SINTA

0.0

Impact

Google Scholar

14

H-Index

SYNAPSI: Journal of Information Systems and Informatics Education

an Open Access Journal

Development of a Web-Based Administrative Document Service Information System to Enhance Service Effectiveness at the Village Level

Suli Wahyuni
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung ROR
Indonesia
suliwahyuni@gmail.com
Indra Gunawan
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung ROR
Indonesia
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to develop a web-based administrative correspondence service information system, SI-PAKAR, at Pagar Village Office using the Waterfall model and to evaluate its feasibility, effectiveness, and functionality in supporting administrative letter services for village officials and residents.

    Methodology: This study employed a Research and Development (R&D) approach using the Waterfall model, consisting of requirements analysis, system design, implementation, integration and testing, and operation and maintenance. Data were collected through observation, interviews, documentation, expert validation, user questionnaires, and Blackbox Testing. Data were analyzed descriptively using percentage scores.

    Main Findings: The system expert validation produced a feasibility score of 98.10%, categorized as very feasible. Administrative staff evaluation resulted in an effectiveness score of 95.19%, while villager evaluation reached 94.82%, both categorized as very effective. Blackbox Testing confirmed that all tested system functions operated according to the expected specifications. These findings indicate that SI-PAKAR met the feasibility, effectiveness, and functional requirements.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: The novelty of this study lies in integrating resident data management with administrative correspondence services through a Waterfall-based web system specifically adapted to Pagar Village Office. The study also combines expert validation, administrative staff evaluation, villager evaluation, and Blackbox Testing, providing a multi-perspective evaluation of system feasibility, effectiveness, and functionality.

  • How to cite

    Wahyuni, S., & Gunawan, I. (2026). Development of a Web-Based Administrative Document Service Information System to Enhance Service Effectiveness at the Village Level. SYNAPSI: Journal of Information Systems and Informatics Education, 1(2), 139-148. https://doi.org/10.37251/synapsi.v1i2.3845

