Jacks of All Trades: The Lived Experiences of Out-of-Field Non-Government Basic Education Teachers
Abstract
Purpose of the study: Out-of-field teaching is a concern that results in teaching ineffectiveness, compromising quality education. However, there is still limited extant literature available, particularly on the experiences of non-government junior high school teachers. This study specifically explored the lived experiences of the out-of-field teachers in the provinces of Pampanga and Tarlac in the Philippines.
Methodology: Ten basic education teachers particularly junior high school teachers were tapped in order to achieve the purpose of the study. Also, maximum variation was utilized, incorporating convenience and snowball techniques to ensure diverse perspectives. The Colaizzi method in analyzing the data was used through a positivist view. Member checking was equally observed to meticulously capture the core experiences of the informants and to ensure the trustworthiness of the data.]
Main Findings: The findings unveiled both positive and negative experiences that were eventually clustered into five categories: (1) challenges of out-of-field teaching, (2) strategies to overcome challenges, (3) opportunities for growth, (4) impact on students, and (5) areas for improvement. Consistent with the recent works of literature, this study highlights the contrasting aspects of out-of-field teaching—its challenges and potential opportunities.
Novelty/Originality of this study: As a contrast to the usual assumption that out-of-field teaching only creates negative experiences, not only among teachers but also among learners, the challenges and opportunities of this phenomenon offer valuable insights that can serve as a cornerstone for policymakers and school administrators in helping and supporting out-of-field teachers. Contextualized assistance and targeted preparations can guarantee quality education
References
Ghufron, F. K. Fitriyah, M. Sodikin, N. Saputra, S. M. Amin, S. M., and H. A. Muhimmah, “Evaluating the impact of teachers’ personal and professional resources in elementary education on school-based human resource management: A case study in Indonesia,” SAGE Open, vol. 14, no. 1. 2024, doi: 10.1177/21582440241231049
A. Arifin, S. S. Suryaningsih, and O. Arifudin, “The relationship between classroom environment, teacher professional development, and student academic performance in secondary education,” International Education Trend Issues, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 151–159. 2024, doi: 10.56442/ieti.v2i2.467
E. J. Ifesinachi, J. Dadzie, and A. C. Ocheni, “Enhancing students’ academic achievement in basic science: the role of assessment for learning, classroom management, and teacher-student relationships,” European Journal of Education Studies, vol. 11, no. 5. 2024, doi: 10.46827/ejes.v11i5.5298
A. M. M. Mahmudul Hasan, “Teachers’ feedback and its impact on students’ performance in education,” International Journal of Academic Pedagogical Research, vol. 8 no. 3, pp. 21-31. 2024.
A. Câmpean, M. Bocoș, A. Roman, D. Rad, C. Crișan, M. Maier, L. Tăușan-Crișan, Z. Triff, D. Triff, D. Mara, E. Mara, R. Răduț-Taciu, I. Todor, C. Baciu, M. Neacșu, I. Dumitru, C. C. Colareza, and C. E. Roman, “Examining teachers’ perception on the impact of positive feedback on school students,” Education Sciences, vol. 14 no. 3, p. 257. 2024, doi: 10.3390/educsci14030257
K. Daniel, M. M. Msafiri, F. Antony, and X. Wan, “Motivate students for better academic achievement: A systematic review of blended innovative teaching and its impact on learning,” Computer Applications in Engineering Education. 2024, doi: 10.1002/cae.22733
J. Hong, W. Liu, and Q. Zhang, “Closing the digital divide: The impact of teachers’ ICT use on student achievement in China,” Journal of Comparative Economics. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jce.2024.06.003
G. Fuentes-Vilugrón, E. Sandoval-Obando, F. Caamaño-Navarrete, C. Arriagada-Hernández, P. Etchegaray-Pezo, F. Muñoz-Troncoso, I. P. Cuadrado-Gordillo, Pablo, and E. Riquelme-Mella, “Difficulties among teachers’ emotional regulation: Analysis for the development of student well-being in Chilean schools,” Behavioral Sciences, vol. 14 no. 9, pp. 749–749. 2024, doi: 10.3390/bs14090749
A. Hawrot and J. Zhou, “Do changes in perceived teacher behaviour predict changes in intrinsic reading motivation? A five-wave analysis in german lower secondary school students,” Reading and Writing. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11145-023-10472-w
K. Yoshida, “Roles of teachers in the SDG4 age: An introductory note,” Kokusai Kyōiku Kyōryoku Ronshū, vol. 22 no. 2, pp. 7–14. 2020, doi: 10.15027/50527
N. Durrani, G. Qanay, G., Mir, J. Helmer, F. Polat, N. Karimova, and A. Temirbekova, “Achieving SDG 4, Equitable quality education after COVID-19: Global evidence and a case study of Kazakhstan,” Sustainability, vol. 15 no. 20, p. 14725. 2023, doi: 10.3390/su152014725
L. Carvalho, D. Almeida, A. Loures, P. Ferreira, and F. Rebola, “Quality education for all: a fuzzy set analysis of sustainable development goal compliance,” Sustainability, vol. 16 no. 12, p. 5218. 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16125218
A. Granada, “Education System In The Philippines: A Complete Guide.” Kabayan Remit, April 14, 2021.
L Hobbs and G. Törner, “Teaching out-of-field as a phenomenon and research problem,” Examining the Phenomenon of “Teaching Out-of-Field,” pp. 3–20. 2019, doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-3366-8_1
J. De La Cruz and R. Alda, “Out-of-field teaching: english teachers’ experiences and practices. Journal of Education and Innovation,” vol. 26 no. 3, pp. 33–45. 2024
A. Albrecht and L. O’Keeffe, “Beyond qualifications: Identity of out-of-field teachers in years 7-10 mathematics in south australia” Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, 2024.
