SINTA

0.0

Impact

Google Scholar

8

h-index

Journal of Academic Biology and Biology Education

Open Access Journal

Integration of Educational and Conservative Landscapes: Designing a Biology Department Garden for Local Biodiversity Conservation

Fransiska Poppy Yulia
University of Brawijaya ROR
Indonesia
frnspoppyyl@gmail.com
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to design a Local Biodiversity Conservation Garden in the Biology Department, evaluate changes in community appreciation after the garden redesign, compare the richness of local and exotic plant species, and identify plant species with the largest canopy cover to support ecological and aesthetic functions.

    Methodology: Field observation, vegetation inventory, questionnaire survey, canopy cover analysis, species classification based on regional distribution references, manual garden design sketching and scanning, descriptive quantitative analysis. Tools used included measuring tape, lux meter, plant identification references, questionnaire forms, digital scanner, statistical analysis software, and biodiversity documentation records.

    Main Findings: The redesigned conservation garden significantly improved aesthetic appreciation among Biology Department community members. Plant species richness increased substantially, with local species dominating over exotic species. Community perception shifted positively toward the reorganized garden. Vegetation stratification showed clear ecological structuring, while canopy analysis identified dominant species contributing most to shade formation and microclimate regulation within the conservation area.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study introduces an integrated campus garden design model that combines biodiversity conservation, ecological restoration, and landscape aesthetics using predominantly local plant species. It advances existing knowledge by demonstrating how academic green spaces can function simultaneously as conservation areas, educational laboratories, and ecological infrastructure supporting biodiversity enhancement within higher education institutions.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    F. P. Yulia, “Integration of Educational and Conservative Landscapes: Designing a Biology Department Garden for Local Biodiversity Conservation”, Jou. Acd. Bio. Ed, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 112–121, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.37251/jouabe.v1i2.3117.

