Enhancing Animal Physiology Practicum: Exploring Students' Perceptions and Influencing Factors
Abstract
Purpose of the study: The purpose of this study was to determine the perception of Biology Education students towards the implementation of Animal Physiology practicum in the Biology Education Laboratory and to determine the factors that influence student perceptions towards the implementation of the practicum. This study aims to provide insight into improving the quality of practicum learning in higher education.
Methodology: This type of research is descriptive with qualitative and quantitative approaches. The subjects of the study were fourth semester Biology Education students of UIN Alauddin Makassar. Data collection techniques used a Likert scale questionnaire 1–5 and documentation. Data analysis techniques include descriptive qualitative analysis for narrative data and quantitative analysis for questionnaire data in a descriptive-qualitative manner.
Main Findings: The main findings of this study show that students perceive teaching assistants as supportive in guiding practicum groups, though there are issues with punctuality. Facilities and infrastructure, including laboratory cleanliness and equipment, are generally adequate but require improvement. Students report better understanding of animal physiology post-practicum, and active participation during the exercises. However, some students were not diligent with preliminary tasks, and there were discrepancies in the provision of assignments and material explanations.
Novelty/Originality of this study: This study offers a unique perspective by integrating the roles of teaching assistants and laboratory assistants in shaping student perceptions of animal physiology practicums. It highlights the importance of punctuality, material explanations, and active involvement, providing practical insights for improving laboratory-based learning.
References
L. Sunnemark, F. Sunnemark, K. Dahlquist, E. Gahnström, P. Assmo, and L. Piper, “Bridging theory and practice through Work-Integrated Learning (WIL): critical perspectives on the conceptualisations of WIL at a university in Sweden,” Crit. Stud. Educ., vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 403–420, 2023, doi: 10.1080/17508487.2023.2294462.
N. Khazieva, A. Pauliková, and H. H. Chovanová, “Maximizing synergy: the benefits of a joint implementation of knowledge management and artificial intelligence systems standards,” Mach. Learn. Knowl. Extr., vol. 6, pp. 2282–2302, 2024, doi: 10.3390/ make6040112.
M. Rangraz and L. Pareto, “Workplace work-integrated learning: supporting industry 4.0 transformation for small manufacturing plants by reskilling staff,” Int. J. Lifelong Educ., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 5–22, 2021, doi: 10.1080/02601370.2020.1867249.
R. Popenoe, A. Langius-Eklöf, E. Stenwall, and A. Jervaeus, “A practical guide to data analysis in general literature reviews,” Nord. J. Nurs. Res., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 175–186, 2021, doi: 10.1177/2057158521991949.
J. P. Casquilho, F. P. Sinaga, N. Septiani, S. W. Oktavia, N. N. Qoidah, and E. F. S. Rini, “The influence of critical thinking ability on students’s science learning outcomes,” EduFisika J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 116–124, 2023, doi: 10.59052/edufisika.v8i2.24865.
C. C. Hyun et al., “Implementation of contextual teaching and learning (CTL) to improve the concept and practice of love for faith-learning integration,” Int. J. Control Autom., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 365–383, 2020.
F. Alfawaire and T. Atan, “The effect of strategic human resource and knowledge management on sustainable competitive advantages at Jordanian universities: The mediating role of organizational innovation,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 15, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13158445.
M. Mohiuddin, E. Hosseini, S. B. Faradonbeh, and M. Sabokro, “Achieving human resource management sustainability in universities,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 19, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020928.
S. A. Handayani, Y. S. Rahayu, and R. Agustini, “Students’ creative thinking skills in biology learning: Fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1747, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1747/1/012040.
A. Sandopa, A. Doyan, and J. Ardhuha, “The effect of reciprocal teaching-learning model on the mastery of physics concepts and creativity of senior high school,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 2165, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2165/1/012011.
J. Kiehle, M. Kopsakangas-Savolainen, M. Hilli, and E. Pongrácz, “Carbon footprint at institutions of higher education: The case of the University of Oulu,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 329, no. May 2022, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117056.
D. Hogan and J. O’flaherty, “Addressing education for sustainable development in the teaching of science: the case of a biological sciences teacher education program,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 21, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su132112028.
L. Chawla, “Childhood nature connection and constructive hope: A review of research on connecting with nature and coping with environmental loss,” People Nat., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 619–642, 2020, doi: 10.1002/pan3.10128.
Z. Zulyusri, I. Elfira, L. Lufri, and T. A. Santosa, “Literature study: utilization of the pjbl model in science education to improve creativity and critical thinking skills,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 133–143, 2023, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2555.
L. Darling-Hammond, L. Flook, C. Cook-Harvey, B. Barron, and D. Osher, “Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development,” Appl. Dev. Sci., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 97–140, 2020, doi: 10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791.
