Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics-Based Problem-Based Learning Model for Fifth-Grade Students’ Learning Outcomes in Perimeter and Area of Plane Figures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37251/jber.v7i3.3042Keywords:
Elementary School, Learning Outcomes, Perimeter and Area of Plane Figures, Problem-Based Learning, Quasi-Experimental DesignAbstract
Purpose of the study: This study aims to analyze the effect of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics-based problem-based learning model on students’ learning outcomes in perimeter and area of plane figures in fifth-grade elementary school. The study focuses on comparing learning outcomes between students taught using science, technology, engineering, and mathematics -based problem-based learning model and those taught using conventional learning methods.
Methodology: This study used a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental method and nonequivalent control group design. The sample consisted of 49 fifth-grade students selected using purposive sampling. Data were collected using pre-test and post-test instruments. Data analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics 25, including normality, homogeneity, and Mann–Whitney U tests.
Main Findings: The results showed that the average post-test score of the experimental class was higher than the control class. The Mann–Whitney U test indicated a significance value of 0.013 < 0.05, showing a significant difference. This indicates that the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics -based PBL model has a significant effect on improving students’ learning outcomes in mathematics.
Novelty/Originality of this study: This study highlights the application of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics-based PBL specifically on perimeter and area of plane figures in elementary school context. It provides empirical evidence of its effectiveness in improving learning outcomes and offers a contextual and student-centered learning approach, contributing to the development of innovative mathematics learning models at the primary education level.
References
[1] M. Hayati and M. Jannah, “The importance of mathematical literacy skills in mathematics learning,” Griya J. Math. Educ. Appl., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 40–54, 2024, doi: 10.29303/griya.v4i1.416.
[2] A. K. Kenedi, Y. Helsa, Y. Ariani, M. Zainil, and S. Hendri, “Mathematical connection of elementary school students to solve mathematical problems,” J. Math. Educ., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 69–80, 2019
[3] R. S. Azwal and Y. Ningsih, “The effect of implementing the problem based learning model (PBL) on the learning outcomes of area measurement of class students IV SDN 05 Air Tawar Barat,” Pendas J. Ilm. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 10, no. 02, pp. 123–133, 2025, doi: 10.23969/jp.v10i02.24685.
[4] N. A. Fitri, Y. Ariani, F. Suciana, and Masniladevi, “Improving student learning outcomes using the problem based learning model on the material on the characteristics of flat shapes in class IV SDN 10 Koto Baru Kabupaten Solok,” Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals J., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 5525–5533, 2025, doi: 10.54373/imeij.v6i4.3631.
[5] I. Anggraini and Y. Ningsih, “The influence of the problem based learning model (PBL) on the classroom learning outcomes of flat shapes IV SD Gugus 3 Kecamatan Barangin Kota Sawahlunto,” J. Basic Educ. Stud., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 720–734, 2022.
[6] M. F. Ardana, C. Chandra, and S. S. Syam, “Improving the understanding of plane shapes in second grade elementary school students through cognitive and psychomotor evaluation,” Katalis Pendidik. J. Ilmu Pendidik. dan Mat., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 219–226, 2025, doi: 10.62383/katalis.v2i2.1673.
[7] F. Zahra, Masniladevi, R. Andika, and Y. Ningsih, “Pengaruh model problem based learning (PBL) terhadap hasil belajar peserta didik kelas V SD pada materi keliling bangun datar,” TSAQOFAH J. Penelit. Guru Indones., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 3930–3939, 2025, doi: 10.58578/tsaqofah.v5i4.6605.
[8] L. Febryanti and S. Ahmad, “Application of problem based learning model to improve students' learning outcomes on picture pattern and number pattern material in class IV elementary school,” Didakt. J. Ilm. PGSD FKIP Univ. Mandiri ISSN, vol. 10, no. 03, pp. 182–194, 2024, doi: 10.36989/didaktik.v10i3.3675.
[9] S. A. Ilmi and R. R. M. Subhan, “Pengaruh pendekatan science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM) terhadap hasil belajar tematik peserta didik di sekolah dasar,” J. Basicedu, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1525–1531, 2021, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v5i6.1839.
[10] G. L. Wati and E. Syafitri, “Improving students' numeracy literacy skills through the implementation of the STEM-Based PBL learning model,” J. Math. Paedagog., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 62–71, 2022, doi: 10.36294/jmp.v7i1.2821.
