Journal of Basic Education Research
Journal of Basic Education Research

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

14

H-Index

Journal of Basic Education Research

an Open Access Journal


How Principals’ Instructional Leadership Influence Teachers’ Self-Efficacy

Share
  • Purpose of the Study: This study focuses on evaluating the degree of TEP of PIL on TSE in Cambodia. It also seeks to identify how TEP on PIL varies according to different demographic characteristics. Furthermore, the researcher aims to uncover whether teachers’ demographic characteristics influence their perception of instructional leadership from their principals.

     

    Methodology: The researcher employed descriptive statistics to measure TEP on PIL and used independent sample t-tests and one-way ANOVA to examine differences in TEP on PIL across various demographic characteristics. A total of 295 PJHSTs participated in this study, all of whom were pursuing higher education degrees at a private university in Phnom Penh.

     

    Main Findings: The results of the research indicate that PJHSTs have diverse perceptions of PIL. These positive perceptions suggest that PIL significantly influences TSE. Additionally, the findings revealed that teachers’ gender had a significant impact on their perceptions of PIL (p < 0.05). However, no significant impact of gender differences on TSE was found. The study also highlighted additional findings, as presented in the results section.

     

    Novelty/Originality of the Study: These findings provide valuable insights into fostering TSE through effective PIL in Cambodian school context. PIL emerges as a critical factor in enhancing TSE, as teachers with high self-efficacy tend to perform their teaching tasks more effectively. Consequently, school principals, academic staff, teachers, and other stakeholders can apply these findings to improve institutional success. Future research should explore other leadership styles and additional factors that may influence TSE.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “How Principals’ Instructional Leadership Influence Teachers’ Self-Efficacy”, J. Bs. Edu. R, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 47–56, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.37251/jber.v6i1.1421.
  • 874
    Abstract views
    457
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. E. T. Butts, “A Study of the Relationship of Teachers’ Self-Efficacy and the Impact of Common Core Professional Development.,” Doctoral Dissertation, Gardner-Webb University, 2016.
    2. A. Jillson, “How does Burnout and Self-Efficacy Effect Teacher’s Perspectives and Implementation Status of Evidence Based Behavior Management Practices?.,” Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, 2020.
    3. S. Tep, “The correlation between instructional leadership and efficacy among the Cambodian public lower secondary school teachers” J. -Salam, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 163–180, 2022, doi: 10.37249/assalam.v6i2.437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37249/assalam.v6i2.437
    4. D. Christian and Y. Sayed, “Teacher motivation to teach in challenging school contexts on the cape flats, western cape, south africa.,” Educ. Sci., vol. 13, no. 2, p. 165, 20223, doi: 10.3390/educsci13020165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020165
    5. C. Day, P. Sammons, and K. Gorgen, "Successful School Leadership." Education development trust., 2020.
    6. E. O. Adu and S. O. Olatundun, “Teachers’ perception of teaching as correlates of students’ academic performance in oyo state, nigeria.,” Essays Educ., vol. 20, no. 1, p. 6, 2007, doi: vol20/iss1/6/.
    7. M. Akram, “Relationship between students’ perceptions of teacher effectiveness and student achievement at secondary school level.,” Bull. Educ. Res., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 93–108, 2019.
    8. D. S. Yost, “Reflection and self-efficacy: Enhancing the retention of qualified teachers from a teacher education perspective.,” Teach. Educ. Q., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 59–76, 2006
    9. H. Kahveci, “The positive and negative effects of teacher attitudes and behaviors on student progress.,” J. Pedagog. Res., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 290–306, doi: 10.33902/JPR.202319128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202319128
    10. P. Hallinger and M. Lee, “Mapping instructional leadership in thailand: has education reform impacted principal practice?.,” Educ. Manag. Adm. Leadersh., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 6–29, 2014, doi: 10.1177/1741143213502196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213502196
    11. S. Liu and P. Hallinger, “Principal instructional leadership, teacher self-efficacy, and teacher professional learning in china: testing a mediated-effects model.,” Educ. Adm. Q., vol. 54, no. 4, Art. no. 4, 2018, doi: 10.1177/0013161X18769048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18769048
