Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)
Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

1.6519

Impact

GScholar

16

H-Index

Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

Needs Analysis for Developing Interactive Learning Resources Assisted by Geogebra Through the Spada Unismuh Learning Management System to Improve Students’ Mathematical Visualization Skills

Sri Satriani ORCID
Muhammadiyah University of Makassar ROR
Indonesia
srisatriani@unismuh.ac.id
Kristiawati Kristiawati ORCID
Muhammadiyah University of Makassar ROR
Indonesia
Muhammad Rizal Usman ORCID
Muhammadiyah University of Makassar ROR
Indonesia
Wahyuddin Wahyuddin ORCID
Muhammadiyah University of Makassar ROR
Indonesia
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to analyze the need for developing GeoGebra-assisted interactive learning resources integrated into the SPADA Learning Management System to improve students' mathematical visualization skills.

    Methodology: The study involved 29 lecturers from the Mathematics Education Study Program at Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar. A questionnaire was used to gather data on first-year undergraduates needs regarding GeoGebra-based learning resources in SPADA Learning Management System. Data analysis was quantitative using descriptive statistics and qualitative analysis for suggestions.

    Main Findings: The study revealed that 83% of lecturers emphasized the importance of developing GeoGebra-assisted learning resources in SPADA Learning Management System to improve understanding of abstract mathematical concepts. Most lecturers were familiar with SPADA LMS, but the use of features for mathematical visualization was limited.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study is the first to analyze the need to integrate GeoGebra into the SPADA Learning Management System in order to improve mathematics learning through interactive visual representations. This study expands knowledge by proposing an innovative approach to improve mathematical visualization, helping students better understand abstract concepts, and improving student learning outcomes in mathematics.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “Needs Analysis for Developing Interactive Learning Resources Assisted by Geogebra Through the Spada Unismuh Learning Management System to Improve Students’ Mathematical Visualization Skills”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 916–923, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.37251/jee.v6i3.1630.

