SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

6

H-Index

Journal of Chemical Learning Innovation

an Open Access Journal

Integrating Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) into Chemical Laboratory Learning: A Mixed-Method Study on Students’ Safety Awareness and Practices

Hassan Abdullahi Dachia
University of Maiduguri ROR
Nigeria
hassan21chiaallahi@gmail.com
Jairus Bulimo Khamali
Roka Secondary School
Kenya
FKR Kumabia
St. Francis College of Education ROR
Ghana
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to analyze students’ occupational health and safety (OHS) awareness and practices in chemical laboratory learning and to evaluate the effectiveness of integrating OHS principles into laboratory instruction to reduce safety risks and improve compliance.

    Methodology: This study employed a mixed-method approach using structured questionnaires, observation sheets, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis. Data were collected from undergraduate chemistry students. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were analyzed through thematic analysis. Job Safety Analysis (JSA) was applied as a risk assessment tool.

    Main Findings: The results showed that 78% of students received safety training, but only 34% could identify hazard symbols correctly. Compliance with safety practices was low, including fume hood usage (25%) and chemical waste disposal (10%). JSA results indicated that 19% of laboratory activities were categorized as high to extreme risk levels.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study provides a novel integration of Job Safety Analysis (JSA) into chemical laboratory learning to systematically identify risks and improve safety practices. It also offers an evidence-based approach for embedding OHS into the curriculum, contributing to the development of a proactive laboratory safety culture.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    H. A. Dachia, J. B. Khamali, and F. Kumabia, “Integrating Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) into Chemical Laboratory Learning: A Mixed-Method Study on Students’ Safety Awareness and Practices”, Jor. Chem. Lea. Inn, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 60–68, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.37251/jocli.v3i1.2977.

