SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

6

H-Index

Journal of Health Innovation and Environmental Education

an Open Access Journal


Health Service Utilization Patterns Among Health Equity Fund Beneficiaries at Khmer-Soviet Friendship Hospital

Share
  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to analyze health service utilization patterns among Health Equity Fund beneficiaries at the Khmer–Soviet Friendship Hospital (KSFH), Phnom Penh, with a particular focus on the distribution of service types and the role of HEF in facilitating access to advanced healthcare services.

    Methodology: A descriptive quantitative study was conducted using secondary data obtained from the medical records unit of KSFH. Data were processed through standardized procedures, including editing, coding, processing, and cleaning. Descriptive (univariate) analysis was employed to examine the frequency and percentage distribution of healthcare service utilization across outpatient, inpatient, emergency, surgical, diagnostic, and maternal services.

    Main Findings: The findings revealed that outpatient services were the most frequently utilized by HEF beneficiaries (38%), followed by inpatient care (26%) and emergency services (18%). Surgical services accounted for 10% of total utilization, with orthopedic and general surgeries being the most common. Diagnostic services (7%) and maternal and child health services (5%) were also accessed, indicating improved access to both essential and specialized care.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study provides novel evidence by systematically mapping HEF beneficiaries’ healthcare utilization patterns at a major national referral hospital using a structured SOFFIIWIER-based data processing framework.

