Evaluative Review: Differences in Knowledge and Perspectives on Generic Drugs Among Health and Non-Health Students
Abstract
Purpose of the study: This study aims to determine differences in the level of knowledge and perception about generic drugs among health and non-health students.
Methodology:This research uses a quantitative approach with a comparative type. The sample used in this research was 30 health students and 30 non-health students. Sample selection was carried out using random sampling techniques. The data collection method used was a questionnaire. The data analysis technique for this research uses the T-test.
Main Findings: Based on the T-test on the level of knowledge and perception about generic drugs in health and non-health students, the results obtained were significance values of 0.048 and 0.041 so it can be concluded that there are differences in the level of knowledge and perception about generic drugs in health and non-health students.
Novelty/Originality of this study: This research expands knowledge regarding generic drugs by examining how differences in educational background can influence students' views and understanding of generic drugs, making an important contribution in increasing knowledge about the use of generic drugs among the public.
References
K. H. Gehlich, J. Beller, B. Lange-Asschenfeldt, W. Köcher, M. C. Meinke, and J. Lademann, “Consumption of fruits and vegetables: improved physical health, mental health, physical functioning and cognitive health in older adults from 11 European countries,” Aging Ment. Heal., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 634–641, 2020, doi: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1571011.
P. A. Findley, R. C. Wiener, C. Shen, N. Dwibedi, and U. Sambamoorthi, “Health reform under the patient protection and Affordable Care Act: characteristics of exchange-based health insurance enrollees,” Soc. Work Health Care, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 685–702, 2019, doi: 10.1080/00981389.2019.1619116.
H. Jormfeldt et al., “Master’s level mental health nursing competencies, a prerequisite for equal health among service users in mental health care,” Int. J. Qual. Stud. Health Well-being, vol. 13, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1080/17482631.2018.1502013.
B. Pelters, “On mountains and prophets: targeting majorities to support minorities by using norm-critics in health education,” Int. J. Qual. Stud. Health Well-being, vol. 13, no. sup1, 2018, doi: 10.1080/17482631.2018.1522203.
Stellefson, S. R. Paige, B. H. Chaney, and J. D. Chaney, “Evolving role of social media in health promotion: Updated responsibilities for health education specialists,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 17, no. 4, 2020, doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041153.
M. Narushima et al., “Youth perspectives on sexual health education: Voices from the YEP study in Toronto,” Can. J. Hum. Sex., vol. 291, no. 1, pp. 32–44, 2020, doi: 10.3138/cjhs.2019-0049.
S. L. Thorp, “How is health education being taught and experienced? A literature review,” Teach. Curric., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 179–195, 2023, doi: 10.4324/9780203816165-16.
J. Donnelly, M. Young, and K. J. Roberts, “Advocates and Researchers Working Together to Improve School Health Education,” J. Heal. Educ. Teach., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 28–35, 2021.
M. A. Komolafe, O. E. Olorunmoteni, and F. O. Fehintola, “Effect of Health Education on Level of Awareness and Knowledge of Nigerian In-School adolescents on Stroke and Its Risk Factors,” J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1–7, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104757.
M. A. Komolafe, O. E. Olorunmoteni, and F. O. Fehintola, “Effect of Health Education on Level of Awareness and Knowledge of Nigerian In-School adolescents on Stroke and Its Risk Factors,” J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1–7, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104757.
S. M. Havercamp, W. R. Barnhart, A. C. Robinson, and C. N. Whalen Smith, “What should we teach about disability? National consensus on disability competencies for health care education,” Disabil. Health J., vol. 14, no. 2, p. 100989, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100989.
S. Barradell and A. Bell, Is health professional education making the most of the idea of ‘students as partners’? Insights from a qualitative research synthesis, vol. 26, no. 2. Springer Netherlands, 2021. doi: 10.1007/s10459-020-09998-3.
N. Ntoumanis et al., “A meta-analysis of self-determination theory-informed intervention studies in the health domain: effects on motivation, health behavior, physical, and psychological health,” Health Psychol. Rev., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 214–244, 2021, doi: 10.1080/17437199.2020.1718529.
A. E. J. van Gaalen, J. Brouwer, J. Schönrock-Adema, T. Bouwkamp-Timmer, A. D. C. Jaarsma, and J. R. Georgiadis, “Gamification of health professions education: a systematic review,” Adv. Heal. Sci. Educ., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 683–711, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10459-020-10000-3.
L. E. Søvold et al., “Prioritizing the Mental Health and Well-Being of Healthcare Workers: An Urgent Global Public Health Priority,” Front. Public Heal., vol. 9, no. May, pp. 1–12, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.679397.