[11] R. A. B. Tarigan and E. Mailani, “The influence of STEM-Based problem based learning model on student learning outcomes in classroom mathematics learning IV SDN 105288 Sei Rotan,” Didakt. J. Ilm. PGSD FKIP Univ. MANDIRI, vol. 11, no. 02, pp. 312–321, 2025, doi: 10.36989/didaktik.v11i02.6659.
[12] M. Zainil, A. K. Kenedi, T. Indrawati, and C. Handrianto, “The influence of STEM-Based digital learning on 6c skills of elementary school students,” Res. Artic., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2024, doi: 10.1515/edu-2024-0039.
[13] I. W. Widana and K. L. Septiari, “Creative thinking ability and students' mathematics learning outcomes using the project-based learning model based on the approach STEM,” J. Elem., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 209–220, 2021, doi: 10.29408/jel.v7i1.3031.
[14] S. Hendri, R. Handika, A. K. Kenedi, and D. Ramadhani, “Development of a digital mathematics learning module based on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics for prospective elementary school teachers,” J. BASICEDU, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 2395–2403, 2021, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v5i4.1172 ISSN.
[15] F. A. Barkah and D. Kurniawati, “The Effectiveness of Integrated PBL-Based Modules on Chemical Equilibrium Material on Student Learning Outcomes,” BIOCHEPHY J. Sci. Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 188–194, 2025, doi: 10.52562/biochephy.v5i1.1597.
[16] M. Zainil, A. K. Kenedi, Rahmatina, T. Indrawati, and C. Handrianto, “The influence of a STEM-based digital classroom learning model and high-order thinking skills on the 21st-century skills of elementary school students in Indonesia,” J. Educ. e-Learning Res., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 29–35, 2023, doi: 10.20448/jeelr.v10i1.4336.
[17] Megalely and A. Purtika, “The influence of STEM-Based PBL learning model on student learning outcomes in science material theme 7 subtheme 1 class V SD Negeri 02 Sokawangi,” Literasi (Jurnal Pendidik. Dasar), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 75–85, 2024, doi: 10.26877/literasi.v3i1.16114.
[18] F. R. Hadi, “The effectiveness of the STEM-Integrated PBL model on students' critical mathematical thinking skills in classroom V SD,” J. Pendidik. Tambusai, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 6644–6649, 2021, doi: 10.31004/jptam.v5i3.2005.
[19] G. Khairunnisa and Y. Ningsih, “The influence of the problem based learning model on student learning outcomes in learning to subtract whole numbers in the classroom I Gugus I Kecamatan Lengayang Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan,” Pendas J. Ilm. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 10, no. 04, pp. 490–505, 2025, doi: 10.23969/jp.v10i04.40123.
[20] A. Mardatilla, M. Masniladevi, and R. Rozalinda, “Implementation of problem based learning based on culturally responsive teaching to improve learning outcomes of classroom student data material V SD,” J. Papeda J. Publ. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 234–243, 2025, doi: 10.36232/jurnalpendidikandasar.v7i2.2010.
[21] Y. Ningsih, I. M. Arnawa, D. Novaliendry, and R. Fadillah, “Problem, realistic, technology in mathematics (protectim) learning model founded on blended learning Problema,” Data Metadata, vol. 3, no. 641, pp. 1–11, 2025, doi: 10.56294/dm2024.641.
[22] T. Vessonen, H. Hellstrand, M. Kurkela, P. Aunio, and A. Laine, “The effectiveness of mathematical word problem-solving interventions among elementary schoolers : A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Int. J. Educ. Res., vol. 132, no. October 2024, p. 102642, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102642.
[23] B. Bognar and S. M. Horvat, “Characteristics of effective elementary mathematics instruction : A scoping review of experimental studies,” Educ. Sci., pp. 1–38, 2025, doi: 10.3390/educsci15010076.
[24] M. Husna, S. Ahmad, Y. Ariani, and S. S. Syam, “Improving student learning outcomes in data presentation material using the problem based learning (PBL) model in the classroom V SDN 26 Rimbo Kaluang Kota Padang,” J. Edu Res. Indones. Inst. Corp. Learn. Stud., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 2691–2696, 2025, doi: 10.47827/jer.v6i2.1094.
