SINTA

2.5

Impact

Google Scholar

10

h-index

Indonesian Journal of Education Research (IJoER)

Open Access Journal

The Role of Physical Self-Efficacy in Enhancing Quality of Life Among Rural Filipino Youth

Marlon A. Mancera ORCID
University of Southern Mindanao ROR
Philippines
mamancera@usm.edu.ph
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study examines the relationship between physical self-efficacy and the quality of life among rural Filipino youth. 

    Methodology: The study employed a quantitative correlational design. Data were collected from 378 respondents selected via simple random sampling, using a validated physical self-efficacy scale and a quality-of-life assessment tool. 

    Main Findings: Findings indicate that students exhibited moderate levels of physical self-efficacy and perceived quality of life. The analysis revealed a significant positive relationship between these variables, with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.439 r = 0.439 r = 0.439 (p-value = 0.001). This result suggests that higher physical self-efficacy is associated with improved life satisfaction, highlighting the importance of fostering confidence in physical abilities as a key contributor to overall wellbeing.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study underscores the pivotal role of physical self-efficacy in enhancing rural youth wellbeing, offering new insights into addressing disparities in resources and opportunities for physical activity. It contributes to sports and education policy by highlighting the need to prioritize physical education programs that build self-efficacy among rural youth. Additionally, the study provides practical applications for community-based interventions, such as designing inclusive sports initiatives and accessible recreational facilities, which can promote active lifestyles and holistic development. These findings serve as a foundation for crafting evidence-based strategies to support rural youth in overcoming socio-economic barriers and achieving improved physical, emotional, and social wellbeing.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    M. A. Mancera, “The Role of Physical Self-Efficacy in Enhancing Quality of Life Among Rural Filipino Youth”, Ind. Jou. Edu. Rsc, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 132–141, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.37251/ijoer.v6i2.1441.

