SINTA

2.5

Impact

Google Scholar

10

h-index

Indonesian Journal of Education Research (IJoER)

Open Access Journal

Exploring the Relationship Between Learner Autonomy and Learner Engagement Among EFL Students in Cambodian Universities

Somara Sun ORCID
The University of Cambodia
Cambodia
somarasun@gmail.com
Share

  • Purpose of the study: The main aims of this study are to: 1) find out how Cambodian EFL university students perceive learner autonomy and engagement; and 2) find out how these two factors correlate to one another.

    Methodology: This research adopted a quantitative methods employing cluster sampling for data collection via a bilingual questionnaire in English and Khmer. The data was processed and analyzed using SPSS (Version 23), utilizing both descriptive and inferential statistics, including correlation coefficients, to extract insights from the survey findings.

    Main Findings: The main findings of this study were: 1) Cambodian EFL university students showed high levels of learner autonomy and engagement, indicating the need for interventions to develop autonomy and create supportive learning environments; and 2) a moderate positive correlation was found between learner autonomy and engagement.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: The unique aspect of this research is how it identifies the complex correlation between learner autonomy and engagement among EFL university students in Cambodia. High levels of motivation and autonomy were seen, but there were also clear difficulties with self-perceived competence. This comprehensive perspective enhances the existing literature by emphasizing the impact of contextual elements on autonomy and engagement, therefore addressing a gap in current research. Furthermore, the results underline the significance of creating supportive learning environments and the requirement for tailored interventions. These insights have practical implications for educational policy and pedagogical approaches, indicating that educators have to adopt techniques that foster autonomy and offer tailored support to improve learner engagement and optimize resource use.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    S. Sun, “Exploring the Relationship Between Learner Autonomy and Learner Engagement Among EFL Students in Cambodian Universities”, Ind. Jou. Edu. Rsc, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 187–197, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.37251/ijoer.v6i2.1486.

