Journal of Language, Literature, and Educational Research

an Open Access Journal

English Language Education for Intercultural Communication: A Course Study in Alauddin State Islamic University

Neelam Nisar
Sapphirine Solutions
Pakistan
neelam.nisar@outlook.com
Mehartab Rabica
Sapphirine Solutions
Pakistan
Muhammad Ali Adam
Sapphirine Solutions
Pakistan
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study evaluates the effectiveness of the course English for Intercultural Communication in enhancing English proficiency and intercultural communicative competence among students at Alauddin State Islamic University, Makassar, Indonesian. It also explores pedagogical practices and students’ preparedness for intercultural communication in multicultural contexts.

    Methodology: This study employed a qualitative research design. Data were collected through teacher interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis. The analyzed documents included curriculum materials, assessment instruments, and students’ feedback. No software, survey instrument, or review method was used in this study.

    Main Findings: The findings provide critical insights into prevailing practices and challenges in the instruction of English for intercultural communication in Indonesian. The study identifies areas for improving curriculum design, pedagogical strategies, and educational policy while supporting educational stakeholders in preparing students for global citizenship through English language education in multicultural contexts.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study examines English as a vehicle for intercultural communication by focusing on both pedagogical practices and students’ preparedness within the English for Intercultural Communication course at Alauddin State Islamic University. The findings contribute practical recommendations for curriculum design, pedagogy, and educational policy in multicultural English language education

     

  • How to cite

    English Language Education for Intercultural Communication: A Course Study in Alauddin State Islamic University. (2026). Journal of Language, Literature, and Educational Research, 3(1), 139-145. https://doi.org/10.37251/jolle.v3i1.3115

