Teacher Strategies in Realizing Teacher Pedagogical Competence in High School
Abstract
Purpose of the study: The aim of this research is to find out teacher strategies in realizing teacher pedagogical competence in high school.
Methodology: This research is included in the type of descriptive qualitative research with a phenomenological approach. Data collection comes from interviews and observations. Interviews were conducted with six informants, consisting of two history subject teachers and two sociology subject teachers. The other informants were one class X student and one class XI student who still received instruction from the four teachers.
Main Findings: The results of the research show: (1) The meaning of pedagogical competence for teachers in high school (2) Teacher strategies in realizing teacher pedagogical competence in high school are (a) the approach taken by teachers towards students, (b) teacher strategies are based on the approach taken by teachers towards students . Erving Goffman's dramaturgical theory provides an overview of the daily lives of individuals that occur on a stage. In the show there are two parts, namely the front stage which consists of setting, appearance and attitude.
Novelty/Originality of this study: The research that is currently being carried out is updated with different approaches from the four high school teachers, resulting in different strategies. An approach can be likened to a map of the geographical conditions of an area, while a strategy is a plan for developing the potential of that area. So, to develop student potential, a teacher must be able to understand student needs in the teaching and learning process.
References
M. M. Matondang, E. F. Setiya Rini, N. D. Putri, and F. Yolvianysah, “Uji Perbandingan Motivasi Belaajar Siswa Kelas XI MIPA 2 dan XII MIPA 2 di SMA Negeri 1 Muaro Jambi,” J. Sains dan Pendidik. Fis., vol. 16, no. 03, pp. 218–227, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.35580/jspf.v16i3.15553.
S. Halimah, “Upaya Guru dalam Pembentukan Akhlak Anak di Raudlotul Athfal Baipas Roudlotul Jannah Kota Malang,” J. Dewantara, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 1–6, 2019.
F. P. Sinaga, Jurhana, Yusrita, and M. Hidayat, “Analisis penggunaan metode mengajar (metode demonstrasi, metode eksperimen, metode inquiry, dan metode discovery di SMA Negeri 11 Kota Jambi),” Relativ. J. Ris. Inov. Pembelajaran Fis., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 103–110, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.29103/relativitas.v5i2.7830.
A. Y. Ridwan, “Implementasi E-Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran IPA Pada Siswa Madrasah Tsanawiyah Ar-Ruhama,” Charity, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2020, doi: 10.25124/charity.v3i2.2546.
W. A. Putri, R. Fitriani, E. F. Setya Rini, F. T. Aldila, and T. Ratnawati, “Pengaruh Motivasi terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama,” SAP (Susunan Artik. Pendidikan), vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 248–254, 2021, doi: 10.36987/jpms.v7i1.1942.
D. Darmaji, A. Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, and E. F. Setiya Rini, “Gender Analysis in Measurement Materials: Critical Thinking Ability and Science Processing Skills,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Fis. Al-BiRuNi, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 113–128, 2022, doi: 10.24042/jipf.
Astalini et al., “Impact of Science Process Skills on Thinking Skills in Rural and Urban Schools,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 803–822, 2023.
F. T. Aldila, E. F. S. Rini, S. W. Oktavia, N. N. Khaidah, F. P. Sinaga, and N. Sinaga, “The Relationship of Teacher Teaching Skills and Learning Interests of Physics Students of Senior High School,” EduFisika J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 8, no. 1, 2023.
F. T. Aldila and E. F. S. Rini, “Teacher’s Strategy in Developing Practical Values of the 5th Pancasila Preepts in Thematic Learning in Elementary School,” J. Basic Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 1, 2023.
S. Syahrial, D. A. Kurniawan, A. Asrial, H. Sabil, S. Maryani, and E. F. S. Rini, “Professional teachers: Study of ICT capabilities and research competencies in urban and rural?,” Cypriot J. Educ. Sci., vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 2247–2261, 2022, doi: 10.18844/cjes.v17i7.7590.