    More Citation Formats

  • 583
    Abstract views
    275
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. S. Rathee, “Self-Efficacy, Self-Confidence, and Physical Appearance in Relation to the Activities Performed by Adolescents”.
    2. A. Bandura, “Self-efficacy conception of anxiety,” in Anxiety and self-focused attention, Routledge, 2015, pp. 89–110.
    3. P. A. Anstiss, C. Meijen, and S. M. Marcora, “The sources of self-efficacy in experienced and competitive endurance athletes,” Int J Sport Exerc Psychol, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 622–638, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2018.1549584
    4. E. Lopez-Bermudez, D. Gomez-Baya, E. Planells, and J. Molina-Lopez, “The mediational role of positive youth development in the relationship between physical activity and health-related quality of life in adolescents from urban and rural environments,” Int J Adolesc Youth, vol. 29, no. 1, p. 2354917, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2024.2354917
    5. X. Ling, J. Chen, D. H. K. Chow, W. Xu, and Y. Li, “The ‘trade-off’ of student well-being and academic achievement: A perspective of multidimensional student well-being,” Front Psychol, vol. 13, p. 772653, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.772653
    6. M. Sejbuk, I. Mirończuk-Chodakowska, and A. M. Witkowska, “Sleep quality: a narrative review on nutrition, stimulants, and physical activity as important factors,” Nutrients, vol. 14, no. 9, p. 1912, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14091912
    7. G. Patnaik, Positive psychology for improving mental health & well-being. Notion Press, 2021.
    8. A. M. Mínguez, “Children’s relationships and happiness: The role of family, friends and the school in four European countries,” J Happiness Stud, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1859–1878, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00160-4
    9. T. Slavinski, D. Bjelica, D. Pavlović, and V. Vukmirović, “Academic performance and physical activities as positive factors for life satisfaction among university students,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 497, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13020497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020497
    10. M. D. H. Rahiem, S. E. Krauss, and R. Ersing, “Perceived consequences of extended social isolation on mental well-being: Narratives from Indonesian university students during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 18, no. 19, p. 10489, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910489
    11. A. E. Sarte Jr and E. J. M. Quinto, “Understanding the importance of weight management: a qualitative exploration of lived individual experiences,” Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 2406099, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2024.2406099
    12. D. H. Kim, J. H. Kim, and K.-J. Park, “The impact of regular exercise, competition experience, and physical self-efficacy on psychological resilience,” Revista de Psicología del Deporte (Journal of Sport Psychology), vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 1–19, 2023.
    13. S. Farzaneh, R. R. Ezabadi, S. S. K. Rad, P. K. Marandi, and V. Ranawat, “Identifying Barriers to Women’s Participation in Sports Activities in both Urban and Rural Communities,” International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 536–542, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/saj.2021.090320
    14. D. Cruz and C. J. Bryan, “Self-Efficacy and its Relationship to the Resilience of Adolescents in South Central Mindanao, Philippines: A Post-Pandemic Study,” Self-Efficacy and its Relationship to the Resilience of Adolescents in South Central Mindanao, Philippines: A Post-Pandemic Study (July 1, 2023), 2023.
    15. D. Pekmezi, E. Jennings, and B. H. Marcus, “Evaluating and enhancing self-efficacy for physical activity,” ACSMs Health Fit J, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 16–21, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/FIT.0b013e3181996571
    16. A. Almutairi, M. Mourshed, and R. F. M. Ameen, “Coastal community resilience frameworks for disaster risk management,” Natural Hazards, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 595–630, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03875-3
    17. A. M. Rogowska, R. Tataruch, K. Niedźwiecki, and B. Wojciechowska-Maszkowska, “The mediating role of self-efficacy in the relationship between approach motivational system and sports success among elite speed skating athletes and physical education students,” Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 19, no. 5, p. 2899, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052899
    18. C. Peers, J. Issartel, S. Behan, N. O’Connor, and S. Belton, “Movement competence: Association with physical self-efficacy and physical activity,” Hum Mov Sci, vol. 70, p. 102582, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2020.102582
    19. H.-Y. An, W. Chen, C.-W. Wang, H.-F. Yang, W.-T. Huang, and S.-Y. Fan, “The relationships between physical activity and life satisfaction and happiness among young, middle-aged, and older adults,” Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 17, no. 13, p. 4817, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134817
    20. D. Martinez, “Eudaimonic and hedonic wellbeing among Bangkokians: A qualitative study of Maslow’s needs, intrinsic and extrinsic values,” ASEAN Journal of Management & Innovation, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 17–47, 2020.
    21. L. E. Gómez Sánchez, R. L. Schalock, and M. Á. Verdugo Alonso, “A new paradigm in the field of intellectual and developmental disabilities: Characteristics and evaluation,” Psicothema, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2020.385
    22. A. C. Lyons and J. Kass‐Hanna, “A methodological overview to defining and measuring ‘digital’ financial literacy,” Financial Planning Review, vol. 4, no. 2, p. e1113, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cfp2.1113
    23. J. W. Creswell, “Research methods,” JW Creswell, Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches, pp. 15–17, 2009.
    24. H. K. Mohajan, “Quantitative research: A successful investigation in natural and social sciences,” Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 50–79, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v9i4.679
