Structured Inquiry Learning: Enhancing Critical Thinking and Conceptual Understanding through Productive Questioning

  • Agustina Agustina Betung 1 Public Senior High School
  • Roszelina Abd Rahman Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jouabe.v2i2.2604
Keywords: Biology Education, Conceptual Understanding, Critical Thinking Skills, Productive Questioning, Structured Inquiry Learning

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This study aims to examine the effect of structured inquiry learning based on productive questioning on students’ critical thinking skills and conceptual understanding of plant tissue structure in senior high school biology learning.

Methodology: This study employed a quantitative quasi-experimental method using a non-equivalent control group design. Data were collected using critical thinking and conceptual understanding tests, observation sheets, and documentation. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, Kolmogorov–Smirnov normality test, Levene’s homogeneity test, N-gain analysis, independent sample t-test, and effect size calculation using SPSS software.

Main Findings: The results showed significant differences between experimental and control groups in critical thinking and conceptual understanding. The experimental group achieved higher posttest scores, moderate-to-high N-gain values, and large effect sizes. These findings indicate that structured inquiry learning with productive questioning effectively improves students’ higher-order thinking and conceptual mastery.

Novelty/Originality of this study: This study integrates productive questioning explicitly within a structured inquiry learning model and examines its simultaneous effect on critical thinking and conceptual understanding. This approach provides new empirical evidence on how productive questioning strengthens cognitive engagement and enhances learning outcomes in biology education contexts.

References

[1] O. for E. C. and Development, PISA. in PISA. Santillana, Mexico, 2007. doi: 10.1787/9789264065949-es.
[2] M. Pedaste et al., “Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle,” Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 14, pp. 47–61, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003.
[3] Z. Arifin, Sukarmin, S. Saputro, and A. Kamari, “The effect of inquiry-based learning on students’ critical thinking skills in science education: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 21, no. 3, 2025, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/15988.
[4] M. Vilela, C. Morais, and J. C. Paiva, “Inquiry-Based Science Education in High Chemistry: Enhancing Oral and Written Communication Skills Through Authentic and Problem-Based Learning Activities,” 2025. doi: 10.3390/educsci15030334.
[5] A. Faria and G. Lobato Miranda, “The Effect of Augmented Reality on Learning Meiosis via Guided Inquiry and Pecha Kucha: A Quasi-Experimental Design,” 2024. doi: 10.3390/info15090566.
[6] B. Aidoo, “A reflective study on adopting inquiry-based science teaching methods,” Discip. Interdiscip. Sci. Educ. Res., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 29, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s43031-024-00119-3.
[7] S. E. Dewi, P. Setyosari, Y. Hanafi, and Supriyono, “Effect of inquiry-based learning on students’ critical thinking: A meta-analysis,” J. Institutional Res. South East Asia, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 18–39, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://www.seaairweb.info/journal/articles/JIRSEA_v23_n03/JIRSEA_v23_n03_Article02.pdf?
[8] N. Mediana, A. Funa, and R. Dio, “Effectiveness of Inquiry-based Learning (IbL) on improving students’ conceptual understanding in science and mathematics: A meta-analysis,” Int. J. Educ. Math. Sci. Technol., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 532–552, 2025, doi: 10.46328/ijemst.4769.
[9] L. I. Nashoihah and T. Nurita, “Improvement of students critical thinking skills through structured inquiry learning models on substance pressure topics,” J. Pijar Mipa, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 462–468, 2022, doi: 10.29303/jpm.v17i4.3661.
Published
2025-12-20
How to Cite
Agustina, A., & Rahman, R. A. (2025). Structured Inquiry Learning: Enhancing Critical Thinking and Conceptual Understanding through Productive Questioning . Journal of Academic Biology and Biology Education, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.37251/jouabe.v2i2.2604
Issue
Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): December
Section
Articles

Copyright (c) 2025 Agustina Agustina, Roszelina Abd Rahman

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Journal of Academic Biology and Biology Education is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.