A. Hasselgren, K. Kralevska, D. Gligoroski, S. A. Pedersen, and A. Faxvaag, “Blockchain in healthcare and health sciences—A scoping review,” Int. J. Med. Inform., vol. 134, no. December 2019, p. 104040, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104040.
E. Rudnicka, P. Napierała, A. Podfigurna, B. Męczekalski, R. Smolarczyk, and M. Grymowicz, “The World Health Organization (WHO) approach to healthy ageing,” Maturitas, vol. 139, no. May, pp. 6–11, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.05.018.
J. Oakman, N. Kinsman, R. Stuckey, M. Graham, and V. Weale, “A rapid review of mental and physical health effects of working at home: how do we optimise health?,” BMC Public Health, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09875-z.
E. Roh and K. M. Choi, “Health Consequences of Sarcopenic Obesity: A Narrative Review,” Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne)., vol. 11, no. May, pp. 1–12, 2020, doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00332.
I. Faber, N. A. Castellanos-Feijoó, L. Van de Sompel, A. Davydova, and F. J. A. Perez-Cueto, “Attitudes and knowledge towards plant-based diets of young adults across four European countries. Exploratory survey,” Appetite, vol. 145, p. 104498, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104498.
K. MacKrill, M. Kleinstäuber, and K. J. Petrie, “The effect of rebranding generic medicines on drug efficacy and side effects,” Psychol. Heal., vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 1470–1485, 2019, doi: 10.1080/08870446.2019.1616088.
M. Kleinstäuber, S. Colgan, and K. J. Petrie, “Changing understanding, perceptions, pain relief of and preference for generic medicines with patient education: An experimental intervention study,” Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm., vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 1288–1299, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.09.014.
Z. U. D. Babar, S. W. Kan, and S. Scahill, “Interventions promoting the acceptance and uptake of generic medicines: A narrative review of the literature,” Health Policy (New. York)., vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 285–296, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.06.004.
A. S. Mohammed, N. A. Woldekidan, and F. A. Mohammed, “Knowledge, attitude, and practice of pharmacy professionals on generic medicines in Eastern Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 1–12, 2020, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235205.
A. U. Mishuk, I. Fasina, and J. Qian, “Impact of U.S. federal and state generic drug policies on drug use, spending, and patient outcomes: A systematic review,” Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 736–745, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.08.031.
C. M. White, “Generic Drugs Not as Safe as FDA Wants You to Believe,” Ann. Pharmacother., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 283–286, 2020, doi: 10.1177/1060028019881692.
S. I. Sharif, S. Aldayeh, H. Alsomali, and F. Hayat, “Assessment of the knowledge and perception of generic medications among pharmacy and medical students in the University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates,” J. Generic Med. Bus. J. Generic Med. Sect., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 120–128, 2020, doi: 10.1177/1741134320926642.
A. Al-Mohamadi et al., “Medical and Pharmacy Students’ Perceptions Regarding Generic Medicines in Yemen,” J. Pharm. Pract. Community Med., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 47–50, 2018, doi: 10.5530/jppcm.2018.2.13.
Y. Ito, K. Hara, and Y. Kobayashi, “The effect of inertia on brand-name versus generic drug choices,” J. Econ. Behav. Organ., vol. 172, pp. 364–379, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2019.12.022.
J. Wang et al., “Impact of ‘4+7’ volume-based drug procurement on the use of policy-related original and generic drugs: A natural experimental study in China,” BMJ Open, vol. 12, no. 3, 2022, doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054346.
K. Souliotis, C. Golna, C. Kani, and S. Markantonis, “Exploring knowledge and perceptions on generic drugs of final year pharmacy school students in Greece,” Expert Rev. Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 569–574, 2019, doi: 10.1080/14737167.2019.1571412.
L. SÜRÜCÜ and A. MASLAKÇI, “Validity and Reliability in Quantitative Research,” Bus. Manag. Stud. An Int. J., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 2694–2726, 2020, doi: 10.15295/bmij.v8i3.1540.
H. Mohajan, Munich Personal RePEc Archive Quantitative Research: A Successful Investigation in Natural and Social Sciences, vol. 9, no. 4. 2020.
G. Sunzuma and A. Maharaj, “In-service Zimbabwean teachers’ obstacles in integrating ethnomathematics approaches into the teaching and learning of geometry,” J. Curric. Stud., vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 601–620, 2021, doi: 10.1080/00220272.2020.1825820.
T. Çakiroğlu, “The Role of Athletic Self-efficacy and Athletic Perfectionism in Predicting Athletic Performance of Gazi University Student Athletes,” J. Educ. Issues, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 300, 2021, doi: 10.5296/jei.v7i2.19108.
