Diversity of Soil Arthropods in the Ranu Pani Restoration Area: An Indicator of Mountain Ecosystem Recovery
Abstract
Purpose of the study: This study aims to identify the diversity of soil arthropods in the restoration area of Ranu Pani, Lumajang, determine the ecological roles of each arthropod group, and analyze the diversity index as an indicator of ecosystem condition and restoration progress in the study area.
Methodology: Descriptive research design with block plot sampling, pitfall trap method using plastic cup traps, digital thermometer, lux meter, binocular microscope, alcohol preservation solution, field observation, ecological identification keys, abiotic factor measurement, Shannon-Wiener diversity index analysis, Important Value Index calculation, density and frequency analysis, supported by literature review.
Main Findings: A total of 916 soil arthropod specimens belonging to 9 orders and 13 families were collected. Diversity index was higher in the first-year location (H’ = 2.523) than the second-year location (H’ = 1.899). Dominant families were Gryllidae and Talitridae. Ecological roles consisted of predators, herbivores, scavengers, and parasitoids, with herbivores and scavengers showing the highest proportions across restoration sites.
Novelty/Originality of this study: This study provides updated ecological baseline data on soil arthropod diversity in Ranu Pani restoration areas by integrating diversity, community structure, ecological roles, and abiotic factors. It advances restoration ecology knowledge by demonstrating the use of soil arthropods as bioindicators for assessing ecosystem recovery and restoration effectiveness in highland conservation landscapes.
References
F. Gonçalves et al., “Soil arthropods in the douro demarcated region vineyards: General characteristics and ecosystem services provided,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 14, pp. 1–35, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13147837.
I. N. Marin and A. V. Tiunov, “Terrestrial crustaceans (Arthropoda, Crustacea): taxonomic diversity, terrestrial adaptations, and ecological functions,” Zookeys, vol. 2023, no. 1169, pp. 95–162, 2023, doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1169.97812.
Krishnan et al., “Influence of soil invertebrates on soil decomposition,” J. Surv. Fish. Sci., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 618–629, 2023.
N. Sagi and D. Hawlena, “Arthropods as the engine of nutrient cycling in arid ecosystems,” Insects, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1–12, 2021, doi: 10.3390/insects12080726.
J. C. Tarafdar, “Role of Soil Biology on Soil Health for Sustainable Agricultural Production,” in Structure and Functions of Pedosphere, Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022, pp. 67–81. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-8770-9_3.
M. C. Abajue and M. C. Ogwu, “Sustainable Alternative Land Management Strategies and Their Impacts on Soil Arthropod Diversity,” in Sustainable Soil Systems in Global South, Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2024, pp. 497–521. doi: 10.1007/978-981-97-5276-8_18.
C. Menta and S. Remelli, “Soil health and arthropods: From complex system to worthwhile investigation,” Insects, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2020, doi: 10.3390/insects11010054.
M. Wale and S. Yesuf, “Abundance and diversity of soil arthropods in disturbed and undisturbed ecosystem in Western Amhara, Ethiopia,” Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 767–781, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s42690-021-00600-w.
C. Martínez‐Núñez et al., “Land‐use change in the past 40 years explains shifts in arthropod community traits,” J. Anim. Ecol., vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 540–553, May 2024, doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.14062.
E. H. Sohlström et al., “Future climate and land-use intensification modify arthropod community structure,” Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., vol. 327, p. 107830, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2021.107830.
S. Li, S. Xia, A. Nakamura, and X. Yang, “Regional and local patterns of soil arthropod diversity are explained by different processes in southwest China,” Catena, vol. 246, no. February, pp. 1–9, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2024.108426.
M. A. K. Gillespie et al., “Status and trends of terrestrial arthropod abundance and diversity in the North Atlantic region of the Arctic,” Ambio, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 718–731, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01162-5.
M. B. Carlucci, P. H. S. Brancalion, R. R. Rodrigues, R. Loyola, and M. V. Cianciaruso, “Functional traits and ecosystem services in ecological restoration,” Restor. Ecol., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1372–1383, 2020, doi: 10.1111/rec.13279.
V. H. Klaus and K. Kiehl, “A conceptual framework for urban ecological restoration and rehabilitation,” Basic Appl. Ecol., vol. 52, pp. 82–94, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2021.02.010.
T. Parkhurst, S. M. Prober, R. J. Hobbs, and R. J. Standish, “Global meta‐analysis reveals incomplete recovery of soil conditions and invertebrate assemblages after ecological restoration in agricultural landscapes,” J. Appl. Ecol., vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 358–372, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13852.
J. Morales‐Márquez and F. Meloni, “Soil fauna and its potential use in the ecological restoration of dryland ecosystems,” Restor. Ecol., vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1–13, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1111/rec.13686.
Y. Zhang, Y. Yang, Z. Chen, and S. Zhang, “Multi-criteria assessment of the resilience of ecological function areas in China with a focus on ecological restoration,” Ecol. Indic., vol. 119, p. 106862, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106862.
J. Aronson, N. Goodwin, L. Orlando, C. Eisenberg, and A. T. Cross, “A world of possibilities: six restoration strategies to support the United Nation’s Decade on Ecosystem Restoration,” Restor. Ecol., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 730–736, 2020, doi: 10.1111/rec.13170.
