SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

6

H-Index

Journal of Health Innovation and Environmental Education

an Open Access Journal


Examining the Influence of Maternal Education, Nutritional Knowledge, and Toddler Food Intake on Nutritional Status

Share
  • Purpose of the study: The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the level of maternal education, the level of maternal nutritional knowledge and the food intake of toddlers on the nutritional status of toddlers.

    Methodology: This type of research is an analytical survey with a cross-sectional design. The sample in this study was 54 toddlers obtained using random sampling techniques. The instruments used were questionnaires, 24-hour recall forms, foot scales and height measuring tapes or microtoises. The data obtained in this study were processed using chi-square test statistics.

    Main Findings: There is a relationship between the level of maternal education and the nutritional status of toddlers with a P value = 0.203 based on BB/A and a P value = 0.847 based on the TB/A index, the level of maternal nutritional knowledge on the nutritional status of toddlers with a P value = 0.990 based on the BB/A index and a P value = 0.171 based on the TB/A index. There is no relationship between food intake and the nutritional status of toddlers in Tamangapa Village, Manggala District, Makassar City with a P value = 0.004 based on energy intake with nutritional status BB/A and a P value = 0.006 TB/A.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: As a reference material for health workers and the government so that they can provide information and direction to the community, especially mothers, to pay attention to food intake and the development of the nutritional status of their toddlers.