A. Mutlu, “Evaluation of students’ scientific process skills through reflective worksheets in the inquiry-based learning environments,” Reflective Pract., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 271–286, 2020, doi: 10.1080/14623943.2020.1736999.
S. Dolapcioglu and A. Doğanay, “Development of critical thinking in mathematics classes via authentic learning: an action research,” Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol., vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1363–1386, 2022, doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2020.1819573.
Z. Shana and E. S. Abulibdeh, “Science practical work and its impact on students’ science achievement,” J. Technol. Sci. Educ., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 199–215, 2020, doi: 10.3926/JOTSE.888.
Ü. Çakiroğlu, O. Güven, and E. Saylan, “Flipping the experimentation process: influences on science process skills,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 3425–3448, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11423-020-09830-0.
Y. S. Al Frijat, I. E. Albawwat, and A. A. Elamer, “Exploring the mediating role of corporate social responsibility in the connection between board competence and corporate financial performance amidst global uncertainties,” Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag., no. September 2023, pp. 1079–1095, 2023, doi: 10.1002/csr.2623.
L. I. González‐pérez and M. S. Ramírez‐montoya, “Components of education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: systematic review,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1–31, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14031493.
N. G. Davy Tsz Kit, W. Luo, H. M. Y. Chan, and S. K. W. Chu, “Using digital story writing as a pedagogy to develop AI literacy among primary students,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 3, no. February, p. 100054, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100054.
G. C. L. Wong et al., “Roadmap on emerging concepts in the physical biology of bacterial biofilms: From surface sensing to community formation,” Phys. Biol., vol. 18, no. 5, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/abdc0e.
A. G. Watts, S. E. Kanoski, G. Sanchez-Watts, and W. Langhans, “The physiological control of eating: signals, neurons, and networks,” Physiol. Rev., vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 689–813, 2022, doi: 10.1152/physrev.00028.2020.
G. Cirino, C. Szabo, and A. Papapetropoulos, “Physiological roles of hydrogen sulfide in mammalian cells, tissues, and organs,” Physiol. Rev., vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 31–276, 2023, doi: 10.1152/physrev.00028.2021.
B. Schamberger et al., “Curvature in biological systems: its quantification, emergence, and implications across the scales,” Adv. Mater., vol. 35, no. 13, 2023, doi: 10.1002/adma.202206110.
D. Jovic, X. Liang, H. Zeng, L. Lin, F. Xu, and Y. Luo, “Single‐cell RNA sequencing technologies and applications: A brief overview,” Clin. Transl. Med., vol. 12, no. 3, 2022, doi: 10.1002/ctm2.694.
S. A. L. M. Kooijman et al., “From formulae, via models to theories: dynamic energy budget theory illustrates requirements,” Ecol. Modell., vol. 497, no. September, p. 110869, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110869.
P. Marshall, “Biology transcends the limits of computation,” Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol., vol. 165, pp. 88–101, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2021.04.006.
S. S. Wickramasuriya et al., “Role of physiology, immunity, microbiota, and infectious diseases in the gut health of poultry,” Vaccines, vol. 10, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.3390/vaccines10020172.
J. S. Ayres, “The biology of physiological health,” Cell, vol. 181, no. 2, pp. 250–269, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.036.
P. Lyon, F. Keijzer, D. Arendt, and M. Levin, “Reframing cognition: Getting down to biological basics,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., vol. 376, no. 1820, 2021, doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0750.
E. Arzt, H. Quan, R. M. McMeeking, and R. Hensel, “Functional surface microstructures inspired by nature – From adhesion and wetting principles to sustainable new devices,” Prog. Mater. Sci., vol. 120, no. January, p. 100823, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100823.
A. Suzuki, J. Ginsborg, M. Phillips, and Z. Franklin, “Developing an online intervention to equip tertiary piano students with skills and strategies for effective practice,” Music Sci., vol. 7, pp. 1–23, 2024, doi: 10.1177/20592043241262612.
K. A. Haedar, M. Ainurridho, and S. I. Cahyani, “Does laboratory matters in today’s high school learning environment?,” Int. J. Educ. Adm. Manag. Leadersh., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2024, doi: 10.51629/ijeamal.v5i1.179.
R. Rosli and N. A. Ishak, “Implementation of virtual laboratory in learning biology to improve students’ achievement, science process skills and self efficacy,” Islam. Stud. Soc. Sci. Res., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 2550–1461, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://ijeisr.net
H. T. T. Diem, M. P. Thinh, and V. T. T. Lam, “Exploring practical pedagogy in high school biology education: A qualitative study of pre-service biology teachers’ experiences in Vietnam,” Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 557–571, 2024, doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.13.2.557.