    More Citation Formats

  • 452
    Abstract views
    305
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. A. T. Birhan, “Autonomy, agency, and identity in teaching and learning English as a foreign language, by (Mark) Feng Teng,” Education as Change, vol. 23, pp. 1-4, June 2019. doi: 10.25159/1947-9417/6273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/6273
    2. K. Sothy, S. Madhur, and R. Chhem, “Cambodia education 2015: employment and empowerment,” S. M. a. R. C. K. Sothy, Ed., Phnom Penh, 2015.
    3. A. Pramanik, “A study on examining autonomy provision in higher education,” 1-7, vol. 5, nº 3, pp. 1-7, May 2023. https://jngr5.com/public/blog/Enhancing%20User%20Experience.pdf
    4. O. Vlasyuk and T. Daragan, “The procedure of admission to higher education institutions as one of the main factors of academic autonomy,” Problems of Education, vol. 1, nº 98, pp. 23-37, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.52256/2710-3986.1-98.2023.02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52256/2710-3986.1-98.2023.02
    5. A. Danilenko; I. Kosmidis; V. Shershneva; and Y. Vainshtein, “Learner autonomy in modern higher education,” SHS Web of Conferences, vol. 48, pp. 1-7, August 2018. doi: 10.1051/shsconf/20184801002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184801022
    6. M. F. Teng, “Learner identity and learners' investment in EFL learning: a multiple case study,” Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, vol. 1, nº 7, pp. 43-60, 2019. doi: 10.30466/ijltr.2019.120632
    7. J. A. Fredricks, Eight myths of student disengagement: Creating classrooms of deep learning, Corwin Press, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483394534
    8. D. Ginting, “Student engagement and factors affecting active learning in English language teaching,” Voices of English Language Education Society, vol. 5, nº 2, p. 215–228, October 2021. doi: 10.29408/veles.v5i2.3968 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v5i2.3968
    9. S. H. Moore, “A case study of assessment in English medium instruction in Cambodia,” em English Medium Instruction in Higher Education in Asia-Pacific, vol. 21, Cham, Springer, 2017, pp. 173-191.doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-51976-0_10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51976-0_10
    10. R. Smith, K. Kuchah, and M. Lamb, “Learner autonomy in developing countries,” em Autonomy in Language Learning and Teaching, London, Palgrave Pivot,, 2018, pp. 7-27. doi: 10.1057/978-1-137-52998-5_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52998-5_2
    11. P. Benson, Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning, 2nd ed., Routledge, 2011. doi: 10.4324/9781315833767 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833767
    12. W. Littlewood, “Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts,” Applied Linguistics, vol. 20, nº 1, pp. 71-94, 1999. doi: 10.1093/applin/20.1.71 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.1.71
    13. N. Zepke, and L. Leach,, “Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action,” Active Learning in Higher Education, vol. 11, nº 3, pp. 167-177, 2010. doi: 10.1177/1469787410379680 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787410379680
    14. G. Humphreys, and M. Wyatt, , “Helping Vietnamese university learners to become more autonomous,” ELT Journal, vol. 68, nº 1, pp. 52-63, 2014. doi: 10.1093/elt/cct056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct056
    15. A. Khamkhien, “Teaching English speaking and speaking-test in the Thai Context: A reflection from Thai perspective,” English Language Teaching Journal, vol. 3, nº 1, pp. 184-190, 2010. doi: 10.5539/elt.v3n1p184 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n1p184
    16. S. Sun, “The effects of learner autonomy on academic performance among Cambodian EFL university students,” International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP), vol. 13, nº 6, pp. 184-198, 2023. doi: 10.29322/IJSRP.13.06.2023.p13827 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.13.06.2023.p13827
    17. M. Kinsella, J. Wyatt, N. Nestor, J. Last, and S. Rackard,, “(2023). Fostering students’ autonomy within higher education: the relational roots of student adviser supports,” Irish Educational Studies, p. 1–20. doi: 10.1080/03323315.2023.2201229 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2023.2201229
    18. M. O. Johansen, S. Eliassen, & L. M. Jeno, “The bright and dark side of autonomy: How autonomy support and thwarting relate to student motivation and academic functioning,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 8, pp. 1-13, 2023. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1153647 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1153647
    19. S. Sun, “Examining Cambodian EFL university learners’ perceived autonomy, engagement, and performance,” Journal of General Education and Humanities, vol. 4, nº 2, p. 323–336, 2025. doi: 10.58421/gehu.v4i2.396 DOI: https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v4i2.396
    20. T. A. Nguyen, T. H. Nguyen, M. H. Nguyen, T. T. Phạm, T. T. Le, Y. H. Phuong, and T. T. A. Huynh, “Empowering Vietnamese EFL learners at tertiary level: Investigating factors shaping learner autonomy in English language acquisition,” Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning, vol. 11, nº 2, pp. 125-138, 2022. doi: 10.21580/vjv12i116406 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21580/vjv12i116406
    21. K. Khulaifiyah, M. Anugerahwati, and U. Widiati, “Autonomous learning among EFL undergraduate students in selected private Indonesian Islamic University: Voices and activities,” Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, pp. 232-242, August 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31849/reila.v4i2.9306
    22. M. S. Gocić and A. Janković , “Investigating learner autonomy of EFL and ESP students at the tertiary level: cross-sectional study,” Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, vol. 9, nº 4, pp. 601-610, 2021. doi: 10.22190/JTESAP210460 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2104601S
