Optimization Of Alam Riang Community Reading Park For Children’s Literacy Development In Pesantren Tembelang Village, Jombang: A Qualitative Study
Abstract
Purpose of the study: This study aims to analyze the optimization of the Alam Riang Community Reading Park (TBM) as a medium for developing children’s literacy in Pesantren Tembelang Village, Jombang, particularly through the implementation of six basic literacies in a community-based learning environment.
Methodology: This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach with a case study method. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation. Purposive sampling involved 10 informants including TBM managers, children, and parents. Data were analyzed using the Miles and Huberman model. Supporting sources include books, journals, and related documents.
Main Findings: The results show that TBM Alam Riang successfully optimizes its role as a community-based literacy center through the implementation of six basic literacies: reading-writing, scientific, financial, numeracy, cultural and civic, and digital literacy. Programs are applied through creative, flexible, and participatory activities, increasing children’s engagement. Despite challenges such as limited funding and technology influence, adaptive strategies and program innovations support sustainability and enhance children’s literacy development in rural areas.
Novelty/Originality of this study: This study offers a novel contribution by integrating six basic literacies into TBM programs in a rural context. It provides a comprehensive and in-depth analysis using a qualitative case study approach, involving multiple informants. The focus on practical implementation and community-based strategies advances knowledge on optimizing literacy development through non-formal education institutions
References
H. Forsman, “Exploring the Letterbox club programme’s impact on foster children’s literacy: Potent intervention or general support?,” Oxford Rev. Educ., vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 502–518, 2019, doi: 10.1080/03054985.2019.1595559.
A. Hackett, K. Pahl, and S. Pool, “In amongst the glitter and the squashed blueberries: Crafting a collaborative lens for children’s literacy pedagogy in a community setting,” Pedagogies, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 58–73, 2017, doi: 10.1080/1554480X.2017.1283994.
S. C. Yen, A. Y. Lee, and S. K. F. Hui, “Jumpstart program efficacy: The impact of early childhood education advancement initiatives on low-income preschool children’s literacy, agency, and social relations,” Cogent Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2019.1592063.
A. Bergström and M. Jervelycke Belfrage, “News in social media incidental consumption and the role of opinion leaders,” Digit. Journal., vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 583–598, 2018, doi: 10.1080/21670811.2018.1423625.
F. Dingyloudi and J. W. Strijbos, “Community representations in learning communities,” Scand. J. Educ. Res., vol. 64, no. 7, pp. 1052–1070, 2020, doi: 10.1080/00313831.2019.1640788.
M. Rahimi and S. Yadollahi, “Effects of offline vs online digital storytelling on the development of efl learners’ literacy skills,” Cogent Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2017.1285531.
P. Hannon, C. Nutbrown, and A. Morgan, “Effects of extending disadvantaged families’ teaching of emergent literacy,” Res. Pap. Educ., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 310–336, 2020, doi: 10.1080/02671522.2019.1568531.
C. Chan, “Digital story retelling-evaluation of a story-reading workshop promoting open-mindedness in the community,” J. evidence-based Soc. Work, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 652–668, 2019, doi: 10.1080/26408066.2019.1684410.
O. Dovbysh, “Commercial or public service actors? controversies in the nature of Russia’s regional mass media,” Russ. J. Commun., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 71–87, 2019, doi: 10.1080/19409419.2019.1572532.
C. Schmidt, “Ethnographic research on children’s literacy practices: Children’s literacy experiences and possibilities for representation,” Ethnogr. Educ., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 48–63, 2020, doi: 10.1080/17457823.2018.1512004.
S. Little, “Is there an app for that? exploring games and apps among heritage language families,” J. Multiling. Multicult. Dev., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 218–229, 2019, doi: 10.1080/01434632.2018.1502776.
N. Theorin, “Maintainers of ethnic hierarchies? investigating the relationship between media use and sttitudes toward perceived remote versus perceived close immigration,” Mass Commun. Soc., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 827–850, 2019, doi: 10.1080/15205436.2019.1660368.
S. Little, “A generational arc: Early literacy practices among Pakistani and Indian heritage language families,” Int. J. Early Years Educ., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 424–438, 2017, doi: 10.1080/09669760.2017.1341302.
G. Gillon and A. H. Macfarlane, “A culturally responsive framework for enhancing phonological awareness development in children with speech and language impairment,” Speech, Lang. Hear., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 163–173, 2017, doi: 10.1080/2050571X.2016.1265738.