    More Citation Formats

  • 38
    Abstract views
    35
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. A. T. Idowu et al., “Biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services: A review of challenges and opportunities,” Int. J. Adv. Multidiscip. Res. Stud., vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 1381–1388, 2024, doi: 10.62225/2583049x.2024.4.6.4015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62225/2583049X.2024.4.6.4015
    2. D. Nurmalasari and R. Nuraini, “The role of local communities in biodiversity conservation : Challenges and integration of local wisdom with modern science,” J. Soc. Sci. Stud. Vol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 99–104, 2021.
    3. C. A. de Carvalho, M. Raposo, C. Pinto-Gomes, and R. Matos, “Native or exotic: A bibliographical review of the debate on ecological science methodologies: Valuable lessons for urban green space design,” Land, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1–17, 2022, doi: 10.3390/land11081201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land11081201
    4. D. Mogîldea and C. Biță-Nicolae, “Ruderal plant diversity as a driver for urban green space sustainability,” Urban Sci., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1–18, 2024, doi: 10.3390/urbansci8040159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci8040159
    5. S. Tulchynska, N. Shevchuk, A. Kleshchov, I. Kryshtopa, and Y. Zaburmekha, “The role of higher education institutions in the development of eco-industrial parks in terms of Sustainable development,” IJCSNS Int. J. Comput. Sci. Netw. Secur., vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 317–323, 2021, doi: 10.22937/IJCSNS.2021.21.10.45
    6. I. Moyo and H. M. S. Cele, “Protected areas and environmental conservation in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: on HEIs, livelihoods and sustainable development,” Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ., vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1536–1551, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1108/IJSHE-05-2020-0157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-05-2020-0157
    7. C. Nansen, “Active learning, living laboratories, student empowerment, and urban sustainability,” Sustain., vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 1–14, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16103902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16103902
    8. R. C. Imoh, “Equipped laboratory and playground as correlate of students’academic performance in private secondary schools in rivers state, Nigeria,” Int. J. Econ. Environ. Dev. Soc., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 82–99, 2023.
    9. B. A. Jnr, “Green campus paradigms for sustainability attainment in higher education institutions – a comparative study,” J. Sci. Technol. Policy Manag., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 117–148, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1108/JSTPM-02-2019-0008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-02-2019-0008
    10. R. Yusuf and I. Fajri, “Differences in behavior, engagement and environmental knowledge on waste management for science and social students through the campus program,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1–14, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08912. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08912
    11. D. Zhu, C. Wu, H. Ren, and D. Hui, “Building national parks to protect key ecosystems in China,” Biol. Divers., vol. 1, no. 3–4, pp. 193–198, 2024, doi: 10.1002/bod2.12029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bod2.12029
    12. N. Kovaleva and A. Mikhaylova, “The study of regional natural heritage sites as an essential component of ecological education,” BIO Web Conf., vol. 130, pp. 1–9, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1051/bioconf/202413008016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202413008016
    13. I. R. Ismail, Enhancing Environmental Communication through Education: Strategies for Promoting Sustainability, no. ICoETS. Atlantis Press SARL, 2024. doi: 10.2991/978-2-38476-331-3_5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-331-3_5
    14. N. A. Din, A. A. Bakar, and J. Othman, “Developing an eco-cultural educational centre at iium gombak campus,” Des. Ideals J., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2023.
    15. S. MacQuarrie and C. Nugent, “Making provision for first-hand nature-based learning within a botanic Garden,” Front. Educ., vol. 7, no. April, pp. 1–13, 2022, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.778151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.778151
    16. C. Zhang et al., Observe it, draw it: Scaffolding children’s observations of plant biodiversity with an interactive drawing tool, vol. 1, no. 1. Association for Computing Machinery, 2023. doi: 10.1145/3585088.3589380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3585088.3589380
    17. D. Haase and D. Gaeva, “Allotments for all? Social–environmental values of urban gardens for gardeners and the public in cities: The example of Berlin, Germany,” People Nat., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1207–1219, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1002/pan3.10488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10488
    18. A. Kwartnik-Pruc and G. Droj, “The role of allotments and community gardens and the challenges facing their development in urban environments—A literature review,” Land, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 325–332, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.3390/land12020325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020325
    19. E. Breman et al., “Plant diversity conservation challenges and prospects—the perspective of botanic gardens and the millennium seed bank,” Plants, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 1–35, 2021, doi: 10.3390/plants10112371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112371
    20. M. Munschek et al., “Putting conservation gardening into practice,” Sci. Rep., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39432-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39432-8
    21. C. Zhang, L. Wen, Y. Wang, C. Liu, Y. Zhou, and G. Lei, “Can constructedwetlands be wildlife refuges? A review of their potential biodiversity conservation value,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1–18, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12041442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041442
    22. K. B. Winter, T. Ticktin, and S. A. Quazi, “Biocultural restoration in Hawaiʻi also achieves core conservation goals,” Ecol. Soc., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2020, doi: 10.5751/ES-11388-250126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11388-250126
    23. K. G. Neves, “Botanic gardens in biodiversity conservation and sustainability: History, contemporary engagements, decolonization challenges, and renewed potential,” J. Zool. Bot. Gard., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 260–275, 2024, doi: 10.3390/jzbg5020018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jzbg5020018
    24. N. Krigas et al., “Prioritizing plants around the cross-border area of greece and the republic of north macedonia: Integrated conservation actions and sustainable exploitation potential,” Diversity, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 1–34, 2022, doi: 10.3390/d14070570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/d14070570
    25. S. M. Ali, N. Othman, F. A. A. Latif, A. H. Awang, and K. Rostam, “The functions of landscape in school learning process,” Plan. Malaysia, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 191–202, 2020, doi: 10.21837/pm.v18i14.826. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v18i14.826
