9, pp. 1470-1478, 2018. doi: 10.1007/s12671-018-0891-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-0891-6
    57. M. Z. Yuan, H. F. Chen, C. C. Yang, T. H. Chow, and C. H. Hsu, “The relationship between medical staff’s emotional labor, leisure coping strategies, workplace spirituality, and organizational commitment during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 19, 2022. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106186
    58. N. D. Volkow and C. Blanco, “Substance use disorders: A comprehensive update of classification, epidemiology, neurobiology, clinical aspects, treatment and prevention,” World Psychiatry, vol. 22, pp. 203-229, 2020. doi: 10.1002/wps.21073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.21073
    59. C. Xie and Y. Kim, “Post-traumatic growth during COVID-19: The role of perceived social support, personality, and coping strategies,” Healthcare, vol. 10, 2-22. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10020224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10020224
    60. R. A. Alves, T. A. Penna, V. B. Paravidino, and A. J. Oliveira, “Association between occupational stress, social support at work, and physical activity in outsourced workers,” Rev. Bras. Med. Trab., vol. 20, pp. 615-623, 2023. doi: 10.47626/1679-4435-2022-804 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47626/1679-4435-2022-804
    61. L. Y. Olimov and Z. M. Maxmudova, “Psychological peculiarities in stressful situations and social psychological features of coping behavior manisfestation,” Sci. Educ., vol. 3, pp. 1324-1333, 2019.
    62. A. Moreira-Almedia, F. L. Neto, and H. G. Koenig, “Religiousness and mental health: A review,” Braz. J. Psychiatry, vol. 38, pp. 242-250, 2006. doi: 10.1590/s1516-44462006000300018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-44462006005000006
    63. E. Andreou, E. C. Alexopoulos, C. Lionis, L.Varvogli, C. Gnardellis, G. P. Chrousos, and C. Darviri, “Perceived stress scale: Reliability and validity study in Greece,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 8, pp. 3287-3298, 2011. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8083287 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8083287
    64. S. Cohen, T. Kamarck, and R. Mermelstein, “A global measure of perceived stress,” J. Health Soc. Behav., vol. 24, pp. 385-396, 1983. doi: 10.2307/2136404 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404
    65. J. O. Serrano, M. E. S. Reyes, and A. B. de Guzman, “Pyschological distress and coping of Filipino university students amidst the global pandemic: A mixed-method study,” J. Pos. Sch. Pysch., vol. 6, pp. 373-386, 2022.
    66. A. Biggs, P. Brough, and S. Drummond, “Lazarus and Folkman’s psychological stress and coping theory,” The Handbook of Stress and Health: A Guide to Research and Practice, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118993811.ch21
    67. J. J. B. A. Aruta, “Socio-ecological determinants of distress in Filipino adults during COVID-19 crisis,” Curr. Psych., vol. 41, pp. 7482-7492, 2021. doi: 10.1007/s12144-020-01322-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01322-x
    68. K. L. Nadal, Filipino Amercian Psychology: A Handbook of Theory, Research, and Clinical Practice, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119677109
    69. J. M. P. Sanchez, B. A. Alejandro, M. M. J. Olvido, and I. M. V. Alejandro, “An analysis of online classes tweets using Gephi: Inputs for online learning,” Int. J. Info. Educ. Technol., vol. 11, pp. 583-589, 2021. doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.12.1568 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.12.1568
    70. I. M. V. Alejandro, J. M. P. Sanchez, G. G. Sumalinog, J. A. Mananay, C. E. Goles, and C. B. Fernandez, “Pre-service teachers’ technology acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in education,” STEME Education, vol. 4, pp. 445-465, 2024. doi: 10.3934/steme.2024024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2024024
    71. R. Flores-Buils and R. Mateu-Pérez, “Influence of decision-making styles on academic stress and resilience: An approach for educational intervention,” Psych. Sch., pp. 1-10, 2025. doi: 10.1002/pits.23603 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.23603
    72. F. A. del Castillo, C. D. del Castillo, and J. C. Corpuz, “Dungaw: Re-imagined religious expression in response to the COVID-19 pandemic,” J. Relig. Health, vol. 60, pp. 2285-2305, 2021. doi: 10.1007/s10943-021-01266-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01266-x
    73. M. N. Q. Cadosales, J. M. P. Sanchez, M. E. Cordova, J. A. Merin, and W. S. Augusto, “Exploring the predictive influence of licensure examination results for beginning teachers’ performance: The case of the Philippines,” Front. Educ., vol. 8, 2023. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1252368 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1252368
    74. M. Hechanova, P. Docena, L. Alampay, A. Acosta, E. Porio, I. Melgar, and R. Berger, “Evaluation of a resilience intervention for Filipino displaced survivors of Super Typhoon Haiyan.” Disaster Prevention and Management, vol. 27, pp. 346-359, 2018. doi: 10.1108/DPM-01-2018-0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-01-2018-0001
    75. C. Fernandez, “Literature review designs in practice: Graduate students’ perspectives from a teacher education program,” Internet Ref. Serv. Quart., vol. 29, 2025. doi: 10.1080/10875301.2025.2520829 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2025.2520829
    76. E. L. Abao, J. A. M. Petancio, J. M. P. Sanchez, and G. G. Sumalinog, “Performance of beginning teachers in the licensure examination for teachers: A national study,” Front. Educ., vol. 8, 2023. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1240658 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1240658
    77. G. H. Gonzales, K. Despe, L. Iway, R. J. Genon, J. Intano, and J. M. Sanchez, “Online collaborative learning platforms in science: Their influence on attitude, achievement, and experiences,” J. Educ. Technol. Instruct., vol. 2, pp. 1-16, 2023. doi: 10.70290/jeti.v2i2.55 DOI: https://doi.org/10.70290/jeti.v2i2.55