    More Citation Formats

  • 14
    Abstract views
    10
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. [1] S. Kuhlmann and M. Heuberger, “Digital transformation going local: implementation, impacts and constraints from a German perspective,” Public Money Manag., vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 147–155, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1080/09540962.2021.1939584.
    2. [2] M. Indriani, Nadirsyah, R. Fuadi, and Evayani, “Can Siskeudes support village governance in Aceh Province of Indonesia?,” Cogent Bus. Manag., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2020.1743617.
    3. [3] J. Osah and C. Pade-Khene, “E-government strategy formulation in resource-constrained local government in South Africa,” J. Inf. Technol. Polit., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 426–451, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1080/19331681.2020.1715907.
    4. [4] C. S. Yap, R. Ahmad, F. T. Newaz, and C. Mason, “Continuous Use and Extended Use of E-Government Portals in Malaysia,” Int. J. Public Adm., vol. 44, no. 15, pp. 1329–1340, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1080/01900692.2020.1759626.
    5. [5] S. R. Chohan and G. Hu, “Strengthening digital inclusion through e-government: cohesive ICT training programs to intensify digital competency,” Inf. Technol. Dev., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 16–38, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1080/02681102.2020.1841713.
    6. [6] I. K. Mensah, C. Luo, and X. C. Thani, “The Moderating Impact of Technical Support and Internet Self-Efficacy on the Adoption of Electronic Government Services,” Int. J. Public Adm., vol. 45, no. 14, pp. 1039–1052, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1080/01900692.2021.1961150.
    7. [7] K. K. Larsson and T. Skjølsvik, “Making sense of the digital co-production of welfare services: using digital technology to simplify or tailor the co-production of services,” Public Manag. Rev., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1169–1186, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1080/14719037.2021.2010402.
    8. [8] S. P. Osborne, M. Powell, T. Cui, and K. Strokosch, “New development: ‘Appreciate–Engage–Facilitate’—The role of public managers in value creation in public service ecosystems,” Public Money Manag., vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 668–671, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1080/09540962.2021.1916189.
    9. [9] C. Devlin and J. Coaffee, “Planning and technological innovation: the governance challenges faced by English local authorities in adopting planning technologies,” Int. J. Urban Sci., vol. 27, no. sup1, pp. 149–163, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1080/12265934.2021.1997632.
    10. [10] L. Khamiliyah, A. Rahayu, P. D. Dirgantari, L. A. Wibowo, and E. Susanto, “Digitalization of government organizations: an empirical study of strategic factors of H.R. resources,” Cogent Bus. Manag., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–24, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2025.2457442.
    11. [11] A. Kud, “Decentralized Information Platforms in Public Governance: Reconstruction of the Modern Democracy or Comfort Blinding?,” Int. J. Public Adm., vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 195–221, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1080/01900692.2021.1993905.
    12. [12] L. Tangi, M. Gaeta, M. Benedetti, L. Gastaldi, and G. Noci, “Assessing the effect of organisational factors and ICT expenditures on e-maturity: empirical results in Italian municipalities,” Local Gov. Stud., vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1333–1358, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1080/03003930.2022.2078807.
    13. [13] J. Willems, M. J. Schmid, D. Vanderelst, D. Vogel, and F. Ebinger, “AI-driven public services and the privacy paradox: do citizens really care about their privacy?,” Public Manag. Rev., vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 2116–2134, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1080/14719037.2022.2063934.
    14. [14] E. R. Sadik-Zada, A. Gatto, and I. Niftiyev, “E-government and petty corruption in public sector service delivery,” Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 3987–4003, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1080/09537325.2022.2067037.
    15. [15] M. Sebő and G. Bel, “E-Government and provision of public services: economic, social, and political determinants of citizen complaints,” Int. Public Manag. J., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 659–679, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1080/10967494.2023.2273343.
    16. [16] A. Desai and A. P. Manoharan, “Digital Transformation and Public Administration: The Impacts of India’s Digital Public Infrastructure,” Int. J. Public Adm., vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 575–578, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1080/01900692.2024.2350762.
    17. [17] M. Gasco Hernandez, “Reflections on three decades of digital transformation in local governments,” Local Gov. Stud., vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1028–1040, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1080/03003930.2024.2410830.
    18. [18] B. Zyzak and P. E. Martinussen, “OK computer: applying the public service logic on digital health services,” Public Manag. Rev., vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 3342–3364, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1080/14719037.2024.2337080.
    19. [19] F. Jahani Chehrehbargh, A. Rajabifard, B. Atazadeh, D. Steudler, and B. W. Nugraha, “Advancing sustainable land governance: extending LADM for integrating global initiatives – a case study in Indonesia,” Surv. Rev., vol. 57, no. 405, pp. 586–600, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.1080/00396265.2025.2543615.
    20. [20] A. Aidi, I. Avianti, P. S. Koeswayo, S. Poulus, and S. Mariam, “The effect of an inclusive approach to collaborative governance and its impact on digitizing the quality of public services,” Cogent Bus. Manag., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2392324.
    21. [21] S. B. G. C., S. K. Gurung, S. B. Jung Bahadur Rana, and B. R. Dhungana, “e-Governance, citizen satisfaction and net benefits: the moderating effect of digital divide,” Cogent Bus. Manag., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–22, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2402512.
    22. [22] H. M. Elmatsani, I. Widianingsih, H. Nurasa, M. D. E. Munajat, and S. Suwanda, “Exploring the evolution of leadership in government: a bibliometric study from e-government era into the digital age,” Cogent Soc. Sci., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–23, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311886.2024.2414877.
    23. [23] H. Pol, E. Besseling, T. Timmerman, M. van Steenbergen, and J. van Grondelle, “Public Services in Digital Transition: The Driving Force of Customer Experience,” Int. J. Public Adm., vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 442–456, May 2026, doi: 10.1080/01900692.2025.2488149.
    24. [24] J. Magnusson, T. Lindroth, N. B. Lindström, and J. Torell, “The vicious circle of ambiguity: how governance deters digital transformation in municipal conglomerates,” Public Money Manag., vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 828–836, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.1080/09540962.2025.2466489.
    25. [25] M. Lucchese, M. C. Pucheta-Martínez, F. Di Carlo, and S. Solimene, “The degree of digital transformation in Italian local government: the impact of their governance characteristics,” Public Money Manag., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–11, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.1080/09540962.2025.2580556.
    26. [26] Y. Yang, “Heterogeneous effects of e-government on urban and rural public services: the perspective of the digital divide,” Appl. Econ., vol. 58, no. 21, pp. 3989–4004, May 2026, doi: 10.1080/00036846.2025.2586293.
    27. [27] J. Marienfeldt, L. M. Wehmeier, and S. Kuhlmann, “Top-down or bottom-up digital transformation? A comparison of institutional changes and outcomes,” Public Money Manag., vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 456–465, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1080/09540962.2024.2365351.
    28. [28] D. Salazar Morales, “A Set-Theoretical Analysis of the Pathway(s) to Digital Innovation in Developing Democracies,” J. Comp. Policy Anal. Res. Pract., vol. 27, no. 5–6, pp. 671–705, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.1080/13876988.2025.2566735.
    29. [29] I. Fiestiandani, E. Setijaningrum, E. Supeno, and S. Samad, “Between bytes, being, and the bridging of boundaries: the human dimension of policy capacity in rural Indonesia’s digital public service delivery,” Cogent Soc. Sci., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–29, Dec. 2026, doi: 10.1080/23311886.2026.2624790.
    30. [30] N. Rahman, Juharni, D. Mustafa, Mustaking, and Suprapto, “Digital governance, public leadership and social inequality in Indonesia: a mixed-methods study,” Cogent Soc. Sci., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–35, Dec. 2026, doi: 10.1080/23311886.2026.2717876.