    More Citation Formats

  • 347
    Abstract views
    203
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. G. A. Goldin, “Mathematical Representations,” in Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 566–572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_103
    2. J. Handhika, “Implementation of Technology in Physics Learning: Multiple-representation-oriented,” in 4th International Conference on Education and Technology (ICETECH 2023), 2024, pp. 735–742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-554-6_60
    3. R. SissyLia, S. M. Siahaan, and A. Fathurohman, “Analysis of the needs for the development of interactive multimedia based on augmented reality in physics learning,” J. Eval. Educ., vol. 6, no. 1 SE-Articles, pp. 10–16, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.37251/jee.v6i1.1287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v6i1.1287
    4. A. K. Jitendra and J. Woodward, “The role of visual representations in mathematical word problems,” in Cognitive Foundations for Improving Mathematical Learning, Elsevier, 2019, pp. 269–294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815952-1.00011-6
    5. R. Vágová and M. Kmetová, “GeoGebra as a tool to improve visual image,” Acta Didact. Napocensia, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 225–237, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.24193/adn.12.2.18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.12.2.18
    6. C. B. Mpungose and S. B. Khoza, “Postgraduate students’ experiences on the use of Moodle and Canvas learning management system,” Technol. Knowl. Learn., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09475-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09475-1
    7. A. A. H. Alia, “The analysis of a learning management system from a design and development perspective,” Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 280–289, 2022, doi: doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.4.1616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.4.1616
    8. S. Satriani, Wahyuddin, and A. Syamsuddin, “Development of flipped learning model learning assisted with spada learning management system,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 11476–11483, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.5613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.5613
    9. S. Satriani, W. Wahyuddin, and A. A. Syahri, “Development of hots-based function derivative worksheet through a network learning system spada,” MaPan, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 320, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.24252/mapan.2021v9n2a9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/mapan.2021v9n2a9
    10. S. Hamady, K. Mershad, and B. Jabakhanji, “Multi-version interactive assessment through the integration of GeoGebra with Moodle,” Front. Educ., vol. 9, p. 1466128, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1466128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1466128
    11. A. A. Shaame, J. R. Anatory, K. M. Osaki, and S. I. Mrutu, “Exploring a learning management system as a way to improve students’ understanding of geometry in secondary schools,” Africa Educ. Rev., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 17–40, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1080/18146627.2020.1868070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2020.1868070
    12. Y. S. Kusumah, D. Kustiawati, and T. Herman, “The effect of geogebra in three-dimensional geometry learning on students’ mathematical communication ability,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 895–908, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.29333/iji.2020.13260a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13260a
    13. S. Suparman, R. Marasabessy, and Y. Helsa, “Fostering spatial visualization in GeoGebra-assisted geometry lesson: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 20, no. 9, p. em2509, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/15170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15170
    14. K. A. Harahap, B. Sinaga, and P. Siagian, “Development of geogebra-assisted problem based learning (pbl) learning tools to improve visual thinking skills in mathematical problem solving students of SMA Negeri 1 Samudera,” Budapest Int. Res. Critics Linguist. Educ. J., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 239–251, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.33258/birle.v4i1.1581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v4i1.1581
    15. A. Yohannes and H.-L. Chen, “GeoGebra in mathematics education: a systematic review of journal articles published from 2010 to 2020,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 5682–5697, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2016861
    16. B. B. Chalaune and A. Subedi, “Effectiveness of GeoGebra in teaching school mathematics,” Contemp. Res. An Interdiscip. Acad. J., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 46–58, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/craiaj.v4i1.32729
    17. M. K. Tomić, B. Aberšek, and I. Pesek, “GeoGebra as a spatial skills training tool among science, technology engineering and mathematics students,” Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ., vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1506–1517, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1002/cae.22165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22165
    18. L. Solvang and J. Haglund, “Learning with friction—students’ gestures and enactment in relation to a geogebra simulation,” Res. Sci. Educ., vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 1659–1675, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11165-021-10017-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10017-7
    19. R. Ziatdinov and J. R. Valles, “Synthesis of modeling, visualization, and programming in geogebra as an effective approach for teaching and learning STEM topics,” Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 398, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3390/math10030398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math10030398
    20. M. S. H. Munna, M. R. Hossain, and K. R. Saylo, “Digital education revolution: evaluating lms-based learning and traditional approaches,” J. Innov. Technol. Converg., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 21–40, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.69478/JITC2024v6n002a03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.69478/JITC2024v6n002a03
    21. A. Kumar et al., “Blended learning tools and practices: a comprehensive analysis,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 85151–85197, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3085844. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3085844
    22. G. Prasetyo, F. Hidayatullah, M. Akhyar, and Wiranto, “The needs analysis of multimedia learning as a solution to strengthen character education,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Progressive Education (ICOPE 2019), 2020, pp. 284–290, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.200323.135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200323.135
    23. D. H. Tong, B. P. Uyen, H. T. D. Kieu, and L. K. Ngan, “The effectiveness of using GeoGebra software in mathematics classrooms: A case study of teaching continuous functions in high schools,” J. Hunan Univ. Nat. Sci., vol. 48, no. 9, 2021.
    24. H. Zulnaidi, E. Oktavika, and R. Hidayat, “Effect of use of GeoGebra on achievement of high school mathematics students,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 51–72, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10639-019-09899-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09899-y
    25. R. Thapa, N. Dahal, and B. P. Pant, “GeoGebra integration in high school mathematics: An experiential exploration on concepts of circle.,” Math. Teach. Res. J., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 16–33, 2022.
    26. N. Ishartono, A. Nurcahyo, M. Waluyo, M. Hanifah, R. A. Razak, and S. F. Sufahani, “GeoGebra-based flipped learning model: An alternative panacea to improve students’ learning independency in online mathematics learning,” JRAMathEdu (Journal Res. Adv. Math. Educ., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 178–196, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.23917/jramathedu.v7i3.18141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v7i3.18141
    27. B. Tamam and D. Dasari, “The use of Geogebra software in teaching mathematics,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1882, no. 1, p. 012042, May 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012042
    28. M. Irfan, B. Kusumaningrum, Y. Yulia, and S. A. Widodo, “Challenges during the pandemic: Use of e-learning in mathematics learning in higher education,” Infin. J., vol. 9, no. 2, p. 147, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.22460/infinity.v9i2.p147-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v9i2.p147-158
    29. M. Zakariashvili, “Integrating GeoGebra math activities into learning management systems (LMS),” Georg. Sci., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 13–34, 2022, doi: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3903-6636.
    30. R. E. Mayer, “The past, present, and future of the cognitive theory of multimedia learning,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 36, no. 1, p. 8, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1
    31. R. Desai, N. Rai, and J. Karekar, “Optimum use of LMS for dynamic mathematics classrooms in blended mode,” J. Eng. Educ. Transform., vol. 36, no. S2, pp. 492–499, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.16920/jeet/2023/v36is2/23075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2023/v36is2/23075
    32. L. Kangwa, “The Incorporation of GeoGebra as a Visualisation tool to teach Calculus in Teacher Education Institutions: The Zambian case.” Doctoral dissertation, RHODES UNIVERSITY). https://core. ac. uk/download/pdf …, 2022.
    33. Z. Marion, A. H. Abdullah, and S. N. S. A. Rahman, “The effectiveness of the geogebra-assisted inquiry-discovery learning strategy on students’ mastery and interest in algebraic expressions,” Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol., vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1681–1695, 2023, doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.11.1977. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.11.1977
    34. N. T. T. Thai, B. De Wever, and M. Valcke, “The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best ‘blend’ of lectures and guiding questions with feedback,” Comput. Educ., vol. 107, pp. 113–126, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.003
    35. R. Weinhandl, Z. Lavicza, M. Hohenwarter, and S. Schallert, “Enhancing flipped mathematics education by utilising GeoGebra,” International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1-15, 2020, doi: 10.46328/ijemst.v8i1.832. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.v8i1.832
    36. D. G. Abdissa, G. F. Duressa, T. T. Olkaba, and E. G. Feyissa, “The effect of blended learning educational model on secondary school students' mathematics achievement,” Problems of Education in the 21st Century, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 9-29, 2025, doi: 10.33225/pec/25.83.09. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/25.83.09
    37. N. Ishartono, A. Nurcahyo, M. Waluyo, H. J. Prayitno, and M. Hanifah, “Integrating Geogebra into the flipped learning approach to improve students' self-regulated learning during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Journal on Mathematics Education, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 69-86, 2022, doi: 10.22342/jme.v13i1.pp69-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v13i1.pp69-86
    38. S. A. Atta, and W. A. Brantuo, “Digitalizing the teaching and learning of mathematics at the senior high schools in Ghana; the case of flipped classroom approach,” American Journal of Education and Practice, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 29-37, 2021, doi: 10.47672/ajep.869. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47672/ajep.869
    39. T. B. Bedada, and M. Machaba, “Investigation of student's perception learning calculus with geogebra and cycle model,” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 18, no. 10, 2022, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/12443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12443
    40. M. C. Borba, P. Askar, J. Engelbrecht, G. Gadanidis, S. Llinares, and M. S. Aguilar, “Blended learning, e-learning and mobile learning in mathematics education,” ZDM, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 589-610, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s11858-016-0798-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0798-4