SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

11

H-Index

Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Indonesia (JPAII)

an Open Access Journal

Active, Creative, Effective, and Enjoyable Learning (PAKEM) with the Utilization of Smart TV to Realize Interactive Islamic Education Learning

Muthia Arin Shafa
UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya ROR
Indonesia
muthiaarinshafa@gmail.com
Muhammad Muzzammil Akbar
UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya ROR
Indonesia
Muhammad Adil Amrullah
UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya ROR
Indonesia
Zaini Tamim AR
UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya ROR
Indonesia
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to analyze the implementation of the Active, Creative, Effective, and Enjoyable Learning (PAKEM) approach integrated with Smart TV technology to create an interactive, collaborative, and student-centered Islamic Religious Education (PAI) learning environment.

    Methodology: This study employed a qualitative descriptive research design using a literature review approach. Data were collected from reputable scientific journal articles indexed in SINTA and published between 2016–2026. The study utilized content analysis, thematic data reduction, theoretical categorization based on the TPACK framework, source triangulation, and theoretical synthesis techniques.

    Main Findings: The findings indicate that Smart TV functions as a multisensory instructional center that transforms abstract Islamic concepts into dynamic visual and audio learning experiences. The PAKEM approach promotes active participation, collaboration, critical thinking, and student engagement. The integration of Smart TV and PAKEM creates an interactive digital learning ecosystem, enhances motivation, supports real-time feedback, and strengthens meaningful spiritual reflection in Islamic Religious Education.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: The novelty of this study lies in the theoretical integration of the TPACK framework with the PAKEM approach and Smart TV technology specifically for Islamic Religious Education. It introduces a digital interactive classroom ecosystem that combines pedagogical strategies and interactive screen technology, providing a new model for enhancing student engagement, collaboration, and meaningful religious learning experiences.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “Active, Creative, Effective, and Enjoyable Learning (PAKEM) with the Utilization of Smart TV to Realize Interactive Islamic Education Learning”, J. Pend. A. Isl. Ind, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 118–125, Jun. 2026, doi: 10.37251/jpaii.v7i3.3379.