    12. N. Nirmawati, S. N. Pratiwi, and I. Irvan, “The Effect of principal leadership on teacher performance through work motivation as an intervening variable at private vocational schools in medan tuntungan district.,” Indones. J. Educ. Math. Sci., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 73–80, 2023, doi: 10.30596/ ijems.v4i2.14393.
    13. R. Cansoy, H. Parlar, and M. Polatcan, “Collective teacher efficacy as a mediator in the relationship between instructional leadership and teacher commitment.,” Int. J. Leadersh. Educ., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 900–918, 2022, doi: 10.1080/13603124.2019.1708470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2019.1708470
    14. K. M. Williams, “Dynamics of Efficacy for Teachers in Formal Leadership Roles: A Case Study.,” East Tennessee State University, 2015.
    15. M. B. Beyer and C. Ruhl-Smith, “The principal’s role in school restructuring and reform: An examination of self-perceived leadership styles.,” J. Leadersh. Stud., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 116–128, 1998, doi: 10.1177/107179199900500210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107179199900500210
    16. N. P. Ololube, “Teachers job satisfaction and motivation for school effectiveness: An assessment.,” Essays Educ., vol. 18, no. 1, p. 9, 2006, doi: 10.6007/IJARPED/v12-i4/20089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v12-i4/20089
    17. K. S. Finnigan, “Principal leadership and teacher motivation under high-stakes accountability policies.,” Leadersh. Policy Sch., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 161–189, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760903216174
    18. B. Han, R. Tösten, and Z. Elçiçek, “Public leadership behaviors of school principals: does it affect teacher motivation and job satisfaction in turkish culture?.,” Int. J. Public Leadersh., vol. 18, no. 3, Art. no. 3, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPL-03-2021-0026
    19. R. Hosseingholizadeh, A. Amrahi, and H. El-Farr, “Instructional leadership, and teacher’s collective efficacy, commitment, and professional learning in primary schools: A mediation model.,” Prof. Dev. Educ., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 518–535, 2023, doi: 10.1080/19415257.2020.1850510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1850510
    20. X. Ma and R. Marion, “Exploring how instructional leadership affects teacher efficacy: A multilevel analysis.,” Educ. Manag. Adm. Leadersh., vol. 49, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1177/1741143219888742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143219888742
    21. F. Ishaq, M. Hamzeh, and A. A. Tabieh, “The degree of charismatic leadership practice among school principals from teachers perspective.,” Educ. Adm. Theory Pract., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 58–75, 2023, doi: 10.17762/kuey.v29i1.454.
    22. G. A. Sparks, “Charismatic leadership: Findings of an exploratory investigation of the techniques of influence.,” J. Behav. Stud. Bus., 2014
    23. R. J. House, “A 1976 Theory of Charismatic Leadership.,” Work. Pap. Ser. 76-06, 1976
    24. L. S. Rubio, “Charismatic leadership of school heads, supervisory relationship and reciprocity beliefs: path model on work ethics of public elementary school teachers.,” Eur. J. Educ. Stud., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 256–342, 2023, doi: oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejes/article/view/4654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v10i1.4654
    25. B. Shamir and J. M. Howell, “Organizational and contextual influences on the emergence and effectiveness of charismatic leadership.,” Emerald Publ. Ltd., vol. 9, pp. 255–281, 2018, doi: 10.1108/S1479-357120180000009020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-357120180000009020
    26. J. Zhang, H. Yim, and T. Wang, “Exploring the effects of professional learning communities on teacher’s self-efficacy and job satisfaction in shanghai, china.,” Educ. Stud., pp. 1–18, 2020, doi: 10.1080/03055698.2020.1834357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1834357
    27. Y. Liu, M. Ş. Bellibaş, and S. Gümüş, “The effect of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Mediating roles of supportive school culture and teacher collaboration.,” Educ. Manag. Adm. Leadersh., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 430–453, 2021, doi: 10.1177/1741143220910438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220910438
    28. P. Loukeri, A. Stathopoulou, Y. Salapata, and A. Drigas, “Charismatic leadership and special education teachers’ empowerment.,” Int. J. Recent Contrib. Eng. Sci. IT, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 89–95, 2021, doi: 10.3991/ijes.v9i3.23477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijes.v9i3.23477
    29. A. Bandura, “Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.,” Psychol. Rev., vol. 84, no. 2, p. 191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.84.2.191
    30. F. Golestan, “A comparative study of sa’adi shirazi’s view of education and albert bandura’s social learning theory.,” Thesis, Charles University, 2022.
