SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

6

H-Index

Journal of Chemical Learning Innovation

an Open Access Journal

Assessing Compliance with Seven Safe Chemical Storage Principles in Academic Laboratories: Implications for Chemical Health and Safety Management

Võ Thị Hai
Ho Chi Minh University of Science
Viet Nam
hai.vo.academic@gmail.com
Wimonnan Pongpatrakant
Loei Rajabhat University ROR
Thailand
Gulmira Ali-zade
Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences ROR
Azerbaijan
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to assess the implementation of safe chemical storage practices in academic laboratories by examining compliance with seven essential storage principles and identifying areas requiring improvement in chemical storage management.

    Methodology: A descriptive qualitative design was employed across seven academic laboratories. Data were collected through direct observations, semi-structured interviews, and document reviews using observation checklists, interview guidelines, chemical inventories, Safety Data Sheets, chemical compatibility matrices, and standard operating procedures. Supporting equipment included a measuring tape, lux meter, hygrometer, camera, and audio recorder.

    Main Findings: The assessment revealed that none of the seven laboratories fully complied with all seven safe chemical storage principles. All laboratories met the requirement for safe chemical placement. However, only one laboratory fulfilled chemical labeling and compatibility requirements. Deficiencies were also identified in chemical procurement, housekeeping, stock control, and shelf storage, indicating inconsistent implementation of essential chemical safety practices.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study provides an integrated assessment of chemical storage safety by examining seven essential management principles within academic laboratory environments. Rather than focusing solely on chemical labeling or storage facilities, it identifies interconnected management deficiencies that may compromise safe storage practices. The findings offer practical evidence for developing more systematic chemical storage procedures and improving laboratory safety management.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    V. T. Hai, W. Pongpatrakant, and G. Ali-zade, “Assessing Compliance with Seven Safe Chemical Storage Principles in Academic Laboratories: Implications for Chemical Health and Safety Management”, Jor. Chem. Lea. Inn, vol. 3, no. 2, Nov. 2026, doi: 10.37251/jocli.v3i2.4626.

    More Citation Formats

  • 0
    Abstract views
    0
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. H. Y. Agustian et al., “Learning outcomes of university chemistry teaching in laboratories: A systematic review of empirical literature,” Rev. Educ., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–41, 2022, doi: 10.1002/rev3.3360.
    2. P. Kumari, A. Mwesigye, and S. Balimuttajjo, “Science laboratory education and students’ perceived behavior towards science education: a Review,” J. Res. Innov. Implic. Educ., vol. 8, no. 2023, pp. 555–561, 2024, doi: 10.59765/pws538jgt.
    3. W. Wang, Y. Su, H. Cao, and D. Li, “Enhancing chemical laboratory safety with hazards risks mitigation and strategic actions,” Laboratories, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2025, doi: 10.3390/laboratories2010005.
    4. M. D. Igbashio, O. E. Idemudia, and H. Ochoyama, “A review of hazards and precautionary measures in science and technology laboratories,” J. Sci. Technol. Res., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 57–71, 2022, doi: 10.53555/jptcp.v29i04.4990.
    5. F. Fatemi, A. Dehdashti, and M. Jannati, “Implementation of chemical health, safety, and environmental risk assessment in laboratories: A case-series study,” Front. Public Heal., vol. 10, no. June, pp. 1–9, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.898826.
    6. M. Bai et al., “Current status, challenges, and future directions of university laboratory safety in China,” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., vol. 74, p. 104671, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104671.
    7. N. F. R. Fouzi, H. A. Aziz, and N. Yaakub, “Systematic review of chemical safety and chemical security risk management approach,” Process Saf. Environ. Prot., vol. 183, pp. 676–686, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2024.01.035.
    8. M. Bai et al., “Why do major chemical accidents still happen in China: Analysis from a process safety management perspective,” Process Saf. Environ. Prot., vol. 176, pp. 411–420, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2023.06.040.
    9. H. Housni, K. Bendahhou, M. Tahiri, and N. Tahiri Jouti, “Evaluation of chemical risks management during handling operations and determination of storage conditions in scientific laboratories,” Chem. Africa, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1087–1101, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s42250-022-00530-1.
    10. O. O. Anthony, H. Shabaan, and H. S. Hassan, “A study of expired laboratory chemicals stockpiles, storage facilities and their disposal patterns in zanzibar’s secondary schools,” J. Res. Innov. Implic. Educ., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1191–1204, 2026, doi: 10.59765/vurh4.
    11. A. H. Anik, M. Toha, and S. M. Tareq, “Occupational chemical safety and management: A case study to identify best practices for sustainable advancement of Bangladesh,” Hyg. Environ. Heal. Adv., vol. 12, p. 100110, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heha.2024.100110.
    12. H. Abedsoltan and M. B. Shiflett, “Mitigation of potential risks in chemical laboratories: A focused review,” ACS Chem. Heal. Saf., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 104–120, 2024, doi: 10.1021/acs.chas.3c00097.
    13. M. G. Ribeiro and F. de Freitas Ventura, “Improving laboratory chemical safety practices through participatory workshops,” ACS Chem. Heal. Saf., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 73–81, 2026, doi: 10.1021/acs.chas.5c00144.
    14. I. Nasrallah et al., “Evaluating the academic scientific laboratories’ safety by applying failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) at the public university in Lebanon,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 1–12, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21145.
    15. W. Utembe, S. Kgalamono, and M. Zungu, “Analysis of the globally harmonized system of classification and labelling of chemicals requirements in the 2021 regulations for hazardous chemical agents in south africa,” Occup. Heal. South. Africa, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 148–154, Sep. 2026, doi: 10.62380/ohsa.2026.32.3.5.
    16. R. Mlelwa and H. A. Rother, “‘If they are not labeled, how do we know what’s risky and what’s not?’: assessing information on brominated flame retardants in children’s plastic products in south africa,” Environ. Health Insights, vol. 20, pp. 1–16, 2026, doi: 10.1177/11786302261435748.
    17. K. Fenton, S. Simske, and J. Luu, “Mitigation of chemical reporting liabilities through systematic modernization of chemical hazard and safety data management systems,” ACS Omega, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 4928–4936, 2023, doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c07244.
    18. I. Durlik, T. Miller, E. Kostecka, and T. Tuński, “Artificial intelligence in maritime transportation: A comprehensive review of safety and risk management applications,” Appl. Sci., vol. 14, no. 18, pp. 1–32, 2024, doi: 10.3390/app14188420.
    19. A. J. Siril, S. N. Abu Bakar, and M. O. Fatehah, “Hazardous waste management, challenges, and risks in handling laboratory waste in universities bt - handbook of solid waste management: Sustainability through circular economy,” C. Baskar, S. Ramakrishna, S. Baskar, R. Sharma, A. Chinnappan, and R. Sehrawat, Eds., Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022, pp. 1655–1714. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-4230-2_79.
    20. J. Li, J. Wu, X. Rong, Q. Yang, and Z. Sun, “The novel hazard control and accident prevention system for sustainable chemical lab management,” Sustain., vol. 17, no. 17, pp. 1–20, 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17178015.