SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

0.0

H-Index

GeoEdu Insight Journal: Geography and Education Geography

an Open Access Journal

A Predictive Model of Geography Learning Achievement Reviewed from Parental Attention and Physical Learning Environment

Tri Warsito
State Senior High School 1 Minggir
Indonesia
Warsito1@gmail.com
Arzeti Debi
PGRI University of Pontianak
Indonesia
Sukma Ngumbarawati
State Senior High School 1 Pontianak
Indonesia
Share

  • Purpose of the study: The study aims to examine the predictive effect of parental attention and physical learning environment on geography learning achievement among high school students, estimating the relative contribution of each factor and their combined influence on academic outcomes.

    Methodology: A quantitative approach with correlational design was employed, using structured questionnaires and Likert-scale measurements to assess parental attention and physical environment. Student semester examination scores were collected as indicators of learning achievement. Data analysis involved Pearson Product-Moment correlation and multiple linear regression, using SPSS software for statistical estimation and hypothesis testing.

    Main Findings: Parental attention and physical learning environment jointly explained 33% of variance in geography learning achievement. Parental attention contributed 18.42%, while physical learning environment accounted for 14.58%, with both predictors showing linear relationships and no multicollinearity. Beta coefficients indicated substantial influence, with parental guidance slightly dominant in enhancing student performance.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: The study integrates parental involvement and physical learning environment into a unified predictive model, addressing gaps in prior research that examined these factors independently. The findings provide robust, evidence-based insights for optimizing both home and school support, offering practical, actionable strategies for enhancing geography learning achievement and informing more effective targeted educational interventions.

  • How to cite

    A Predictive Model of Geography Learning Achievement Reviewed from Parental Attention and Physical Learning Environment. (2026). GeoEdu Insight Journal: Geography and Education Geography, 1(2), 124-130. https://doi.org/10.37251/gedij.v1i2.3546

