How Principals’ Instructional Leadership Influence Teachers’ Self-Efficacy
Abstract
Purpose of the Study: This study focuses on evaluating the degree of TEP of PIL on TSE in Cambodia. It also seeks to identify how TEP on PIL varies according to different demographic characteristics. Furthermore, the researcher aims to uncover whether teachers’ demographic characteristics influence their perception of instructional leadership from their principals.
Methodology: The researcher employed descriptive statistics to measure TEP on PIL and used independent sample t-tests and one-way ANOVA to examine differences in TEP on PIL across various demographic characteristics. A total of 295 PJHSTs participated in this study, all of whom were pursuing higher education degrees at a private university in Phnom Penh.
Main Findings: The results of the research indicate that PJHSTs have diverse perceptions of PIL. These positive perceptions suggest that PIL significantly influences TSE. Additionally, the findings revealed that teachers’ gender had a significant impact on their perceptions of PIL (p < 0.05). However, no significant impact of gender differences on TSE was found. The study also highlighted additional findings, as presented in the results section.
Novelty/Originality of the Study: These findings provide valuable insights into fostering TSE through effective PIL in Cambodian school context. PIL emerges as a critical factor in enhancing TSE, as teachers with high self-efficacy tend to perform their teaching tasks more effectively. Consequently, school principals, academic staff, teachers, and other stakeholders can apply these findings to improve institutional success. Future research should explore other leadership styles and additional factors that may influence TSE.
References
E. T. Butts, “A Study of the Relationship of Teachers’ Self-Efficacy and the Impact of Common Core Professional Development.,” Doctoral Dissertation, Gardner-Webb University, 2016.
A. Jillson, “How does Burnout and Self-Efficacy Effect Teacher’s Perspectives and Implementation Status of Evidence Based Behavior Management Practices?.,” Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, 2020.
S. Tep, “The correlation between instructional leadership and efficacy among the Cambodian public lower secondary school teachers” J. -Salam, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 163–180, 2022, doi: 10.37249/assalam.v6i2.437.
D. Christian and Y. Sayed, “Teacher motivation to teach in challenging school contexts on the cape flats, western cape, south africa.,” Educ. Sci., vol. 13, no. 2, p. 165, 20223, doi: 10.3390/educsci13020165.
C. Day, P. Sammons, and K. Gorgen, "Successful School Leadership." Education development trust., 2020.
E. O. Adu and S. O. Olatundun, “Teachers’ perception of teaching as correlates of students’ academic performance in oyo state, nigeria.,” Essays Educ., vol. 20, no. 1, p. 6, 2007, doi: vol20/iss1/6/.
M. Akram, “Relationship between students’ perceptions of teacher effectiveness and student achievement at secondary school level.,” Bull. Educ. Res., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 93–108, 2019.
D. S. Yost, “Reflection and self-efficacy: Enhancing the retention of qualified teachers from a teacher education perspective.,” Teach. Educ. Q., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 59–76, 2006
H. Kahveci, “The positive and negative effects of teacher attitudes and behaviors on student progress.,” J. Pedagog. Res., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 290–306, doi: 10.33902/JPR.202319128.
P. Hallinger and M. Lee, “Mapping instructional leadership in thailand: has education reform impacted principal practice?.,” Educ. Manag. Adm. Leadersh., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 6–29, 2014, doi: 10.1177/1741143213502196.
S. Liu and P. Hallinger, “Principal instructional leadership, teacher self-efficacy, and teacher professional learning in china: testing a mediated-effects model.,” Educ. Adm. Q., vol. 54, no. 4, Art. no. 4, 2018, doi: 10.1177/0013161X18769048.
N. Nirmawati, S. N. Pratiwi, and I. Irvan, “The Effect of principal leadership on teacher performance through work motivation as an intervening variable at private vocational schools in medan tuntungan district.,” Indones. J. Educ. Math. Sci., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 73–80, 2023, doi: 10.30596/ ijems.v4i2.14393.