  • How to cite

    Health Service Utilization Patterns Among Health Equity Fund Beneficiaries at Khmer-Soviet Friendship Hospital. (2024). Journal of Health Innovation and Environmental Education, 1(2), 66-73. https://doi.org/10.37251/jhiee.v2i2.2582
  • 82
    Abstract views
    55
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. K. Vireak, S. Rany, L. Bunrosy, and R. Wen, “Freshmen ’ s perceptions of the effect of technology on learning english : A case study at the national University of Battambang , Cambodia,” vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 54–75, 20245, doi: 10.37251/jske.v6i1.1291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jske.v6i1.1291
    2. B. Van Dusen and J. Nissen, “Associations between learning assistants, passing introductory physics, and equity: A quantitative critical race theory investigation,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 16, no. 1, p. 10117, 2020, doi: 10.1103/PHYSREVPHYSEDUCRES.16.010117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010117
    3. M. Kennedy-Martin et al., “Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines,” Eur. J. Heal. Econ., vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1245–1257, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01195-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-020-01195-8
    4. B. Terpou, M. Bird, D. Srinivasan, S. Bains, L. Rosella, and L. Desveaux, “A population health approach: An organizational case study of mental models among hospital leaders,” Acad. Manag. Proc., vol. 2024, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2024, doi: 10.5465/amproc.2024.14222abstract. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMPROC.2024.14222abstract
    5. Y. R. Ho, B. Y. Chen, and C. M. Li, “Thinking more wisely: Using the socratic method to develop critical thinking skills amongst healthcare students,” BMC Med. Educ., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04134-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04134-2
    6. J. Glazzard and A. Rose, “The impact of teacher well-being and mental health on pupil progress in primary schools,” J. Public Ment. Health, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 349–357, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMH-02-2019-0023
    7. A. Liberati et al., “The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration,” PLoS Med., vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 1–28, 2009, doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
    8. K. Shelley and L. McCuaig, “Close encounters with critical pedagogy in socio-critically informed health education teacher education,” Phys. Educ. Sport Pedagog., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 510–523, 2018, doi: 10.1080/17408989.2018.1470615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2018.1470615
    9. M. Siarudin, S. A. Awang, R. Sadono, and P. Suryanto, “Renewable energy from secondary wood products contributes to local green development: the case of small-scale privately owned forests in Ciamis Regency, Indonesia,” Energy. Sustain. Soc., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s13705-023-00383-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-023-00383-7
    10. S. Karami, M. Ghahremani, F. A. Parra-martinez, and F. A. Parra-martinez, “A polyhedron model of wisdom : A systematic review of the wisdom studies in psychology , management and leadership , and education,” Roeper Rev., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 241–257, 2020, doi: 10.1080/02783193.2020.1815263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2020.1815263
    11. T. Kee, H. Zhang, and R. B. King, An empirical study on immersive technology in synchronous hybrid learning in design education, vol. 34, no. 3. Springer Netherlands, 2024. doi: 10.1007/s10798-023-09855-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-023-09855-5
    12. B. Ban, T. Kanjanarach, and S. Chanaboon, “Awareness, intention to act and action in the exercising of patients’ rights: a case study of patients in khmer soviet friendship hospital, Phnom Penh, Cambodia,” Risk Manag. Healthc. Policy, vol. Volume 13, pp. 2365–2370, 2020, doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S265928. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S265928
    13. H. Susanto, D. Setiawan, S. Mahanal, Z. Firdaus, and C. Tsany Kusmayadi, “Development and evaluation of e-comic nervous system app to enhance self-directed student learning,” JPBI (Jurnal Pendidik. Biol. Indones., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 143–153, 2024, doi: 10.22219/jpbi.v10i1.31451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i1.31451
    14. D. P. Sari, S. Sriyati, and R. Solihat, “The development of ethnobotany based local wisdom learning materials to improve environmental literacy and creative thinking skills,” in Proceedings of the 7th Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science Education International Seminar, MSCEIS 2019, 2020. doi: 10.4108/eai.12-10-2019.2296334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.12-10-2019.2296334
    15. F. N. Husain, “Digital Assessment Literacy: The need of online assessment literacy and online assessment literate educators,” Int. Educ. Stud., vol. 14, no. 10, p. 65, 2021, doi: 10.5539/ies.v14n10p65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v14n10p65
    16. I. Ikhsan and A. Amri, “Exploration of macroeconomic effects on criminality in Indonesia,” Cogent Soc. Sci., vol. 9, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1080/23311886.2023.2206678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2206678
    17. T. U. Zaman, H. D. Goswami, and Y. Hassan, “The impact of growth and development of slums on the health status and health awareness of slum dwellers,” Int. J. Med. Res. Heal. Sci., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 55–65, 2018.
    18. L. Meilana and Q. Fang, “Local knowledge-based study on the status of horseshoe crabs along the Indonesian coast,” Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci., vol. 36, no. 1, p. 101252, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.rsma.2020.101252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2020.101252
    19. A. Klonecka et al., “XANES reference library of sulphur-containing compounds for biological research: A status report from the ASTRA beamline at the solaris national synchrotron radiation centre,” RSC Adv., vol. 15, no. 17, pp. 13513–13524, 2025, doi: 10.1039/D5RA00682A. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D5RA00682A
    20. N. Mafarja, H. Zulnaidi, and H. Mohd. Fadzil, “Using Reciprocal Teaching Strategy to Improve Physics Students’ Critical Thinking Ability,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2022, doi: 10.29333/EJMSTE/11506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11506