    More Citation Formats

  • 14
    Abstract views
    5
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. M. Solem et al., “Student- and school-level Predictors of geography achievement in the United States, 1994 – 2018,” J. Geog., vol. 120, no. 6, pp. 201–211, 2021, doi: 10.1080/00221341.2021.2000009.
    2. S. Meechandee and N. Meekaew, “Integrating phenomenon ‑ based learning and GIS to improve geo ‑ literacy and student engagement : An action research approach,” Discov. Educ., vol. 4, no. 91, pp. 1–12, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s44217-025-00468-9.
    3. T. Bendl, L. Krajňáková, M. Marada, and D. Řezníčková, “Geographical thinking in geography education: A systematic review,” Int. Res. Geogr. Environ. Educ., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 326–352, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.1080/10382046.2024.2354097.
    4. A. Costa, D. Moreira, J. Casanova, and Â. Azevedo, Determinants of academic achievement from the middle to secondary school education : A systematic review, vol. 27, no. 6. Springer Netherlands, 2024. doi: 10.1007/s11218-024-09941-z.
    5. S. Li, Y. Tang, and Y. Zheng, “How the home learning environment contributes to children’s social–emotional competence: A moderated mediation model,” Front. Psychol., vol. 14, no. 1065978, pp. 1–19, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1065978
    6. Q. Liu, X. Du, and H. Lu, “Teacher support and learning engagement of EFL learners: The mediating role of self-efficacy and achievement goal orientation,” Curr. Psychol., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 2619–2635, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-04043-5.
    7. M. Goshin, D. Dubrov, S. Kosaretsky, and D. Grigoryev, “The Strategies of Parental Involvement in Adolescents’ Education and Extracurricular Activities,” J. Youth Adolesc., vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 906–920, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10964-021-01399-y.
    8. E. Hernández-padilla, A. Bazán-ramírez, W. Bazán-ramírez, J. Solano-gutierrez, E. Hernández-padilla, and A. Bazán-ramírez, “Parental participation and parents ’ support : effects on mathematics achievement , 2018 national assessment of learning , Mexico,” Front. Psychol., vol. 14, no. 1154470, pp. 1–15, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1154470.
    9. C. Y. Tan, M. Lyu, and B. Peng, “Academic benefits from parental involvement are stratified by parental socioeconomic status: A meta-analysis,” Parenting, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 241–287, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1080/15295192.2019.1694836.
    10. S. Kim, “Fifty years of parental involvement and achievement research: A second-order meta-analysis,” Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 37, pp. 1–15, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100463.
    11. H. K. Wilson and A. J. Cotgrave, “Learning space design: The presentation of a framework for the built environment discipline,” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 132–148, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1080/15578771.2020.1727067.
    12. V. Mirata, F. Hirt, P. Bergamin, and C. Van Der Westhuizen, “Challenges and contexts in establishing adaptive learning in higher education : Findings from a Delphi study,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 17, no. 32, pp. 1–25, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s41239-020-00209-y.
    13. H. Balalle, “Exploring student engagement in technology-based education in relation to gamification , online / distance learning , and other factors : A systematic literature review,” Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open, vol. 9, no. 100870, pp. 2–10, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100870.
    14. M. M. Pellegrini, F. Ciampi, G. Marzi, and B. Orlando, “The relationship between knowledge management and leadership: Mapping the field and providing future research avenues,” J. Knowl. Manag., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1445–1492, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1108/JKM-01-2020-0034.
    15. infrastructure resilience,” Environ. Syst. Decis., vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 341–376, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10669-020-09795-8.
    16. H. Cheong, A. Lyons, R. Houghton, and A. Majumdar, “Secondary qualitative research methodology using online data within the context of social sciences,” Int. J. Qual. Methods, vol. 22, pp. 1–19, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1177/16094069231180160.
    17. E. E. Ebhuoma et al., “Subsistence farmers’ differential vulnerability to drought in Mpumalanga province , South Africa: Under the political ecology spotlight,” Cogent Soc. Sci., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2020, doi: 10.1080/23311886.2020.1792155.
    18. L. M. En, C. Heng, Y. Sern, Z. Binti, A. Aziz, and L. Jing, “Architectural colour and lighting strategies for autism-friendly physical learning environment in Malaysia,” J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng., vol. 00, no. 00, pp. 1–15, 2026, doi: 10.1080/13467581.2026.2621574.
    19. E. R. Hinde et al., “Linking geography to reading and English language learners’ achievement in US elementary and middle school classrooms,” Int. Res. Geogr. Environ. Educ., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 47–63, 2011, doi: 10.1080/10382046.2011.540102.
    20. M. Solem and M. Solem, “Geography Achievement and Future Geographers,” Prof. Geogr., vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 207–219, 2023, doi: 10.1080/00330124.2022.2081227.
    21. L. Watt and L. Watt, “Fijian infrastructural citizenship: spaces of electricity sharing and informal power grids in an informal settlement,” Cogent Soc. Sci., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2020, doi: 10.1080/23311886.2020.1719568.
    22. P. S. Mustafa et al., Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan penelitian tindakan kelas dalam pendidikan olahraga. 2022.
    23. I. D. Weighting, K. Model, V. Pengamatan, and V. Model, “Perbandingan Akurasi Metode idw dan Kriging dalam Pemetaan Muka Air,” Maj. Geogr. Indones., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 49–57, 2019.
    24. F. Geografi and U. Gadjah, “Pengelolaan usaha jasa pariwisata berbasis pengembangan masyarakat pada kawasan ubud bali,” Maj. Geogr. Indones., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 145–164, 2008.
    25. H. Rose, S. Curle, I. Aizawa, and G. Thompson, “What drives success in english medium taught courses? The interplay between language proficiency, academic skills, and motivation,” Stud. High. Educ., vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 2149–2161, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1590690.
    26. K. Gunungkidul, A. P. Wicaksono, and M. A. Khafid, “Karakterisasi Longsor untuk Analisis Kerawanan Bencana Longsor,” Maj. Geogr. Indones., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 119–125, 2022, doi: 10.22146/mgi.71857.
    27. L. A. Nasution, Suratman, and Sudrajat, “Program studi magister ilmu lingkungan, sekolah pascasarjana Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia departemen ilmu Lingkungan, Fakultas Geografi, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia,” Maj. Geogr. Indones., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 95–103, 2021, doi: 10.22146/mgi.63231.
    28. R. Harini, D. N. Aulia, E. C. Ningrum, K. Hanifah, L. Fitria, and T. Dewanti, “Kearifan lokal pertanian, permasalahan, dan arahan strategi dalam pengelolaan pertanian di Desa Sembungan,” Maj. Geogr. Indones., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 125–129, 2020, doi: 10.22146/mgi.32310.
    29. T. Z. Keith, M. R. Reynolds, and J. M. Caemmerer, Multiple Regression and Beyond; An Introduction to Multiple Regression and Structural Equation Modeling; Fourth Edition. Routledge, 2025.
    30. U. Indonesia, I. Badan, and I. Nasional, “Model prediksi perubahan penutup lahan di Kota Kabupaten Majalengka menggunakan metode cellular automata Markov chain,” Maj. Geogr. Indones., vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 114–126, 2024, doi: 10.22146/mgi.70636.
    31. A. W. Wijaya et al., “Analisis ekologi bentanglahan di Taman Nasional Baluran dan sekitarnya,” Maj. Geogr. Indones., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 34–32, 2020, doi: 10.22146/mgi.51956.
    32. S. R. Budiani, L. Puspitasari, M. N. Adibah, S. Nisa, and A. Fauzia, “Kajian Daya Dukung Fisik Wisata Berkemah Telaga Cebong Desa Sembun- gan untuk Mendukung Pariwisata Berkelanjutan,” Maj. Geogr. Indones., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 9–15, 2019, doi: 10.22146/mgi.32304.
    33. A. Rofi and H. Zarodi, “Dampak gempa Lombok dan Sumbawa 2018 terhadap sumber penghidupan dan strategi kelangsungan hidup keluarga korban,” Maj. Geogr. Indones., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 95–100, 2020, doi: 10.22146/mgi.49132.
    34. M. Orero-Blat, D. Palacios-Marqués, and A. L. Leal-Rodríguez, “Orchestrating the digital symphony: The impact of data-driven orientation, organizational culture and digital maturity on big data analytics capabilities,” J. Enterp. Inf. Manag., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 679–703, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1108/JEIM-03-2024-0159.
    35. L. G. Boakye, C. K. Osei, S. Y. Annor, L. G. Boakye, C. K. Osei, and S. Y. Annor, “On-farm diversification strategies and improved welfare of the immiserated rural smallholder farmer: Fallacy or realism ?†,” Cogent Soc. Sci., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2021, doi: 10.1080/23311886.2020.1865609.