Journal of Basic Education Research
Journal of Basic Education Research

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

14

H-Index

Journal of Basic Education Research

an Open Access Journal

The Effectiveness of Self-Regulation Strategies to Increase Achievement Motivation in Elementary School Students

Bagas Fevernova Wibowo
University of Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Angola
fevernovabagas@gmail.com
Minsih Minsih
University of Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Indonesia
Share

  • Purpose of the study: Good academic achievement will be fulfilled if students have the motivation to excel but some students have problems with the motivation to achieve. The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness of self-regulation strategies in increasing student achievement motivation.

    Methodology: This study uses an experimental quantitative method with a one group pre-test post-test research design. The sampling technique used purposive sampling, a research sample of 10 students in grade V of SDN Kedung Waduk 01 Sragen. The data collected is in the form of a score in the form of a percentage. The validity of the data was tested using pretest and posttest. Data analysis was carried out using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test.

    Main Findings: The results of the study showed an increase in the percentage of student achievement motivation indicators by 71.2 (high) from the initial condition of 25.9 (low). Self-regulation strategy with a standard deviation of 09.95 and a standard error mean of 4.70. After receiving treatment, the self-regulation strategy was seen to increase with a standard deviation of 8.74 and a mean error standard of 4.00.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: It can be concluded that the motivation of students to achieve achievement after receiving treatment (Self Regulation Strategy) is higher before receiving treatment (Self Regulation Strategy).

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “The Effectiveness of Self-Regulation Strategies to Increase Achievement Motivation in Elementary School Students”, J. Bs. Edu. R, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 277–282, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.37251/jber.v6i2.1537.

