Journal of Basic Education Research
Journal of Basic Education Research

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

14

H-Index

Journal of Basic Education Research

an Open Access Journal

Teacher Strategies in Installing Independent Character in High School Elementary School Students in Learning

Elpinora Elpinora
STKIP Muhammadiyah Sungai Penuh
Indonesia
Anggarwati Riscaputantri
Yogyakarta State University ROR
Indonesia
Jimoh Azeeh Ade
University of Ilorin
Nigeria
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to analyze teacher strategies in instilling independent character in students in Elementary Schools.

    Methodology: A qualitative approach with descriptive design was used in this study, with a population of teachers at elementary schools Terbansari I selected by purposive sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using the Miles and Huberman model, including data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions.

    Main Findings: The results of the study showed that project-based learning strategies, small group discussions, and active parental involvement through digital communication were effective in increasing student independence. The main challenge faced by teachers was the habit of students relying on teacher direction. Teachers overcame this by providing individual guidance and rewards to encourage student motivation.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: The novelty of this research lies in the integration of project-based learning strategies with reflective activities and direct parental involvement in character learning in Elementary Schools.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “Teacher Strategies in Installing Independent Character in High School Elementary School Students in Learning”, J. Bs. Edu. R, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 149–153, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.37251/jber.v6i1.1413.

