Journal of Basic Education Research
Journal of Basic Education Research

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

14

H-Index

Journal of Basic Education Research

an Open Access Journal

A Touch of Culture in Learning: Teaching Materials My Food is Healthy and Nutritious for Elementary School

Milla Firza
Madrasah Ibtidiah 11 Banda Aceh
Indonesia
Safitri Safitri
Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh
Indonesia
sftrrsafitri098@gmail.com
Haval Hussein Saeed
Salahaddin University
Iraq
Okpala Onyinye Peace
Nnamdi Azikiwe University ROR
Nigeria
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This research aims to design teaching materials grounded in local wisdom and to evaluate the feasibility of these materials for the elementary/MI level, specifically focusing on Theme 9 "My Food is Healthy and Nutritious" and Subtheme 1 "My Food is Healthy and Nutritious."

    Methodology: The research employed the Research and Development (R&D) method utilizing the ADDIE model. The participants included one class teacher and two lecturers who provided feedback through validation questionnaires and teacher response questionnaires.

    Main Findings: The findings indicate that the responses from both lecturers regarding the development of teaching materials based on local wisdom were valid, with lecturer II's responses being highly valid. The teacher's feedback also confirmed the high validity of the teaching materials developed. Based on these results, it can be concluded that the designed teaching materials are suitable and effective for use in learning activities.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This research represents a significant advancement in the design of teaching materials by creatively integrating local wisdom to enhance the understanding of Class IV SD/MI students about health and nutrition through Theme 9 and Subtheme 1. Adopting an innovative design approach, this study pioneers a new direction in Class IV SD/MI learning, exploring effective strategies to incorporate local wisdom into teaching materials to strengthen students' comprehension of healthy and nutritious food.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “A Touch of Culture in Learning: Teaching Materials My Food is Healthy and Nutritious for Elementary School”, J. Bs. Edu. R, vol. 3, no. 3, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.37251/jber.v3i3.894.