H. A. R. Mercado and L. M. Morante, “Experiences of senior high school mathematics teachers in out-of-field teaching,” Salud, Ciencia Y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias, vol. 3, p. 1125. 2024, doi: 10.56294/sctconf20241125
L. Ma, “Challenges in the professional development of teachers teaching out-of-field in chinese elementary schools under the background of “structural teacher shortage,” Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, pp. 419–427. 2024, doi: 10.2991/978-2-38476-253-8_51
M. Anana, “The dichotomy of specialization: Is a literature teacher necessarily a language teacher?,” UJAH Unizik Journal of Arts and Humanities, vol. 21 no. 2, pp. 108–133. 2021, doi: 10.4314/ujah.v21i2.6
N. J. L. M. Madulara, “Out-of-field teaching: The stories of novice educators in teaching social studies,” International Journal of Research Publications, vol. 112 no. 1. 2022, doi: 10.47119/ijrp10011211120224116
M. Rey and N. M. Tañola, “Ang magturo ay di biro: A hermeneutic phenomenological study on the lived-experiences of math educators in out-of-field teaching,” EPRA International Journal of Research & Development, pp. 131–141. 2024, doi: 10.36713/epra15810
C. Shah, Helen, and P. W. Richardson, “Out-of-field teaching and instructional practices in Years 7-10 mathematics classes in Australia: evidence from TALIS 2018,” Handle.net. 2024, https://hdl.handle.net/10419/306474
R. Porsch and E. Wilden, “Teaching English Out-of-Field in Primary School: Differences in Professional Characteristics and Effects on Self-Assessed Instructional Quality,” pp. 117–134. 2022, doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-9328-1_6
M. H. Aburto, G. Elacqua, and M. Kutscher, “The Impact of Out-of-field STEM High School Teachers on College Decisions: Evidence from Chie.” 2024, doi: 10.18235/0013116
L. F. and A. L. A. Abrantes, “Lived experiences of out-of-field senior high school teachers teaching physics,” International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation, vol. 2 no. 1, pp. 117-143. 2024
M. J. Branzuela, E. C. Ayro, and M. J. D. Cruz-Vidal, “Teaching outside the box: Senior high school teaching experiences, challenges, and windows of innovations of non-social science majors,” International Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Business and Education Research, vol. 4 no. 7, pp. 2210–2222. 2023, doi: 10.11594/ijmaber.04.07.06
K. M. Smith, J. Hillier, and S. Erduran, “Examining Differences in Teacher Self-efficacy for In-field Versus Out-of-Field Teachers of Physics,” Challenges in Physics Education, pp. 281–295. 2024, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-72541-8_19
S. K. Apau, “Out-of-Field teaching in ghanaian basic schools: a matrix of basic school teachers’ experiences in ekumfi district,” Social Education Research, pp. 188–199. 2022, doi: 10.37256/ser.3120221314
E. Wheeley, H. Klieve, E. Park, and A. Du Plessis, “Preservice teachers’ perceptions about out-of-field teaching: Implications for students, teachers and schools,” The Australian Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 48 no. 4. 2023, doi: 10.14221/1835-517x.5619
S. Nakar and A. E. Du Plessis, “Facing the dilemma of the out-of-field teaching phenomenon in Vocational Education and Training (VET),” Vocations and Learning, vol. 16 no. 3, pp. 551–575. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s12186-023-09329-8
J. B. Napier, J. A. Luft, and H. Singh, “In the classrooms of newly hired secondary science teachers: the consequences of teaching in-field or out-of-field,” Journal of Science Teacher Education, vol. 31 no. 7, pp. 802–820. 2020, doi: 10.1080/1046560X.2020.1800195
R. J. Ligawad, “Fitting the square peg in a round hole: Teaching experiences of out-of-field physical education teachers in the senior high school,” Deleted Journal, vol. 2 no. 1. 2022, doi: 10.56901/rslq6891
R. Roxas, “Being out-of-field: A phenomeno logical research on the lives of teachers teaching non-major,” International Journal of Research Studies in Education, vol. 11 no. 14. 2022, doi: 10.5861/ijrse.2022.b017
L. L. Tingzon and H. J. A. Buyok, “Lived experiences of non-TLE teachers teaching TLE subjects: A phenomenological inquiry,” European Journal of Education Studies, vol. 9 no. 11. 2022, doi: 10.46827/ejes.v9i11.4538
J. W. Creswell, Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed), United States of America: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2014.
