Journal of Basic Education Research
Journal of Basic Education Research

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

14

H-Index

Journal of Basic Education Research

an Open Access Journal


The Effectiveness of the Multiple Intelligences Approach in Remedial Calistung Instruction in Elementary Schools: A Systematic Literature Review-Based Analysis

Share
  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of the Multiple Intelligences (MI) approach for remedial foundational reading, writing, and arithmetic (calistung) instruction in elementary schools

    Methodology: A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted according to the PRISMA framework. A comprehensive search of literature published between 2020-2025 was performed across multiple academic databases using predefined keywords. A total of 20 relevant studies were identified, critically appraised, and thematically synthesized.

    Main Findings: The MI approach shows positive potential in improving calistung skills, particularly when integrated with active strategies like Problem-Based Learning and using MI-based worksheets. However, most existing studies have key methodological limitations, including small sample sizes, weak designs, and a lack of longitudinal data. Effectiveness is highly dependent on implementation quality and context.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This review provides a novel, focused synthesis of recent empirical evidence on MI for remedial calistung, a specific and critical educational context. It advances knowledge by identifying a consistent research-practice gap and offering concrete, evidence-based recommendations for future research and curriculum integration, moving beyond general theoretical discussion.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “The Effectiveness of the Multiple Intelligences Approach in Remedial Calistung Instruction in Elementary Schools: A Systematic Literature Review-Based Analysis”, J. Bs. Edu. R, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 29–37, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.37251/jber.v7i1.2531.
  • 147
    Abstract views
    231
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. I. Ayuningsih, D. Anjariyah, and H. J. Wiyono, ‘Meningkatkan literasi numerasi melalui pembelajaran berdiferensiasi berbantuan lkpd berbasis etnomatematika’, Prism. J. Pendidik. dan Ris. Mat., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 151–161, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33503/prismatika.v7i1.201
    2. L. A. Megawati and H. Sutarto, ‘Analysis numeracy literacy skills in terms of standardized math problem on a minimum competency assessment’, Unnes J. Math. Educ., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 155–165, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v10i2.49540
    3. M. Vivin, N. Mariana, A. Solihin, and Farman, ‘An analysis of elementary school students’ number sense in solving numerical problems’, MaPan, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 219–235, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.24252/mapan.2025v13n1a12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/mapan.2025v13n1a12
    4. A. Solihin, N. Mariana, W. Wiryanto, I. Rahmawati, and S. Suryanti, ‘Integrating ethnomathematics of zero waste culture based ESD to enhance students’ creative thinking and sustainability consciousness’, J. Innov. Res. Prim. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 136–147, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56916/jirpe.v4i2.1221
    5. J. Pinardi, A. R. Azahari, and B. Basuki, ‘Analisis miskonsepsi siswa pada materi operasi hitung campuran di SDN 8 Pahandut Palangka Raya’, J. Pendidik., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 87–97, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52850/jpn.v22i2.3843
    6. N. Maulidiyah and V. Rezania, ‘Literature study of multiple intelligences implementation on learning outcomes in elementary schools’, Acad. Open, vol. 4, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.21070/acopen.4.2021.1739. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.4.2021.1739
    7. І. А. Хижняк, Л. Цибулько, І. Вікторенко, and Н. Могильова, ‘Implementing the theory of multiple intelligences into project-based multimedia learning at primary school’, Inf. Technol. Learn. Tools, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 18–31, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.33407/itlt.v82i2.4326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v82i2.4326
    8. H. Hasbullah, N. Wahidah, and N. Nanning, ‘Integrating multiple intelligence learning approach to upgrade students’ english writing skills’, Int. J. Lang. Educ., vol. 7, no. 2, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.26858/ijole.v7i2.34383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v7i2.34383
    9. V. R. Langcuyan, I. C. Lopez, and M. L. S. P. Mendez, ‘Enhancing reading comprehension in Araling Panlipunan of Grade 5 learners through differentiated instruction’, Davao Res. J., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 95–107, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.59120/drj.v15i4.276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59120/drj.v15i4.276