    23. U. Dilnoza, K. Dilshoda, and T. Muzaffar, “Learner autonomy in language teaching and learning,” International Journal of Research, vol. 6, nº 13, pp. 493-498, 2019. https://journals.pen2print.org/index.php/ijr/article/view/19597
    24. E. Kuluşaklı, “EFL learners’ language learning effort and autonomy in online distance education in higher education,” Journal of Faculty of Education, vol. 23, nº 1, pp. 51-66, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2023..-1104227
    25. T. Q. Tran, “EFL students' attitudes towards learner autonomy in English vocabulary learning,” English Language Teaching Educational Journal, vol. 3, nº 2, pp. 86-94, 2020. doi: 10.12928/eltej.v3i2.2361 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v3i2.2361
    26. J. L. Núñez and J. León, “Determinants of classroom engagement: A prospective test based on self-determination theory,” Teachers and Teaching, pp. 147-159, 2018. doi: 10.1080/13540602.2018.1542297 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1542297
    27. J. Reeve, “How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 105, nº 3, p. 579–595, 2013. doi: 10.1037/a0032690 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032690
    28. R. Okada, “Effects of perceived autonomy support on academic achievement and motivation among higher education students: A meta-analysis,” Japanese Psychological Research, vol. 65, nº 3, p. 230–242, 2023. doi: 10.1111/jpr.12380 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12380
    29. W. Q. Oga-Baldwin and Y. Nakata, “Engagement, gender, and motivation: A predictive model for Japanese young language learners,” System, vol. 65, pp. 151-163, April 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2017.01.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.01.011
    30. A. M. Svalberg, “Engagement with language: Interrogating a construct,” Language Awareness, vol. 18, nº 3-4, pp. 242-258, 2009. doi: 10.1080/09658410903197264 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410903197264
    31. L. Taylor and J. Parsons, “Improving student engagement,” Current Issues in Education, vol. 14, nº 1, pp. 1-33, 2011. https://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/view/745
    32. Y. Nie and S. Lau, “Complementary roles of care and behavioral control in classroom management: the self-determination theory perspective,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 34, nº 3, pp. 185-194, 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.03.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.03.001
    33. H. Jang, J. Reeve, and E. L. Deci, “Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 102, nº 3, p. 588–600, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019682
    34. S. N. S. Gandhimathi and A. Devi, “Learner autonomy and motivation-a literature review,” Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 6, nº 3, pp. 80-83, 2016. https://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/RHSS/article/view/28934/29697
    35. S, Borg and S. Al-Busaidi , “Learner autonomy: English language teachers’ beliefs and practices,” ELT Journal, vol. 12, nº 7, pp. 1-45, 2012. https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/b459%20ELTRP%20Report%20Busaidi_final.pdf
    36. E. Namaziandost, F. Çakmak, T. Heydarnejad, and A. Rezai, “The predictive effects of learner autonomy and academic engagement on willingness to communicate, foreign language learning self-esteem, and L2 grit in an EFL context,” Acta Psychologica, vol. 250, pp. 1-14, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104528 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104528
    37. G. Şakrak-Ekin, and C. Balcikanli, “Does autonomy really matter in language learning. 5(4), .,” Journal of Language and Education, vol. 5, nº 4, p. 98–111, December 2019. doi: 10.17323/JLE.2019.8762 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2019.8762
    38. Y. H. Phuong, and P. Q. Vo, “Students’ learning autonomy, involvement and motivation towards their English proficiency,” Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture, vol. 4, nº 1, pp. 1-12, 2019. doi: 10.30659/E.4.1.1-12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30659/e.4.1.1-12
    39. E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, “Self-determination theory: a macro theory of human motivation, development, and health,” Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, vol. 49, nº 3, pp. 182-185, 2008. doi: 10.1037/a0012801 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801
    40. M. Csikszentmihalyi and R. Larson, Flow and the foundations of positive psychology, vol. 10, Dordrecht: Springer, 2014. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8
    41. J. W. Creswel, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 4th ed., London: Sage Publications, Inc., 2013.
    42. G. D. Israel, Determining sample size, Unversity of Florida, 1992.
    43. M. M. Johnston, and S. J. Finney, , “Measuring basic needs satisfaction: Evaluating previous research and conducting new psychometric evaluations of the Basic Needs Satisfaction in General Scale,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 35, nº 4, pp. 280-296, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.04.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.04.003
    44. C. J. Wang, W. C. Liu, Y. H. Kee, and L. K. Chian, “Competence, autonomy, and relatedness in the classroom: understanding students’ motivational processes using the self-determination theory,” Heliyon, vol. 5, nº 7, pp. 1-6, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01983 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01983
    45. A. Bandura, “Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales,” Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents,, vol. 5, nº 1, pp. 307-337, 2006.
    46. J. L. Webb-Williams, Self-efficacy in the primary classroom: An investigation into the relationship with performance, 2007.