GIS-Based Spatial Modeling for Drought Vulnerability Mapping with Field Validation in Sukabumi Regency, Indonesia
-
Purpose of the study: This study aimed to identify and map drought vulnerability levels in Sukabumi Regency, Indonesia, using GIS-based spatial modeling integrated with remote sensing and field validation to provide reliable spatial information for drought risk assessment and mitigation planning.
Methodology: A quantitative descriptive approach was employed using Geographic Information Systems (GIS), Landsat imagery, and remote sensing techniques. ArcGIS 10.8 software was used for spatial analysis through scoring and overlay methods. Primary data were obtained from field observations and interviews, while secondary data included rainfall, land use, soil type, slope, NDVI, and land surface temperature datasets.
Main Findings: Results revealed that drought vulnerability in Sukabumi Regency was classified into low, moderate, high, and very high categories. High vulnerability covered the largest area, accounting for 1,815.68 km² (44.02%), followed by very high vulnerability with 1,278.83 km² (31.00%). Field validation at thirty observation points confirmed the consistency between spatial modeling results and actual drought conditions.
Novelty/Originality of this study: Novelty of this study lies in the integration of GIS-based spatial modeling and remote sensing with field validation through observations and interviews conducted in districts with the highest drought potential. This approach enhances the reliability of drought vulnerability mapping and provides more comprehensive spatial information for supporting disaster mitigation and regional planning.
-
How to cite
GIS-Based Spatial Modeling for Drought Vulnerability Mapping with Field Validation in Sukabumi Regency, Indonesia. (2026). GeoEdu Insight Journal: Geography and Education Geography, 1(2), 138-145. https://doi.org/10.37251/gedij.v1i2.3544 -
10Abstract views13Downloads
Metrics — Badges
-
- P. Babu and S. C. Maury, “Assessment of drought vulnerability zones by integrating TRFNAHP and GIS approaches,” Geomatics, Nat. Hazards Risk, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2026, doi: 10.1080/19475705.2026.2616642.
- P. Fezzigna, M. Wens, J. Gupta, and P. Scussolini, “Data injustice and attribution of drought events: Implications for global climate policy,” Clim. Policy, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1473–1488, 2025, doi: 10.1080/14693062.2025.2462633.
- Y. Huang et al., “Comprehensive inventory of landslide relics in the three gorges reservoir area: Spatial distribution and controlling factors,” Geomatics, Nat. Hazards Risk, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–30, 2026, doi: 10.1080/19475705.2026.2687968.
- A. Masuwai, H. Zulkifli, and M. I. Hamzah, “Evaluation of content validity and face validity of secondary school Islamic education teacher self-assessment instrument,” Cogent Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2024, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2024.2308410.
- T. Vaiyapuri and G. Julie, “AI and geospatial technologies for climate change mitigation: Opportunities, challenges, and pathways to sustainability,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 259, pp. 1346–1355, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2025.04.089.
- A. A. Mohamed, P. K. Chauke, and K. Palanisamy, “Pastoral communities and drought: A scoping review of drought hazards and management practices,” Hydrol. Sci. J., vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2026, doi: 10.1080/02626667.2025.2594627.
- Y. Cui, W. Song, J. Jin, Y. Zhou, Y. Zhang, and H. Tang, “Drought damage sensitivity assessment under continuous drought using a crop transpiration drought index and a three-phase disaster loss curve,” Geomatics, Nat. Hazards Risk, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2026, doi: 10.1080/19475705.2026.2634965.
- F. Zhou, W. Zhang, W. Su, H. Peng, and S. Zhou, “Spatial differentiation and driving mechanism of rural water security in typical ‘engineering water depletion’ of karst mountainous area—a lesson of Guizhou, China,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 793, p. 148387, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148387.
- A. Burka, B. Biazin, and W. Bewket, “Drought susceptibility modeling with geospatial techniques and AHP model: A case of bilate river watershed, central rift valley of ethiopia,” Geocarto Int., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1–28, 2024, doi: 10.1080/10106049.2024.2395319.
