SINTA

0.0

Impact

Google Scholar

8

h-index

Journal of Academic Biology and Biology Education

Open Access Journal


Getting to Know Local Tubers from the School Environment: An Analysis of Elementary School Students' Recognition and Appreciation in Malang City

Share
  • Purpose of the study: This study aimed to analyze the influence of school location on elementary students’ recognition of local tuber diversity and to evaluate the appreciation of 117 elementary school students in Malang City toward processed local tuber products as an effort to strengthen local food literacy among young learners.

    Methodology: Descriptive research design involving 117 fourth- and fifth-grade elementary students from three schools in Malang City. Data were collected using Questionnaire I and Questionnaire II, direct tuber observation, organoleptic testing, product demonstrations, Likert scale assessment, Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney test, descriptive statistical analysis, and Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 16.00 for Windows.

    Main Findings: School location influenced students’ direct recognition of local tubers, with students near traditional markets showing higher familiarity. Pocket money profiles did not significantly affect recognition or consumption experience. Consumption of processed local tuber products was relatively equal across schools. Students’ acceptance levels varied, with generally moderate appreciation, indicating that product appearance, taste, and innovation remain important factors affecting acceptance.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study integrates assessment of elementary students’ recognition of twelve local tuber varieties with evaluation of appreciation toward processed products across different school locations. It provides new evidence that geographical school context has greater influence than economic indicators on local food recognition, offering practical insights for strengthening food education and local biodiversity conservation strategies.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    N. Z. Rahmawati, “Getting to Know Local Tubers from the School Environment: An Analysis of Elementary School Students’ Recognition and Appreciation in Malang City”, Jou. Acd. Bio. Ed, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 151–158, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.37251/jouabe.v1i2.3160.
  • 37
    Abstract views
    28
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. C. Nelly, L. Fitriyana, T. D. Santi, and Saudah, “Diversity of traditional vegetables and spices as local food security for the Gayo Tribe, Aceh, Indonesia,” Biodiversitas, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 4699–4711, 2024, doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d251206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d251206
    2. H. Gunawan et al., “Integrating social forestry and biodiversity conservation in Indonesia,” Forests, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 1–27, 2022, doi: 10.3390/f13122152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f13122152
    3. M. K. S. Malki, J. A. A. C. Wijesinghe, R. H. M. K. Ratnayake, and G. C. Thilakarathna, “Characterization of arrowroot (Maranta arundinacea) starch as a potential starch source for the food industry,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 1–13, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20033
    4. D. Histifarina, A. Rahman, N. R. Purnamasari, and R. Rahmat, “Utilization of canna (Canna edulis ker.) as raw material for non-gluten processed food to supporting food diversification program: A review,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2023, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1246/1/012045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1246/1/012045
    5. A. N. Kairupan et al., “Local Tubers Production and Value Chain: Evidence from Sangihe Island Regency, Indonesia,” in Sustainable Agricultural Value Chain, IntechOpen, 2022. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.103711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.103711
    6. S. M. Leksono et al., “From farm to classroom: Tubers as key resources in developing biology learning media rooted in Banten’s local culture,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 575–589, 2023, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v12i4.48278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i4.48278
    7. M. Garg et al., “Rising demand for healthy foods-anthocyanin biofortified colored wheat is a new research trend,” Front. Nutr., vol. 9, no. May, pp. 1–23, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.878221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.878221
    8. F. Khan, Z. A. Jewel, M. T. Nadeem, P. R. Ray, M. I. Hossain, and A. R. Swapon, “Concerns regarding food safety and future research approaches in the Case of wheat in the context of urbanization in Bangladeshi diet,” J. Adv. Food Sci. Technol., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2022, doi: 10.56557/jafsat/2022/v9i17490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56557/jafsat/2022/v9i17490
    9. L. Nasreddine, N. Hwalla, F. Al Zahraa Chokor, F. Naja, L. O’Neill, and L. Jomaa, “Food and nutrient intake of school-aged children in Lebanon and their adherence to dietary guidelines and recommendations,” BMC Public Health, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13186-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13186-w
