SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

11

H-Index

Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Indonesia (JPAII)

an Open Access Journal

Al-Amtsāl as a Cognitive Bridge for Understanding Faith in Angels Among Elementary School Students

Awan Setiawan
Institut Agama Islam PERSIS Garut
Indonesia
awansetiawan25@iaipersisgarut.ac.id
Ridwan
Institut Agama Islam PERSIS Garut
Indonesia
Lia Marliana
Institut Agama Islam PERSIS Garut
Indonesia
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to analyze the use of al-amtsāl in teaching faith in angels at the elementary school level and to explain its role as a cognitive mediation mechanism that supports students’ understanding of unseen concepts in Islamic creed learning.

    Methodology: This study employed a qualitative approach using a case study design conducted at SDN Binakarya 1 Banyuresmi Garut, Indonesia. Participants included elementary school teachers and students. Data were collected through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis. The collected data were coded and analyzed using thematic analysis techniques to identify recurring patterns and categories.

    Main Findings: The findings reveal that teachers employed al-amtsāl through existential, functional, and visual analogies to connect the concept of angels with students’ concrete experiences. These analogies facilitated cognitive mediation by linking prior knowledge with unseen concepts, enabling students to construct meaning through experience-based understanding and analogical reasoning. The findings also indicate that this approach improved students’ comprehension of abstract theological concepts in aqidah learning contexts.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study offers an initial conceptualization of an al-amtsāl-based pedagogical model for teaching unseen concepts in Islamic education, derived from an elementary school case study. It contributes to the literature on Qur’anic pedagogy by positioning al-amtsāl as a cognitive bridge that mediates students’ understanding of abstract theological concepts through experience-based analogical learning. The findings provide preliminary insights into integrating cognitive and theological dimensions in elementary Islamic education.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “Al-Amtsāl as a Cognitive Bridge for Understanding Faith in Angels Among Elementary School Students”, J. Pend. A. Isl. Ind, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 151–159, Jun. 2026, doi: 10.37251/jpaii.v7i3.3467.

