Journal of Language, Literature, and Educational Research

an Open Access Journal

English Language Education for Intercultural Communication: A Course Study in Alauddin State Islamic University

Neelam Nisar
Sapphirine Solutions
Pakistan
neelam.nisar@outlook.com
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study evaluates the effectiveness of the course English for Intercultural Communication in enhancing English proficiency and intercultural communicative competence among students at Alauddin State Islamic University, Makassar, Indonesian. It also explores pedagogical practices and students’ preparedness for intercultural communication in multicultural contexts.

    Methodology: This study employed a qualitative research design. Data were collected through teacher interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis. The analyzed documents included curriculum materials, assessment instruments, and students’ feedback. No software, survey instrument, or review method was used in this study.

    Main Findings: The findings provide critical insights into prevailing practices and challenges in the instruction of English for intercultural communication in Indonesian. The study identifies areas for improving curriculum design, pedagogical strategies, and educational policy while supporting educational stakeholders in preparing students for global citizenship through English language education in multicultural contexts.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study examines English as a vehicle for intercultural communication by focusing on both pedagogical practices and students’ preparedness within the English for Intercultural Communication course at Alauddin State Islamic University. The findings contribute practical recommendations for curriculum design, pedagogy, and educational policy in multicultural English language education

     

  • How to cite

    English Language Education for Intercultural Communication: A Course Study in Alauddin State Islamic University. (2026). Journal of Language, Literature, and Educational Research, 3(1), 139-145. https://doi.org/10.37251/jolle.v3i1.3115