- N. A. M. Abdelrahim, S. Jin, and S. Li, “Impacts of urbanization on temperatures and agricultural drought in Africa based on urban heat drought index from 2000 to 2023,” Geomatics, Nat. Hazards Risk, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–29, 2026, doi: 10.1080/19475705.2026.2649443.
- P. Bhunia, P. Das, and R. Maiti, “Meteorological drought study through SPI in three drought prone districts of west Bengal, India,” Earth Syst. Environ., vol. 4, pp. 43–55, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s41748-019-00137-6.
- S. B. Wassie, D. A. Mengistu, A. B. Birlie, and D. K. Waktola, “Drought-induced agricultural livelihood vulnerability: Livelihood-based comparative analysis in Northeast highlands of Ethiopia,” Cogent Food Agric., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–29, 2023, doi: 10.1080/23311932.2023.2238981.
- L. Wang et al., “Human disturbance intensity reduces drought resistance without prolonging recovery in karst forests of southwest China,” GIScience Remote Sens., vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2026, doi: 10.1080/15481603.2025.2610841.
- H. Hedayat and H. Seyed Kaboli, “Drought risk assessment: The importance of vulnerability factors interdependencies in regional drought risk management,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., vol. 100, p. 104152, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104152.
- A. Galimberti, F. Zanelli, N. Debattisti, M. Mauri, and G. Tomasini, “A novel fault injection and monitoring methodology for freight train air brakes: From simulation to field validation,” Int. J. Rail Transp., vol. 00, no. 00, pp. 1–31, 2025, doi: 10.1080/23248378.2025.2559983.
- M. Aljabri, “Recent advances in pesticide bioremediation: Integrating microbial, phytoremediation, and biotechnological strategies - a comprehensive review,” Environ. Pollut. Bioavailab., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1–50, 2025, doi: 10.1080/26395940.2025.2554173.
- Y. Kang, S. Gao, and R. E. Roth, “Artificial intelligence studies in cartography: A review and synthesis of methods, applications, and ethics,” Cartogr. Geogr. Inf. Sci., vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 599–630, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1080/15230406.2023.2295943.
- P. Gunderson, E. Louie, and K. Cort, “Laboratory and field validation of the performance benefits and costs of thin triple-pane windows in residential buildings,” Sci. Technol. Built Environ., vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 767–784, 2024, doi: 10.1080/23744731.2024.2357529.
- S. Rayaprolu and M. Venigalla, “Public data, private insights: Field-validated approaches to estimating e-scooter travel patterns,” Urban, Plan. Transp. Res., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2026, doi: 10.1080/21650020.2026.2642835.
- M. A.-A. Hoque, B. Pradhan, and N. Ahmed, “Assessing drought vulnerability using geospatial techniques in northwestern part of Bangladesh,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 705, p. 135957, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135957.
- S. Saha et al., “Spatial assessment of drought vulnerability using fuzzy-analytical hierarchical process: a case study at the Indian state of Odisha,” Geomatics, Nat. Hazards Risk, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 123–153, 2021, doi: 10.1080/19475705.2020.1861114.
- H. Nagar, R. Machavaram, Ambuj, P. Soni, S. Saha, and T. S. C. Bose, “An integrated cloud system based serverless android app for generalised tractor drawbar pull prediction model using machine learning,” Syst. Sci. Control Eng., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2024, doi: 10.1080/21642583.2024.2385332.
- L. Fichtl et al., “Towards grapevine root architectural models to adapt viticulture to drought,” Front. Plant Sci., no. March, pp. 1–10, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1162506.
- H. Nagar, R. Machavaram, P. Kulkarni, and P. Soni, “AI-based engine performance prediction cum advisory system to maximise fuel efficiency and field performance of the tractor for optimum tillage,” Syst. Sci. Control Eng., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–27, 2024, doi: 10.1080/21642583.2024.2347936.
- H. Zhou, H. Tang, X. Liu, X. Shi, and L. Xia, “Contrastive learning based remote sensing text-to-image generation for few-shot remote sensing image captioning,” Int. J. Digit. Earth, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2025, doi: 10.1080/17538947.2025.2526102.
- W. Sun et al., “Coastline extraction using remote sensing: A review,” GIScience Remote Sens., vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 1–27, 2023, doi: 10.1080/15481603.2023.2243671.