    21. L. S. Ling and S. Krishnasamy, “Information technology capability (ITC) framework to improve learning experience and academic achievement of mathematics in Malaysia,” Electron. J. e-Learning, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 36–51, 2023, doi: 10.34190/ejel.21.1.2169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.21.1.2169
    22. M. Asigbaase et al., “Ethnobotanical and ethnopharmacological survey of medicinal tree species used in the treatment of diseases by forest-fringe communities of Southwestern Ghana,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 1, p. e23645, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23645
    23. Konstantina Vasileiou, Julie Barnett, Susan Thorpe, and Terry Young, “Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period,” BMC Med. Res. Methodol., vol. 18, no. 1, p. 148, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7
    24. J. Ferreira, M. Behrens, P. Torres, and R. Marriott, “The necessary knowledge for online education: Teaching and learning to produce knowledge,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 2097–2106, 2018, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/86463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/86463
    25. H. Sofyani, H. A. Riyadh, and H. Fahlevi, “Improving service quality , accountability and of information technology governance improving service quality , accountability and transparency of local government : The inter- vening role of information technology governance,” Cogent Bus. Manag. ISSN, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 4–20, 2020, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2020.1735690. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1735690
    26. P. L. Annear et al., “Protecting the poor? Impact of the national health equity fund on utilization of government health services in Cambodia, 2006-2013,” BMJ Glob. Heal., vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 1–9, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001679
    27. W. N. Huang, X. Xin, V. Rao, T. H. Wong, P. Chow, and H. K. Tan, “Battling against the great disruption to surgical care in a pandemic: Experiences of 11 South and Southeast Asian countries,” BMJ Open, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1–10, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060770. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060770
    28. M. Bigdeli and P. L. Annear, “Barriers to access and the purchasing function of health equity funds: Lessons from Cambodia,” Bull. World Health Organ., vol. 87, no. 7, pp. 560–564, Jul. 2009, doi: 10.2471/BLT.08.053058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.08.053058
    29. N. T. Handayani, T. Krobthong, and K. Goodwell, “Descriptive study: Student learning motivation in learning physics of renewable energy materials,” Schrödinger J. Phys. Educ., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 98–103, 2023, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v4i4.775. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v4i4.775
    30. H. Taherdoost, “What are different research approaches? comprehensive review of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method research, their applications, types, and limitations,” J. Manag. Sci. Eng. Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 53–63, 2022, doi: 10.30564/jmser.v5i1.4538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/jmser.v5i1.4538
    31. N. Z. Siddik and R. Sutanto, “Postpartum education in the working area of the tebing community health center,” Zo. Kedokt. Progr. Stud. Pendidik. Dr. Univ. Batam, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 24–28, 2021, doi: 10.37776/zked.v10i3.520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37776/zked.v10i3.520
    32. O. Dakhi, J. Jama, D. Irfan, Ambiyar, and Ishak, “Blended learning: A 21St century learning model at college,” Internatinal J. Multiscience, vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 50–65, 2020.
    33. P. U. Wijayanti, W. Windia, D. P. Darmawan, and W. Widhianthini, “Sustainable development model of subak in Denpasar City,” Int. J. life Sci., 2020, doi: 10.29332/ijls.v4n1.418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29332/ijls.v4n1.418
    34. T. N. A. Nguyen, T. H. H. Pham, and T. Vallée, “Similarity in trade structure: Evidence from ASEAN + 3,” J. Int. Trade Econ. Dev., vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1000–1024, 2017, doi: 10.1080/09638199.2017.1331372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2017.1331372
    35. B. W. Pratolo and H. A. Solikhati, “Investigating teachers’ attitude toward digital literacy in EFL classroom,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 97–103, 2020, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v15i1.15747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v15i1.15747
    36. Almita, M. Tahir, and M. N. Hajjad, “Employee performance and the impact of workplace facilities and discipline,” J. Manaj. Bisnis, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 417–425, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33096/jmb.v10i2.616
    37. P. da S. Finamore et al., “Nigerian politicians, discipline, integrity, character and the rule of law: Application versus financial spending in 2019 federal elections,” J. Chem. Inf. Model., vol. 53, no. February, p. 2021, 2021, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19482.59846.
    38. M. J. K. DiMattio and S. S. Hudacek, “Educating generation Z: Psychosocial dimensions of the clinical learning environment that predict student satisfaction,” Nurse Educ. Pract., vol. 49, p. 102901, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102901. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102901
    39. S. Bouchard, S. Gamache, and G. Abdulnour, “Operationalizing mass customization in manufacturing SMEs A Systematic Literature Review,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 4, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15043028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043028
    40. H. Xu, “Cultivating film appreciation and creativity: the development of public film education in mainland China,” Film Educ. J., vol. 6, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.14324/fej.06.1.03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/FEJ.06.1.03
    41. A. Dengel, M. Z. Iqbal, S. Grafe, and E. Mangina, “A review on augmented reality authoring toolkits for education,” Front. Virtual Real., vol. 3, no. April, pp. 1–15, 2022, doi: 10.3389/frvir.2022.798032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2022.798032
    42. C. O. Webb, J. W. F. Slik, and T. Triono, “Biodiversity inventory and informatics in Southeast Asia,” Biodivers. Conserv., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 955–972, Apr. 2010, doi: 10.1007/s10531-010-9817-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9817-x