[25] M. Goos, S. Carreira, and I. K. Namukasa, “Mathematics and interdisciplinary STEM education : Recent developments and future directions,” ZDM – Math. Educ., vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 1199–1217, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11858-023-01533-z.
[26] H. C. Le and V. H. Nguyen, “Education sciences Integrated STEM approaches and associated outcomes of K-12 student learning : A Systematic Review,” Educ. Sci., vol. 13, pp. 1–19, 2023, doi: 10.3390/educsci13030297.
[27] H. Ye, B. Liang, O. L. Ng, and C. S. Chai, “Integration of computational thinking in K ‑ 12 mathematics education : a systematic review on CT ‑ based mathematics instruction and student learning,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1–26, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40594-023-00396-w.
[28] S. Chudin and H. Retnawati, “Improving numeracy through STEAM-based PBL: Comparative learning innovation in the classroom SMP,” Temat. J. Konten Pendidik. Mat., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 186–193, 2025, doi: 10.55210/jkpm.
[29] N. Ifadillah, Y. Ariani, S. Ahmad, and S. Syafitri, “Improving student learning outcomes on the area of flat shapes using the problem based learning model in class IV SDN 01 Ulak Karang Selatan,” Didakt. J. Ilm. PGSD STKIP Subang, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 2025, 2025, doi: 10.36989/didaktik.v11i03.7603.
[30] Agramaiya, T. Dahlan, and Y. Indriyani, “The effect of problem based learning model assisted by wordwall media on elementary school students' mathematics learning outcomes,” J. Pendidikan, Sains Dan Teknol., vol. 02, no. 02, pp. 185–193, 2025.
[31] A. Susanta, E. Susanto, E. Stiadi, and Rusnilawati, “Comparative study between mathematical literacy skills for elementary school students: A comparative study between interactive STEM learning and paper-and- pencil STEM learning,” Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1569–1582, 2021, doi: doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.4.1569.
[32] S. F. Azzahrah, Muhammadi, Y. Fitria, and A. Hidayati, “The influence of the contextual teaching and learning model on student learning activities and learning outcomes on ecosystem material in cluster II Sungai Penuh,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 864–872, 2026, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v12i1.14148.
[33] T. A. Nasution, A. Abdurrahman, B. A. Wicaksono, and U. Rosidin, “Implementation of the PBL model integrated with stem-edp to improve numeracy literacy skills in high school students,” EduFisika J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 65–74, 2025, doi: 10.59052/edufisika.v10i1.41893.
[34] A. Žakelj, M. Cotič, and D. Doz, “Evaluating the impact of active and experiential learning in mathematics : an experimental study on eighth-grade student outcomes,” Cogent Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2024, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2024.2436698.
[35] Asrulla, Risnita, M. S. Jailani, and F. Jeka, “Population and sampling (Quantitative), and selection of key informants (Qualitative) in a practical approach,” J. Pendidik. Tambusai, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 26320–26332, 2023.
[36] M. I. Syahroni, “Prosedur penelitian kuantitatif,” J. Al-Musthafa STIT Al-Aziziyah Lomb. Barat, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 43–56, 2022.
[37] W. Paramita and Y. Fitria, “The influence of PJBL-Based STEAM approach on students ’ high order thinking skills,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1201–1205, 2025, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i8.11824.
[38] R. O. Peni and Y. Ningsih, “The influence of the problem based learning model on learning outcomes of picture patterns and number patterns in the classroom IV SD Negeri 18 Air Tawar Selatan Kota Padang,” J. Pendidik. Tambusai, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 9542–9551, 2024, doi: 10.31004/jptam.v8i1.13834.
[39] I. Anugraheni, A. Gufron, and Y. W. Purnomo, “The impact of realistic problem-based learning on mathematical connection abilities : Evidence from elementary schools in Indonesia,” Cogent Educ., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2025, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2025.2523078.
[40] S. F. Kong and M. E. E. M. Matore, “Can a science , technology , engineering , and mathematics ( stem ) approach enhance students ’ mathematics performance ?,” sustainability, vol. 14, no. 379, pp. 1–15, 2022, doi: doi.org/10.3390/su14010379.
[41] S. Abdo and M. Elsayed, “The effectiveness of learning mathematics according to the stem approach in developing the mathematical proficiency of second graders of the intermediate school,” Educ. Res. Int., vol. 2022, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/5206476.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Meiliza Aulia, Yarisda Ningsih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Journal of Basic Education Research is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
.png)
.png)
.png)