    10. R. Lekše, D. Godec, and M. Prosen, “Determining the impact of lifestyle on the health of primary school children in Slovenia through mixed membership focus groups,” J. Community Health, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 857–869, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10900-023-01231-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-023-01231-7
    11. O. Pedrera, U. Ortega-Lasuen, A. Ruiz-González, J. R. Díez, and O. Barrutia, “Branches of plant blindness and their relationship with biodiversity conceptualisation among secondary students,” J. Biol. Educ., vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 566–591, May 2023, doi: 10.1080/00219266.2021.1933133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.1933133
    12. I. Fitrianto and A. Saif, “The role of virtual reality in enhancing experiential learning: A comparative study of traditional and immersive learning environments,” Int. J. Post Axial Futur. Teach. Learn., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 97–110, 2024, doi: 10.59944/postaxial.v2i2.300.
    13. D. Harefa, “Strengthening mathematics and natural sciences education based on the Local wisdom of South Nias: Integration of traditional concepts in modern education,” Haga J. Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 63–79, 2024, doi: 10.57094/haga.v3i2.2347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57094/haga.v3i2.2347
    14. Y. F. Kasi et al., “Integrating local science and school science: The benefits for preserving local wisdom and promoting students’ learning,” Paedagogia, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 24–37, 2024, doi: 10.20961/paedagogia.v27i1.83925. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/paedagogia.v27i1.83925
    15. U. Yampap and H. Haryanto, “The value of local wisdom in the burning stone tradition through learning for character building of elementary school students,” in KnE Social Sciences, 2023, pp. 239–254. doi: 10.18502/kss.v8i8.13301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i8.13301
    16. T. P. Holloway et al., “Enhancing food literacy and food security through school gardening in rural and regional communities,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 20, no. 18, pp. 1–13, 2023, doi: 10.3390/ijerph20186794. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20186794
    17. Y. Lee, T. Kim, and H. Jung, “Effects of university students’ perceived food literacy on ecological eating behavior towards sustainability,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 1–15, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14095242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095242
    18. D. A. Oladiran and N. M. Emmambux, “Locally available African complementary foods: Nutritional limitations and processing technologies to improve nutritional quality—A review,” Food Rev. Int., vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 1033–1063, 2022, doi: 10.1080/87559129.2020.1762640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2020.1762640
    19. S. M. Laurie et al., “Seventy years of sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas L. (LAM)] research in South Africa,” Crop Sci., vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 1112–1128, 2024, doi: 10.1002/csc2.21097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.21097
    20. W. Junfeng and K. N. Mustaffa Halabi, “Exploring the Influence of Packaging Design on Children’s Food Choices: Insights from the Chinese Market,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci., vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 1833–1850, 2024, doi: 10.6007/ijarbss/v14-i9/22916. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i9/22916
    21. N. Karimov et al., “Exploring food processing in natural science education: Practical applications and pedagogical techniques,” Nat. Eng. Sci., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 359–375, 2024, doi: 10.28978/nesciences.1574453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28978/nesciences.1574453
    22. A. M. Karunaratne and B. S. Nanayakkara, “Providing a sound theoretical base and appropriate skills at early ages through nutrition education to improve food consumption patterns in Sri Lanka,” Ceylon J. Sci., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 3–19, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.4038/cjs.v51i1.7974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4038/cjs.v51i1.7974
    23. F. Fauziah, H. Husna, M. Maulida, F. Fajri, and A. Anora, “The influence of local food-based nutritional literacy on increasing parents’ knowledge in supporting the cognitive growth of primary school Age children in samudera district,” J. Eduhealth, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1045–1052, 2024, doi: 10.54209/eduhealth.v15i04.
    24. M. M. Rahman, A. de Silva, M. Sassa, M. R. Islam, S. Aktar, and S. Akter, “A systematic analysis and future projections of the nutritional status and interpretation of its drivers among school-aged children in South-East Asian countries,” Lancet Reg. Heal. - Southeast Asia, vol. 16, pp. 1–13, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100244
    25. M. Yusuf and A. Usman, “Development of local staple food in supporting food security: A case study in North Lombok, West Nusa Tenggara,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2022, pp. 1–15. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1107/1/012032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1107/1/012032