    More Citation Formats

  • 129
    Abstract views
    70
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. F. Fatemi, A. Dehdashti, and M. Jannati, “Implementation of chemical health, safety, and environmental risk assessment in laboratories: A case-series study,” Front. Public Heal., vol. 10, no. June, pp. 1–9, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.898826. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.898826
    2. H. Abedsoltan and M. B. Shiflett, “Mitigation of potential risks in chemical laboratories: a focused review,” ACS Chem. Heal. Saf., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 104–120, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1021/acs.chas.3c00097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chas.3c00097
    3. C.-C. Ho and M.-S. Chen, “Risk assessment and quality improvement of liquid waste management in Taiwan University chemical laboratories,” Waste Manag., vol. 71, pp. 578–588, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.09.029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.09.029
    4. S. Yilmaz, “How to enhance occupational health and safety practices in schools: An analysis through the eyes of school principals,” Int. J. Psychol. Educ. Stud., vol. 9, pp. 922–933, 2022, doi: 10.52380/ijpes.2022.9.4.871. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2022.9.4.871
    5. F. Lestari, A. Bowolaksono, S. Yuniautami, T. R. Wulandari, and S. Andani, “Evaluation of the implementation of occupational health, safety, and environment management systems in higher education laboratories,” J. Chem. Heal. Saf., vol. 26, no. 4–5, pp. 14–19, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jchas.2018.12.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchas.2018.12.006
    6. C. Dufour, A. Draghci, L. Ivascu, and M. Sarfraz, “Occupational health and safety division of responsibility: A conceptual model for the implementation of the OHSAS 18001: 2007 standard,” Hum. Syst. Manag., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 549–563, 2020, doi: 10.3233/HSM-201060. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-201060
    7. A. Aliyo and A. Edin, “Assessment of safety requirements and their practices among teaching laboratories of health institutes,” Microbiol. Insights, vol. 16, pp. 4–9, 2023, doi: 10.1177/11786361231174414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/11786361231174414
    8. A. D. Ménard and J. F. Trant, “A review and critique of academic lab safety research,” Nat. Chem., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 17–25, 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41557-019-0375-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-019-0375-x
    9. T. Olewski and M. Snakard, “Challenges in applying process safety management at university laboratories,” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., vol. 49, pp. 209–214, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2017.06.013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2017.06.013
    10. A. Stuart, “A blended learning approach to safety training: Student experiences of safe work practices and safety culture,” Saf. Sci., vol. 62, pp. 409–417, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.005
    11. J. Robinson, T. Gershwin, and D. London, “Maintaining safety and facilitating inclusion: Using applied behavior analysis to address self-injurious behaviors within general education classrooms,” Beyond Behav., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 154–167, 2019, doi: 10.1177/1074295619870473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1074295619870473
    12. C. U. Madsen, M. L. Kirkegaard, J. Dyreborg, and P. Hasle, “Making occupational health and safety management systems ‘work’: A realist review of the OHSAS 18001 standard,” Saf. Sci., vol. 129, p. 104843, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104843. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104843
    13. M. Jaeger and D. Adair, “Time pressure in scenario-based online construction safety quizzes and its effect on students’ performance,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 241–251, 2017, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2016.1153042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2016.1153042
    14. M. Higgins, A. Ishimaru, R. Holcombe, and A. Fowler, “Examining organizational learning in schools: The role of psychological safety, experimentation, and leadership that reinforces learning,” J. Educ. Chang., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 67–94, 2012, doi: 10.1007/s10833-011-9167-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-011-9167-9
    15. I. K. Sudiana, I. W. Suja, I. D. K. Sastrawidana, and I. N. Sukarta, “Basic chemistry practicum handbook with occupational health and safety (K3) to prevent work accidents in laboratory: validity and feasibility,” J. Pendidik. dan Pengajaran, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 181–189, 2021, doi: 10.23887/jpp.v54i1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v54i1.31934
    16. B. Hui, L. Cui, R. Guo, M. Zhao, Y. Huang, and W. Chen, “Building an application-oriented pharmaceutical laboratory safety and ethics education system based on ehs principles: challenges and strategies,” J. Acad. Ethics, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1489–1498, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10805-025-09609-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09609-z
    17. F. Ricci, A. Chiesi, C. Bisio, C. Panari, and A. Pelosi, “Effectiveness of occupational health and safety training: A systematic review with meta-analysis,” J. Work. Learn., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 355–377, 2016, doi: 10.1108/JWL-11-2015-0087. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-11-2015-0087
    18. Z. Kamaruddin and Z. Isa, “The impacts of knowledge, attitude, awareness and organizational commitment on risk management effectiveness in laboratories.,” J. Pengur., vol. 69, 2023, doi: 10.17576/pengurusan-2023-69-04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17576/pengurusan-2023-69-04
    19. F. O. Ansah, H. D. Assem, T. A. Ossei-Anto, A. Acheampong, and M. Owusu, “Evaluating the availability and effectiveness of safety equipment in chemistry laboratories at public colleges of education in ghana,” Creat. Educ., vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 2224–2257, 2024, doi: 10.4236/ce.2024.1510136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2024.1510136