    More Citation Formats

  • 40
    Abstract views
    18
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. [1] U. S. Al-Asyqar, Alam al-Mala’ikah al-Abrar. Amman, Jordan: Dar al-Nafais, 2005.
    2. [2] S. M. N. Al-Attas, Prolegomena to the metaphysics of islam: An exposition of the fundamental elements of the worldview of islam. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC), 1995.
    3. [3] J. Piaget, Science of education and the psychology of the child. New York, NY: Orion Press, 1970.
    4. [4] C. T. Fosnot, Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, 2013.
    5. [5] L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.
    6. [6] G. J. Posner, K. A. Strike, P. W. Hewson, and W. A. Gertzog, “Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change,” Sci. Educ., vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 211–227, 1982, doi: 10.1002/sce.3730660207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207
    7. [7] M. T. H. Chi, “Translating the mental model of conceptual change into a learning progression framework,” Hum. Dev., vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 5–26, 2020, doi: 10.1159/000511153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000511153
    8. [8] S. Vosniadou, “Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change,” Learn. Instr., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 45–69, 1994, doi: 10.1016/0959-4752(94)90018-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90018-3
    9. [9] D. H. Jonassen, J. Strobel, and C. B. Gottdenker, “Model building for conceptual change,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 13, no. 1–2, pp. 15–37, 2005, doi: 10.1080/10494820500173287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820500173292
    10. [10] N. Epley, A. Waytz, and J. T. Cacioppo, “On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism,” Psychol. Rev., vol. 114, no. 4, pp. 864–886, 2007, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864
    11. [11] S. E. Guthrie, Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195069013.002.0003
    12. [12] M. E. Gray and K. J. Holyoak, “Teaching by analogy: From theory to practice,” Mind, Brain, and Education, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 250–263, 2021, doi: 10.1111/mbe.12288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12288
    13. [13] M. S. Vendetti, B. J. Matlen, L. E. Richland, and S. A. Bunge, “Analogical reasoning in the classroom: Insights from cognitive science,” Mind, Brain, and Education, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 100–106, 2015.
    14. [14] L. E. Richland and N. Simms, “Analogy, higher order thinking, and education,” WIREs Cognitive Science, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 177–192, 2015, doi: 10.1002/wcs.1336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1336
    15. [15] D. Gentner and A. B. Markman, “Structure mapping in analogy and similarity,” American Psychologist, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 45–56, 1997, doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.1.45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.1.45
    16. [16] D. Gentner, “Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy,” Cogn. Sci., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 155–170, 1983, doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(83)80009-3
    17. [17] L. E. Richland and K. N. Begolli, “Analogy and higher-order thinking: Learning mathematics as an example,” Policy Insights Behav. Brain Sci., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 160–168, 2016, doi: 10.1177/2372732216652968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732216629795
    18. [18] M. S. Vendetti and L. E. Richland, “Relational reasoning in education: The promise of cognitive science for teaching and learning,” NPJ Sci. Learn., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2017, doi: 10.1038/s41539-017-0002-z.
    19. [19] S. Eriksson, “Analogy competence for science teachers,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2024, doi: 10.1080/03057267.2024.2434797. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2024.2434797
    20. [20] K. F. Guarino and S. Goldin-Meadow, “Teaching analogical reasoning with co-speech gesture shows children where to look, but only boosts learning for some,” Front. Psychol., vol. 11, p. 575628, 2020, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575628
    21. [21] M. K. Al-Qattan, Mabahith fi Ulum al-Qur’an. Cairo, Egypt: Maktabah Wahbah, 2013.
    22. [22] A. An-Nahlawi, Ushul al-Tarbiyah al-Islamiyah wa Asalibuha fi al-Bayt wa al-Madrasah wa al-Mujtama. Damascus, Syria: Dar al-Fikr, 1995.
    23. [23] T. Haryati, Syahidin, and E. Suresman, “Model amtsal learning and its implications in Islamic religious education learning,” ZAD Al-Mufassirin, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 18–37, 2023, doi: 10.55759/zam.v5i1.67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55759/zam.v5i1.67
    24. [24] Subur, “Media for education moral value based on metaphor (Matsal),” IQRO: Journal of Islamic Education, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24256/iqro.v4i1.1820
    25. [25] F. Fazar, F. F. Ilyasa, R. Permana, Syahidin, and A. Muflih, “Development of SYAM (Synectic-Amtsal) model in islamic religious education learning at SMPN 1 Margahayu,” Tadris: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 210–230, 2024.
    26. [26] M. Arif and M. K. N. Abd Aziz, “Islamic religious education learning model in the 21st century: A systematic literature review,” International Journal of Islamic Education Studies, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 310–328, 2023, doi: 10.33367/ijies.v6i2.4417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33367/ijies.v6i2.4417
    27. [27] R. Freathy and J. Doney, “The re-searchers approach: An exposition of methodologically oriented religious education through metaphor, analogy and allegory,” British Journal of Religious Education, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2025, doi: 10.1080/01416200.2025.2508494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2025.2508494
    28. [28] M. L. Hakim, “Amtsal in the Qur'an from the perspective of islamic education,” AL-AFKAR: Journal for Islamic Studies, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 192–206, 2025.
    29. [29] J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2018.
    30. [30] R. K. Yin, Case study research and applications: Design and methods, 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2018.
    31. [31] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research & evaluation methods, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2015.
    32. [32] N. K. Denzin, The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York, NY: Routledge, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134543
    33. [33] V. Braun and V. Clarke, Thematic analysis: A practical guide. London, UK: SAGE, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036232078.n9
    34. [34] L. E. Richland and H. Zhao, “Relational reasoning and educational applications,” Behavioral Sciences, vol. 16, no. 2, p. 210, 2026, doi: 10.3390/bs16020210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16020210
    35. [35] D. Syalawaty, A. Aldi, T. Tanti, W. Utami, and D. Deliza, “Mosques and literacy reading of the Quran: Empowering mosques as educational centers during covid-19 outbreak,” J. Qual. Assur. Islam. Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 73–84, 2021, doi: 10.47945/jqaie.v1i2.433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47945/jqaie.v1i2.433
    36. [36] Maison, Syahrial, Syamsurizal, and Tanti, “Learning environment, students’ beliefs, and self-regulation in learning physics: Structural equation modeling,” J. Balt. Sci. Educ., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 389–403, 2019, doi: 10.33225/jbse/19.18.389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.389
    37. [37] A. R. Saidek, Tanti, F. Anwar, and T. Rahman, “Reorientation of the Islamic religious education curriculum through a humanistic approach and social reconstruction in the global era,” At-Ta’lim J. Kaji. Pendidik. Agama, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 18–39, 2026, [Online]. Available: https://www.preventionweb.net/news/preliminary-report-february-6-2023-earthquakes-turkiye