    10. S. Anggoro, A. Fitriati, N. K. Thoe, C. A. Talib, and L. Mareza, ‘Differentiated instruction based on multiple intelligences as promising joyful and meaningful learning’, Int J Eval Res Educ ISSN, vol. 2252, no. 8822, p. 1195, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i2.24791
    11. S. Suhartono, H. Hanafi, C. Murniasih, and M. N. Nugroho, ‘Learning model based on multiple intelligences oriented towards higher order thinking skills (hots) through the application of visual, auditory, read-write preferential, kinesthetic (vark), and directed reading listening thinking activity (DRLTA) in eleme’, Res. Innov. Soc. Sci. Educ. J., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 67–79, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.30595/rissej.v3i1.257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30595/rissej.v3i1.257
    12. A. Solihin, R. K. Habibie, and I. Rahmawati, ‘Computational thinking with the guided-discovery-learning model using ethnomathematics-based lkpd. edm in elementary school’, Didakt. J. Pendidik. Sekol. Dasar, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 80–93, 2024, doi: 10.21831/didaktika.v7i1.75845. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/didaktika.v7i1.75845
    13. M. Ferrero, M. A. Vadillo, and S. P. León, ‘A valid evaluation of the theory of multiple intelligences is not yet possible: Problems of methodological quality for intervention studies’, Intelligence, vol. 88, p. 101566, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2021.101566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2021.101566
    14. D. Ulya, S. Wardani, and . W., ‘Development of student worksheets based on multiple intelligence in thematic learning of grade iv elementary schools’, Int. J. Res. Rev., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 101–111, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.52403/ijrr.20230214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20230214
    15. N. Mariana, ‘Pengaruh model pembelajaran problem based learning (PBL) terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis matematika kelas v sekolah dasar’, Elem. Sch. J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran ke-SD-an, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 233–239, 2025, doi: 10.31316/esjurnal.v12i1.4388.
    16. I. Aprilia, N. Bayu, N. Widya, R. Bagus, and S. Lutfi, ‘Implementasi pembelajaran berbasis HOTS dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa pada mata pelajaran matematika sekolah dasar’, J. Pendidikan, Bhs. dan Budaya, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 59–68, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.55606/jpbb.v3i1.2706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55606/jpbb.v3i1.2706
    17. N. Rehman, W. Zhang, A. Mahmood, M. Z. Fareed, and S. Batool, ‘Fostering twenty-first century skills among primary school students through math project-based learning’, Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 424, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01914-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01914-5
    18. S. Kaitera and S. Harmoinen, ‘Developing mathematical problem-solving skills in primary school by using visual representations on heuristics’, LUMAT Int. J. Math, Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 10, no. 2, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.31129/LUMAT.10.2.1696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.10.2.1696
    19. D. D. Hidayat and A. Mahmudi, ‘Impact of multiple intelligences and problem-based learning on mathematical literacy and self-efficacy in junior high school students’, AL-ISHLAH J. Pendidik., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 512–523, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.35445/alishlah.v17i1.5463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i1.5463
    20. D. Fischer et al., ‘Teacher education for sustainable development: A review of an emerging research field’, J. Teach. Educ., vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 509–524, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1177/00224871221105784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871221105784
    21. S. Murni and S. Ruqoyyah, ‘Development of teaching materials using a realistic mathematics education approach in a multiple intelligences perspective of elementary school students’, PrimaryEdu J. Prim. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 208–219, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.22460/pej.v4i2.1912. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22460/pej.v4i2.1912
    22. I. Farid, N. Bulqois, N. A. Assidiq, S. Megahutami, and M. Iskarim, ‘Fostering Multiple Intelligences in Elementary Schools: Harnessing Independent Curriculum-Based Learning in Elementary Schools’, Tadibia Islam., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 62–73, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.28918/tadibia.v3i2.1177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28918/tadibia.v3i2.1177