    More Citation Formats

  • 462
    Abstract views
    303
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. L. Mishra, T. Gupta, and A. Shree, “Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic,” Int. J. Educ. Res. Open, vol. 1, no. June, p. 100012, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012
    2. R. A. Salas-Rueda, G. De-La-cruz-martínez, C. Alvarado-Zamorano, and E. Prieto-Larios, “The Collaborative Wall: A Technological Means to Improving the Teaching-Learning Process about Physics,” Cent. Educ. Policy Stud. J., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 205–231, 2022, doi: 10.26529/cepsj.1167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1167
    3. N. Erlina, Prayekti, and I. Wicaksono, “Atomic Physics Teaching Materials in Blended Learning To Improve Self-Directed Learning Skills in Distance Education,” Turkish Online J. Distance Educ., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 20–38, 2022, doi: 10.17718/tojde.1182747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1182747
    4. Ö. Altintas, “The use of open-ended items for giving feedback during the formative assessment process,” Int. J. Assess. Tools Educ., vol. 9, no. Special Issue, pp. 109–125, 2022, doi: 10.21449/ijate.1132981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1132981
    5. C. D. Cao, L. T. Phan, and T. T. Nguyen, “a Study on the Competency-Based Education of Lecturers in Universities of Technology and Education,” Int. J. Educ. Pract., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 267–276, 2022, doi: 10.18488/61.v10i3.3117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v10i3.3117
    6. G. Oflaz, “Evaluation of Educational Games Prepared by Mathematics Teacher Candidates According to Game Design Key Model,” Educ. Policy Anal. Strateg. Res., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 145–174, 2023, doi: 10.29329/epasr.2023.525.7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2023.525.7
    7. R. Siddiqui and K. A. Soomro, “Teachers’ Perceptions regarding Moral Education in Private and Public Schools in Karachi: A Comparative Study,” J. Educ. Educ. Dev., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 229–252, 2022, doi: 10.22555/joeed.v9i2.664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v9i2.664
    8. R. Abidin., N. Suryani., and S. Sariyatun, “Students’ perceptions of 360 degree virtual tour-based historical learning about the cultural heritage area of the Kapitan and Al-Munawar villages in Palembang City,” International Journal of Social Sciences and Management, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 105-112, 2020. doi: 10.3126/ijssm.v7i3.29764 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/ijssm.v7i3.29764
    9. A. Astalini., D. Darmaji., D. A. Kurniawan., D. Chen., R. Fitriani., M. Wulandari., S. Maryan., N. N. Simamora., and A. Ramadhanti, “A Study for Student Perception of Mathematical Physics E-Module Based on Gender,” Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(3), 911-936, 2022.DOI: 10.36681/tused.2022.156 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.156
    10. M. Maison., S. Syahrial., S. Syamsurizal., and T. Tanti,“Learning Environment, Students’ Beliefs, And Self-Regulation In Learning Physics: Structural Equation Modeling,”Journal of Baltic Science Education, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 389-403. 2019. doi:10.33225/jbse/19.18.389 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.389
    11. M. D. W. Ernawati, D. Muhammad, A. Asrial, and M. Muhaimin, “Development of Creative Thinking Skill Instruments for Chemistry Student Teachers in Indonesia”, Int. J. Onl. Eng., vol. 15, no. 14, pp. 21–30, 2019, doi: 10.3991/ijoe.v15i14.11354 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v15i14.11354
    12. Y. Yusnidar., M. D. W. Ernawati., D. A. Kurniawan., M. Z. Azzahra., F. I. Putri., and N. Prameswari, “Effect of learning using the problem-based learning (pbl) model with scaffolding on creative thinking and learning independence,” Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, vol. 58, no. 5, 2023, doi: 10.35741/issn.0258-2724.58.5.52 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.58.5.52
    13. A. Fadli and Irwanto, “The effect of local wisdom-based ELSII learning model on the problem solving and communication skills of pre-service islamic teachers,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 731–746, 2020, doi: 10.29333/iji.2020.13147a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13147a
    14. N. Intem, T. Phuwanatwichit, A. Sarobol, and C. Wannapaisan, “The Local Wisdom Management Mohom for Stable Inherit and Lifelong Learning,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 10, no. 5, p. 38, 2021, doi: 10.5539/jel.v10n5p38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v10n5p38
    15. S. Bahri, M. Ramly, A. Gani, and S. Sukmawati, “Organizational Commitment and Civil Servants Performance: The Contribution of Intelligence, Local Wisdom and Organizational Culture,” Eur. J. Bus. Manag. Res., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 128–134, 2021, doi: 10.24018/ejbmr.2021.6.1.720. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2021.6.1.720
    16. F. Marmani, “Creating Gender Equality in the Educational System Foteini,” Anatol. J. Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 57–72, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2022.715a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2022.715a
    17. M. E. I. Khan, “Deploying Blended Learning in the New Normal Pedagogy,” Int. J. Asian Educ., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 531–538, 2021, doi: 10.46966/ijae.v2i4.215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v2i4.215
    18. W. R. Geibel, “A Pedagogy of Student Mobility: Facilitating humanistic outcomes in internationalization and student mobility,” J. Comp. Int. High. Educ., vol. 12, pp. 67–77, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32674/jcihe.v12iSpring.1271
    19. J. Gregersen-Hermans, “Toward a Curriculum for the Future: Synthesizing Education for Sustainable Development and Internationalization of the Curriculum,” J. Stud. Int. Educ., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 461–481, 2021, doi: 10.1177/10283153211031033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10283153211031033
    20. B. Arslan-Cansever, “Investigation of Third Grade Students’ Views on Media Literacy,” Int. J. Educ. Methodol., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 265–273, 2019, doi: 10.12973/ijem.5.1.265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.5.2.265
    21. S. Elayyan, “The future of education according to the fourth industrial revolution,” J. Educ. Technol. Online Learn., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 23–30, 2021, doi: 10.31681/jetol.737193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.737193
    22. D. Uerz, M. Volman, and M. Kral, “Teacher educators’ competences in fostering student teachers’ proficiency in teaching and learning with technology: An overview of relevant research literature,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 70, pp. 12–23, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.005