N. M. Ratminingsih, I. G. Budasi, and W. D. A. Kurnia, “Local culture-based storybook and its effect on reading competence,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 253–268, 2020, doi: 10.29333/iji.2020.13218a.
M. J. Vansteensel, G. Kristo, E. J. Aarnoutse, and N. F. Ramsey, “The brain-computer interface researcher’s questionnaire: from research to application,” Brain-Computer Interfaces, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 236–247, 2017, doi: 10.1080/2326263X.2017.1366237.
J. Qu et al., “Knowledge, perceptions and practices of pharmacists regarding generic substitution in China: A cross-sectional study,” BMJ Open, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 1–11, 2021, doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051277.
D. Kwarikunda, U. Schiefele, J. Ssenyonga, and C. M. Muwonge, “The Relationship between Motivation for, and Interest in, Learning Physics among Lower Secondary School Students in Uganda,” African J. Res. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 435–446, 2020, doi: 10.1080/18117295.2020.1841961.
M. A. A. Musa and J. A. Al Momani, “University Students’ Attitudes towards using the Nearpod Application in Distance Learning,” J. Educ. e-Learning Res., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 110–118, 2022, doi: 10.20448/jeelr.v9i2.4030.
T. K. Tan, “Practical t-test Power Analysis with R,” Pract. Assessment, Res. Eval., vol. 27, no. 18, pp. 1–27, 2022, doi: 10.7275/mmna-sh25.
M. D. W. Ernawati, A. Asrial, R. Perdana, S. E. Septi, S. Rohana, and A. M. Nawahdani, “Evaluation of Students’ Interest, Attitudes, and Science Process Skills in Science Subjects,” J. Educ. Res. Eval., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 181–194, 2022, doi: 10.23887/jere.v6i1.37583.
I. N. Dewi, S. D. Utami, I. Effendi, A. Ramdani, and I. S. Rohyani, “The Effectiveness of Biology Learning-Local Genius Program of Mount Rinjani Area to Improve the Generic Skills,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 265–282, 2020, doi: 10.29333/IJI.2021.14116A.
Y. M. Al-Worafi et al., “Knowledge, Beliefs and Factors Affecting the Use of Generic Medicines among Patients in Ibb, Yemen: A Mixed-method Study,” J. Pharm. Pract. Community Med., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 53–56, 2020, doi: 10.5530/jppcm.2020.4.16.
K. Suthar, V. Prajapati, B. Bhad, S. Patel, and G. Dumra, “Assessment of knowledge and attitude toward generic drugs among interns and residents in tertiary care teaching hospital,” Natl. J. Physiol. Pharm. Pharmacol., vol. 11, no. 05, pp. 476–480, 2021, doi: 10.5455/njppp.2021.11.12375202030122020.
D. B. Mamo and B. K. Alemu, “Rational drug-use evaluation based on world health organization core drug-use indicators in a Tertiary Referral Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study,” Drug. Healthc. Patient Saf., vol. 12, pp. 15–21, 2020, doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S237021.
Y. Zhu, C. Che, B. Jin, N. Zhang, C. Su, and F. Wang, “Knowledge-driven drug repurposing using a comprehensive drug knowledge graph,” Health Informatics J., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 2737–2750, 2020, doi: 10.1177/1460458220937101.
J. Charan, D. Saxena, M. Chaudhri, S. Dutta, R. J. Kaur, and P. Bhardwaj, “Universal health coverage ‑ There is more to it than meets the eye,” J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 169–170, 2017, doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc.
L. A. Mahdi, D. J. Kadhim, and A. A. Al-Jumaili, “Knowledge, Perception and Attitude Regarding Generic Medicines among Iraqi Physicians,” Inov. Pharm., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 9, 2020, doi: 10.24926/iip.v11i1.2332.
Y. Ito, K. Hara, H. Sato, and J. Tomio, “Knowledge, experience, and perceptions of generic drugs among middle-aged adults and their willingness-to-pay: A nationwide online survey in japan,” Tohoku J. Exp. Med., vol. 255, no. 1, pp. 9–17, 2021, doi: 10.1620/tjem.255.9.
J. Qu et al., “Knowledge, perceptions and practices of pharmacists regarding generic substitution in China: A cross-sectional study,” BMJ Open, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 1–11, 2021, doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051277.
Copyright (c) 2024 Helza Cahyani, Khue Le Thai Thanh, Umar Muhammad Faisal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Indonesian Journal of Education Research (IJoER) is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