    More Citation Formats

  • 16
    Abstract views
    3
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. [1] C. Althaus et al., “Research and education in public sector practice: A systems approach to understanding policy impact,” Policy Des. Pract., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 309–322, 2021, doi: 10.1080/25741292.2021.1977478.
    2. [2] M. F. Zalazar-jaime et al., “Evaluation of an academic satisfaction model in e-learning education contexts,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 4687–4697, 2023, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2021.1979047.
    3. [3] M. Tomlinson and M. Tomlinson, “Missing values: Engaging the value of higher education and implications for future measurements,” Oxford Rev. Educ., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 46–62, 2022, doi: 10.1080/03054985.2021.1908247.
    4. [4] T. Firat and A. Bildiren, “University processes of students with visual impairments taking distance education,” Open Learn. J. Open, Distance e-Learning, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 152–168, 2025, doi: 10.1080/02680513.2022.2133600.
    5. [5] K. Falkner, J. D. Larsson, and K. Falkner, “Professional formation of Swedish special education teachers in the tension between formal education at university and informal learning in practice,” Nord. J. Stud. Educ. Policy, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 79–87, 2020, doi: 10.1080/20020317.2020.1736870.
    6. [6] L. Ripatti-torniainen, L. Mikkola, L. Ripatti-torniainen, and L. Mikkola, “Journalism education as scientific education: Research university students’ engagement with knowledge,” Journal. Stud., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 270–287, 2023, doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2022.2157317.
    7. [7] F. Pfeiffer and H. Stichnoth, “Fiscal and individual rates of return to university education with and without graduation,” Appl. Econ. Lett., vol. 28, no. 16, pp. 1432–1435, 2021, doi: 10.1080/13504851.2020.1855299.
    8. [8] S. Kailaheimo-lönnqvist and J. Erola, “Child’s age at parental death and university education,” Eur. Soc., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 433–455, 2020, doi: 10.1080/14616696.2020.1719179.
    9. [9] M. Purnomo, Y. Yuliati, A. Shinta, and F. D. Riana, “Developing coffee culture among indonesia’s middle-class: A case study in a coffee-producing country,” Cogent Soc. Sci., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2021, doi: 10.1080/23311886.2021.1949808.
    10. [10] K. Al-shehari, “Communicating health related risks to non Arabic speakers in Qatar: Policies and practices,” Transl., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 506–522, 2023, doi: 10.1080/13556509.2022.2161810.
    11. [11] C. Van Noort, “The aesthetic power of ships in international political communication: Why ships matter in China’s communication of the maritime silk road initiative,” Glob. Soc., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 516–537, 2022, doi: 10.1080/13600826.2021.1942801.
    12. [12] E. Zemmrich, “Making sense of shifts in perspectives: Perceiving and framing examples of interreligious learning in Indonesia,” Islam Christ. Relations, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 151–172, 2020, doi: 10.1080/09596410.2020.1782096.
    13. [13] I. Moeis, R. Febriani, I. Sandra, and M. Pabbajah, “Intercultural values in local wisdom: A global treasure of Minangkabau ethnic in Indonesia,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2022, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2022.2116841.
    14. [14] A. Simpson, “Reconfiguring intercultural communication education through the dialogical relationship of istina (truth) and pravda (truth in justice),” Educ. Philos. Theory, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 456–467, 2023, doi: 10.1080/00131857.2022.2098109.
    15. [15] R. Hamza, “North/South imbalances in intercultural communication education,” Lang. Intercult. Commun., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 144–157, 2021, doi: 10.1080/14708477.2020.1866593.
    16. [16] R. Hamza, “Epistemological plurality in intercultural communication knowledge,” J. Multicult. Discourses, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 173–188, 2022, doi: 10.1080/17447143.2022.2069784.
    17. [17] M. Vajak, S. Izadpanah, and J. Naserian, “The assessment of intercultural competence in iranian efl and non-efl leaners: Knowledge, skill, awareness, and attitude,” Cogent Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2021, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2021.1936885.
    18. [18] Z. Tian and T. Mcconachy, “Relational challenges in an intercultural volunteer programme in jordan: Views from Chinese participants,” J. Intercult. Commun. Res., vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 588–609, 2021, doi: 10.1080/17475759.2021.1959381.
    19. [19] P. Holmes, S. Ganassin, and S. Li, “Reflections on the co construction of an interpretive approach to interculturality for higher education in China,” Lang. Intercult. Commun., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 503–518, 2022, doi: 10.1080/14708477.2022.2114491.
    20. [20] P. Holmes, B. P. Dix, P. Holmes, and B. P. Dix, “A research trajectory for difficult times: Decentring language and intercultural communication,” Lang. Intercult. Commun., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 337–353, 2022, doi: 10.1080/14708477.2022.2068563.
    21. [21] H. Tan, K. Zhao, F. Dervin, and H. Tan, “Experiences of and preparedness for intercultural teacherhood in higher education: Non specialist english teachers’ positioning, agency and sense of legitimacy in China,” Lang. Intercult. Commun., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 68–84, 2022, doi: 10.1080/14708477.2021.1988631.
    22. [22] A. Simpson, F. Dervin, J. Tao, and F. Dervin, “Business english students’ multifaceted and contradictory perceptions of intercultural communication education (ice) at a Chinese University,” Int. J. Biling. Educ. Biling., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 2041–2057, 2022, doi: 10.1080/13670050.2020.1840508.
    23. [23] M. Almayez, “Investigating the place of religion within the professional identity construction of two muslim english language teachers in Saudi Arabia,” Cogent Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2022, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2022.2091632.
    24. [24] W. S. Al-yaseen, “Teaching english to young children as an innovative practice: Kuwaiti public kindergarten teachers’ beliefs,” Cogent Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2021, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2021.1930492.
    25. [25] E. Baumgartner and E. Baumgartner, “De-constructing the other: An integrated pedagogy of inclusive learning and teaching approaches in and beyond prison,” Contemp. Soc. Sci., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 548–560, 2020, doi: 10.1080/21582041.2020.1855466.
    26. [26] A. Kazemi, M. S. Bagheri, and E. Rassaei, “Dynamic assessment in english classrooms: Fostering learners’ reading comprehension and motivation,” Cogent Psychol., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2020, doi: 10.1080/23311908.2020.1788912.
    27. [27] A. Goodarzi, H. Weisi, and N. Yousofi, “Newly published english course books under microscope: An exploration of teachers’ views about the prospect series,” Cogent Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–27, 2020, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2020.1840958.
    28. [28] D. L. Banegas, S. Consoli, F. Group, and D. L. Banegas, “Initial English language teacher education: The effects of a module on teacher research,” Cambridge J. Educ., vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 491–508, 2021, doi: 10.1080/0305764X.2021.1876840.
    29. [29] A. Ahmed et al., “English language teaching through a short story: A technique for improving students’ vocabulary retrieving,” Cogent Educ., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2023, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2022.2161221.
    30. [30] T. Giesler and T. Giesler, “Start afresh or return? The impact of the reform movement on northern German english language teaching,” Lang. Hist., vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 187–203, 2021, doi: 10.1080/17597536.2021.1996088.
    31. [31] H. A. Alkateeb, “The british council’s role in nourishing the english language teaching industry in the gulf cooperation council region: A visual social semiotic perspective,” Soc. Semiot., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 305–325, 2023, doi: 10.1080/10350330.2020.1833686.
    32. [32] L. E. Wang and F. G. Fang, “Native speakerism policy in english language teaching revisited: Chinese university teachers’ and students’ attitudes towards native and non native english speaking teachers,” Cogent Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2020, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2020.1778374.