    More Citation Formats

  • 346
    Abstract views
    196
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. F. Mufit, Asrizal, S. A. Hanum, and A. Fadhilah, “Preliminary research in the development of physics teaching materials that integrate new literacy and disaster literacy,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1481, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1481/1/012041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1481/1/012041
    2. I. Eilks, “Science education and education for sustainable development - justifications, models, practices and perspectives,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 149–158, 2015, doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2015.1313a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1313a
    3. D. T. Amijaya, S. Komariah, K. P. Putri, and M. C. Devi, “Multiple regression : deteminant on profitability at islamic commercial banks in Indonesia,” Dinasti Int. J. Econ. Financ. Account., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 21–30, 2020, doi: 10.38035/DIJEFA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38035/dijefa.v1i1.201
    4. A. Ratana-Ubol and J. A. Henschke, “Cultural learning processes through local wisdom,” Int. J. Adult Vocat. Educ. Technol., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 41–60, 2015, doi: 10.4018/ijavet.2015040104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/ijavet.2015040104
    5. S. Hamid, S. Naveed, H. Ayub, and S. Akhtar, “Academic leadership during the time of crisis: Success story of implementation success from traditional to online mode of education in a low-resource context,” Cogent Soc. Sci., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2023, doi: 10.1080/23311886.2023.2197302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2197302
    6. D. Akgunduz, “A research about the placement of the top thousand students in STEM fields in Turkey between 2000 and 2014,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1365–1377, 2016, doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2016.1518a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1518a
    7. M. A. Seven, “Innovation in language learning and teaching,” Innov. Lang. Learn. Teach., vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 62–71, 2019, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-13413-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13413-6
    8. A. Agbi and P. Yuangsoi, “Enhancement of critical thinking skills in students using mobile-blended learning with a collaborative inquiry-based approach,” Humanit. Arts Soc. Sci. Stud., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 9–20, 2022.
    9. P. T. Nugroho, D. P. Dewi, S. Fuada, H. E. Putri, F. R. Jannah, and F. W. Zanah, “Teaching sine wave concept through simulation for elementary school students,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1987, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1987/1/012044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1987/1/012044
    10. A. E. Strode, P. P. Singh, C. M. Slack, and D. R. Wassenaar, “Research ethics committees in a tight spot: Approving consent strategies for child research that are prima facie illegal but are ethical in terms of national guidelines,” South African Med. J., vol. 108, no. 10, pp. 828–832, 2018, doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2018.v108i10.13203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2018.v108i10.13203
    11. I. S. M. Ramli, S. M. Maat, and F. Khalid, “The design of game-based learning and learning analytics,” Cypriot J. Educ. Sci., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1742–1759, 2022, doi: 10.18844/cjes.v17i5.7326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i5.7326
    12. F. Saltan and Ö. Arslan, “The use of augmented reality in formal education: A scoping review,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 503–520, 2017, doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2017.00628a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00628a
    13. A. Lilian, “Motivational beliefs, an important contrivance in elevating digital literacy among university students,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 12, p. e11913, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11913. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11913
    14. F. T. Nephawe, “Evaluating embodied pedagogical game approach in the learning of selected prepositions of time,” JET (Journal English Teaching), vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 150–164, 2023, doi: 10.33541/jet.v9i2.4210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v9i2.4210
    15. A. Nor, M. Yusuf, and I. Arabi, “Strategies for improving the professionalism of islamic education teachers at university,” Tafkir Interdiscip. J. Islam. Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 40–61, 2024, doi: 10.31538/tijie.v5i1.774. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31538/tijie.v5i1.774
    16. A. O. Safitri, P. A. Handayani, and V. D. Yunianti, “Pengaruh model pembelajaran discovery learning terhadap peningkatan hasil belajar siswa SD,” J. Pendidik. Tambusai, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 9106–9114, 2022.
    17. S. Sukarno, “Efforts to improve science learning outcomes through the problem-based learning model for students in Bengkulu,” J. Basic Educ. Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 11–15, 2024, doi: 10.37251/jber.v5i1.742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jber.v5i1.742
    18. M. R. KHADAVI and S. A. MAULANA, “Hubungan sarana prasaran dan motivasi terhadap pencapaian prestasi olahraga siswa sma kota Pangkalpinang,” J. Muara Olahraga, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 228–238, 2020, doi: 10.52060/jmo.v2i2.312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52060/jmo.v2i2.312
    19. Q. Uyuni and N. Af’idah, “Meningkatkan motivasi belajar siswa pada materi gerak ringan dengan pendekatan ilmiah berbantuan produk sederhana,” EduFisika J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 385–394, 2023, doi: 10.59052/edufisika.v8i3.29768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v8i3.29768
    20. R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, “Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 61, no. April, p. 101860, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
    21. M. A. Seven, “Motivation in language learning and teaching,” African Educ. Res. J., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 62–71, 2020.
    22. D. P. Putri, I. Rahayu, and E. A. Wahyuni, “Analisis kebutuhan bahan ajar siswa sekolah dasar berbasis etnosains pada materi zat dan campuran,” J. Nat. Sci. Educ. Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 105–110, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/nser.v5i1.15757
    23. J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 4th Editio. Newbury Park: Sage publications, 2017.
    24. P. Guzik and B. Więckowska, “Data distribution analysis – a preliminary approach to quantitative data in biomedical research,” J. Med. Sci., vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 81–96, 2023, doi: 10.20883/medical.e869. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20883/medical.e869
    25. Razali, A. Halim, A. G. Haji, and E. Nurfadilla, “Effect of inquiry learning methods on generic science skills based on creativity level,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1460, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012118
    26. I. Bakkenes, J. D. Vermunt, and T. Wubbels, “Teacher learning in the context of educational innovation: Learning activities and learning outcomes of experienced teachers,” Learn. Instr., vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 533–548, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.09.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.09.001
    27. H. B. Santoso, R. D. Riyanti, T. Prastati, F. A. H. S. Triatmoko, A. Susanty, and M. Yang, “Learners’ online self-regulated learning skills in indonesia open university: implications for policies and practice,” Educ. Sci., vol. 12, no. 7, 2022, doi: 10.3390/educsci12070469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070469
    28. T. J. Cleary and A. Kitsantas, “Motivation and self-regulated learning influences on middle school mathematics achievement,” School Psych. Rev., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 88–107, 2017, doi: 10.1080/02796015.2017.12087607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2017.12087607
    29. S. Perez-Melo and B. M. G. Kibria, “On some test statistics for testing the regression coefficients in presence of multicollinearity: a simulation study,” Stats, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 40–55, 2020, doi: 10.3390/stats3010005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/stats3010005
    30. H. Hyytinen, J. Ursin, K. Silvennoinen, K. Kleemola, and A. Toom, “Studies in educational evaluation the dynamic relationship between response processes and self-regulation in critical thinking assessments,” Stud. Educ. Eval., vol. 71, no. August, p. 101090, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101090. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101090
    31. H. L. Andrade and S. M. Brookhart, “Classroom assessment as the co-regulation of learning,” Assess. Educ. Princ. Policy Pract., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 350–372, 2020, doi: 10.1080/0969594X.2019.1571992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1571992
    32. A. Aseery, “Enhancing learners’ motivation and engagement in religious education classes at elementary levels,” Br. J. Relig. Educ., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 43–58, 2024, doi: 10.1080/01416200.2023.2256487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2023.2256487
    33. V. Clinton, “Reflections versus extended quizzes: which is better for student learning and self-regulation?,” J. Scholarsh. Teach. Learn., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2018, doi: 10.14434/josotl.v18i1.22508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v18i1.22508
    34. M. C. Butter, E. M. Aguilera, M. G. B. Quintana, L. J. Pérez, and E. S. Valenzuela, “Quality assurance for postgraduate programs: Design of a model applied on a university in Chile,” Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 266–292, 2017, doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i1.2670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i1.2670
    35. C. F. Correia and C. Harrison, “Teachers’ beliefs about inquiry-based learning and its impact on formative assessment practice,” Res. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 355–376, 2020, doi: 10.1080/02635143.2019.1634040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1634040