SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

6

H-Index

Journal of Health Innovation and Environmental Education

an Open Access Journal


The Dual Dimension of Consciousness: Environment and Health as Predictors of Environmentally Friendly Behavior

Share
  • Purpose of the study: This study was conducted to determine the influence of environmental and health awareness on people's pro-environmental behavior.

    Methodology: The subjects in this study were 203 residents of Tondo District, Manila, Philippines, selected using non-probability sampling and accidental sampling techniques. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to test the validity of the measuring instrument, and Multiple Regression Analysis was used to test the research hypotheses.

    Main Findings: The results of the study indicate that there is a joint influence of environmental awareness and health on the pro-environmental behavior of people living in Tondo District, Manila, Philippines. The results of the minor hypothesis test indicate that general belief, personal attitude and health self-monitoring have a significant influence on Pro-environmental. The results also show that the proportion of Pro-environmental variance explained by all independent variables is 26.9%, while the remaining 73.1% is influenced by other variables outside this study.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: The novelty of this study lies in its integrated examination of environmental awareness and health as dual predictors of pro-environmental behavior in society. Unlike previous studies that focused solely on the ecological or health dimensions, this research offers a holistic perspective, highlighting how shared awareness influences people's sustainable actions in their daily lives.

  • How to cite

    The Dual Dimension of Consciousness: Environment and Health as Predictors of Environmentally Friendly Behavior. (2025). Journal of Health Innovation and Environmental Education, 2(1), 94-101. https://doi.org/10.37251/jhiee.v2i1.2010
  • 92
    Abstract views
    108
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. M. Petrov, Z. Nikolaeva, and A. Dimitrov, “The impact of anthropogenic activity on the global environment,” Int. Sci. J., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 59–64, 2023.
    2. M. Kabir et al., “Impacts of anthropogenic activities & climate change resulting from increasing concentration of Carbon dioxide on environment in 21 st Century ; A Critical Review,” in IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1194, 2023, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1194/1/012010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1194/1/012010
    3. S. K. Sahoo, A. K. Das, S. Samanta, and S. S. Goswami, “Assesing the Role of Sustainable Development in Mitigating the Issue of Global Warming,” J. Process Manag. New Technol., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/jouproman2301001S
    4. X. M. Chen, A. Sharma, and H. Liu, “The Impact of Climate Change on Environmental Sustainability and Human Mortality,” Environments, vol. 10, no. 165, pp. 1–12, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ environments10100165 Academic. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/environments10100165
    5. J. Amriwijaya and V. Anindita, “Exploring The Emotional Landscape of Environmental Action: The Role of Hope in Pro-Environmental Behavior,” Int. J. Soc. Educ., vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 2217–2230, 2025.
    6. L. Zebardast and M. Radaei, “The influence of global crises on reshaping pro-environmental behavior, case study: the COVID-19 pandemic,” Sci. Total Environ. J., vol. 811, no. January, pp. 1–11, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151436
    7. W. Si, C. Jiang, and L. Meng, “The Relationship between Environmental Awareness , Habitat Quality , and Community Residents ’ Pro-Environmental Behavior — Mediated Effects Model Analysis Based on Social Capital,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 19, pp. 1–20, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013253
    8. B. Handoyo, I. K. Astina, and R. L. Mkumbachi, “Students’ environmental awareness and pro-environmental behaviour: preliminary study of geography students at state university of malang,” in International Geography Seminar, 2021, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/683/1/012049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/683/1/012049
    9. L. Omarova and S. Jo, “Employee Pro-Environmental Behavior : The Impact of Environmental Transformational Leadership and GHRM,” Sustainability, vol. 14, pp. 1–18, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042046
    10. R. M. Probosari, F. Sarwendah, and A. Nugraheni, “Raising Environmental Awareness in School : A Case Study of Environmental Education Through Implementation Adiwiyata-based Curriculum,” in Proceeding Biology Education Conference, 2021, pp. 181–190.