    20. A. U. C. Walters, W. Lawrence, and N. K. Jalsa, “Chemical laboratory safety awareness, attitudes and practices of tertiary students,” Saf. Sci., vol. 96, pp. 161–171, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.03.017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.03.017
    21. B. Caymaz, “Secondary school students’ knowledge and views on laboratory safety.,” J. Sci. Learn., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 220–229, 2021, doi: EJ1307053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v4i3.30752
    22. M. A. Dalvie, H.-A. Rother, and L. London, “Chemical hazard communication comprehensibility in South Africa: Safety implications for the adoption of the globally harmonised system of classification and labelling of chemicals,” Saf. Sci., vol. 61, pp. 51–58, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.07.013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.07.013
    23. Y. Mehrifar et al., “Safety culture and perception of warning signs of chemical hazards among hospital cleaning workers: a cross-sectional study,” BMC Public Health, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 817, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15726-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15726-4
    24. K. Ostad-Ali-Askari, “Management of risks substances and sustainable development,” Appl. Water Sci., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1–23, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s13201-021-01562-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-021-01562-7
    25. D. Pontigon and V. Talanquer, “Examining student engagement in the organic chemistry laboratory,” Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 780–793, 2025, doi: 10.1039/D5RP00063G. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D5RP00063G
    26. S. Nadar, J. C. Brown, L. S. Y. Coe, N. M. Koukoulidis, E. M. Czyż, and D. M. Czyż, “Antimicrobial resistance and One Health in the high school biology curriculum,” J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. e00145-25, 2025, doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00145-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00145-25
    27. K.-F. Chen, G.-J. Hwang, and M.-R. A. Chen, “Effects of a concept mapping-guided virtual laboratory learning approach on students’ science process skills and behavioral patterns,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 1623–1651, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11423-024-10348-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10348-y
    28. R. Papadopoli, C. G. A. Nobile, A. Trovato, C. Pileggi, and M. Pavia, “Chemical risk and safety awareness, perception, and practices among research laboratories workers in Italy,” J. Occup. Med. Toxicol., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 17, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s12995-020-00268-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-020-00268-x
    29. M. O. Faruque, “The effects of organizational commitment, knowledge, attitude, and awareness on risk management effectiveness in labs,” Educ. Adm. Theory Pract., vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 3100–3114, 2024, doi: 10.53555/kuey.v30i6.5842. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i6.5842
    30. H. Aldhamy, G. Maniatopoulos, V. L. McCune, I. Mansi, M. Althaqafy, and M. S. Pearce, “Knowledge, attitude and practice of infection prevention and control precautions among laboratory staff: a mixed-methods systematic review,” Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control, vol. 12, no. 57, pp. 1–14, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s13756-023-01257-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-023-01257-5
    31. F. Ghasemi, A. Doosti-Irani, and H. Aghaei, “Applications, shortcomings, and new advances of Job Safety Analysis (JSA): findings from a systematic review,” Saf. Health Work, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 153–162, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2023.03.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2023.03.006
    32. A. Pedro, H. C. Pham, J. U. Kim, and C. Park, “Development and evaluation of context-based assessment system for visualization-enhanced construction safety education,” Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 811–823, 2020, doi: 10.1080/10803548.2018.1553377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2018.1553377
    33. S.-J. Kwon, S.-W. Choi, and E.-B. Lee, “Hazard identification and risk assessment during simultaneous operations in industrial plant maintenance based on job safety analysis,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 21, p. 9277, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16219277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219277
    34. X. Chen, “Integrated multimethod analysis of miners’ safety behavior and risk interaction for practical applications,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 34722, 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-18454-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-18454-4
    35. N. Xia, X. Wang, M. A. Griffin, C. Wu, and B. Liu, “Do we see how they perceive risk? an integrated analysis of risk perception and its effect on workplace safety behavior,” Accid. Anal. Prev., vol. 106, pp. 234–242, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.06.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.06.010
    36. Y. Zhou and R. Jia, “Research on driving behavior risk identification and safety assessment methods based on artificial intelligence,” Artif. Intell. Mach. Learn. Rev., vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 1–15, 2025, doi: 10.69987/AIMLR.2025.60201.
    37. A. Yaqoob and T. Bibi, “Occupational health management and safety programs in public sector universities: mixed method research,” Res. J. Soc. Aff., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 161–182, 2025, doi: 10.71317/RJSA.003.04.0272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.71317/RJSA.003.04.0272