F. Lind and C. E. Meltzer, “Now you see me, now you don’t: Applying automated content analysis to track migrant women’s salience in German news,” Fem. Media Stud., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 923–940, 2021, doi: 10.1080/14680777.2020.1713840.
A. Schwabe, F. Lind, L. Kosch, and H. G. Boomgaarden, “No negative effects of reading on screen on comprehension of narrative texts compared to print: A meta-analysis,” Media Psychol., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 779–796, 2022, doi: 10.1080/15213269.2022.2070216.
J. A. Holman, A. Drummond, S. E. Hughes, and G. Naylor, “Hearing impairment and daily-life fatigue: A qualitative study,” Int. J. Audiol., vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 408–416, 2019, doi: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1597284.
M. L. Puglisi, C. Hulme, L. G. Hamilton, and M. J. Snowling, “The home literacy environment is a correlate, but perhaps not a cause, of variations in children’s language and literacy development,” Sci. Stud. Read., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 498–514, 2017, doi: 10.1080/10888438.2017.1346660.
E. Eriksson, L. B. Boistrup, and R. Thornberg, “A qualitative study of primary teachers’ classroom feedback rationales,” Educ. Res., vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 189–205, 2018, doi: 10.1080/00131881.2018.1451759.
S. L. Harrison et al., “The role of pain in pulmonary rehabilitation: A qualitative study,” Int. J. COPD, vol. 12, pp. 3289–3299, 2017, doi: 10.2147/COPD.S145442.
C. Nutbrown, P. Clough, L. Stammers, N. Emblin, and S. Alston-Smith, “Family literacy in prisons: Fathers’ engagement with their young children,” Res. Pap. Educ., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 169–191, 2019, doi: 10.1080/02671522.2017.1402085.
Y. N. Chang and P. Monaghan, “Quantity and diversity of preliteracy language exposure both affect literacy development: Evidence from a computational model of reading,” Sci. Stud. Read., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 235–253, 2019, doi: 10.1080/10888438.2018.1529177.
S. Zeighami Mohammadi, S. Mohammadkhan Kermanshahi, and Z. Vanaki, “Pity: A qualitative study on Iranian women with breast cancer,” Patient Prefer. Adherence, vol. 13, pp. 21–28, 2019, doi: 10.2147/PPA.S183712.
M. C. Wofford and S. Tibi, “A human right to literacy education: Implications for serving syrian refugee children,” Int. J. Speech. Lang. Pathol., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 182–190, 2018, doi: 10.1080/17549507.2017.1397746.
M. Edström, “Visibility patterns of gendered ageism in the media buzz: A study of the representation of gender and age over three decades,” Fem. Media Stud., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 77–93, 2018, doi: 10.1080/14680777.2018.1409989.
C. van Nimwegen and K. Bergman, “Effects on cognition of the burn after reading principle in ephemeral media applications,” Behav. Inf. Technol., vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 1060–1067, 2019, doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2019.1659853.
S. van Viersen, E. H. de Bree, and P. F. de Jong, “Protective factors and compensation in resolving dyslexia,” Sci. Stud. Read., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 461–477, 2019, doi: 10.1080/10888438.2019.1603543.
S. Mohammadhossini, F. Ahmadi, M. Gheibizadeh, A. S. Malehi, and K. Zarea, “Comprehensive physical domain care needs of burn patients: A qualitative study,” Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dermatol., vol. 12, pp. 573–581, 2019, doi: 10.2147/CCID.S215517.
A. Haller and K. Holt, “Paradoxical populism: How pegida relates to mainstream and alternative media,” Inf. Commun. Soc., vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 1665–1680, 2019, doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2018.1449882.
F. E. Fardazar, A. S. Asiabar, H. Safari, M. Asgari, A. Saber, and A. A. E. F. Azar, “Policy analysis of Iranian pharmaceutical sector: A qualitative study,” Risk Manag. Healthc. Policy, vol. 12, pp. 199–208, 2019, doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S209318.
F. Kamali, A. Yousefy, and N. Yamani, “Explaining professionalism in moral reasoning: A qualitative study,” Adv. Med. Educ. Pract., vol. 10, pp. 447–456, 2019, doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S183690.
Copyright (c) 2026 Tince Yurika Ajeng
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the SYNAPSI: Journal of Information Systems and Informatics Education is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
.png)
.png)
