Comparative Analysis of Students' Biology Learning Outcomes: Memory and Understanding Aspects

Yanti Yusipa

doi:10.37251/jouabe.v1i1.1012

Yanti Yusipa Public High School 6 Bengkulu Selatan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jouabe.v1i1.1012

Keywords: Analysis, Biology Learning, Comparative, Learning Outcomes, Memory

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This research aims to analyze the learning outcomes of 11th-grade students by examining how they answer questions using memory aspects, evaluate the overall learning outcomes of the class, and identify the differences in learning outcomes between students who use memory aspects and those who use comprehension aspects to solve questions.

Methodology: This study is a true experimental study. The population in this study were all students of Public High School 6 South Bengkulu totaling 142 people. The sample was taken using a random sampling technique of 42 people was obtained. This study used a learning outcome test instrument in form of multiple choice questions. Data analysis techniques used include descriptive statistics and inferential statistics.

Main Findings: The analysis shows that students' abilities are in the moderate category. Biology learning outcomes are in the high category. The results of the hypothesis test show that the significance value is less than 0.05, so Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted, which means that there is a significant difference in the learning outcomes of class XI science students at Public High School 6 South Bengkulu who use memory and understanding aspects in answering questions.

Novelty/Originality of this study: This type of study can provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of both cognitive abilities in understanding and remembering information in the context of learning Biology subjects. In addition, this study can also provide information to educators about more effective ways to help students learn and remember subject matter better.

References

M. Huda, ‘Peran Pendidikan Islam Terhadap Perubahan Sosial’, Edukasia J. Penelit. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 165–188, 2015, doi: 10.21043/edukasia.v10i1.790.

E. Cristiana, ‘Digitalisasi pendidikan ditinjau dari perspektif hukum’, in Prosiding Seminar Nasional IAHN-TP Palangka Raya, 2021, no. 3, pp. 58–66, doi: 10.33363/sn.v0i3.89.

A. Astalini et al., ‘Identification of Student Character Values in Class X Particle Dynamics Materials’, JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidik. Fis., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 380–388, 2023.

P. D. Darmoko, ‘Peran strategis guru dalam MEA’, J. Ilm. Madaniyah, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 143–156, 2016.

S. Halia and R. Linda, ‘Strategi Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah Dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Guru’, UNISAN J., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 491–499, 2023.

U. Ulfah and O. Arifudin, ‘Pengaruh Aspek Kognitif, Afektif, Dan Psikomotor Terhadap Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik’, J. Al-Amar Ekon. Syariah, Perbank. Syariah, Agama Islam. Manaj. Dan Pendidik., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2021.

N. Pohan, ‘Pelaksanaan pembimbingan belajar aspek kognitif, afektif dan psikomotorik siswa di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Swasta Amal Shaleh Medan’, At-Tazakki J. Kaji. Ilmu Pendidik. Islam dan Hum., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 15–28, 2017.

A. Mustopa, J. Jasim, H. Basri, and U. C. Barlian, ‘Analisis Standar Penilaian Pendidikan’, J. Manaj. Pendidik., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 24–29, 2021, doi: 10.33751/jmp.v9i1.3364.

I. F. N. D. Primasari, A. Marini, and M. S. Sumantri, ‘Analisis kebijakan dan pengelolaan pendidikan terkait standar penilaian di Sekolah Dasar’, J. Basicedu, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1479–1491, 2021, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v5i3.956.

J. P. Casquilho, F. Sinaga, N. Septiani, S. W. Oktavia, N. N. Qoidah, and E. F. S. Rini, ‘The Influence of Critical Thinking Ability on Students’s Science Learning Outcomes’, EduFisika J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 116–124, 2023, doi: 10.59052/edufisika.v8i2.24865.

D. Shofiyani, A. Azis, and I. Setiawan, ‘Efektivitas Metode Al-Qasimi Terhadap Kemampuan Santri Dalam Menghafal Al-Qur’an’, Bestari J. Stud. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2020, doi: 10.36667/bestari.v17i2.510.

S. Rahayuningsih and C. T. Octavianti, ‘Analisis Kesalahan Mahasiswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Kombinatorik’, 2016.

M. Husni, ‘Memahami Konsep Pemikiran Mind Map Tony Buzan (1970) Dalam Realitas Kehidupan Belajar Anak’, AL-IBRAH, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 110–126, 2018.

I. K. W. Sari, ‘Analisis kemampuan kognitif dalam pembelajaran IPA SMP’, J. Pendidik. Dan Pembelajaran Sains Indones., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 145–152, 2020, doi: 10.23887/jppsi.v3i2.28559.

T. Rumhadi, ‘Urgensi motivasi dalam proses pembelajaran’, Inovasi-Jurnal Diklat Keagamaan, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 33–41, 2017.

I. W. Muderawan, I. G. L. Wiratma, and M. Z. Nabila, ‘Analisis faktor-faktor penyebab kesulitan belajar siswa pada pelajaran Kimia’, J. Pendidik. Kim. Indones., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 17–23, 2019, doi: 10.23887/jpk.v3i1.20944.

Y. Basith, ‘Nilai-nilai tauhid dalam mata pelajaran biologi (telaah pada mata pelajaran biologi)’, Qiro’ah J. Pendidik. Agama Islam, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 52–75, 2021, doi: 10.33511/qiroah.v11n1.52-75.