    38. A. Abdurrasyid, H. Geisfarad, R. A. Pamungkas, A. R. Yanti, D. Elnastio, and D. Wahyudin, “Air management in chemistry laboratories to prevent sick building syndrome ( sbs ): a mixed-method approach,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1047–1058, 2025, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i4.10799. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i4.10799
    39. A. Imran et al., “Health and safety risk analysis with jsa method (job safety analysis),” Int. J. Heal. Sci., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 143–149, 2023, doi: 10.59585/ijhs. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59585/ijhs.v1i2.66
    40. A. S. Ramadhani, F. Yanti, and S. M. Ulva, “Hazard potential analysis using job safety analysis at the mandala waluya university laboratory,” Miracle J. Public Heal., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 205–221, 2025, doi: 10.36566/mjph/Vol8.Iss2/483.
    41. A. Dehdashti, F. Fatemi, M. Jannati, F. Asadi, and M. B. Kangarloo, “Applying health , safety , and environmental risk assessment at academic settings,” BMC Public Health, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09419-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09419-5
    42. H. Henny, A. H. S. Budi, M. Andriyansyah, M. R. A. Rozzak, M. M. Baru, and A. Masek, “Hazard identification, risk assessment, and determining control (hiradc) for workplace safety in manufacturing industry: a risk-control framework compelete with bibliometric literature review analysis to support sustainable development goals (SDGs),” ASEAN J. Sci. Eng. Mater., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 267–284, 2025.
    43. K. Bhagwat and V. S. K. Delhi, “A systematic review of construction safety research: quantitative and qualitative content analysis approach,” Built Environ. Proj. Asset Manag., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 243–261, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1108/BEPAM-04-2021-0068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-04-2021-0068
    44. H. Yue, G. Ye, H. Cao, Q. Liu, Q. Xiang, and Y. Luo, “Exploring the internal influence mechanism of group safety behavior of construction workers: Qualitative method pproach,” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., vol. 150, no. 11, pp. 1–17, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-14851. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-14851
    45. M. Almansour and F. Almoayad, “Exploring challenges and perceptions in the learning environment: an online qualitative study of medical students,” BMC Med. Educ., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05116-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05116-8
    46. D. Peftitsis and A. Mavroudi, “Students perceptions on teaching design of power electronics using student-response systems: Thematic content analysis of interviews,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 64059–64071, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3183584
    47. Y. Lu, G. Zhou, J. Ewald, Z. Pang, T. Shiri, and J. Xia, “Microbiome analyst 2.0: Comprehensive statistical, functional and integrative analysis of microbiome data,” Nucleic Acids Res., vol. 51, no. W1, pp. W310–W318, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad407
    48. M. Kang, E. Ko, and T. B. Mersha, “A roadmap for multi-omics data integration using deep learning,” Brief. Bioinform., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2022, doi: 10.1093/bib/bbab454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbab454
    49. C. N. Lacerenza, S. K. Johnson, N. V. Schwatka, M. A. Beldon, and J. T. Dennerlein, “Team diversity as a safety asset: A field investigation of language diversity and occupational safety,” Hum. Resour. Manage., vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 695–711, May 2025, doi: 10.1002/hrm.22280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22280
    50. M. R. Permana, M. C. P. A. Islami, and T. Tranggono, “Analysis of the effect of management commitment, safety compliance and safety awareness on safety culture,” J. La Soc., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1267–1279, 2025, doi: 10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v6i4.1962. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v6i4.1962
    51. A. Y. Zhao, N. E. DeSousa, H. C. Henriksen, A. M. May, X. Tan, and D. S. Lawrence, “An assessment of laboratory safety training in undergraduate education,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 1626–1634, 2024, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c01299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c01299
    52. P. Chan, T. Van Gerven, J. L. Dubois, and K. Bernaerts, “Study of motivation and engagement for chemical laboratory safety training with VR serious game,” Saf. Sci., vol. 167, no. 106278, pp. 1–13, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106278
    53. S. L. Sonawane, V. J. Patil, and R. A. Tigaa, “Evaluating and Promoting Chemical Safety Awareness in the Chemical Sciences,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 469–478, 2023, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00102
    54. R. J. Khidhir and T. H. Rassul, “Assessing the validity of experts’ value judgment over research instruments,” ZANCO J. Humanit. Sci., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 324–343, 2023, doi: 10.21271/zjhs.27.5.21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21271/zjhs.27.5.21
    55. A. Roebianto, S. I. Savitri, I. Aulia, A. Suciyana, and L. Mubarokah, “Content validity: Definition and procedure of content validation in psychological research,” TPM - Testing, Psychom. Methodol. Appl. Psychol., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 5–18, 2023, doi: 10.4473/TPM30.1.1.
    56. L. Sun, D. Zeng, R. Xu, and L. Liu, “Effects of different safety training methods on students’ unsafe behavior in the laboratory,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 102, no. 5, pp. 1981–1990, May 2025, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01458
    57. M. Bai et al., “Current status, challenges, and future directions of university laboratory safety in China,” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., vol. 74, p. 104671, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104671
    58. O.-H. Kwon, G.-J. Sim, S.-H. Choi, and K.-Y. Kim, “Essential safety sheet in university hospital and healthcare laboratories: A comprehensive evaluation sttdy with longitudinal impact analysis,” Healthcare, vol. 13, no. 2975, pp. 1–20, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.3390/healthcare13222975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13222975
