SINTA

0.0

Impact

Google Scholar

8

h-index

Journal of Academic Biology and Biology Education

Open Access Journal


Development of a Biology Magazine as Learning Material for the Human Regulatory System: Validity and Student Attractiveness Evaluation

Share
  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to develop a magazine-shaped biology learning media on the regulatory system material and to determine the level of feasibility and attractiveness of the product based on expert validation results and student responses so that it can be used as teaching material in biology learning.

    Methodology: This study employed the Research and Development (R&D) method with the Sugiyono development model, extending to the product revision stage. Data collection was conducted using a validation questionnaire and student response questionnaire. The instrument was validated by subject matter experts, media experts, and language experts. Data analysis used descriptive statistics in the form of percentages on a five-level Likert scale to determine the product's feasibility and attractiveness.

    Main Findings: The results of the study showed that the magazine-based learning media received a feasibility rating of 83% from material experts, 90% from media experts, and 93% from language experts, all of which were categorized as very feasible. Student responses in the trial averaged 88%, categorized as very interesting, thus the media was declared suitable for use as teaching material for the regulatory system topic.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This research has produced a biology learning medium in the form of a magazine that integrates the presentation of regulatory system material with colorful illustrations, communicative language, and contextual information in one engaging printed material. The developed product not only meets the feasibility criteria but also enhances student learning engagement, making it an innovative alternative in biology instruction.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    N. A. Kartika and N. Amalia, “Development of a Biology Magazine as Learning Material for the Human Regulatory System: Validity and Student Attractiveness Evaluation”, Jou. Acd. Bio. Ed, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 175–184, Jun. 2026, doi: 10.37251/jouabe.v3i1.3589.
  • 0
    Abstract views
    0
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. L. Wang, “The impact of student-centered learning on academic motivation and achievement: A comparative research between traditional instruction and student-centered approach,” J. Educ. Humanit. Soc. Sci., vol. 22, pp. 346–353, 2023, doi: 10.54097/ehss.v22i.12463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v22i.12463
    2. V. Bhardwaj, S. Zhang, Y. Q. Tan, and V. Pandey, “Redefining learning: Student-centered strategies for academic and personal growth,” Front. Educ., vol. 10, no. February, pp. 1–15, 2025, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1518602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1518602
    3. D. A. E. P. Sembiring and M. Yusuf, “How do students understand biological concepts ? A study on science literacy in basic education,” J. Sinar Edukasi, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 207–222, 2025, doi: 10.61346/jse .v6i03.289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61346/jse
    4. M. Z. R. Asir, L. Subagiyo, and K. P. Candra, “Innovating biology education through google sites – integrated problem- based learning to enhance students ’ critical thinking skills and learning outcomes,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 166–175, 2026, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v12i1.13904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v12i1.13904
    5. M. A. Almuhanna, “Teachers’ perspectives of integrating AI-powered technologies in K-12 education for creating customized learning materials and resources,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 10343–10371, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-13257-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13257-y
    6. F. A. Riva’i and N. Rahmawati, “Workshops and mentoring as a strategy to empower teachers in developing 21st-century learning-based teaching materials,” J. Pendidik. dan Pemikir. Islam, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 247–262, 2025, doi: ag.v5i2.470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.69900/ag.v5i2.470
    7. R. Rumiyati, A. P. Lestari, and J. Juanda, “The role of learning media in enhancing the effectiveness and activeness of the learning process,” J. Didask., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 114–127, 2025, doi: 10.33856/didaskalia.v8i2.614. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33856/didaskalia.v8i2.614
    8. I. Levin, A. L. Semenov, and M. Gorsky, “Smart learning in the 21st century: Advancing constructionism across three digital epochs,” Educ. Sci., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2025, doi: 10.3390/educsci15010045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15010045
    9. M. Mudzakkir and D. Darmawan, “The influence of teacher teaching styles and leaning motivation on The learning achievement,” EDU-RILIGIA J. Ilmu Pendidik. Islam dan Keagamaan, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 79–91, 2024, doi: 10.47006/er.v8i1.19707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47006/er.v8i1.19707
    10. R. Salhab and W. Daher, “University students’ engagement in mobile learning,” Eur. J. Investig. Heal. Psychol. Educ., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 202–216, 2023, doi: 10.3390/ejihpe13010016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13010016
    11. S. M. Sari and M. N. Adlini, “Biology e-magazine integrated on wahdatul ‘ulum: Learning media on reproductive system material,” BIO-INOVED J. Biol. Pendidik., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 137–145, 2024, doi: 10.20527/bino.v6i2.19162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/bino.v6i2.19162
    12. R. Andriani, E. Marlina, and N. S. Rahayu, “The character education based on local wisdom with flipbook assisted digital literacy media in online learning,” Int. J. Quant. Res. Model., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 104–109, 2023, doi: 10.46336/ijqrm.v4i2.450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46336/ijqrm.v4i2.450
