SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

11

H-Index

Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Indonesia (JPAII)

an Open Access Journal

Generative AI-Assisted Learning in Islamic Religious Education: Its Effects on Students’ Critical Religious Thinking and Learning Autonomy

Hapiz
Universitas Islam Yasni Bungo ROR
Indonesia
hapiz@iaiyasnibungo.ac.id
Mawaddah
Universitas Islam Yasni Bungo ROR
Indonesia
Titi Sartini
Universitas Islam Yasni Bungo ROR
Indonesia
Marifatul Adawiyah
Universitas Islam Mamba'ul Ulum Jambi
Indonesia
Irham. M
STIT Al-Falah Rimbo Bujang
Indonesia
Nuraina
STIT Al-Falah Rimbo Bujang
Indonesia
Share

  • Purpose of the study: Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is increasingly integrated into educational practices, yet its use in Islamic Religious Education (IRE) raises concerns regarding students’ critical evaluation of religious information and independent learning. This study examined the effect of structured GenAI-assisted learning on students’ critical religious thinking and learning autonomy.

    Methodology: A quantitative quasi-experimental pretest-posttest control-group design involved 60 third-semester students in the Islamic Religious Education program at Universitas Islam Yasni Bungo, comprising 30 students in the experimental group and 30 in the control group. The experimental group participated in an eight-session GenAI-assisted intervention involving problem identification, initial reasoning, ChatGPT-supported inquiry, critical evaluation of AI-generated responses, religious-source verification, independent argument construction, reflection, and integrated case discussion. The control group received conventional lecturer- and textbook-guided inquiry.

    Main Findings: The experimental group showed greater improvement in critical religious thinking (64.10 to 71.60) and learning autonomy (109.10 to 118.70) than the control group. ANCOVA revealed statistically significant group effects on critical religious thinking, F(1,57) = 87.22, p < .001, partial η² = .605, and learning autonomy, F(1,57) = 134.57, p < .001, partial η² = .702. These findings indicate that structured GenAI-assisted learning was associated with improved critical religious thinking and learning autonomy when integrated with reasoning, critical evaluation, religious-source verification, independent argumentation, and reflection.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study introduces a structured GenAI-assisted learning framework that positions ChatGPT as cognitive scaffolding rather than cognitive substitution in Islamic Religious Education. Its novelty lies in integrating initial reasoning, AI-supported inquiry, critical evaluation, religious-source verification, independent argument construction, and reflection within one intervention, while empirically examining its effects on both critical religious thinking and learning autonomy.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “Generative AI-Assisted Learning in Islamic Religious Education: Its Effects on Students’ Critical Religious Thinking and Learning Autonomy”, J. Pend. A. Isl. Ind, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 256–265, Oct. 2026, doi: 10.37251/jpaii.v7i5.3863.