    23. K. McKnight, K. O’Malley, R. Ruzic, M. Horsley, J. J. Franey, and K. Bassett, “Teaching in a digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning,” J. Res. Technol. Educ., vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 194–211, 2016, doi: 10.1080/15391523.2016.1175856. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1175856
    24. K. Maass, P. Cobb, K. Krainer, and D. Potari, “Different ways to implement innovative teaching approaches at scale,” Educ. Stud. Math., vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 303–318, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10649-019-09920-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09920-8
    25. M. Henderson, N. Selwyn, and R. Aston, “What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning,” Stud. High. Educ., vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1567–1579, 2017, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946.
    26. M. Henderson, N. Selwyn, and R. Aston, “What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning,” Stud. High. Educ., vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1567–1579, 2017, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946
    27. M. M. Fernandez-Antolin, J. M. del Río, and R. A. Gonzalez-Lezcano, “The use of gamification in higher technical education: perception of university students on innovative teaching materials,” Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ., vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1019–1038, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10798-020-09583-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09583-0
    28. F. Weng, H. J. Ho, R. J. Yang, and C. H. Weng, “The influence of learning style on learning attitude with multimedia teaching materials,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2019, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/100389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/100389
    29. I. T. Awidi and M. Paynter, “The impact of a flipped classroom approach on student learning experience,” Comput. Educ., vol. 128, no. 2, pp. 269–283, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.013
    30. K. Sarnok, P. Wannapiroon, and P. Nilsook, “Digital Learning Ecosystem by Using Digital Storytelling for Teacher Profession Students,” Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 21–26, 2019, doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2019.9.1.1167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2019.9.1.1167
    31. R. Wulandari, S. Utaminingsih, and M. Kanzunnudin, “Development of Class VI Elementary School Thematic Teaching Materials Based Local Wisdom,” J. Educ. Technol., vol. 4, no. 3, p. 296, 2020, doi: 10.23887/jet.v4i3.28457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v4i3.28457
    32. U. Kustiawan, R. D. T. Maningtyas, A. Purnama Putra, and A. Asmah, “Designing Clothing Patterns to Promote Fine Motor Skills: A Research and Development Project,” Int. J. Whole Child, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 9–18, 2021.
    33. G. W. Ulferts, N. J. Cannon, and T. L. Howard, “The Changing Landscape for Funding Research and Development,” Res. High. Educ. J., vol. 40, pp. 1–20, 2018, [Online]. Available: http://www.aabri.com/copyright.html.
    34. W. N. W. M. Adnan, N. N. M. Radin, A. F. M. Adam, and N. Hashim, “Designing Interactive Academia-Industry Framework in Digital Language Classroom,” Asian J. Univ. Educ., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 745–755, 2022, doi: 10.24191/ajue.v18i3.18966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v18i3.18966
    35. A. Syawaluddin, S. Afriani Rachman, and Khaerunnisa, “Developing Snake Ladder Game Learning Media to Increase Students’ Interest and Learning Outcomes on Social Studies in Elementary School,” Simul. Gaming, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 432–442, 2020, doi: 10.1177/1046878120921902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878120921902
    36. B. Gleason and M. K. Heath, “Injustice embedded in Google Classroom and Google Meet: A techno-ethical audit of remote educational technologies,” Ital. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 26–41, 2021, doi: 10.17471/2499-4324/1209.
    37. P. H. Sette-de-Souza, “Motivating learners in pandemic period through WhatsApp and Google Meet,” J. Dent. Educ., vol. 85, no. S1, pp. 1156–1157, 2021, doi: 10.1002/jdd.12352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.12352
    38. J. Feng and T. Sangsawang, “Information technology, according to the ADDIE model on English subject teaching, enhances the learning achievement of Shunde Polytechnic students in China .,” TOJET Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 121–131, 2023.
    39. L. Lu and M. Sides, “Instructional Design for Effective Teaching: The Application of ADDIE Model in a College Reading Lesson,” NOSS Pract. to Pract., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 4–12, 2022.
    40. A. M. Alzoebi, M. A. Ghunaimat, and E. A. Alawneh, “The Effects of Flipped Classroom Strategy Based on ‘Addie Model’ for Algebraic Skill Development,” Anatol. J. Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 141–158, 2023, doi: 10.29333/aje.2023.8110a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2023.8110a
    41. D. Muhtadi, R. Charitas, and I. Prahmana, “Sundanese Ethnomathematics : Mathematical Activities In Estimating , Measuring , And Making,” J. Math. Educ., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 185–198, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.8.2.4055.185-198
    42. S. Mania and S. Alam, “Teachers’ perception toward the use of ethnomathematics approach in teaching math,” Int. J. Educ. Math. Sci. Technol., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 282–298, 2021, doi: 10.46328/IJEMST.1551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.1551
    43. G. Sunzuma, N. Zezekwa, I. Gwizangwe, and G. Zinyeka, “A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ethnomathematics and Traditional Lecture Approaches in Teaching Consumer Arithmetic: Learners’ Achievement and Teachers’ Views,” Pedagog. Res., vol. 6, no. 4, p. em0103, 2021, doi: 10.29333/pr/11215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/11215
    44. I. M. Mudiartana, I. G. Margunayasa, and D. G. H. Divayana, “How is The Development of Valid and Practical Android-Based Local Wisdom Teaching Materials?,” J. Ilm. Sekol. Dasar, vol. 5, no. 3, p. 403, 2021, doi: 10.23887/jisd.v5i3.38176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v5i3.38176
    45. P. Abiam, O. Abonyi, J. Ugama, and G. Okafor, “Effects of Ethnomathematics-based Instructional Approach on Primary School Pupils’ Achievement in Geometry,” J. Sci. Res. Reports, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1–15, 2016, doi: 10.9734/jsrr/2016/19079. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/JSRR/2016/19079
    46. D. Mogari, “An in-service programme for introducing an ethno-mathematical approach to mathematics teachers,” Africa Educ. Rev., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 348–364, 2014, doi: 10.1080/18146627.2014.934992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2014.934992
    47. O. A. Cimen, “Discussing Ethnomathematics: Is Mathematics Culturally Dependent?,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 152, pp. 523–528, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.215