SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

11

H-Index

Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Indonesia (JPAII)

an Open Access Journal

The Effect of Disciplinary Measures on the Learning Motivation of Students at Pondok Modern Al-Amanah Baubau

Fiqi Hidayat Atmir
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari ROR
Indonesia
fiqi.sword@gmail.com
Share

  • Purpose of the study: To analyze and describe the impact of sanctions and discipline on the learning motivation of students at Pondok Modern Al Amanah.

    Methodology: This study employs a quantitative approach using an associative research design. The research design utilized is multiple linear regression. The population for this study consists of 200 participants, and the sample size is 30% of the population, resulting in 30% × 200 = 60 students. Data collection methods used in this study include questionnaires, documentation, and interviews. Data analysis includes testing classical assumptions, descriptive statistics, and hypothesis testing.

    Main Findings: The F-test indicates that sanctions and discipline, when considered together, significantly influence learning motivation, with an F-value of 46.501 and a significance level of 0.001 (< 0.05). This implies that the regression model is statistically reliable and suitable for explaining the combined effect of sanctions (X1) and discipline (X2) on learning motivation (Y) at the Al-Amanah Modern Islamic Boarding School. The combined R² value of 0.620 indicates that 62% of the variation in students’ learning motivation can be explained jointly by sanctions and discipline, while the remaining 38% is attributed to other factors outside the model.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: The imposition of sanctions that are fair, proportionate, and educational in nature has been shown to increase students’ awareness and sense of responsibility toward the learning process.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “The Effect of Disciplinary Measures on the Learning Motivation of Students at Pondok Modern Al-Amanah Baubau”, J. Pend. A. Isl. Ind, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 160–167, Jun. 2026, doi: 10.37251/jpaii.v7i3.3350.

    More Citation Formats

  • 46
    Abstract views
    15
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. [1] H. F. Zarkasyi, Modern islamic boarding schools: Maintaining tradition in a modern system. Darul Fikri, 2015.
    2. [2] Ministry of national education, The great dictionary of the Indonesian language, 4th Edition. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2008.
    3. [3] A. P. Mangkunegara, Corporate human resource management. Jakarta: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2011.
    4. [4] Djaali, Educational psychology. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2011.
    5. [5] Wasty Soemanto, Educational psychology. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 1998.
    6. [6] Purwa Atmaja Prawira., Educational psychology from a new perspective. Yogyakarta: Ar Ruz Media, 2012.
    7. [7] A. Gintings, The practical essence of learning and teaching. Bandung: Humaniora, 2008.
    8. [8] S. A.M, Interaction and motivation in teaching and learning. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2011.
    9. [9] C. R. Semiawan, Family education in the global era. Jakarta: PT Prenhallindo, 2002.
    10. [10] Slameto, Learning and the factors influencing it. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2010.
    11. [11] M. Syah, Educational psychology in a new approach. Bandung: PT Rosdakarya.
    12. [12] Hamzah B. Uno, Motivation theory and its measurement. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2009.
    13. [13] Muhibbin Syah, Learning psychology. Jakarta: Raja Grapindo Persada, 2011.
    14. [14] Slameto, Learning and its influencing factors. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2013.
    15. [15] S. Silahuddin, “Education and morality (a review of the thought of Imam Al-Ghazali),” J. Tarb., vol. 23(1), 2016.
    16. [16] Riyadlotussholikhah, “The influence of students’ study discipline on academic achievement in islamic religious education at SMPN 3
    17. [17] Fuad, M., Suyanto, E., & Muhammad, U. A. Can 'reward and punishment' improve student motivation? European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 10(1), 165–179, 2021.
    18. [18] Aris Shoimin, Innovative learning models in the 2013 curriculum. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media, 2014.
    19. [19] Sugiyono, Quantitative, qualitative, and r&d research methods. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2011.
    20. [20] Supranto, Multivariate analysis: Meaning and interpretation. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2004.
    21. [21] T. D. Syamsul, F. A. Guampe, and N. Amzana, Quantitative research methods: Theory and application. 2020.
    22. [22] Suharsimi Arikunto, Fundamentals of educational evaluation. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2008.
    23. [23] Arief Armai, Introduction to islamic education science and methodology. Jakarta: Ciputat Press, 2002.
    24. [24] M. A. Q. Ahmad, Methodology of teaching islamic religious education, Jakarta. Directorate General of Islamic Religious Institutional Development, 1985.
    25. [25] Rudolf Dreikurs, Psychology in the classroom: A manual for teachers (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row, 1968.
    26. [26] B. F. Skinner, Science and Human Behavior. New York: Macmillan, 1953.
    27. [27] Abraham Maslow, “A theory of human motivation,” Psychol. Rev., vol. 50(4), pp. 370–396, 1943, doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346.
    28. [28] R. M. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum, 1985.
    29. [29] Ministry of religious affairs of the Republic of Indonesia, The Qur’an and Its Translation. 2019.
    30. [30] D. T. Wood, W., & Neal, “A new look at habits and the habit-goal interface,” Psychol. Rev., vol. 114(4), p. 843, 2007.
    31. [31] R. M. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, “The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality,” J. Res. Pers., vol. 19(2), pp. 109–134, 1985.
    32. [32] Kaya, C., & Nazarov, A. The influence of reward and punishment systems on student discipline. International Journal of Educational Narratives, 3(2), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.70177/ijen.v3i2.2158, 2025.
    33. [33] An, Z. The influence of teacher discipline on teaching effect and students' psychology in universities and the normative suggestions for discipline behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.910764, 2022.
    34. [34] Nursiah Nur, Sohorah, & Nurjayanti. The implementation of reward and punishment in improving student discipline at MI DDI Ar Rahim. EduSpirit: Collaborative Education Journal, 1(1), 574–579. https://journal.makwafoundation.org/index.php/eduspirit/article/view/1003, 2024.
    35. [35] Amiruddin, D. M. S., et al. The effect of giving rewards and punishments on students' learning motivation. Edu Cendikia: Scientific Journal of Education, 2(01), 1596–1604. https://doi.org/10.47709/educendikia.v2i01.1596, 2022.
    36. [36] Maison, Syahrial, Syamsurizal, and Tanti, “Learning environment, students’ beliefs, and self-regulation in learning physics: Structural equation modeling,” J. Balt. Sci. Educ., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 389–403, 2019, doi: 10.33225/jbse/19.18.389.
    37. [37] A. R. Saidek, Tanti, F. Anwar, and T. Rahman, “Reorientation of the Islamic religious education curriculum through a humanistic approach and social reconstruction in the global era,” At-Ta’lim J. Kaji. Pendidik. Agama, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 18–39, 2026, [Online]. Available: https://www.preventionweb.net/news/preliminary-report-february-6-2023-earthquakes-turkiye
    38. [38] D. Syalawaty, A. Aldi, T. Tanti, W. Utami, and D. Deliza, “Mosques and literacy reading of the Quran: Empowering mosques as educational centers during covid-19 outbreak,” J. Qual. Assur. Islam. Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 73–84, 2021, doi: 10.47945/jqaie.v1i2.433.
    39. [39] T. Tanti, D. A. Kurniawan, R. Perdana, and O. H. Wiza, “Comparison of student attitudes toward natural sciences in rural middle schools in Jambi Province,” Ta’dib, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 63–74, 2020.
    40. [40] T. Susanti, D. Damris, M. Maison, and T. Tanti, “Learning environment and motivation in junior high school,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 2047–2056, 2020.