    59. C. A. Emektar and H. Yamak, “Knowledge levels and safety culture of science center instructors in laboratories: An analytical study from Türkiye,” Bull. Educ. Stud., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 81–95, 2025, doi: 10.61326/bes.v4i2.437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61326/bes.v4i2.437
    60. G. Kotronoulas et al., “An overview of the fundamentals of data management, analysis, and interpretation in quantitative research,” Semin. Oncol. Nurs., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 1–9, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2023.151398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2023.151398
    61. A. M. Vieriu and G. Petrea, “The impact of artificial intelligence on students’ learning experience,” Educ. Sci., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1–12, 2025, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-71526-6_7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030343
    62. A. S. Ramadhani, F. Yanti, and S. M. Ulva, “Hazard potential analysis using job safety analysis at the Mandala Waluya University Laboratory,” Miracle J. Public Heal., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 205–221, 2025, doi: 10.36566/mjph/Vol8.Iss2/483.
    63. F. N. C. Rotinsulu, A. K. Torry Dundu, G. Y. Malingkas, M. R. I. A. Mondoringin, and A. H. Thambas, “Risk potential analysis using hazard identication, risk assessment and determine control (HIRADC) and job safety analysis (JSA) methods,” Asian J. Eng. Soc. Heal., vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 1133–1141, 2023, doi: 10.46799/ajesh.v2i10.147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46799/ajesh.v2i10.147
    64. E. Tziakou, A. G. Fragkaki, and A. Ν. Platis, “Identifying risk management challenges in laboratories,” Accredit. Qual. Assur., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 167–179, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00769-023-01540-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-023-01540-3
    65. S. Ezenwa et al., “Toward improved safety culture in academic and industrial chemical laboratories: An assessment and recommendation of best practices,” ACS Chem. Heal. Saf., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 202–213, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1021/acs.chas.1c00064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chas.1c00064
    66. M. A. Adeoye, “Mastering the basics: A guide to research methodology for effective writing and publication,” Chalim J. Teach. Learn., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 30–41, 2024, doi: 10.31538/cjotl.v4i1.1345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31538/cjotl.v4i1.1345
    67. E. Lorenzini, S. P. Osorio-Galeano, C. R. Schmidt, and W. Cañon-Montañez, “Practical guide to achieve rigor and data integration in mixed methods research,” Investig. y Educ. en Enfermería, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 1–17, 2024, doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v42n3e02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v42n3e02
    68. N. R. Mishra, “Constructivist approach to learning: An analysis of pedagogical models of social constructivist learning theory,” J. Res. Dev., vol. 6, no. 01, pp. 22–29, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.3126/jrdn.v6i01.55227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/jrdn.v6i01.55227
    69. A. Nurhuda, M. F. Al Khoiron, Y. S. Azami, and S. J. Ni’mah, “Constructivism learning theory in education: Characteristics,” Res. Educ. Rehabil., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 234–242, 2023, doi: 10.51558/2744-1555.2023.6.2.234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51558/2744-1555.2023.6.2.234
    70. M. J. Burke, “Learning Theories and Safety Training,” 2025, pp. 61–90. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-91926-8_3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-91926-8_3
    71. M. Heydari, G. Heravi, R. Raeisinafchi, and H. Karimi, “A dynamic model to assess the role of site supervision systems in the safety performance of construction projects,” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., vol. 150, no. 3, pp. 1–15, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13810
    72. M. Jabbari, Y. Yousefpour, M. Ghaffari, and A. Shokuhian, “Evaluation of effectiveness of risk-based comprehensive safety training planning in the gas pipeline construction industry,” Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 2468–2481, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1080/10803548.2021.2002584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2021.2002584
    73. S. Mixafenti, A. Karagkouni, and D. Dimitriou, “Integrating business ethics into occupational health and safety: An evaluation framework for sustainable risk management,” Sustain., vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1–24, 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17104370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104370
    74. A. C. Mendieta, J. C. Obijiaku, M. Wengert, and T. M. Lutz-Rechtin, “Enhancing lab safety culture through student engagement with active learning events and cross-functional collaboration,” in 2025 ASEE Midwest Section Conference Enhancing, 2025, pp. 1–11. doi: 10.18260/1-2-1153-57828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-1153-57828
    75. M. G. Ribeiro and F. de Freitas Ventura, “Improving laboratory chemical safety practices through participatory workshops,” ACS Chem. Heal. Saf., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 73–81, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.1021/acs.chas.5c00144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chas.5c00144
    76. J. A. Oppon, B. B. Akomah, D. E. Hagan, C. K. Tieru, and K. Koufie, “Organizational culture and its impact on employees’ safety,” Constr. Econ. Build., vol. 25, no. 3/4, pp. 121–142, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.5130/AJCEB.v25i3/4.9201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v25i3/4.9201
    77. K. N. Key, P. T. Hu, I. Choi, and D. J. Schroeder, “Safety culture assessment and continuous improvement in aviation: A literature review,” Fed. Aviat. Adm., no. May, p. 74, 2023.