    31. C. Mensah, E. M. Azila-Gbettor, C. R. Nunyonameh, M. E. Appietu, and S. N. Amedome, “Research methods anxiety, attitude, self-efficacy and academic effort: a social cognitive theory perspective.,” Cogent Psychol., vol. 10, no. 1, doi: 10.1080/23311908.2023.2167503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2023.2167503
    32. A. L. Hijriyah, A. H. Putri, A. Setiyawan, and A. H. Badrisya, “The social cognitive theory by albert bandura and its implementation in arabic language learning.,” Mantiqu Tayr J. Arab. Lang., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 626–639, doi: 10.25217/mantiqutayr.v4i2.4564. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25217/mantiqutayr.v4i2.4564
    33. A. Bandura, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: WH Freeman and Company, 1997.
    34. M. L. Pearce, “The effects of instructional leadership on teacher efficacy.,” Doctoral Dissertation, Kennesaw State University, 2017.
    35. M. Tschannen-Moran and P. McMaster, “Sources of self-efficacy: Four professional development formats and their relationship to self-efficacy and implementation of a new teaching strategy.,” Elem. Sch. J., vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 228–245, 2009, doi: 10.1086/605771 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/605771
    36. T. Urdan and F. Pajares, Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. 2006.
    37. J. Mulholland and J. Wallace, “Teacher induction and elementary science teaching: Enhancing self-efficacy.,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 17, no. 2, 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00054-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00054-8
    38. S. Shaukat and H. M. Iqbal, “Teacher self-efficacy as a function of student engagement, instructional strategies and classroom management.,” Pak. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 82–85, 2012.
    39. M. Poulou, “Personal teaching efficacy and its sources: Student teachers’ perceptions.,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 191–218, 2007, doi: 10.1080/01443410601066693. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410601066693
    40. M. Tschannen-Moran and A. W. Hoy, “The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers.,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 944–956, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.003
    41. A. Meyer, D. Richter, and V. Hartung-Beck, “The relationship between principal leadership and teacher collaboration: Investigating the mediating effect of teachers’ collective efficacy.,” Educ. Manag. Adm. Leadersh., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 593–612, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220945698
    42. Y. M. N. Almutairi, “Leadership self-efficacy and organizational commitment of faculty members: higher education.,” Adm. Sci., vol. 10, no. 3, p. 66, 2020, doi: 10.3390/admsci10030066. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10030066
    43. K. Khozin, T. Tobroni, and D. S. Rozza, “Implementation of albert bandura’s social learning theory in student character development.,” Int. J. Adv. Multidiscip., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 102–112, 2024, doi: 10.38035/ijam.v3i1.543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38035/ijam.v3i1.543
    44. Y. E. H. Al-Mahdy, M. M. Emam, and P. Hallinger, “Assessing the contribution of principal instructional leadership and collective teacher efficacy to teacher commitment in Oman.,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 69, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2017.10.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.10.007
    45. P. Hallinger, “Tools for improving principals’ work,” in A data-driven approach to assess and develop instructional leadership with the PIMRS., 2012, pp. 47–69.
    46. R. D. Goddard, W. K. Hoy, and A. W. Hoy, “Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and impact on student achievement.,” Am. Educ. Res. J., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 479–507, 2000, doi: 10.3102/00028312037002479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312037002479
    47. K. Leithwood and D. Jantzi, “Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader efficacy.,” Educ. Adm. Q., vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 496–528, 2008, doi: 10.1177/0013161X08321501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321501
    48. J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications, 2017.
    49. R. V. Krejcie and D. W. Morgan, “Determining sample size for research activities.,” Educ. Psychol. Meas., vol. 30, 1970. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
    50. P. Hallinger and W. C. Wang, “Measurement properties of the principal instructional management rating scale.,” in Sarasota, FL: Leading Development Associates, 2013.
    51. I. Kennedy, “Sample size determination in test-retest and Cronbach alpha reliability estimates.,” Br. J. Contemp. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.52589/BJCE-FY266HK9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52589/BJCE-FY266HK9
    52. P. Hallinger, “Developing Successful Leadership,” in Developing Instructional Leadership., Springer, Dordrecht, 2010, pp. 61–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9106-2_5