    11. M. H. Zikargae, A. G. Woldearegay, and T. Skjerdal, “Empowering rural society through non-formal environmental education : An empirical study of environment and forest development community projects in Ethiopia,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. August 2021, p. e09127, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09127
    12. A. N. Daly, E. J. O’Sullivan, and J. M. Kearney, “Considerations for health and food choice in adolescents,” in Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 2022, pp. 75–86. doi: 10.1017/S0029665121003827. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665121003827
    13. Z. Huang, Y. Zhu, J. Deng, and C. Wang, “Marketing Healthy Diets : The Impact of Health Consciousness on Chinese Consumers ’ Food Choices,” Sustainability, vol. 14, pp. 1–11, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042059
    14. A. Baobeid, M. Koç, and S. G. Al-ghamdi, “Walkability and Its Relationships With Health , Sustainability , and Livability : Elements of Physical Environment and Evaluation Frameworks,” Front. Built Environ., vol. 7, no. September, pp. 1–17, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2021.721218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.721218
    15. L. Steg, “Psychology of Climate Change,” Annu. Rev. ofPsychology is, vol. 74, pp. 391–421, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-032720-042905
    16. M. Simanjuntak and rahma I. Harbani, “Consumerism Behaviour of Indonesian Consumer : The Role of Self-Sufficiency and Information-Seeking,” J. Manaj. dan Organ., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/jmo.v13i1.40434
    17. M. Farid and D. Saputra, “Media , Consumerism and the Environment : The Relationship of Media and Consumptive Behavior of Urban Society to Environmental Damage,” Muharrik J. Dakwah dan Sos., vol. 4, no. 02, pp. 255–266, 2021, doi: 10.37680/muharrik.v4i02.1011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37680/muharrik.v4i02.1011
    18. C. Ourdas and S. Ponis, “Evaluating the Effects of Gamification in Behavioural Change : A Proposed SEM-Based Approach,” Sustainability, vol. 15, pp. 1–31, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065442
    19. H. Tian and X. Liu, “Pro-Environmental Behavior Research : Theoretical Progress and Future Directions,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 19, pp. 1–16, 2022, doi: https:// doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116721
    20. Z. Zeng, W. Zhong, and S. Naz, “Can Environmental Knowledge and Risk Perception Make a Difference ? The Role of Environmental Concern and Pro-Environmental Behavior in Fostering Sustainable Consumption Behavior,” Sustainability, vol. 15, pp. 1–23, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064791. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064791
    21. S. K. Shah, T. Zhongjun, A. Sattar, and Z. Xinhao, “Technology in Society Consumer ’ s intention to purchase 5G : Do environmental awareness , environmental knowledge and health consciousness attitude matter ?,” Technol. Soc., vol. 65, no. April, pp. 1–9, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101563
    22. Y. Li and B. Shan, “Exploring the role of health consciousness and environmental awareness in purchase intentions for green-packaged organic foods : an extended TPB model,” Front. Nutr., vol. 12, no. February, pp. 1–10, 2025, doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1528016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2025.1528016
    23. A. Z. Balqis and D. Awang, “Analysis of Society Behaving in Environmental Health Management in Indonesia,” in SHS Web of Conferences, 2024, pp. 1–6.
    24. P. Resolute, “Applying cultural perspective in Indonesia municipal solid waste management process towards a grounded climate concept and action : A mini-review of opportunities and challenges,” Waste Manag. Res., vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 873–881, 2024, doi: 10.1177/0734242X241262711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X241262711
    25. A. F. Koko and M. Bello, “Exploring the Contemporary Challenges of Urbanization and the Role of Sustainable Urban Development: A Study of Lagos City, Nigeria,” J. Contemp. Urban Aff., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 175–188, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2023.v7n1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2023.v7n1-12
    26. M. A. Rahaman, A. Kalam, and M. Al-Mamun, “Unplanned urbanization and health risks of Dhaka City in Bangladesh: uncovering the associations between urban environment and public health,” Front. Public Heal., vol. 11, no. October, pp. 1–18, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1269362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1269362