    26. S. Lawali, S. Boureima, and S. Idi, “A gender-responsive breeding approach to the intensification of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) production in the Maradi region of Niger,” Front. Sociol., vol. 9, pp. 1–7, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1254094. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1254094
    27. C. N. Akpen, S. Asaolu, S. Atobatele, H. Okagbue, and S. Sampson, “Impact of online learning on student’s performance and engagement: a systematic review,” Discov. Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s44217-024-00253-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00253-0
    28. R. F. O. Cayubit, “Why learning environment matters? An analysis on how the learning environment influences the academic motivation, learning strategies and engagement of college students,” Learn. Environ. Res., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 581–599, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10984-021-09382-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09382-x
    29. S. Melindawati, E. K. E. Sartono, W. Wuryandani, and F. Fatimah, “Towards a pancasila student profile: Implementation of multicultural education in shaping the character of tolerance and gotong royong in learning natural and social sciences in elementary schools,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 10152–10160, 2024, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v10i12.9621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i12.9621
    30. G. Nieto, L. Mart, and F. Mar, “Applications of plant bioactive compounds as replacers of synthetic additives in the food industry,” Foods, vol. 13, no. 47, pp. 1–28, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13010047
    31. S. Garg and N. Goel, “Optoelectronic applications of conjugated organic polymers: Influence of donor/acceptor groups through density functional studies,” J. Phys. Chem. C, vol. 126, no. 22, pp. 9313–9323, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c02938. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c02938
    32. S. Muhammad et al., “Quantum chemical tailoring of intrinsic donor–acceptor configurations as efficient nonlinear optical materials,” Opt. Quantum Electron., vol. 56, no. 11, p. 1850, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11082-024-06428-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-024-06428-1
    33. A. I. Khamidullina, Y. E. Abramenko, A. V. Bruter, and V. V. Tatarskiy, “Key proteins of replication stress response and cell cycle control as cancer therapy targets,” Int. J. Mol. Sci., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 1–32, 2024, doi: 10.3390/ijms25021263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25021263
    34. S. Li, L. Wang, Y. Wang, C. Zhang, Z. Hong, and Z. Han, The synthetic lethality of targeting cell cycle checkpoints and PARPs in cancer treatment, vol. 15, no. 1. BioMed Central, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s13045-022-01360-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-022-01360-x
    35. V. A. Adhav and K. Saikrishnan, “The realm of unconventional noncovalent interactions in proteins: Their significance in structure and function,” ACS Omega, vol. 8, no. 25, pp. 22268–22284, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c00205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c00205
    36. J. Chen, Q. Peng, X. Peng, H. Zhang, and H. Zeng, “Probing and manipulating noncovalent interactions in functional polymeric systems,” Chem. Rev., vol. 122, no. 18, pp. 14594–14678, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00215
    37. J. S. Dhaliwal et al., “Pharmacotherapeutics applications and chemistry of chalcone derivatives,” Molecules, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27207062
    38. L. Marotta et al., “The green chemistry of chalcones: Valuable sources of privileged core structures for drug discovery,” Front. Chem., vol. 10, no. September, pp. 1–22, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fchem.2022.988376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2022.988376
    39. G. George et al., “Structural modifications on chalcone framework for developing new class of cholinesterase inhibitors,” Int. J. Mol. Sci., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1–40, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijms23063121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23063121
    40. N. Kratena, B. Marinic, and T. J. Donohoe, “Recent advances in the dearomative functionalisation of heteroarenes,” Chem. Sci., vol. 13, no. 48, pp. 14213–14225, 2022, doi: 10.1039/d2sc04638e. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SC04638E
    41. N. C. Charlton, M. Mastyugin, B. Török, and M. Török, “Structural features of small molecule antioxidants and strategic modifications to improve potential bioactivity,” Molecules, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 1–39, 2023, doi: 10.3390/molecules28031057. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031057
    42. T. Liu et al., “Chemical modification of polysaccharides: A review of synthetic approaches, biological activity and the structure–activity relationship,” Molecules, vol. 28, no. 16, pp. 1–23, 2023, doi: 10.3390/molecules28166073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28166073