R. Cansoy, H. Parlar, and M. Polatcan, “Collective teacher efficacy as a mediator in the relationship between instructional leadership and teacher commitment.,” Int. J. Leadersh. Educ., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 900–918, 2022, doi: 10.1080/13603124.2019.1708470.
K. M. Williams, “Dynamics of Efficacy for Teachers in Formal Leadership Roles: A Case Study.,” East Tennessee State University, 2015.
M. B. Beyer and C. Ruhl-Smith, “The principal’s role in school restructuring and reform: An examination of self-perceived leadership styles.,” J. Leadersh. Stud., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 116–128, 1998, doi: 10.1177/107179199900500210.
N. P. Ololube, “Teachers job satisfaction and motivation for school effectiveness: An assessment.,” Essays Educ., vol. 18, no. 1, p. 9, 2006, doi: 10.6007/IJARPED/v12-i4/20089.
K. S. Finnigan, “Principal leadership and teacher motivation under high-stakes accountability policies.,” Leadersh. Policy Sch., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 161–189, 2010.
B. Han, R. Tösten, and Z. Elçiçek, “Public leadership behaviors of school principals: does it affect teacher motivation and job satisfaction in turkish culture?.,” Int. J. Public Leadersh., vol. 18, no. 3, Art. no. 3, 2022.
R. Hosseingholizadeh, A. Amrahi, and H. El-Farr, “Instructional leadership, and teacher’s collective efficacy, commitment, and professional learning in primary schools: A mediation model.,” Prof. Dev. Educ., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 518–535, 2023, doi: 10.1080/19415257.2020.1850510.
X. Ma and R. Marion, “Exploring how instructional leadership affects teacher efficacy: A multilevel analysis.,” Educ. Manag. Adm. Leadersh., vol. 49, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1177/1741143219888742.
F. Ishaq, M. Hamzeh, and A. A. Tabieh, “The degree of charismatic leadership practice among school principals from teachers perspective.,” Educ. Adm. Theory Pract., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 58–75, 2023, doi: 10.17762/kuey.v29i1.454.
G. A. Sparks, “Charismatic leadership: Findings of an exploratory investigation of the techniques of influence.,” J. Behav. Stud. Bus., 2014
R. J. House, “A 1976 Theory of Charismatic Leadership.,” Work. Pap. Ser. 76-06, 1976
L. S. Rubio, “Charismatic leadership of school heads, supervisory relationship and reciprocity beliefs: path model on work ethics of public elementary school teachers.,” Eur. J. Educ. Stud., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 256–342, 2023, doi: oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejes/article/view/4654.
B. Shamir and J. M. Howell, “Organizational and contextual influences on the emergence and effectiveness of charismatic leadership.,” Emerald Publ. Ltd., vol. 9, pp. 255–281, 2018, doi: 10.1108/S1479-357120180000009020.
J. Zhang, H. Yim, and T. Wang, “Exploring the effects of professional learning communities on teacher’s self-efficacy and job satisfaction in shanghai, china.,” Educ. Stud., pp. 1–18, 2020, doi: 10.1080/03055698.2020.1834357.
Y. Liu, M. Ş. Bellibaş, and S. Gümüş, “The effect of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Mediating roles of supportive school culture and teacher collaboration.,” Educ. Manag. Adm. Leadersh., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 430–453, 2021, doi: 10.1177/1741143220910438.
P. Loukeri, A. Stathopoulou, Y. Salapata, and A. Drigas, “Charismatic leadership and special education teachers’ empowerment.,” Int. J. Recent Contrib. Eng. Sci. IT, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 89–95, 2021, doi: 10.3991/ijes.v9i3.23477.
A. Bandura, “Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.,” Psychol. Rev., vol. 84, no. 2, p. 191.
F. Golestan, “A comparative study of sa’adi shirazi’s view of education and albert bandura’s social learning theory.,” Thesis, Charles University, 2022.