    27. S. J. Stratton, “Population Research: Convenience Sampling Strategies,” Prehosp. Disaster Med., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 373–374, 2021, doi: 10.1017/S1049023X21000649. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X21000649
    28. M. M. Rahman, “Sample Size Determination For Survey Research And Non-Probability Sampling Techniques: A Review And Set Of Recommendations,” J. Entrep. Bus. Econ., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 42–62, 2023, [Online]. Available: www.scientificia.com
    29. H. Taherdoost, “Designing a Questionnaire for a Research Paper: A Comprehensive Guide to Design and Develop an Effective Questionnaire,” Asian J. Manag. Sci., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 8–16, 2022, doi: 10.51983/ajms-2022.11.1.3087. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51983/ajms-2022.11.1.3087
    30. I. Masriah, I. Rachman, D. Ardianto, and T. Matsumoto, “Assessing the Validity and Reliability of Environmental Awareness Measurement Tools in Agricultural Area School,” Int. J. Sci. Adv., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 550–562, 2025, doi: 10.51542/ijscia.v6i3.22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51542/ijscia.v6i3.22
    31. J. Manuel, A. Navia, S. S. Sánchez, and D. C. Guevara, “Environmental awareness of university students in Colombia,” Knowl. Perform. Manag., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 104–114, 2024, doi: 10.21511/kpm.08(1).2024.08. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/kpm.08(1).2024.08
    32. G. J. Bean and N. K. Bowen, “Item Response Theory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis : Complementary Approaches for Scale Development,” J. Evid. Based. Soc. Work, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 597–618, 2021, doi: 10.1080/26408066.2021.1906813.
    33. M. A. Aljaberi et al., “Rasch Modeling and Multilevel Confirmatory Factor Analysis for the Usability of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised ( IES-R ) during the COVID-19 Pandemic,” Healthcare, vol. 10, pp. 1–20, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10101858. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10101858
    34. B. I. Sappaile, A. T. Abeng, and N. Nuridayanti, “Exploratory Factor Analysis as a Tool for Determining Indicators of a Research Variable : Literature Review,” Int. J. Educ. Narrat., vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 352–361, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.55849/ijen.v1i6.387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55849/ijen.v1i6.387
    35. M. Tamar, H. Wirawan, T. Arfah, and R. P. S. Putri, “Predicting pro-environmental behaviours : the role of environmental values , attitudes and knowledge,” Manag. Environ. Qual. An Int. J., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 328–343, 2021, doi: 10.1108/MEQ-12-2019-0264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-12-2019-0264
    36. L. Ma, P. Shahbaz, S. Haq, and I. Boz, “Exploring the Moderating Role of Environmental Education in Promoting a Clean Environment,” Sustainability, vol. 15, pp. 1–19, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108127
    37. W. Fu, J. Fang, and B. Chang, “Caring for yourself , caring for nature : a pro- environmental mechanism of self-compassion and intervention study,” BMC Psychol., vol. 13, pp. 1–14, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03389-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03389-2
    38. S. O. Ballazhi, L. Bexheti, K. S. Ivanoska, and I. Neziri, “Social Norms And Health Literacy As Predictor Of Pro- Environmental Behavior : Evidence From North Macedonia,” Knowl. – Int. J., vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 1137–1142, 2024.
    39. G. Castellini, M. Acampora, L. Provenzi, L. Cagliero, L. Lucini, and S. Barello, “Health consciousness and pro ‑ environmental behaviors in an Italian representative sample : A cross ‑ sectional study,” Sci. Rep., vol. 13, pp. 1–9, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35969-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35969-w
    40. S. Kousar, M. Afzal, and F. Ahmed, “Environmental Awareness and Air Quality : The Mediating Role of Environmental Protective Behaviors,” Sustainability, vol. 14, pp. 1–20, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su14063138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063138
    41. M. C. Dîrt and O. Prundeanu, “Narcissism and Pro-Environmental Behaviors : The Mediating Role of Self-Monitoring, Environmental Control and Attitudes,” Sustainability, vol. 15, pp. 1–16, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su15021571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021571
    42. Y. Liu and X. Li, “Pro-Environmental Behavior Predicted by Media Exposure , SNS Involvement , and Cognitive and Normative Factors,” Environ. Commun., vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 954–968, 2021, doi: 10.1080/17524032.2021.1922479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2021.1922479