SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

11

H-Index

Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Indonesia (JPAII)

an Open Access Journal

Al-Amtsāl as a Cognitive Bridge for Understanding Faith in Angels Among Elementary School Students

Awan Setiawan
Institut Agama Islam PERSIS Garut
Indonesia
awansetiawan25@iaipersisgarut.ac.id
Ridwan
Institut Agama Islam PERSIS Garut
Indonesia
Lia Marliana
Institut Agama Islam PERSIS Garut
Indonesia
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to analyze the use of al-amtsāl in teaching faith in angels at the elementary school level and to explain its role as a cognitive mediation mechanism that supports students’ understanding of unseen concepts in Islamic creed learning.
    Methodology: This study employed a qualitative approach using a case study design conducted at SDN Binakarya 1 Banyuresmi Garut, Indonesia. Participants included elementary school teachers and students. Data were collected through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis. The collected data were coded and analyzed using thematic analysis techniques to identify recurring patterns and categories.
    Main Findings: The findings reveal that teachers employed al-amtsāl through existential, functional, and visual analogies to connect the concept of angels with students’ concrete experiences. These analogies facilitated cognitive mediation by linking prior knowledge with unseen concepts, enabling students to construct meaning through experience-based understanding and analogical reasoning. The findings also indicate that this approach improved students’ comprehension of abstract theological concepts in aqidah learning contexts.
    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study proposes an al-amtsāl-based pedagogy model for teaching unseen concepts in Islamic education. It advances Qur’anic pedagogy literature by conceptualizing al-amtsāl as a cognitive bridge that mediates students’ understanding of abstract theological concepts through experience-based analogical learning. The model provides a practical framework for integrating cognitive and theological dimensions in elementary Islamic education.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “Al-Amtsāl as a Cognitive Bridge for Understanding Faith in Angels Among Elementary School Students”, J. Pend. A. Isl. Ind, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 151–159, Jun. 2026, doi: 10.37251/jpaii.v7i3.3467.