    13. Y. Mei et al., “From sensation to regulation: The diverse functions of peripheral sensory nervous system,” Front. Immunol., vol. 16, pp. 1–21, 2025, doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1575917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1575917
    14. Y. Xiao et al., “Interoceptive regulation of skeletal tissue homeostasis and repair,” Bone Res., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41413-023-00285-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41413-023-00285-6
    15. Y. F. Hussein and C. Csíkos, “The effect of teaching conceptual knowledge on students’ achievement, anxiety about, and attitude toward mathematics,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 1–25, 2023, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/12938. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12938
    16. Y. Rahmawati, O. Hartanto, I. Falani, and D. Iriyadi, “Students’ conceptual understanding in chemistry learning using phet interactive simulations,” J. Technol. Sci. Educ., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 303–326, 2022, doi: 10.3926/jotse.1597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1597
    17. J. I. Chisunum and C. N. Nwadiokwu, “Enhancing student engagement through practical production and utilization of instructional materials in an educational technology class: A multifaceted approach,” NIU J. Educ. Res., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 81–89, 2024, doi: 10.58709/niujed.v10i2.2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58709/niujed.v10i2.2002
    18. G. Lampropoulos, E. Keramopoulos, K. Diamantaras, and G. Evangelidis, “Augmented reality and gamification in education: A systematic literature review of research, applications, and empirical studies,” Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 13, pp. 1–43, 2022, doi: 10.3390/app12136809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12136809
    19. N. Magfirah, Anisa, H. Hambali, R. Thahir, and Nurdiyanti, “Digital literacy in Indonesian biology education (2020–2025): A research synthesis over one lustrun, methodological critique, and strategic roadmap,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 12–23, 2025, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i8.12068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i8.12068
    20. Y. N. Fitra, A. Razak, Z. Zulyusri, and E. Yuniarti, “Development of contextual e-magazine on circulatory system material for eleventh graders,” JPBI (Jurnal Pendidik. Biol. Indones., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 49–62, 2025, doi: 10.22219/jpbi.v11i1.39742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v11i1.39742
    21. Z. Zulkhairunnas, A. Razak, and M. Fadilah, “Science literacy-based e-magazine on the regulatory system material to improve scientific literacy and learning interest,” J. Pendidik. Indones., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 932–941, 2025, doi: 10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v14i4.103135 Science. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v14i4.103135
    22. D. M. Olvet et al., “A multi-institutional study of the feasibility and reliability of the Implementation of constructed response exam questions,” Teach. Learn. Med., vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 609–622, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1080/10401334.2022.2111571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2022.2111571
    23. T. Helda, Atmazaki, and E. Gani, “The validity and practicality of discovery-group learning models to improve 21st century skills of high school students,” rEFLections, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 1408–1433, 2024, doi: 10.61508/refl.v31i3.277735. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v31i3.277735
    24. A. B. Turmudli, Sumarno, “Development of visual literacy-based learning media to enhance writing skills of second grade elementary students,” J. Educ. Sci. J., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 5901–5915, 2025, doi: 10.31258/jes.9.6.p.5901-5915.
    25. N. A. Nurlaila, E. Erfiana, and L. Rohmah, “Development of digital teaching materials through canva and book creator for college students of elementary education,” J. Integr. Elem. Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 60–87, 2025, doi: 10.21580/jieed.v5i1.24060. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21580/jieed.v5i1.24060
    26. S. Ramaila and A. J. Molwele, “The role of technology integration in the development of 21st century skills and competencies in life sciences teaching and learning,” Int. J. High. Educ., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 9–17, 2022, doi: 10.5430/ijhe.v11n5p9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v11n5p9
    27. M. N. Adlini, U. N. A. D. Jayanti, and Y. N. R. Wiryawan, “Designing educational resources of the 21st-century skills instructional models and socio-scientific issues integration,” Res. Dev. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1123–1141, 2024, doi: 10.22219/raden.v4i2.36596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/raden.v4i2.36596
    28. A. Hakim and S. Wahyuni, “A critical review: Technology as learning media in teaching reading,” J-SHMIC J. English Acad., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 77–83, 2024, doi: 10.25299/jshmic.2024.vol11(1).15830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25299/jshmic.2024.vol11(1).15830
    29. N. M. Yulia et al., “Use of game-based learning media education as an effort to increase interest elementary school students learning,” JERIT J. Educ. Res. Innov. Technol., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 38–45, 2025, doi: 10.34125/jerit.v2i1.23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34125/jerit.v2i1.23
    30. M. Noris, S. Saputro, M. Muzzazinah, and A. Rahayu, “Development of biology learning media assisted by construct2 to improve critical thinking skills,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 498–504, 2023, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v9i2.1921. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i2.1921
    31. M. Toni and M. Sudin, “Research and development (r&d) interactive media that is effective, efficient and fun for students,” Asian J. Soc. Humanit., vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 1239–1252, 2024, doi: 10.59888/ajosh.v2i6.250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v2i6.250