H. Mirza, F. Bellalem, and C. Mirza, “Ethical considerations in qualitative research: Summary guidelines for novice social science researchers,” vol. 11, pp. 441-449. 2023.
A. Skukauskaitė and M. Sullivan, “Conversational interviewing grounded in interactional ethnographic principles”, in Routledge eBooks, pp. 114–141. 2022. doi: 10.4324/9781003215479-8
K. Edward and T. Welch, “The extension of Colaizzi’s method of phenomenological enquiry,” Contemporary Nurse, vol. 39 no. 2, pp. 163–171. 2011, doi: 10.5172/conu.2011.163
A. T. Ahmed and Y. O. Shogbesan, “Exploring pedagogical content knowledge of teachers: A paradigm for measuring teacher’s effectiveness,” Pedagogi Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, vol. 23 no. 1, pp. 64–73. 2023, doi: 10.24036/pedagogi.v23i1.1540
E. Mizzi, “Pedagogical content knowledge in school economics,” Citizenship Social and Economics Education. 2024, doi: 10.1177/14788047241276192
M. Muñoz-Galván and K. Padilla, “Pedagogical content knowledge about the sustainability of high school chemistry and biology teachers,” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 14 no. 4, pp. 652–665. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s13412-024-00919-z
E. Nabiebakye and L. Susan, “An examination of the challenges and strategies of adaptive instruction in junior high schools in the jirapa municipality of the upper west region of ghana,” Research on Humanities and Social Sciences. 2022, doi: 10.7176/rhss/12-20-03
B. Galvez and R. A. Azarias, “Guro at gabay: Mentoring and coaching from the lens of selected public elementary teachers,” International Journal of Research Studies in Education, vol. 13 no. 5. 2024, doi: 10.5861/ijrse.2024.24038
Y. Belavina and O. Klyuchko, “Mentoring as a developmental mechanism of the all-russian olympiad for primary school teachers “My First Teacher,” Primary Education, vol. 12 no. 2, pp. 9–17. 2024, doi: 10.12737/1998-0728-2024-12-2-9-17
I. P. Kinasih and N. Hardiani, “Role playing and the changing of teacher understanding to middle school Mathematics lesson planning within ELPSA Framework,” Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 14 no. 2, pp. 183–198. 2020, doi: 10.22342/jpm.14.2.6647.183-198
I. Istiana, B. Jatmiko and B. K. Prahani, “Effectiveness of implementing guided inquiry to improve students’ critical thinking skills,” SAR Journal - Science and Research, pp. 275–280. 2023, doi: 10.18421/sar64-07
S. Lindriani and I. P. Suwarna, “Effectiveness of guided inquiry model in enhancing students’ critical thinking on light waves” Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, vol. 11 no. 3, p. 339. 2023, doi: 10.20527/bipf.v11i3.16388
J. K. Putri, C. W. Gunawan and Y. Wiyatmo, “Implementation of guided inquiry to increase students’ interest in learning physics and critical thinking skills,” Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 10(2), 257–263. 2024, doi: 10.29303/jpft.v10i2.7091
M. S. A. Buenacosa and M. B. Petalla, “Embracing the unknown: Adaptability and resiliency of out-of-field secondary teachers teaching English in public schools,” Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, pp. 1–29. 2022, doi: 10.9734/ajess/2022/v37i2796
J. Geertsema and K. B. Laksov, “Turning challenges into opportunities: (Re)vitalizing the role of academic development,” The International Journal for Academic Development, vol. 24 no. 1, pp. 1–6. 2019, doi: 10.1080/1360144x.2019.1557870
A. Nazish and M. A. Kang, “Exploring the positive teacher-student relationship on students’ motivation and academic performance in secondary schools in karachi,” Academy of Education and Social Sciences Review, 4(2), 149–159. 2024, doi: doi.org/10.48112/aessr.v4i2.710
B. M. Alnijres, “Reflecting on different aspects of classroom teaching: Mirrors on the road of educators’ self-professional development,” Journal of Ecohumanism, vol. 3 no. 7. 2024, doi: 10.62754/joe.v3i7.4469
M. Aryal, Reflective teaching and practices in the classroom. Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Advancements, 2(1), pp. 26-31. 2024
D. Soelistya, R. A. Santoso, A. Akhsin, and T. Triasmono, “The importance of guidance and motivational encouragement: the significance of leadership and communication in organizational management,” Kontribusia Research Dissemination for Community Development, vol. 6 no. 2, 194. 2023, doi: doi.org/10.30587/kontribusia.v6i2.5929
A. E. Du Plessis, L. Hobbs, J. A. Luft, and C. Vale, The out-of-field teacher in context: The impact of the school context and environment, In Springer eBooks, pp. 217–242. 2019. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-3366-8_9
C. Harber, Human and material resources: finance, teachers and physical resources In Springer eBooks (pp. 53–81). 2017, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-57382-3_4
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Journal of Basic Education Research is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