J. He, Y. Li, X. Shi, and H. Hou, “Integrating the impacts of vegetation coverage on ecosystem services to determine ecological restoration targets for adaptive management on the Loess Plateau, China,” L. Degrad. Dev., vol. 34, no. 18, pp. 5697–5712, 2023, doi: 10.1002/ldr.4871.
L. Zhang and J. Li, “Sustainable land management and degraded grassland restoration: Key measures for vegetation and soil health,” Geogr. Res. Bull. ONLINE, vol. 3, pp. 175–178, 2024, doi: 10.50908/grb.3.0.
S. E. G. Findlay, “Organic Matter Decomposition,” in Fundamentals of Ecosystem Science, Elsevier, 2021, pp. 81–102. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-812762-9.00004-6.
Neemisha, “Role of Soil Organisms in Maintaining Soil Health, Ecosystem Functioning, and Sustaining Agricultural Production,” 2020, pp. 313–335. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-44364-1_17.
A. K. Mishra, A. Tiwari, P. K. Maurya, and S. Sharma, “Enhancing ecosystem dynamics: Organic and regenerative practices in rice–wheat systems and their impact on soil arthropod biodiversity,” Front. Environ. Sci., vol. 12, no. October, pp. 1–11, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1407954.
P. Dietrich et al., “Plant diversity and community age stabilize ecosystem multifunctionality,” Glob. Chang. Biol., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 1–16, 2024, doi: 10.1111/gcb.17225.
L. G. Ribeiro, A. O. Silva, K. A. Vaz, J. V. dos Santos, C. A. Nunes, and M. A. C. Carneiro, “Soil arthropod community responses to restoration in areas impacted by iron mining tailings deposition after Fundão dam failure,” Environ. Monit. Assess., vol. 195, no. 11, p. 1299, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11843-0.
A. H. Siddiqui, M. M. Rahman, M. N. Sayadat Pitol, M. A. Islam, and S. M. M. Hasan, “Seedling diversity considerably changes near localities in Three salinity zones of sundarbans mangrove forest, Bangladesh,” J. Trop. Biodivers. Biotechnol., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1–14, 2021, doi: 10.22146/JTBB.65241.
Y. Y. Kyaw, K. S. S. Kyaw, and Z. M. Htet, “Quantitative Analysis of Tree Species Diversity and Composition in Thein Min Kha Area, Myaing Township,” Yadanabon Univ. Res. J., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 294–302, 2022.
T. Fremout et al., “Mapping tree species vulnerability to multiple threats as a guide to restoration and conservation of tropical dry forests,” Glob. Chang. Biol., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 3552–3568, 2020, doi: 10.1111/gcb.15028.
S. Dröge et al., “Listening to a changing landscape: Acoustic indices reflect bird species richness and plot-scale vegetation structure across different land-use types in north-eastern Madagascar,” Ecol. Indic., vol. 120, pp. 1–11, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106929.
M. Winarni and A. Susanto, “Tree composition on light intensity In agroforestry systems in people’s forests,” Int. J. Sci. Environ., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 125–129, 2024, doi: 10.51601/ijse.v4i4.112.
P. Buchenberg and S. Baur, “Sun sensor design for position detection and intensity measurement using light depending resistors,” in NEIS 2021; Conference on Sustainable Energy Supply and Energy Storage Systems, 2021, pp. 1–5.
R. C. Verma et al., “The role of insects in ecosystems, An in-depth review of entomological research,” Int. J. Environ. Clim. Chang., vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 4340–4348, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i103110.
O. Bashir et al., “Soil Organic Matter and Its Impact on Soil Properties and Nutrient Status,” in Microbiota and Biofertilizers, Vol 2, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 129–159. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-61010-4_7.
A. Scavo, S. Fontanazza, A. Restuccia, G. R. Pesce, C. Abbate, and G. Mauromicale, “The role of cover crops in improving soil fertility and plant nutritional status in temperate climates. A review,” Agron. Sustain. Dev., vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1–25, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s13593-022-00825-0.
C. C. Chang and P. A. Todd, “Reduced predation pressure as a potential driver of prey diversity and abundance in complex habitats,” NPJ Biodivers., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s44185-022-00007-x.
M. Mohammed, “Transient patterns and delayed herbivore response in plant-herbivore systems,” Theor. Ecol., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 235–245, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s12080-024-00586-4.
J. F. Terlau et al., “Microhabitat conditions remedy heat stress effects on insect activity,” Glob. Chang. Biol., vol. 29, no. 13, pp. 3747–3758, 2023, doi: 10.1111/gcb.16712.
C. Yuan et al., “Effect of karst microhabitats on the structure and function of the rhizosphere soil microbial community of rhododendron pudingense,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1–20, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15097104.
Z.-X. Lu et al., “Effects of different vegetation restoration on soil nutrients, enzyme activities, and microbial communities in degraded karst landscapes in southwest China,” For. Ecol. Manage., vol. 508, p. 120002, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.120002.
A. Rathi, P. Kumar, S. Nangla, S. Sharma, and S. Sharma, “Soil restoration strategies for sustaining soil productivity: A review,” Asian Res. J. Agric., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 33–48, 2024, doi: 10.9734/arja/2024/v17i1408.
Copyright (c) 2024 Jr Sulthan Ardillah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Journal of Academic Biology and Biology Education is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
.png)
.png)