    More Citation Formats

  • 99
    Abstract views
    33
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. [1] S. Aisyah, “Utilization of smart TV in increasing interest and attention in learning Islamic Religious Education,” Jurnal Kemandirian Instruksional, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 140–152, 2021.
    2. [2] D. Anggraini, R. Wijaya, and S. Aminah, “Interactive digital media and the formation of collaborative classroom learning spaces in modern classes,” Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pembelajaran, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 45–59, 2023.
    3. [3] B. Anugrah, “The urgency of 21st century skills in the dynamics of Indonesian education,” Jurnal Pedagogi dan Pembelajaran, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 290–303, 2020.
    4. [4] Z. Arifin, “Measuring students’ physical and mental engagement in a student-centered learning ecosystem,” Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan Islam, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 198–212, 2023.
    5. [5] APJII, “Survey on internet penetration among adolescents and digital screen-based learning preferences in Indonesia,” Annual Report, 2024.
    6. [6] M. Daheri, I. Warsah, and A. Hasan, “Problems of verbalism and textual memorization in Christian and Islamic education learning,” Jurnal Studi Agama dan Pembelajaran, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 89–104, 2022.
    7. [7] A. Fauzi, “Reducing learning boredom through innovative visual media based on smart screens,” Jurnal Kreativitas Instruksional, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 165–179, 2023.
    8. [8] A. Hamid, N. Kusuma, and M. Riza, “The gap between digital technology dynamics and conventional learning practices,” Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 210–225, 2023.
    9. [9] M. Hamka, “Interactive screens in classrooms: transformation of multi-directional communication,” Jurnal Komunikasi Pendidikan, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 56–70, 2022.
    10. [10] N. Hidayat and A. Prasetyo, “Utilization of Android smart TV as a multimedia instructional nexus,” Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Kesejahteraan, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 312–326, 2023.
    11. [11] N. Hidayat, “Digitalization of Islamic content: strategies to shift monotonous Islamic education media based on animation,” Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 178–191, 2022.
    12. [12] M. J. Koehler and P. Mishra, “What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?,” Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 60–70, 2009.
    13. [13] D. Kurniawan, “The effect of instant feedback in interactive assessment media on student self-efficacy,” Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 112–126, 2024.
    14. [14] A. H. Maslow, Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper & Row, 1970.
    15. [15] “Integrative RPP based on strengthening digital technology aspects,” Jurnal Pendidikan Modern, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 45–58, 2024.
    16. [16] Muhaimin, Development of Islamic Education Curriculum in Schools. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2022.
    17. [17] E. Mulyasa, “Measuring the effectiveness of student-centered learning strategies through PAKEM syntax,” Jurnal Kurikulum dan Pengajaran, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 201–215, 2023.
    18. [18] S. Nugroho, “Substitution of analog projectors to Android TV-based smart screens in educational institutions,” Jurnal Inovasi Elektronik, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 34–48, 2023.
    19. [19] Y. Pratama and A. Mutia, “The impact of low variation in instructional media on declining student academic engagement,” Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Pendidikan, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 120–133, 2024.
    20. [20] A. Putra and R. Handayani, “Android system architecture as the main control of interactive television screens,” Jurnal Komputasi Media, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 15–29, 2022.
    21. [21] F. Rahmat and A. Fahrudin, “Teacher-centered vs student-centered: pedagogical critique of traditional Islamic education classrooms,” Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 167–182, 2021.
    22. [22] I. Rahmawati, “Physical and mental activities through the implementation of active learning models in elementary schools,” Jurnal Pedagogi dan Pembelajaran, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 78–92, 2024.
    23. [23] S. Ramadhan, “Digital education ecosystem: integration of Islamic content knowledge through multisensory screens,” Jurnal Pemikiran Keagamaan Islam, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 12–26, 2025.
    24. [24] Rusman, “Four operational pillars of PAKEM in the modern independent curriculum,” Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 102–117, 2024.
    25. [25] W. Sanjaya, “Pedagogical competence and teacher professionalism in the 21st century,” Jurnal Pendidikan Pemikiran, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 240–255, 2023.
    26. [26] K. Sari, “Implementation of PAKEM model to stimulate learning activity in fiqh and akidah akhlak,” Jurnal Kurikulum Islam, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 33–47, 2019.
    27. [27] D. H. Schunk, Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective, 8th ed. New York: Pearson, 2020.
    28. [28] B. Setiawan, “Utilization of smart TV as an extensive learning resource for future digital literacy,” Jurnal Pendidikan Terbuka, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 95–109, 2023.
    29. [29] N. Siregar, “Kahoot interactive quizzes and PowerPoint integrated with smart TV to stimulate meaningful learning,” Jurnal Pendidikan Modern, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 67–81, 2025.
    30. [30] R. E. Slavin, Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice, 12th ed. New York: Pearson, 2018.
    31. [31] A. Sudrajat, “Verbal participation and non-verbal actions in measuring classroom engagement dynamics,” Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 144–157, 2022.
    32. [32] N. Suryani, “Experiential learning models and their effect on students’ conceptual memory retention,” Jurnal Teori Pengajaran, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 54–68, 2020.
    33. [33] D. Syalawaty, A. Aldi, T. Tanti, W. Utami, and D. Deliza, “Mosques and literacy reading of the Quran: Empowering mosques as educational centers during covid-19 outbreak,” J. Qual. Assur. Islam. Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 73–84, 2021, doi: 10.47945/jqaie.v1i2.433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47945/jqaie.v1i2.433
    34. [34] T. Tanti, D. A. Kurniawan, R. Perdana, and O. H. Wiza, “Comparison of student attitudes toward natural sciences in rural middle schools in Jambi Province,” Ta’dib, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 63–74, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v23i1.1607
    35. [35] T. Susanti, D. Damris, M. Maison, and T. Tanti, “Learning environment and motivation in junior high school,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 2047–2056, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080542