K. Michos, A. Cantieni, R. Schmid, L. Müller, and D. Petko, “Examining the relationship between internship experiences, teaching enthusiasm, and teacher self-efficacy when using a mobile portfolio app,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 109, p. 103570, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2021.103570.
T. Alqahtani et al., “The emergent role of artificial intelligence, natural learning processing, and large language models in higher education and research,” Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm., vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1236–1242, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.05.016.
M. D. González-Zamar and E. Abad-Segura, “Implications of virtual reality in arts education: Research analysis in the context of higher education,” Educ. Sci., vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1–19, 2020, doi: 10.3390/educsci10090225.
E. E. Scott, M. P. Wenderoth, and J. H. Doherty, “Design-based research: a methodology to extend and enrich biology education research,” CBE Life Sci. Educ., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1–12, 2020, doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-11-0245.
M. Maidiana, “Penelitian survey,” ALACRITY J. Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 20–29, 2021, doi: 10.52121/alacrity.v1i2.23.
C. A. P. Vercaruz, N. Septiani, and R. S. Fitriani, “Comparison of character responsibilities and learning outcomes in mexico and indonesia in first high schools,” EduFisika J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 183–196, 2023, doi: 10.59052/edufisika.v8i2.26532.
J. Manullang, R. Maria, and A. Manullang, “Relevansi pendidikan humanis paulo freire dengan pendidikan agama kristen jenjang sekolah menengah atas,” J. Educ. Fkip Unma, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 482–490, 2021, doi: 10.31949/educatio.v7i2.1088.
T. E. Situmorang and D. Purba, “Perancangan aplikasi pengujian validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen penelitian,” KAKIFIKOM Kumpul. Artik. Karya Ilm. Fak. Ilmu Komput., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 54–58, 2020.
A. Astalini, D. Darmaji, D. A. Kurniawan, N. Septiani, and M. Z. Azzahra, “Revitalizing Science education: teachers’ response to embedding adat bersendi syara’and syara’bersendi kitabullah values into the learning process,” Integr. Sci. Educ. J., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 117–122, 2023, doi: 10.37251/isej.v4i3.735.
U. Ulfah, Y. Supriani, and O. Arifudin, “Kepemimpinan Pendidikan di era disrupsi,” JIIP (Jurnal Ilm. Ilmu Pendidikan), vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 153–161, 2022, doi: 10.54371/jiip.v5i1.392.
S. W. Octavia, N. Septiani, F. Sinaga, and N. N. Qoidah, “Analysis of the relationship in learning interest to learning outcomes static fluid material in senior high school,” J. Ilm. Ilmu Terap. Univ. Jambi, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 31–41, 2023, doi: 10.22437/jiituj.v7i1.26696.
D. Deriyanto and F. Qorib, “Persepsi mahasiswa Universitas Tribhuwana Tunggadewi Malang terhadap penggunaan aplikasi tik tok,” J. Ilmu Sos. dan Ilmu Polit., vol. 7, no. 2, 2019, doi: 10.33366/jisip.v7i2.1432.
N. K. Pratiwi, “Pengaruh tingkat pendidikan, perhatian orang tua, dan minat belajar siswa terhadap prestasi belajar bahasa indonesia siswa smk kesehatan di kota tangerang,” Pujangga J. Bhs. dan Sastra, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 31, 2017, doi: 10.47313/pujangga.v1i2.320.
A. Astalini et al., “Identification of student character values in class X particle dynamics materials,” JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidik. Fis., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 380–388, 2023, doi: 10.26737/jipf.v8i3.3776.
Y. Shambodo, “Faktor yang mempengaruhi persepsi khalayak mahasiswa pendatang UGM terhadap siaran pawartos ngayogyakarta Jogja TV,” J. Al Azhar Indones. Seri Ilmu Sos., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 98–110, 2020, doi: 10.36722/jaiss.v1i2.464.
R. F. Akbar, “Analisis persepsi pelajar tingkat menengah pada Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Kudus,” Edukasia J. Penelit. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 10, no. 1, 2015, doi: 10.21043/edukasia.v10i1.791.
A. Valverde et al., “Perceptions of animal welfare on livestock: evidence from College Agronomy students in Costa Rica,” Animals, vol. 14, no. 10, 2024, doi: 10.3390/ani14101398.
D. Susanti, Rina Widiana, Ramadhan Sumarmin, and Silvi Susanti, “Student motivation against using guided inquiry-based animal physiology practicum guide,” Bioeduscience, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 69–73, 2021, doi: 10.22236/j.bes/514994.
Copyright (c) 2024 Sri Pratiwi Yanti Arsyam, Martin N Kariuki , Janreve Martirez Odango
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Journal of Academic Biology and Biology Education is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
.png)