    26. Z. Zhang, M. Jiang, and J. Zhao, “The restorative effects of unique green space design: Comparing the restorative quality of classical chinese gardens and modern urban parks,” Forests, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1–27, 2024, doi: 10.3390/f15091611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f15091611
    27. B. Mahanayak, “Ex-situ and in-situ conservation of wild life,” World J. Biol. Pharm. Heal. Sci., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 277–282, 2024, doi: 10.30574/wjbphs.2024.18.3.0371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjbphs.2024.18.3.0371
    28. J. Zhou, M. Yang, X. Wen, N. Li, and H. Ren, “Strengthen ex situ conservation of plants and promote protection and utilization of plant resources,” Bull. Chinese Acad. Sci., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 417–424, 2021, doi: 10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20210225101.
    29. B. Priambodo, Y. Septiani, and B. Yanuwiadi, “Community structure of arthropods on the sea of sand at Bromo Tengger Semeru National Park,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2021, pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/743/1/012038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/743/1/012038
    30. I. Hermawan, M. Amin, and S. Suhadi, “Genetic diversity of springtails (collembola subclass) based on cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) genes in malang,” Biotropika J. Trop. Biol., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 67–77, 2022, doi: 10.21776/ub.biotropika.2022.010.01.09. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.biotropika.2022.010.01.09
    31. Q. Li et al., “Transformation of soil organic matter subjected to environmental disturbance and preservation of organic matter bound to soil minerals: a review,” J. Soils Sediments, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1485–1500, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11368-022-03381-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-022-03381-y
    32. M. R. Islam, B. Singh, and F. A. Dijkstra, “Stabilisation of soil organic matter: interactions between clay and microbes,” Biogeochemistry, vol. 160, no. 2, pp. 145–158, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10533-022-00956-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-022-00956-2
    33. B. M. Kumar, Do carbon stocks and floristic diversity of tropical homegardens vary along an elevational gradient and based on holding size in central Kerala, India?, vol. 97, no. 5. Springer Netherlands, 2023. doi: 10.1007/s10457-023-00821-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00821-7
    34. J. Cavender-Bares et al., “Horticultural availability and homeowner preferences drive plant diversity and composition in urban yards,” Ecol. Appl., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1–16, 2020, doi: 10.1002/eap.2082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2082
    35. S. Touil, A. Richa, M. Fizir, and B. Bingwa, “Shading effect of photovoltaic panels on horticulture crops production: a mini review,” Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 281–296, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11157-021-09572-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-021-09572-2
    36. M. Knoop et al., “Daylight: What makes the difference?,” Light. Res. Technol., vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 423–442, 2020, doi: 10.1177/1477153519869758. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153519869758
    37. M. Huber, N. M. Nieuwendijk, C. K. Pantazopoulou, and R. Pierik, “Light signalling shapes plant–plant interactions in dense canopies,” Plant Cell Environ., vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 1014–1029, 2021, doi: 10.1111/pce.13912. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13912
    38. C. F. Dormann et al., “Plant species richness increases with light availability, but not variability, in temperate forests understorey,” BMC Ecol., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s12898-020-00311-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-020-00311-9
    39. E. Driesen, W. Van den Ende, M. De Proft, and W. Saeys, “Influence of environmental factors light, co2, temperature, and relative humidity on stomatal opening and development: A review,” Agronomy, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 1–28, 2020, doi: 10.3390/agronomy10121975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10121975
    40. M. M. Qaderi, A. B. Martel, and C. A. Strugnell, “Environmental factors regulate plant secondary metabolites,” Plants, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1–27, 2023, doi: 10.3390/plants12030447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12030447
    41. J. Calleja-Cabrera, M. Boter, L. Oñate-Sánchez, and M. Pernas, “Root growth adaptation to climate change in crops,” Front. Plant Sci., vol. 11, no. May, pp. 1–23, 2020, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00544
    42. M. Yanagi, “Climate change impacts on wheat production: Reviewing challenges and adaptation strategies,” Adv. Resour. Res., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 89–107, 2024, doi: 10.50908/arr.4.1.
    43. R. Holmes et al., “The naturalized vascular flora of Malesia,” Biol. Invasions, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1339–1357, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10530-022-02989-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-022-02989-y
    44. H. García-Mozo, “Assessment of the diversity, abundance and range of invasive alien plant species in córdoba, a mediterranean urban area,” Diversity, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1–17, 2024, doi: 10.3390/d16120777. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/d16120777
    45. F. Fornoff, M. Staab, C. D. Zhu, and A. M. Klein, “Multi-trophic communities re-establish with canopy cover and microclimate in a subtropical forest biodiversity experiment,” Oecologia, vol. 196, no. 1, pp. 289–301, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s00442-021-04921-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-021-04921-y
    46. M. He, Y. Wu, X. Liu, B. Wu, and H. Fu, “Constructing a multi-functional small urban green space network for green space equity in urban built-up areas: A case study of Harbin, China,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1–17, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21671
    47. B. Şenik and O. Uzun, “A process approach to the open green space system planning,” Landsc. Ecol. Eng., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 203–219, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11355-021-00492-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-021-00492-5
    48. D. P. Cariveau, B. Bruninga-Socolar, and G. L. Pardee, “A review of the challenges and opportunities for restoring animal-mediated pollination of native plants,” Emerg. Top. Life Sci., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 99–109, 2020, doi: 10.1042/ETLS20190073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1042/ETLS20190073
    49. M. K. Yadav et al., “Ecological interactions of invasive insects and native plant species in changing climate,” J. Adv. Zool., vol. 44, no. 03, pp. 1770–1780, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17762/jaz.v44iS6.2616
    50. C. Li and X. Huang, “Differences in visual attraction between historical garden and urban park walking scenes,” Land, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 1–16, 2022, doi: 10.3390/land11101766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land11101766
    51. P. Wang, W. Yang, D. Wang, and Y. He, “Insights into public visual behaviors through eye-tracking tests: A study based on national park system pilot area landscapes,” Land, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1–19, 2021, doi: 10.3390/land10050497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land10050497