    32. A. Syahrul, K. Mustami, and S. Ondeng, “Research and development (r&d) and evaluation research: A comparative analysis of methodologies and applications in educational and technological innovation,” Agency J. Manag. Bus., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 105–111, 2025, doi: 10.54065/agency.5.1.2025.469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54065/agency.5.1.2025.469
    33. F. Hardiansyah and Mulyadi, “Improve science learning outcomes for elementary school students through the development of flipbook media,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 3069–3077, 2022, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v8i6.2413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i6.2413
    34. I. W. Yusa, A. Y. R. Wulandari, B. Tamam, I. Rosidi, M. Yasir, and A. Y. B. Setiawan, “Development of augmented reality (ar) learning media to increase student motivation and learning outcomes in science,” J. Inov. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 127–145, 2023, doi: 10.21831/jipi.v9i2.52208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v9i2.52208
    35. E. I. Obilor, “Convenience and purposive sampling techniques: Are they the same?,” Int. J. Innov. Soc. Sci. Educ. Res., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2023.
    36. K. M. Q. Magnone and E. J. Yezierski, “Beyond Convenience: A Case and Method for Purposive Sampling in Chemistry Teacher Professional Development Research,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 718–726, 2024, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00217
    37. G. O. Hingmane and S. Rahmadonna, “Feasibility assessment of a nursing learning e-book through content and media expert validation,” NUSRA J. Penelit. dan Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 429–499, 2025, doi: 10.55681/nusra.v6i3.3794. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55681/nusra.v6i3.3794
    38. V. Elistiana, N. Novita, and F. W. Ginting, “Development of e-module learning media based on sets (Science, environment, technology, and society) on sound wave material,” Indones. J. Educ. Soc. Humanit., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 20–32, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.62945/ijesh.v1i2.120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62945/ijesh.v1i2.120
    39. F. Daryanes, D. Darmadi, K. Fikri, I. Sayuti, M. A. Rusandi, and D. D. B. Situmorang, “The development of articulate storyline interactive learning media based on case methods to train student’s problem-solving ability,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1–14, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15082
    40. A. Amran et al., “Developing learning media for an online learning-based big ball game at class xi vocational high school students: Feasibility and efficacy,” Fund. Dialnet, vol. 2041, no. 2016, pp. 724–736, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v50.99235
    41. A. Jannah, Irwandi, A. H. Lubis, and N. M. Julia, “Development of number card media in mathematics learning for elementary school students,” J. Indones. Prim. Sch., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 12–23, 2024, doi: 10.62945/jips.v1i3.135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62945/jips.v1i3.135
    42. C.-Q. Huang et al., “XKT: Toward explainable knowledge tracing model With cognitive learning theories for questions of multiple knowledge concepts,” IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 7308–7325, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2024.3418098. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2024.3418098
    43. A. Marougkas, C. Troussas, A. Krouska, and C. Sgouropoulou, “Virtual reality in education: A review of learning theories, approaches and methodologies for the last decade,” Electron., vol. 12, no. 13, pp. 1–21, 2023, doi: 10.3390/electronics12132832. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12132832
    44. C. F. Sriwahyunati, A. Nasrulloh, C. Rismayanthi, H. A. Hermawan, and D. Yuliawan, “Developing a gymnastics-based fundamental movement model to enhance motor development in elementary school students Christina Fajar Sriwahyuniati,” J. Sport. J. Penelit. Pembelajaran, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 477–493, 2025, doi: 10.29407/js_unpgri.v11i3.26452.
    45. M. Jamil et al., “Photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue dye and electrocatalytic water oxidation over copper(II) complex with mixed ligands,” J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem., vol. 446, p. 115095, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2023.115095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2023.115095
    46. V. Febrina and D. Setiawan, “Analysis of the use of learning media on the learning interest of learning science students and environmental themes,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 5702–5709, 2024, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v10i8.7497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i8.7497
    47. S. L. Mariati, “The influence of interactive learning media on students interest in learning in mathematics subjects at UPTD SMPN 7 Sinjai,” JTMT J. Tadris Mat., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 160–165, 2024, doi: 10.47435/jtmt.v5i2.3234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47435/jtmt.v5i2.3234
    48. T. E. Umeohana, “Examining the utilization and impact of teaching resources on biology education in Awka South Local Government Area, Nigeria,” J. Indones. Pendidik. Profesi Guru, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 65–72, 2024, doi: 10.64420/jippg.v1i2.244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.64420/jippg.v1i2.244
    49. A. Alawiyah, Y. Rosalinah, U. Bina, and S. Informatika, “Collaborative discussion in vocabulary learning through short stories : Students’ perceptions in an indonesian efl context,” J. English Lang. Teach., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 401–421, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24256/foster-jelt.v6i4.298
    50. M. Fauyan, A. Efendy, and S. B. Wahyono, “Investigate innovative teaching strategies that improve elementary school students’ speaking skills in the digital age,” J. Integr. Elem. Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 98–113, 2026, doi: 10.21580/jieed.v6i1.28363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21580/jieed.v6i1.28363