    25. M. M. Rahman, M. I. Tabash, A. Salamzadeh, S. Abduli, and M. S. Rahaman, “Sampling techniques (probability) for quantitative social science researchers: a conceptual guidelines with examples,” Seeu Review, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 42–51, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/seeur-2022-0023
    26. S. P. Cumming, R. E. Smith, F. L. Smoll, M. Standage, and J. R. Grossbard, “Development and validation of the achievement goal scale for youth sports,” Psychol Sport Exerc, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 686–703, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2007.09.003
    27. G. A. Salum, D. L. Patrick, L. R. Isolan, G. G. Manfro, and M. P. Fleck, “Youth Quality of Life Instrument-Research version (YQOL-R): psychometric properties in a community sample,” J Pediatr (Rio J), vol. 88, pp. 443–448, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2223/JPED.2193
    28. D. Jekauc et al., “The effect of self-confidence on performance in sports: a meta-analysis and narrative review,” Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol, pp. 1–27, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2023.2222376
    29. E. A. Nothnagle and C. Knoester, “Sport participation and the development of grit,” Leis Sci, pp. 1–18, 2022.
    30. B.-C. Serdà, A. Planas-Lladó, A. DelValle, and P. Soler-Masó, “Health promotion in secondary schools: participatory process for constructing a self-assessment tool,” Health Promot Int, vol. 37, no. 2, p. daab123, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daab123
    31. A.-C. Sollerhed, J. Fransson, Ji. Skoog, and P. Garmy, “Physical Activity Levels, Perceived Body Appearance, and Body Functioning in Relation to Perceived Wellbeing Among Adolescents,” Front Sports Act Living, vol. 4, p. 830913, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.830913
    32. P. S. Tandon, E. Kroshus, K. Olsen, K. Garrett, P. Qu, and J. McCleery, “Socioeconomic inequities in youth participation in physical activity and sports,” Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 18, no. 13, p. 6946, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18136946
    33. K. Murfay, A. Beighle, H. Erwin, and E. Aiello, “Examining high school student perceptions of physical education,” Eur Phy Educ Rev, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 704–719, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X211072860
    34. M. Vaquero-Solís, M. A. Tapia-Serrano, D. Hortigüela-Alcalá, M. J. Sierra-Díaz, and P. A. Sánchez-Miguel, “Physical activity and quality of life in high school students: Proposals for improving the self-concept in physical education,” Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 18, no. 13, p. 7185, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137185
    35. S. Sharma, H. Åkerlund, H.-W. Liao, and S. Bluck, “Life challenges and resilience: the role of perceived personality continuity,” Aging Ment Health, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 2090–2099, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2020.1795619
    36. M. Morano, C. Robazza, M. C. Ruiz, S. Cataldi, F. Fischetti, and L. Bortoli, “Gender-typed sport practice, physical self-perceptions, and performance-related emotions in adolescent girls,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 20, p. 8518, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208518
    37. D. H. Schunk and M. K. DiBenedetto, “Self-efficacy and human motivation,” in Advances in motivation science, vol. 8, Elsevier, 2021, pp. 153–179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2020.10.001
    38. S. Di Maio, J. Keller, D. H. Hohl, R. Schwarzer, and N. Knoll, “Habits and self‐efficacy moderate the effects of intentions and planning on physical activity,” Br J Health Psychol, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 50–66, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12452
    39. K. Bertills, M. Granlund, Ö. Dahlström, and L. Augustine, “Relationships between physical education (PE) teaching and student self-efficacy, aptitude to participate in PE and functional skills: with a special focus on students with disabilities,” Phys Educ Sport Pedagogy, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 387–401, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2018.1441394
    40. K. Mouratidis, “Built environment and social well-being: How does urban form affect social life and personal relationships?,” Cities, vol. 74, pp. 7–20, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.020
    41. A. Twum-Antwi, P. Jefferies, and M. Ungar, “Promoting child and youth resilience by strengthening home and school environments: A literature review,” Int J Sch Educ Psychol, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 78–89, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2019.1660284
    42. F. Pedalino and A.-L. Camerini, “Instagram use and body dissatisfaction: The mediating role of upward social comparison with peers and influencers among young females,” Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 19, no. 3, p. 1543, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031543
    43. N. P. Gothe, D. K. Ehlers, E. A. Salerno, J. Fanning, A. F. Kramer, and E. McAuley, “Physical activity, sleep and quality of life in older adults: influence of physical, mental and social well-being,” Behavioral sleep medicine, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 797–808, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15402002.2019.1690493
    44. S. Evans-Lacko et al., “Socio-economic variations in the mental health treatment gap for people with anxiety, mood, and substance use disorders: results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) surveys,” Psychol Med, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 1560–1571, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291717003336
    45. Z. Zhou and Q. Cheng, “Relationship between online social support and adolescents’ mental health: A systematic review and meta‐analysis,” J Adolesc, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 281–292, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12031
    46. B. R. K. Sinha, Multidimensional approach to quality of life issues: A spatial analysis. Springer, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6958-2
    47. D. Hernández-Torrano et al., “Mental health and well-being of university students: A bibliometric mapping of the literature,” Front Psychol, vol. 11, p. 1226, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01226
    48. P. Singh, “NEP 2020: The Status of the Role of Infrastructure in Enhancing Physical Education Programs”.