    More Citation Formats

  • 0
    Abstract views
    0
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. [1] K. Dai, Y. Liu, and X. Zhang, “Generative AI in higher education: A bibliometric review of emerging trends, power dynamics, and global research landscapes,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 10, p. 100544, Jun. 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100544.
    2. [2] A. Abroto, M. Maemonah, and I. Machali, “Mapping artificial intelligence research in primary education: a bibliometric study,” Discov Educ, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 824, Sep. 2026, doi: 10.1007/s44217-026-02012-9.
    3. [3] S. AlBlooshi, “Artificial intelligence in higher education, opportunities, and challenges: a review,” Front. Educ., vol. 10, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1683968.
    4. [4] N. R. Nasr, C.-H. Tu, L. Sujo-Montes, S. Haniya, C.-J. Yen, and S. Hossain, “Generative artificial intelligence impact on critical thinking in higher education: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis and systematic review,” J. Comput. Educ., Jun. 2026, doi: 10.1007/s40692-026-00396-z.
    5. [5] R. A. E. Gabay, A. A. Funa, and J. D. Ricafort, “Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) for Academic Writing in Higher Education: A Scoping Review of Applications, Challenges, and Implications,” International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 200–232, 2026.
    6. [6] R. Deng, M. Jiang, X. Yu, Y. Lu, and S. Liu, “Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies,” Computers & Education, vol. 227, p. 105224, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105224.
    7. [7] Y. Jin and L. Sercu, “ChatGPT Interventions in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Experimental Studies,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 41, no. 4, p. e70072, 2025, doi: 10.1111/jcal.70072.
    8. [8] A. Musthopa, H. Bayanillah, H. Firmansyah, A. Zuhri, Z. Saidah, and S. M. Munjiat, “Islamic Religious Education as a Spiritual Coping System: Enhancing Adolescents’ Mental and Emotional Well-Being in a Vocational School Context,” J-PAI: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, vol. 12, no. 2, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.18860/jpai.v12i2.39189.
    9. [9] I. Dergaa et al., “ChatGPT is not ready yet for use in providing mental health assessment and interventions,” Front. Psychiatry, vol. 14, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1277756.
    10. [10] E. Sumiati, Sutrisno, Sibawaihi, and M. Tekke, “Transformation of Islamic Higher Education: Policy Strategy, Challenges, and Opportunities,” Al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1399–1417, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.35723/ajie.v8i4.46.
    11. [11] F. Syukur, A. Maghfurin, U. Marhamah, and P. Jehwae, “Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Islamic Higher Education: Comparative Responses between Indonesia and Thailand,” Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 531–553, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.31538/nzh.v7i3.13.
    12. [12] N. A. Sofa, A. Kunaepi, and Nasikhin, “The Use of Chatgpt in Improving the Critical Thinking Skills of Islamic Education Graduates in Islamic Universities,” Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, vol. 11, no. 02, pp. 135–149, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.19109/6cdck053.
    13. [13] Helmiatin, A. Hidayat, and M. R. Kahar, “Investigating the adoption of AI in higher education: a study of public universities in Indonesia,” Cogent Education, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 2380175, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2024.2380175.
    14. [14] M. S. Abubakari, G. A. N. Zakaria, D. Yusmaliana, A. Zaldi, J. Musa, and M. M. Taruna, “Pedagogical Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Islamic Religious Education: A Comprehensive Review,” in Ethical, Legal, and Pedagogical Perspectives on AI in Education, IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2026, pp. 239–276. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3373-3000-6.ch009.
    15. [15] S. T. Jarmer, “Critique of religion and critical thinking in religious education,” British Journal of Religious Education, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 253–267, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1080/01416200.2024.2403400.
    16. [16] R. Aulia, S. Suryanih, Aproni, S. A. Fatahuddin, and Jupri, “A Conceptual Framework for Digital-Ethical Literacy and Social Responsibility in Islamic Religious Education in the Generative AI Era,” Journal of Deep Learning, Computer Vision and Digital Image Processing, pp. 309–323, Jun. 2026, doi: 10.61255/decoding.v4i2.1551.
    17. [17] L. Qi, X. Xu, Y. Wu, F. Wang, and W. Wei, “Investigating AI competence among Chinese secondary school teachers: Insights from the UNESCO framework,” Acta Psychologica, vol. 267, p. 107053, Jul. 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107053.
    18. [18] J. Wang, W. C. H. Hong, X. Xu, Y. Zhang, and Y. Yin, “Exploring AI competency in Chinese undergraduates through the UNESCO framework,” Acta Psychologica, vol. 263, p. 106299, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106299.
    19. [19] T. K. F. Chiu and P. ‘asher’ Rospigliosi, “Six global frameworks for human-centred AI literacy and competency: comparative analysis and a way forward,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 1003–1005, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2026.2648342.
    20. [20] A. Okada, T. Sherborne, G. Panselinas, and G. Kolionis, “Fostering Transversal Skills Through Open Schooling Supported by the CARE-KNOW-DO Pedagogical Model and the UNESCO AI Competencies Framework,” Int J Artif Intell Educ, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 1953–1998, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s40593-025-00458-w.
    21. [21] R. Meylani, G. Bitter, and J. Legacy, “Impacts Of Professional Development And Implementation Fidelity On Online Middle School Mathematics: A Quasi-Experimental Quantitative Study,” TOJDE, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 90–119, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.17718/tojde.1484344.
    22. [22] T.-C. Yang, Y.-C. Hsu, and J.-Y. Wu, “The effectiveness of ChatGPT in assisting high school students in programming learning: evidence from a quasi-experimental research,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 3726–3743, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2025.2450659.
    23. [23] R. S. Robinson, “Purposive Sampling,” in Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, Springer, Cham, 2023, pp. 5645–5647. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_2337.
    24. [24] H.-Y. Lee, P.-H. Chen, W.-S. Wang, Y.-M. Huang, and T.-T. Wu, “Empowering ChatGPT with guidance mechanism in blended learning: effect of self-regulated learning, higher-order thinking skills, and knowledge construction,” Int J Educ Technol High Educ, vol. 21, no. 1, p. 16, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1186/s41239-024-00447-4.
    25. [25] W.-S. Wang, C.-J. Lin, H.-Y. Lee, Y.-M. Huang, and T.-T. Wu, “Enhancing self-regulated learning and higher-order thinking skills in virtual reality: the impact of ChatGPT-integrated feedback aids,” Educ Inf Technol, vol. 30, no. 14, pp. 19419–19445, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10639-025-13557-x.
    26. [26] I. Jahan, S. Kamruzzaman, K. M. N. Hossen, N. Nurain, and A. B. M. A. A. Islam, “From Mind Mapping to Dream Interpretation: Understanding Muslim Users’ Engagement with GenAI Tools in Religious Context,” in Human-Computer Interaction, M. Kurosu and A. Hashizume, Eds., Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2026, pp. 353–372. doi: 10.1007/978-3-032-29586-6_23.
    27. [27] G. D. O. Lima, J. A. R. Costa, F. A. Dorça, and R. D. Araújo, “An AI-Supported Pedagogical Architecture to Foster Self-Regulated Learning in Virtual Environments,” Computer Applications in Engineering Education, vol. 34, no. 1, p. e70118, 2026, doi: 10.1002/cae.70118.
    28. [28] R. D. Romdhoni, R. Arrasyid, S. Widodo, and U. Elviani, “AI-Driven Learning Analytics for Self-Regulated and Metacognitive Learning: A Systematic Review,” Intellect : Indonesian Journal of Learning and Technological Innovation, vol. 4, no. 02, pp. 329–347, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.57255/intellect.v4i02.1657.
    29. [29] M. Javaid, A. Haleem, R. P. Singh, S. Khan, and I. H. Khan, “Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT Tool towards ameliorating the education system,” BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 100115, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100115.
    30. [30] H.-Y. Lee, P.-H. Chen, Y.-M. Huang, and T.-T. Wu, “From Immediate Answers to Structured Inquiry: A Socratic Method-Enhanced ChatGPT System for Blended Learning Discussions,” Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 1254–1293, Jul. 2026, doi: 10.1177/07356331261429306.
    31. [31] L. M. Oliva-Córdova, I. Álvarez-Icaza, and C. E. George-Reyes, “Evaluation of Generative AI Use to Foster Critical Thinking in Higher Education,” IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, vol. 20, pp. 237–243, 2025, doi: 10.1109/RITA.2025.3597848.