    More Citation Formats

  • 67
    Abstract views
    57
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. L. A. Maharani and S. B. Waluya, “Systematic literature review: implementation of a problem-based learning model with ethnomathematics nuances in improving students’ mathematical problem solving ability,” J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 1, no. 2, p. 13, 2023, doi: 10.47134/ppm.v1i2.218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47134/ppm.v1i2.218
    2. T. U. Zaman, H. D. Goswami, and Y. Hassan, “The impact of growth and development of slums on the health status and health awareness of slum dwellers,” Int. J. Med. Res. Heal. Sci., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 55–65, 2018.
    3. M. Crul et al., “How the different policies and school systems affect the inclusion of syrian refugee children in sweden, germany, greece, lebanon and turkey,” Comp. Migr. Stud., vol. 7, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s40878-018-0110-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-018-0110-6
    4. Y. Yusutria and R. Febriana, “Aktualisasi nilai–nilai kemandirian dalam membentuk karakter mandiri siswa,” Ta’dib J. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 577–582, 2019, doi: 10.29313/tjpi.v8i1.4575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/tjpi.v8i1.4575
    5. Z. Guan and Y. Wang, “Non-parametric construction of site-specific non-Gaussian multivariate joint probability distribution from sparse measurements,” Struct. Saf., vol. 91, no. November 2020, p. 102077, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2021.102077. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2021.102077
    6. Y. J. Oh, J. Zhang, M. L. Fang, and Y. Fukuoka, “A systematic review of artificial intelligence chatbots for promoting physical activity, healthy diet, and weight loss,” Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–25, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01224-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01224-6
    7. Asrial, Syahrial, H. Sabil, and J. Ryan, “Science teacher’s book: analyzing elementary school students’ character values,” J. Ilm. Ilmu Terap. Univ. Jambi, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 180–187, 2024, doi: 10.22437/jiituj.v8i1.32766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v8i1.32766
    8. J. Sari, R. Asyhar, and S. Purwaningsih, “Integrated science learning devices on substances and their characteristics material with character enrichment through the application of problem-based learning,” Integr. Sci. Educ. J., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 90–95, 2023, doi: 10.37251/isej.v4i3.691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v4i3.691
    9. I. Magdalena, A. S. Haq, and F. Ramdhan, “Pembelajaran pendidikan kewarganegaraan di sekolah dasar negri bojong 3 pinang,” J. Pendidik. dan Sains STITPN, vol. 2, pp. 97–104, 2020
    10. M. A. Martawijaya, S. Rahmadhanningsih, A. Swandi, M. Hasyim, and E. H. Sujiono, “The effect of applying the ethno-stem-project-based learning model on students’ Higher-Order Thinking Skill and Misconception of Physics Topics Related To Lake Tempe, Indonesia,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2023, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v12i1.38703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i1.38703
    11. C. F. Correia and C. Harrison, “Teachers’ beliefs about inquiry-based learning and its impact on formative assessment practice,” Res. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 355–376, 2020, doi: 10.1080/02635143.2019.1634040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1634040
    12. R. Ambarwati, E. B. Ulla, and M. Tajaddini, “Analysis of high school students’ learning discipline in physics learning,” Schrödinger J. Phys. Educ., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 112–117, 2023, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v4i4.764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v4i4.764
    13. R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, “Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 61, no. April, p. 101860, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
    14. F. Mufit, Asrizal, S. A. Hanum, and A. Fadhilah, “Preliminary research in the development of physics teaching materials that integrate new literacy and disaster literacy,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1481, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1481/1/012041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1481/1/012041
    15. A. O. Safitri, P. A. Handayani, and V. D. Yunianti, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning terhadap Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS,” J. Pendidik. Tambusai, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 9106–9114, 2022.
    16. M. S. Farooq, N. Feroze, and Y. T. Kai, “Computer simulation instruction and pupils’ achievement in basic science, akure township, nigeria,” Int. Online J. Prim. Educ., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 30–38, 2017.
    17. L. G. Snyder and M. J. Snyder, “Optional teaching critical thinking and problem solving skills,” J. Res. Bus. Educ., vol. 50, no. 2, p. 90, 2008.
    18. K. Resch, I. Schrittesser, and M. tedKnapp, “Overcoming the theory-practice divide in teacher education with the ‘partner school programme’. a conceptual mapping,” Eur. J. Teach. Educ., vol. 00, no. 00, pp. 1–17, 2022, doi: 10.1080/02619768.2022.2058928. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2022.2058928
    19. N. Nursakinah and J. Jauhar, “A study of thematic learning in discipline character cases,” J. Basic Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 80–84, 2023, doi: 10.37251/jber.v4i2.424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jber.v4i2.424
    20. F. Amila and J. Ostadmohamadi, “Implementation of the Islamic Religious Education Learning Model for Deaf Students: Empirical Study in Salatiga State Special Middle Schools,” J. Pendidik. Agama Islam Indones., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 56–64, 2024, doi: 10.37251/jpaii.v5i2.994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jpaii.v5i2.994
    21. M. Ahsanu, T. Purwati, and E. Wardani, “Unpacking reflective practice in the praxis of english language teaching in indonesia,” Arab World English J., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 272–290, 2020, doi: 10.24093/awej/vol11no4.18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no4.18
    22. M. Romero-Ariza, A. Quesada, A. M. Abril, P. Sorensen, and M. C. Oliver, “Highly recommended and poorly used: english and spanish science teachers’ views of Inquiry-based Learning (IBL) and its enactment,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2020, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/109658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/109658
    23. Kilag, Uy, Calledo, Cerna, Villanueva, and Angtud, “Quality performance of teachers: work environment, work attitude, and principal supervision: qualitative investigation,” Sci. Educ., vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 415–429, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11594/baerj.04.01.01
    24. Asrulla, Risnita, M. S. Jailani, and F. Jeka, “Populasi dan sampling (kuantitatif), serta pemilihan informan kunci (kualitatif) dalam pendekatan praktis,” J. Pendidik. Tambusai, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 26320–26332, 2023.
    25. B. Terpou, M. Bird, D. Srinivasan, S. Bains, L. Rosella, and L. Desveaux, “A population health approach: an organizational case study of mental models among hospital leaders,” Acad. Manag. Proc., vol. 2024, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2024, doi: 10.5465/amproc.2024.14222abstract. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMPROC.2024.14222abstract
    26. L. Prior, “Content analysis,” Oxford Handb. Qual. Res., no. January 2016, pp. 541–568, 2020, doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190847388.013.25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190847388.013.25
    27. F. Adamson and L. Darling-Hammond, "Policy pathways for twenty-first century skills". 2015. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7_15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7_15
    28. Rahmatika, M. Yusuf, and L. Agung, “The effectiveness of youtube as an online learning media,” J. Educ. Technol., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 152–158, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i1.33628
    29. J. Jusmaniar, I. Riani, E. C. Anderson, M. C. Lee, and S. W. Oktavia, “Gasing game: ethnoscientific exploration of circular motion in physics learning on the coast of east sumatra to build the character of perseverance,” Schrödinger J. Phys. Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2024, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v5i1.902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v5i1.902
    30. G. Syahputra and A. J. Edwards, “Transforming history teaching: using adobe photoshop e-posters to teach the battle of november 10, 1945,” J. Educ. Technol. Learn. Creat., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 29–40, 2024, doi: 10.37251/jetlc.v2i1.980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jetlc.v2i1.980
    31. N. M. Fuad, S. Zubaidah, S. Mahanal, and E. Suarsini, “Improving junior high schools’ critical thinking skills based on test three different models of learning,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 101–116, 2017, doi: 10.12973/iji.2017.1017a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.1017a
    32. H. Alkharusi, “English Language Teachers’ Uses of classroom assessment,” Anatol. J. Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 103–108, 2021, doi: 10.29333/aje.2021.618a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2021.618a
    33. J. B. Jarrett, K. L. Goliak, S. T. Haines, E. Trolli, and A. Schwartz, “Development of an entrustment-supervision assessment tool for pharmacy experiential education using stakeholder focus groups,” Am. J. Pharm. Educ., vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 15–20, 2022, doi: 10.5688/ajpe8523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8523
    34. F. Kiraga, “Literature review: efforts to improve creative thinking ability in science learning,” Integr. Sci. Educ. J., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 77–83, 2023, doi: 10.37251/isej.v4i2.330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v4i2.330
    35. A. WALKER and T. KETTLER, “Developing critical thinking skills in high ability adolescents: effects of a debate and argument analysis curriculum,” Talent, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 21–39, 2020, doi: 10.46893/talent.758473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46893/talent.758473
    36. Tanti, D. A. Kurniawan, Kuswanto, W. Utami, and I. Wardhana, “Science process skills and critical thinking in science: urban and rural disparity,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 489–498, 2020, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v9i4.24139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i4.24139