S. H. Jamila, ‘Model Pembelajaran Terpadu (Studi Kasus di Yayasan Muhammad Ya’qub Jombang)’, Autentik J. Pengemb. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 73–85, 2019, doi: 10.36379/autentik.v3i2.35.

S. Wulandari and I. F. Rahma, ‘Efektivitas media video kine master terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa secara daring’, J. Anal., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 33–45, 2021.

N. C. Maulida and S. A. Pranajaya, ‘Pengentasan degradasi minat belajar pada siswa remaja’, Tarb. Wa Ta’lim J. Penelit. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 7–16, 2018, doi: 10.21093/twt.v5i1.2421.

C. A. P. Vercaruz, N. Septiani, and R. S. Fitriani, ‘Comparison of character responsibilities and learning outcomes in mexico and indonesia in first high schools’, EduFisika J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 183–196, 2023, doi: 10.59052/edufisika.v8i2.26532.

N. Suriani and M. S. Jailani, ‘Konsep Populasi dan Sampling Serta Pemilihan Partisipan Ditinjau Dari Penelitian Ilmiah Pendidikan’, IHSAN J. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 24–36, 2023, doi: 10.61104/ihsan.v1i2.55.

N. L. C. Pertiwi, I. W. Wiarta, and I. K. Ardana, ‘Hubungan Antara Adversity Quotient (AQ) dengan Hasil Belajar Matematika’, J. Educ. Technol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 73–80, 2019, doi: 10.23887/jet.v3i2.21707.

A. Nisa, Y. M. Oktavianti, and A. Sumitra, ‘Meningkatkan Kecerdasan Logis Matematis Pada Kelompok B Anak Usia Dini Melalui Media Pembelajaran Dadu Angka Pada Kelompok B’, CERIA (Cerdas Energik Responsif Inov. Adapt., vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 347–353, 2019.

Y. Maulidiyah, K. Mubarok, and E. Rahmawati, ‘Pengaruh Metode Role Playing Terhadap Hasil Belajar Subtema Pekerjaan di Sekitarku Siswa Kelas IV SD’, J. Ilm. Mandala Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.58258/jime.v8i1.2754.

S. W. Octavia, Neni Septiani, F. Sinaga, and N. N. Qoidah, ‘Analysis Of The Relationship In Learning Interest To Learning Outcomes Static Fluid Material In Senior High School’, J. Ilm. Ilmu Terap. Univ. Jambi, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 22–26, 2023.

Y. L. Sukestiyarno and A. Agoestanto, ‘Batasan prasyarat uji normalitas dan uji homogenitas pada model regresi linear’, Unnes J. Math., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 168–177, 2017, doi: 10.15294/UJM.V6I2.11887.

R. Sianturi, ‘Uji homogenitas sebagai syarat pengujian analisis’, J. Pendidikan, Sains Sos. dan Agama, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 386–397, 2022, doi: 10.53565/pssa.v8i1.507.

A. Astalini, D. Darmaji, D. A. Kurniawan, N. Septiani, and M. Z. Azzahra, ‘Revitalizing Science Education: Teachers’ Response to Embedding Adat Bersendi Syara’and Syara’Bersendi Kitabullah Values into the Learning Process’, Integr. Sci. Educ. J., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 117–122, 2023, doi: 10.37251/isej.v4i3.735.

R. Melasari, ‘Pengaruh Kecerdasan Intelektual, Kecerdasaran Emosional Dan Minat Belajar Terhadap Tingkat Pemahaman Akuntansi Pada Mahasiswa Akuntansi Di Universitas Islam Indragiri’, J. Akunt. Dan Keuang., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 24–34, 2021, doi: 10.32520/jak.v10i1.1645.

N. Daulay, ‘Implementasi tes psikologi dalam bidang pendidikan’, J. Tarb., vol. 21, no. 2, 2016.

N. E. Kartini, E. S. Nurdin, K. A. Hakam, and S. Syihabuddin, ‘Telaah Revisi Teori Domain Kognitif Taksonomi Bloom dan Keterkaitannya dalam Kurikulum Pendidikan Agama Islam’, J. Basicedu, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 7292–7302, 2022, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3478.

D. M. Fernandes, ‘Mengukur Hasil Belajar Pada Aspek Pengetahuan Mata Pelajaran PJOK’, in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Jasmani Pascasarjana UM, 2016, pp. 293–308.

F. T. Aldila, E. F. S. Rini, S. W. Octavia, N. N. Khaidah, F. P. Sinaga, and N. Septiani, ‘The Relationship of Teacher Teaching Skills and Learning Interests of Physics Students of Senior High School’, Edufisika J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 101–105, 2023, doi: 10.59052/edufisika.v8i1.24864.

P. Diana, I. Marethi, and A. S. Pamungkas, ‘Kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis siswa: ditinjau dari kategori kecemasan matematik’, SJME (Supremum J. Math. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 24–32, 2020.

D. Rosyidi, ‘Teknik dan instrumen asesmen ranah kognitif’, Tasyri’ J. Tarbiyah-Syari’ah Islam., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2020.

W. Astuti and M. H. Sianipar, ‘The Effect of Scaffolding Using the Peer Tutoring Method on Biology Learning Outcomes in the Material of the Human Excretory System’, Indones. J. Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 43–48, 2023, doi: 10.37251/ijoer.v4i2.582.