T. Mulyati, “Pendekatan Konstruktivisme Dan Dampaknnya Bagi Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa SD,” EduHumaniora | J. Pendidik. Dasar Kampus Cibiru, vol. 1, no. 2, 2016, doi: 10.17509/eh.v1i2.2738.
E. Trisnowati, “Model Keterpaduan Pembelajaran Sains dalam Kurikulum 2013,” SPEKTRA J. Kaji. Pendidik. Sains, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 20–27, 2016, doi: 10.32699/spektra.v2i01.4.
W. Ningsih, “Etika Psikolog Dalam Pengumpulan Dan Penyampaian Hasil Pemeriksaan Psikologis (Tinjauan Aksiologi),” J. Filsafat Indones., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 53, 2021, doi: 10.23887/jfi.v4i1.31344.
R. P. Agustami, S. Alimah, and I. Artikel, “Persepsi Guru dan Siswa Terhadap Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu Serta Implikasinya di SMP,” J. Innov. Sci. Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 96–103, 2017, doi: 10.15294/jise.v6i1.17069.
W. Puspita Hadi, Y. Hidayati, and I. Rosidi, “Respon Guru Ipa Terhadap Pembelajaran Ipa Berintegrasi Etnosains: Studi Pendahuluan Di Kabupaten Bangkalan,” LENSA (Lentera Sains) J. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 46–53, 2020, doi: 10.24929/lensa.v10i1.92.
S. W. Oktavia, N. Septiani, F. Sinaga, and N. N. Qoidah, “Analysis of the relationship in learning interest to learning outcomes static fluid material in senior high school,” J. Ilm. Ilmu Terap. Univ. Jambi, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 22–26, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v7i1.26696.
H. M. Natsir, “Pengembangan Pembelajaran Fikih Kelas X Madrasah Aliyah dalam Model Dick & Carey,” J. Pendidik. Agama Islam (Journal Islam. Educ. Stud., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 45–67, 2017, doi: 10.15642/jpai.2017.5.1.44-67.
S. Sulastri, H. Fitria, and A. Martha, “Kompetensi Profesional Guru dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Pendidikan”, J. Educ. Res., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 258–264, Dec. 2020.
S. Syarif and F. Yunus, Metode Penelitian Sosial. Banda Aceh: Ushuluddin Publishing, 2013.
M. B. Miles and A. M. Huberman, Qualitatif Data Analysis. SAGE Publications, 1994.
P. Y. Ko, “Transcending Conventional Assessment Boundaries in Conducting Learning Study: A Case in Hong Kong,” Int. J. Lesson Learn. Stud., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 212–228, 2019, doi: 10.1108/IJLLS-10-2018-0078.
E. F. Setiya Rini, D. Darmaji, and D. A. Kurniawan, “Identifikasi Kegiatan Praktikum dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains di SMPN Se-Kecamatan Bajubang,” Edukatif J. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 2476–2481, 2022.
E. F. S. Rini and F. T. Aldila, “Practicum Activity: Analysis of Science Process Skills and Students ’ Critical Thinking Skills,” Integr. Sci. Educ. J., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 54–61, 2023, doi: 10.37251/isej.v4i2.322.
G. Ritzer, Toward an Integrated Sociological Paradigma. Boston: Allyn Bacon, 1981.
B. Handayani and A. S. Purnami, “Strategi Pembinaan Kompetensi Profesional Guru Oleh Kepala Sekolah dalam Mewujudkan Mutu Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar,” Media Manaj. Pendidik., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 429–437, 2021, doi: 10.30738/mmp.v3i3.7952.
I. Ilyas, “Strategi Peningkatan Kompetensi Profesional Guru”, JIEPP, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 34–40, Aug. 2022
Copyright (c) 2023 Annas Kuncoro Abdurrahman, Ruobing Ji
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Indonesian Journal of Education Research (IJoER) is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