    More Citation Formats

  • 0
    Abstract views
    0
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. [1] U. S. Al-Asyqar, Alam al-Mala’ikah al-Abrar. Amman, Jordan: Dar al-Nafais, 2005.
    2. [2] S. M. N. Al-Attas, Prolegomena to the Metaphysics of Islam: An Exposition of the Fundamental Elements of the Worldview of Islam. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC), 1995.
    3. [3] J. Piaget, Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child. New York, NY: Orion Press, 1970.
    4. [4] C. T. Fosnot, Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives, and Practice, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, 2013.
    5. [5] L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.
    6. [6] G. J. Posner, K. A. Strike, P. W. Hewson, and W. A. Gertzog, “Accommodation of a Scientific Conception: Toward a Theory of Conceptual Change,” Sci. Educ., vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 211–227, 1982, doi: 10.1002/sce.3730660207.
    7. [7] M. T. H. Chi, “Translating the Mental Model of Conceptual Change Into a Learning Progression Framework,” Hum. Dev., vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 5–26, 2020, doi: 10.1159/000511153.
    8. [8] S. Vosniadou, “Capturing and Modeling the Process of Conceptual Change,” Learn. Instr., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 45–69, 1994, doi: 10.1016/0959-4752(94)90018-3.
    9. [9] D. H. Jonassen, J. Strobel, and C. B. Gottdenker, “Model Building for Conceptual Change,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 13, no. 1–2, pp. 15–37, 2005, doi: 10.1080/10494820500173287.
    10. [10] N. Epley, A. Waytz, and J. T. Cacioppo, “On Seeing Human: A Three-Factor Theory of Anthropomorphism,” Psychol. Rev., vol. 114, no. 4, pp. 864–886, 2007, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864.
    11. [11] S. E. Guthrie, Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1993.
    12. [12] M. E. Gray and K. J. Holyoak, “Teaching by Analogy: From Theory to Practice,” Mind, Brain, and Education, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 250–263, 2021, doi: 10.1111/mbe.12288.
    13. [13] M. S. Vendetti, B. J. Matlen, L. E. Richland, and S. A. Bunge, “Analogical Reasoning in the Classroom: Insights from Cognitive Science,” Mind, Brain, and Education, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 100–106, 2015.
    14. [14] L. E. Richland and N. Simms, “Analogy, Higher Order Thinking, and Education,” WIREs Cognitive Science, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 177–192, 2015, doi: 10.1002/wcs.1336.
    15. [15] D. Gentner and A. B. Markman, “Structure Mapping in Analogy and Similarity,” American Psychologist, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 45–56, 1997, doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.1.45.
    16. [16] D. Gentner, “Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy,” Cogn. Sci., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 155–170, 1983, doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3.
    17. [17] L. E. Richland and K. N. Begolli, “Analogy and Higher-Order Thinking: Learning Mathematics as an Example,” Policy Insights Behav. Brain Sci., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 160–168, 2016, doi: 10.1177/2372732216652968.
    18. [18] M. S. Vendetti and L. E. Richland, “Relational Reasoning in Education: The Promise of Cognitive Science for Teaching and Learning,” NPJ Sci. Learn., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2017, doi: 10.1038/s41539-017-0002-z.
    19. [19] S. Eriksson, “Analogy Competence for Science Teachers,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2024, doi: 10.1080/03057267.2024.2434797.
    20. [20] K. F. Guarino and S. Goldin-Meadow, “Teaching Analogical Reasoning With Co-Speech Gesture Shows Children Where to Look, but Only Boosts Learning for Some,” Front. Psychol., vol. 11, p. 575628, 2020, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575628.
    21. [21] M. K. Al-Qattan, Mabahith fi Ulum al-Qur’an. Cairo, Egypt: Maktabah Wahbah, 2013.
    22. [22] A. An-Nahlawi, Ushul al-Tarbiyah al-Islamiyah wa Asalibuha fi al-Bayt wa al-Madrasah wa al-Mujtama. Damascus, Syria: Dar al-Fikr, 1995.
    23. [23] T. Haryati, Syahidin, and E. Suresman, “Model Pembelajaran Amtsal dan Implikasinya dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam,” ZAD Al-Mufassirin, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 18–37, 2023, doi: 10.55759/zam.v5i1.67.
    24. [24] Subur, “Media for Education Moral Value Based on Metaphor (Matsal),” IQRO: Journal of Islamic Education, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2021.
    25. [25] F. Fazar, F. F. Ilyasa, R. Permana, Syahidin, and A. Muflih, “Development of SYAM (Synectic-Amtsal) Model in Islamic Religious Education Learning at SMPN 1 Margahayu,” Tadris: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 210–230, 2024.
    26. [26] M. Arif and M. K. N. Abd Aziz, “Islamic Religious Education Learning Model in the 21st Century: A Systematic Literature Review,” International Journal of Islamic Education Studies, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 310–328, 2023, doi: 10.33367/ijies.v6i2.4417.
    27. [27] R. Freathy and J. Doney, “The RE-Searchers Approach: An Exposition of Methodologically Oriented Religious Education Through Metaphor, Analogy and Allegory,” British Journal of Religious Education, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2025, doi: 10.1080/01416200.2025.2508494.
    28. [28] M. L. Hakim, “Amtsal dalam Al-Qur’an Perspektif Pendidikan Islam,” AL-AFKAR: Journal for Islamic Studies, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 192–206, 2025.
    29. [29] J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2018.
    30. [30] R. K. Yin, Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2018.
    31. [31] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2015.
    32. [32] N. K. Denzin, The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. New York, NY: Routledge, 2017.
    33. [33] V. Braun and V. Clarke, Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. London, UK: SAGE, 2021.
    34. [34] L. E. Richland and H. Zhao, “Relational Reasoning and Educational Applications,” Behavioral Sciences, vol. 16, no. 2, p. 210, 2026, doi: 10.3390/bs16020210.