  • How to cite

    Examining the Influence of Maternal Education, Nutritional Knowledge, and Toddler Food Intake on Nutritional Status. (2024). Journal of Health Innovation and Environmental Education, 1(2), 38-46. https://doi.org/10.37251/jhiee.v1i2.1211
  • 367
    Abstract views
    306
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. N. E. Marshall et al., “The importance of nutrition in pregnancy and lactation: lifelong consequences,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., vol. 226, no. 5, pp. 607–632, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.12.035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.12.035
    2. V. Von Salmuth, E. Brennan, M. Kerac, M. McGrath, S. Frison, and N. Lelijveld, “Maternal-focused interventions to improve infant growth and nutritional status in lowmiddle income countries: A systematic review of reviews,” PLoS One, vol. 16, no. 8 August, pp. 1–30, 2021, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256188
    3. B. Kumari, “Factors Affecting Nutritional Status of Pregnant Women,” J. Sci. Innov. Nat. Earth, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 51–56, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59436/mec2vz30
    4. J. L. Hudson, J. I. Baum, E. C. Diaz, and E. Børsheim, “Dietary protein requirements in children: Methods for consideration,” Nutrients, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1–14, 2021, doi: 10.3390/nu13051554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13051554
    5. M. Homan et al., “Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Children: An Update to the ESPGHAN Position Paper,” J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr., vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 415–426, 2021, doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000003207
    6. L. Day, J. A. Cakebread, and S. M. Loveday, “Food proteins from animals and plants: Differences in the nutritional and functional properties,” Trends Food Sci. Technol., vol. 119, no. December 2021, pp. 428–442, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.12.020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.12.020
    7. M. M. Black, A. C. B. Trude, and C. K. Lutter, “All Children Thrive: Integration of Nutrition and Early Childhood Development,” Annu. Rev. Nutr., vol. 40, pp. 375–406, 2020, doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-120219-023757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nutr-120219-023757
    8. M. M. Black et al., “The principles of Nurturing Care promote human capital and mitigate adversities from preconception through adolescence,” BMJ Glob. Heal., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1–9, 2021, doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004436
    9. L. F. Grilo et al., “Metabolic Disease Programming: From Mitochondria to Epigenetics, Glucocorticoid Signalling and Beyond,” Eur. J. Clin. Invest., vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 1–21, 2021, doi: 10.1111/eci.13625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13625
    10. T. Peni, S. I. Laili, E. D. Jayanti, and D. A. Sari, “Analysis of Cognitive Abilities of School-Age Children Based on,” Int. J. Nurs. Midwifery Sci., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 37–45, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29082/IJNMS/2020/Vol4/Iss1/257
    11. R. Sepriani, Y. Ockta, E. Eldawaty, and P. Padli, “How do physical fitness, nutritional status, and self-concept affect student learning outcomes in physical education with a focus on health and hygiene education?,” J. Konseling dan Pendidik., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1–12, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29210/1118100
    12. J. M. Saavedra and A. M. Prentice, “Nutrition in school-age children: a rationale for revisiting priorities,” Nutr. Rev., vol. 81, no. 7, pp. 823–843, 2023, doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuac089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuac089
    13. N. M. Cristina and D. Lucia, “Nutrition and healthy aging: Prevention and treatment of gastrointestinal diseases,” Nutrients, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 1–23, 2021, doi: 10.3390/nu13124337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13124337
    14. E. Kose, H. Wakabayashi, and N. Yasuno, “Polypharmacy and malnutrition management of elderly perioperative patients with cancer: A systematic review,” Nutrients, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1–17, 2021, doi: 10.3390/nu13061961. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13061961
    15. M. Roberts, T. Tolar-Peterson, A. Reynolds, C. Wall, N. Reeder, and G. Rico Mendez, “The Effects of Nutritional Interventions on the Cognitive Development of Preschool-Age Children: A Systematic Review,” Nutrients, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1–15, 2022, doi: 10.3390/nu14030532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14030532
    16. G. Yadav and K. Chowdhury, “From undernourished (Karshya) to thriving: How food nutrition supports preschool children’s growth,” Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 5–8, 2023.
    17. A. A. Almulla, A. S. Alanazi, M. Ahmad, and S. Khasawneh, “The Relationship between Nutritional Intake and Mother’s Education Level with the Nutritional Status of Children with Special Needs,” J. Re Attach Ther. Dev. Divers., vol. 6, no. 8s, pp. 686–692, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://jrtdd.com
    18. N. Indrawati, S. Katmawanti, and F. Paramita, “Proceedings of the International Conference on Sports Science and Health (ICSSH 2022),” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Sports Science and Health (ICSSH 2022), Atlantis Press International BV, 2022, pp. 316–331. doi: 10.2991/978-94-6463-072-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-072-5_33
    19. M. Sotiraki et al., “Burden of Childhood Malnutrition : A Roadmap of Global and,” Children, vol. 9, no. 1179, pp. 1–17, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/children9081179
    20. A. N. Kusuma, “Nutritional Problems of Toddlers and Its Relationship with Indonesia’s Public Health Growth Index,” NeuroQuantology, vol. 20, no. 15, pp. 2685–2692, 2022, doi: 10.14704/NQ.2022.20.15.NQ88259.
    21. M. Ratnawati, M. S. Prihatini, R. Probowati, R. H. Lestari, and D. Puspitaningsih, “Analysis of The Situation of Undernutrition and Malnutrition on Toddlers,” Malaysian J. Med. Res., vol. 06, no. 03, pp. 01–05, 2022, doi: 10.31674/mjmr.2022.v6i03.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31674/mjmr.2022.v6i03.001
    22. N. D. Amaha and B. T. Woldeamanuel, “Maternal factors associated with moderate and severe stunting in Ethiopian children: analysis of some environmental factors based on 2016 demographic health survey,” Nutr. J., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s12937-021-00677-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-021-00677-6
    23. X. Wang and Z. Cheng, “Cross-Sectional Studies: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Recommendations,” Chest, vol. 158, no. 1, pp. S65–S71, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.012
    24. T. W. Taris, S. R. Kessler, and E. K. Kelloway, “Strategies addressing the limitations of cross-sectional designs in occupational health psychology: What they are good for (and what not),” Work Stress, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2021, doi: 10.1080/02678373.2021.1888561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2021.1888561
    25. Q. Han et al., “Trust in government regarding COVID-19 and its associations with preventive health behaviour and prosocial behaviour during the pandemic: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study,” Psychol. Med., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 149–159, 2023, doi: 10.1017/S0033291721001306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721001306
    26. B. Gao et al., “Causal inference from cross-sectional earth system data with geographical convergent cross mapping,” Nat. Commun., vol. 14, no. 5875, pp. 1–12, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41619-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41619-6
    27. H. Mohajan, “Quantitative Research: A Successful Investigation in Natural and Social Sciences,” J. Econ. Dev. Environ. People, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 52–79, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/105149/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v9i4.679
    28. W. Sui, X. Gong, and Y. Zhuang, “The mediating role of regulatory emotional self-efficacy on negative emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study,” Int. J. Ment. Health Nurs., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 759–771, 2021, doi: 10.1111/inm.12830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12830
    29. S. J. Stratton, “Population Research: Convenience Sampling Strategies,” Prehosp. Disaster Med., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 373–374, 2021, doi: 10.1017/S1049023X21000649. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X21000649
    30. S. Rico, Nur Ilham; Irada, Sinta; Mangasi, “the Effect of Technical Analysis on Cryptocurrency Investment Returns With the 5 ( Five ) Highest Market,” Ejournal Sean Inst., vol. 11, no. 02, pp. 1022–1035, 2022.