- W. Chen, L. Yan, and V. Chandrasekar, “Optical polarization remote sensing,” Int. J. Remote Sens., vol. 41, no. 13, pp. 4849–4852, 2020, doi: 10.1080/01431161.2020.1743529.
- C. Chen, Y. Bao, F. Zhu, and R. Yang, “Remote sensing monitoring of rice growth under Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenée) damage by integrating satellite and UAV remote sensing data,” Int. J. Remote Sens., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 772–790, 2024, doi: 10.1080/01431161.2024.2302350.
- Z. Li, T. Qu, Q. Chong, and J. Xu, “FMCNet: A Fuzzy Multiscale Convolution Network for Remote Sensing Image Segmentation,” Can. J. Remote Sens., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2024, doi: 10.1080/07038992.2024.2418091.
- A. A. C. Attiogbé, E. Bessah, E. Quansah, U. Nehren, and S. K. Agodzo, “Spatial analysis of drought vulnerability in cocoa agroforestry systems across the Ghana-Togo border,” Geomatics, Nat. Hazards Risk, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2025, doi: 10.1080/19475705.2025.2467406.
- M. S. Ummah, “Metodologi pennelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan penelitian tindakan kelas dalam pendidikan olahraga,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2019.
- X. Pan, X. She, X. Li, and J. Zhao, “Chat-RSC: Interactive remote sensing image classification via large language models,” Int. J. Digit. Earth, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–36, 2025, doi: 10.1080/17538947.2025.2519999.
- T. Zhao, M. H. Cosh, A. Roy, X. Mu, Y. Qiu, and J. Shi, “Remote sensing experiments for earth system science,” Int. J. Digit. Earth, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1237–1242, 2021, doi: 10.1080/17538947.2021.1977473.
- S. G. Yalew et al., “Open-access remote sensing data for cooperation in transboundary water management,” Water Int., vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 955–974, 2023, doi: 10.1080/02508060.2023.2263226.
- S. Di Grazia and G. M. Tina, “Optimal site selection for floating photovoltaic systems based on geographic information systems (GIS) and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA): A case study,” Int. J. Sustain. Energy, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2024, doi: 10.1080/14786451.2023.2167999.
- E. T. Mutch and A. B. Newsam, “Hand-drawn historic maps: Utilization and conversion of unique features into geographic information systems (GIS),” J. Map Geogr. Libr., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 117–136, 2024, doi: 10.1080/15420353.2024.2399714.
- S. Adelabu, O. S. Durowoju, E. G. Adagbasa, A. Matamanda, and A. Olusola, “Footprints of drought in a montane grassland biome: A drought vulnerability index approach to drought conditions,” African Geogr. Rev., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 240–262, 2025, doi: 10.1080/19376812.2025.2530636.
- G. A. Bogale and Z. B. Erena, “Drought vulnerability and impacts of climate change on livestock production and productivity in different agro-Ecological zones of Ethiopia,” J. Appl. Anim. Res., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 471–489, 2022, doi: 10.1080/09712119.2022.2103563.
- E. E. Ebhuoma, F. K. Donkor, O. O. Ebhuoma, L. Leonard, and H. B. Tantoh, “Subsistence farmers’ differential vulnerability to drought in Mpumalanga province, South Africa: Under the political ecology spotlight,” Cogent Soc. Sci., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2020, doi: 10.1080/23311886.2020.1792155.
- A. S. Chandel, “Mapping drought risks in agriculture: A GIS and remote sensing study of Nagele Arsi district, Ethiopia,” Cogent Food Agric., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 2025, doi: 10.1080/23311932.2025.2525319.
- T. Le, C. Sun, S. Choy, and Y. Kuleshov, “Regional drought risk assessment in the Central Highlands and the South of Vietnam,” Geomatics, Nat. Hazards Risk, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 3140–3159, 2021, doi: 10.1080/19475705.2021.1998232.
- Z. N. Qaisrani et al., “Evaluating and mapping spatial drought in northeast Thailand: utilizing analytic hierarchy process and random forest algorithms,” Geocarto Int., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1–32, 2025, doi: 10.1080/10106049.2025.2518413.