    More Citation Formats

  • 72
    Abstract views
    28
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. [1] C. Althaus et al., “Research and education in public sector practice: A systems approach to understanding policy impact,” Policy Des. Pract., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 309–322, 2021, doi: 10.1080/25741292.2021.1977478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1977478
    2. [2] M. F. Zalazar-jaime et al., “Evaluation of an academic satisfaction model in e-learning education contexts,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 4687–4697, 2023, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2021.1979047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1979047
    3. [3] M. Tomlinson and M. Tomlinson, “Missing values: Engaging the value of higher education and implications for future measurements,” Oxford Rev. Educ., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 46–62, 2022, doi: 10.1080/03054985.2021.1908247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2021.1908247
    4. [4] T. Firat and A. Bildiren, “University processes of students with visual impairments taking distance education,” Open Learn. J. Open, Distance e-Learning, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 152–168, 2025, doi: 10.1080/02680513.2022.2133600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2022.2133600
    5. [5] K. Falkner, J. D. Larsson, and K. Falkner, “Professional formation of Swedish special education teachers in the tension between formal education at university and informal learning in practice,” Nord. J. Stud. Educ. Policy, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 79–87, 2020, doi: 10.1080/20020317.2020.1736870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1736870
    6. [6] L. Ripatti-torniainen, L. Mikkola, L. Ripatti-torniainen, and L. Mikkola, “Journalism education as scientific education: Research university students’ engagement with knowledge,” Journal. Stud., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 270–287, 2023, doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2022.2157317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2022.2157317
    7. [7] F. Pfeiffer and H. Stichnoth, “Fiscal and individual rates of return to university education with and without graduation,” Appl. Econ. Lett., vol. 28, no. 16, pp. 1432–1435, 2021, doi: 10.1080/13504851.2020.1855299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1855299
    8. [8] S. Kailaheimo-lönnqvist and J. Erola, “Child’s age at parental death and university education,” Eur. Soc., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 433–455, 2020, doi: 10.1080/14616696.2020.1719179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1719179
    9. [9] M. Purnomo, Y. Yuliati, A. Shinta, and F. D. Riana, “Developing coffee culture among indonesia’s middle-class: A case study in a coffee-producing country,” Cogent Soc. Sci., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2021, doi: 10.1080/23311886.2021.1949808. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1949808
    10. [10] K. Al-shehari, “Communicating health related risks to non Arabic speakers in Qatar: Policies and practices,” Transl., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 506–522, 2023, doi: 10.1080/13556509.2022.2161810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2022.2161810
    11. [11] C. Van Noort, “The aesthetic power of ships in international political communication: Why ships matter in China’s communication of the maritime silk road initiative,” Glob. Soc., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 516–537, 2022, doi: 10.1080/13600826.2021.1942801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2021.1942801
    12. [12] E. Zemmrich, “Making sense of shifts in perspectives: Perceiving and framing examples of interreligious learning in Indonesia,” Islam Christ. Relations, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 151–172, 2020, doi: 10.1080/09596410.2020.1782096. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2020.1782096
    13. [13] I. Moeis, R. Febriani, I. Sandra, and M. Pabbajah, “Intercultural values in local wisdom: A global treasure of Minangkabau ethnic in Indonesia,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2022, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2022.2116841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2022.2116841
    14. [14] A. Simpson, “Reconfiguring intercultural communication education through the dialogical relationship of istina (truth) and pravda (truth in justice),” Educ. Philos. Theory, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 456–467, 2023, doi: 10.1080/00131857.2022.2098109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2098109
    15. [15] R. Hamza, “North/South imbalances in intercultural communication education,” Lang. Intercult. Commun., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 144–157, 2021, doi: 10.1080/14708477.2020.1866593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2020.1866593
    16. [16] R. Hamza, “Epistemological plurality in intercultural communication knowledge,” J. Multicult. Discourses, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 173–188, 2022, doi: 10.1080/17447143.2022.2069784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2022.2069784
    17. [17] M. Vajak, S. Izadpanah, and J. Naserian, “The assessment of intercultural competence in iranian efl and non-efl leaners: Knowledge, skill, awareness, and attitude,” Cogent Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2021, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2021.1936885. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1936885
    18. [18] Z. Tian and T. Mcconachy, “Relational challenges in an intercultural volunteer programme in jordan: Views from Chinese participants,” J. Intercult. Commun. Res., vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 588–609, 2021, doi: 10.1080/17475759.2021.1959381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2021.1959381
    19. [19] P. Holmes, S. Ganassin, and S. Li, “Reflections on the co construction of an interpretive approach to interculturality for higher education in China,” Lang. Intercult. Commun., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 503–518, 2022, doi: 10.1080/14708477.2022.2114491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2022.2114491
    20. [20] P. Holmes, B. P. Dix, P. Holmes, and B. P. Dix, “A research trajectory for difficult times: Decentring language and intercultural communication,” Lang. Intercult. Commun., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 337–353, 2022, doi: 10.1080/14708477.2022.2068563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2022.2068563
    21. [21] H. Tan, K. Zhao, F. Dervin, and H. Tan, “Experiences of and preparedness for intercultural teacherhood in higher education: Non specialist english teachers’ positioning, agency and sense of legitimacy in China,” Lang. Intercult. Commun., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 68–84, 2022, doi: 10.1080/14708477.2021.1988631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2021.1988631
    22. [22] A. Simpson, F. Dervin, J. Tao, and F. Dervin, “Business english students’ multifaceted and contradictory perceptions of intercultural communication education (ice) at a Chinese University,” Int. J. Biling. Educ. Biling., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 2041–2057, 2022, doi: 10.1080/13670050.2020.1840508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1840508
    23. [23] M. Almayez, “Investigating the place of religion within the professional identity construction of two muslim english language teachers in Saudi Arabia,” Cogent Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2022, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2022.2091632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2091632
    24. [24] W. S. Al-yaseen, “Teaching english to young children as an innovative practice: Kuwaiti public kindergarten teachers’ beliefs,” Cogent Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2021, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2021.1930492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1930492
    25. [25] E. Baumgartner and E. Baumgartner, “De-constructing the other: An integrated pedagogy of inclusive learning and teaching approaches in and beyond prison,” Contemp. Soc. Sci., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 548–560, 2020, doi: 10.1080/21582041.2020.1855466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2020.1855466
    26. [26] A. Kazemi, M. S. Bagheri, and E. Rassaei, “Dynamic assessment in english classrooms: Fostering learners’ reading comprehension and motivation,” Cogent Psychol., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2020, doi: 10.1080/23311908.2020.1788912. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2020.1788912
    27. [27] A. Goodarzi, H. Weisi, and N. Yousofi, “Newly published english course books under microscope: An exploration of teachers’ views about the prospect series,” Cogent Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–27, 2020, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2020.1840958. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1840958
    28. [28] D. L. Banegas, S. Consoli, F. Group, and D. L. Banegas, “Initial English language teacher education: The effects of a module on teacher research,” Cambridge J. Educ., vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 491–508, 2021, doi: 10.1080/0305764X.2021.1876840. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2021.1876840
    29. [29] A. Ahmed et al., “English language teaching through a short story: A technique for improving students’ vocabulary retrieving,” Cogent Educ., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2023, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2022.2161221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2161221
    30. [30] T. Giesler and T. Giesler, “Start afresh or return? The impact of the reform movement on northern German english language teaching,” Lang. Hist., vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 187–203, 2021, doi: 10.1080/17597536.2021.1996088. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17597536.2021.1996088
    31. [31] H. A. Alkateeb, “The british council’s role in nourishing the english language teaching industry in the gulf cooperation council region: A visual social semiotic perspective,” Soc. Semiot., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 305–325, 2023, doi: 10.1080/10350330.2020.1833686. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1833686
    32. [32] L. E. Wang and F. G. Fang, “Native speakerism policy in english language teaching revisited: Chinese university teachers’ and students’ attitudes towards native and non native english speaking teachers,” Cogent Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2020, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2020.1778374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1778374