C. Mensah, E. M. Azila-Gbettor, C. R. Nunyonameh, M. E. Appietu, and S. N. Amedome, “Research methods anxiety, attitude, self-efficacy and academic effort: a social cognitive theory perspective.,” Cogent Psychol., vol. 10, no. 1, doi: 10.1080/23311908.2023.2167503.
A. L. Hijriyah, A. H. Putri, A. Setiyawan, and A. H. Badrisya, “The social cognitive theory by albert bandura and its implementation in arabic language learning.,” Mantiqu Tayr J. Arab. Lang., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 626–639, doi: 10.25217/mantiqutayr.v4i2.4564.
A. Bandura, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: WH Freeman and Company, 1997.
M. L. Pearce, “The effects of instructional leadership on teacher efficacy.,” Doctoral Dissertation, Kennesaw State University, 2017.
M. Tschannen-Moran and P. McMaster, “Sources of self-efficacy: Four professional development formats and their relationship to self-efficacy and implementation of a new teaching strategy.,” Elem. Sch. J., vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 228–245, 2009, doi: 10.1086/605771
T. Urdan and F. Pajares, Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. 2006.
J. Mulholland and J. Wallace, “Teacher induction and elementary science teaching: Enhancing self-efficacy.,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 17, no. 2, 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00054-8.
S. Shaukat and H. M. Iqbal, “Teacher self-efficacy as a function of student engagement, instructional strategies and classroom management.,” Pak. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 82–85, 2012.
M. Poulou, “Personal teaching efficacy and its sources: Student teachers’ perceptions.,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 191–218, 2007, doi: 10.1080/01443410601066693.
M. Tschannen-Moran and A. W. Hoy, “The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers.,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 944–956, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.003.
A. Meyer, D. Richter, and V. Hartung-Beck, “The relationship between principal leadership and teacher collaboration: Investigating the mediating effect of teachers’ collective efficacy.,” Educ. Manag. Adm. Leadersh., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 593–612, 2022.
Y. M. N. Almutairi, “Leadership self-efficacy and organizational commitment of faculty members: higher education.,” Adm. Sci., vol. 10, no. 3, p. 66, 2020, doi: 10.3390/admsci10030066.
K. Khozin, T. Tobroni, and D. S. Rozza, “Implementation of albert bandura’s social learning theory in student character development.,” Int. J. Adv. Multidiscip., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 102–112, 2024, doi: 10.38035/ijam.v3i1.543.
Y. E. H. Al-Mahdy, M. M. Emam, and P. Hallinger, “Assessing the contribution of principal instructional leadership and collective teacher efficacy to teacher commitment in Oman.,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 69, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2017.10.007.
P. Hallinger, “Tools for improving principals’ work,” in A data-driven approach to assess and develop instructional leadership with the PIMRS., 2012, pp. 47–69.
R. D. Goddard, W. K. Hoy, and A. W. Hoy, “Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and impact on student achievement.,” Am. Educ. Res. J., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 479–507, 2000, doi: 10.3102/00028312037002479.
K. Leithwood and D. Jantzi, “Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader efficacy.,” Educ. Adm. Q., vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 496–528, 2008, doi: 10.1177/0013161X08321501.
J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications, 2017.
R. V. Krejcie and D. W. Morgan, “Determining sample size for research activities.,” Educ. Psychol. Meas., vol. 30, 1970.
P. Hallinger and W. C. Wang, “Measurement properties of the principal instructional management rating scale.,” in Sarasota, FL: Leading Development Associates, 2013.
I. Kennedy, “Sample size determination in test-retest and Cronbach alpha reliability estimates.,” Br. J. Contemp. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.52589/BJCE-FY266HK9.
P. Hallinger, “Developing Successful Leadership,” in Developing Instructional Leadership., Springer, Dordrecht, 2010, pp. 61–76.
Copyright (c) 2025 Sopheng Tep, Ratana Loch, Visalboth Pok
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Journal of Basic Education Research is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.