    23. S. Scippo, S. Madiai, and S. Cuomo, ‘Digital Tessellation for Geometry Learning in Primary School: A Quasi-Experimental Study’, J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res., vol. 24, p. 009, 2025, doi: 10.28945/5473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/5473
    24. I. Larasati, A. S. Pramasdyahsari, and L. Harun, ‘Enhancing elementary student’s numeracy skills through ethnomathematics-based learning: An analysis of minimum competency assessment results’, J. Honai Math, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 71–88, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.30862/jhm.v8i1.861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30862/jhm.v8i1.861
    25. L. I. Putri, G. Begimbetova, N. Sa’idah, and A. Murfi, ‘Evaluating the impact of ethnomathematics on mathematics achievement: a meta-analysis of studies from 2014-2024’, Glob. Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 110–122, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.71380/GERR-10-2024-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.71380/GERR-10-2024-12
    26. Y. Riyanto and T. A. Oktariyanda, Metodologi Penelitian: Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. 2023.
    27. N. Purwaningsih, S. Utaminingsih, and S. Surachmi, ‘Development of assessment instruments based on higher order thinking skills (hots) in thematic learning of grade iv elementary school students’, J. Prakarsa Paedagog., vol. 5, no. 1, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.24176/jpp.v5i1.8674. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24176/jpp.v5i1.8674
    28. W. Wawan, H. Retnawati, and W. Setyaningrum, ‘An integrative learning model to improve problem-solving and creative thinking abilities, collaboration, and motivation’, Islam. Guid. Couns. J., vol. 6, no. 2, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.25217/0020236402400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25217/0020236402400
    29. N. T. Arega and T. S. Hunde, ‘Constructivist instructional approaches: A systematic review of evaluation‐based evidence for effectiveness’, Rev. Educ., vol. 13, no. 1, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1002/rev3.70040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.70040
    30. A. Hadiana, ‘Efektivitas media pembelajaran interaktif berbasis wordwall terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis dan hasil belajara peserta didik pada pembelajaran matematika’, Sustain., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2019.
    31. S. A. Wibowo and Z. Z. A. Thaariq, ‘Desain interactive video berorientasi pembelajaran diferensiasi’, Proc. Ser. Educ. Stud., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 211–221, 2023.
    32. A. Solihin and I. Rahmawati, ‘Kartu eksplorasi etnomatematika-qr pada materi bangun datar kelas IV sekolah dasar’, J. Rev. Pendidik. Dasar J. Kaji. Pendidik. dan Has. Penelit., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 64–79, 2024, doi: 10.26740/jrpd.v10n1.p64-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpd.v10n1.p64-79
    33. T. A. Gebremeskel, M. M. Bachore, and E. W. Bushisho, ‘The effects of multiple intelligence based reading tasks on EFL students reading skills achievements: The case of university students in Ethiopia’, Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 13, p. e33591, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33591
    34. H. E. Gardner, Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. Basic Books/Hachette Book Group, 1993.
    35. A. Solihin, N. Mariana, B. Purwoko, and I. Rahmawati, ‘How can the mathematics anxiety rating scale be modified for Indonesian elementary students (aged 10-12)? A psychometric analysis’, J. Math. Educ., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 689–708, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.22342/JME.V16I2.PP689-708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v16i2.pp689-708
    36. C. Lumei and E.-S. Turda, ‘The role of theory multiple intelligences in primary education process’, Mar. 2022, pp. 477–486. doi: 10.15405/epes.22032.48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15405/epes.22032.48
    37. A. Solihin and R. K. Habibie, ‘Pengaruh integrasi budaya karapan sapi berbasis etnomatematika terhadap hasil belajar geometri siswa sekolah dasar’, J. Penelit. Pendidik. Guru Sekol. Dasar, vol. 12, no. 8, 2024.
    38. K. Gravemeijer, ‘A socio-constructivist elaboration of realistic mathematics education’, 2020, pp. 217–233. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-33824-4_12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33824-4_12
    39. N. Ghaznavi, M. Haddad Narafshan, and M. Tajadini, ‘The implementation of a multiple intelligences teaching approach: classroom engagement and physically disabled learners’, Cogent Psychol., vol. 8, no. 1, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1080/23311908.2021.1880258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2021.1880258
    40. A. D. Et al., ‘“The effect of multiple intelligences on student learning achievement of elementary school students in central java.”’, Psychol. Educ. J., vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 5104–5114, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.17762/pae.v58i1.1732. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17762/pae.v58i1.1732