• Abstract
• How to cite
• Metrics
• References

• Purpose of the study: The aim of this research is to provide an overview of how effective the use of e-assessment is in science learning.

  Methodology: This research is qualitative research with a literature review research method. The data in this research is secondary data where data is obtained from search results for documents related to the research topic. The sample from this research in the form of articles was selected based on several criteria, including publications in journals ranging from 2017-2022. After articles that match the topic and the basis of the data are collected, the researcher then carries out a review using several criteria explained in the descriptive statistics table.

  Main Findings: Based on the results of a review of several relevant articles, it was found that the use of e-assessment will greatly simplify the assessment process and is useful for quickly providing results for science assessment. So the application of e-assessment for assessing student science is very necessary to be implemented in schools.

  Novelty/Originality of this study: The novelty lies in its focus on the comprehensive application of e-assessment in evaluating cognitive, affective, and psychomotor aspects of science learning. The results of this research can be a basis for policy makers in developing and implementing e-assessment systems in schools. With evidence that e-assessment can speed up the assessment process and improve learning outcomes, policies that support the digitalization of assessments will be more easily accepted.

• How to cite

  [1]

  “Effectiveness of E-Assessment in Science Learning: Improving the Quality and Efficiency of Assessment in the Digital Era”, In. Sci. Ed. J, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 74–81, May 2024, doi: 10.37251/isej.v5i2.960.

  More Citation Formats

  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
• 729

  Abstract views

  500

  Downloads

  ---

  Metrics — Badges
• 1. I. G. S. Y. Yasa, N. Dantes, and I. W. Suastra, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw Dan Asesmen Autentik Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ipa,” J. Lesson Learn. Stud., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 404–413, 2019.
  2. D. Sakinah, I. Putri, and B. T. Turaqulov, “Harmonizing Tradition , Science , and STEM Learning : Empowering Students ’ Creative Minds with Sound Waves and Local Wisdom,” vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 90–98, 2022, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v3i4.916. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v3i4.916
  3. P. E. Trisnawati, N. K. Suarni, and D. P. Parmiti, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Make a Match Berbasis Penilaian Kinerja Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Ipa,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Profesi Guru, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 101–109, 2019, doi: 10.23887/jippg.v2i1.18558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jippg.v2i1.18558
  4. N. Juharti and L. Kartika, “Comparison of Student Learning Outcomes in Class VIII SMP Negeri 2 Muaro Jambi,” Integr. Sci. Educ. J., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 13–19, 2021, doi: 10.37251/isej.v2i1.127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v2i1.127
  5. R. O. Sandra, Maison, and D. A. Kurniawan, “Pengembangan Instrument Miskonsepsi Menggunakan Dreamweaver Berbasis Web Pada Materi Tekanan Berformat Five-Tier,” J. Fis. Fis. Sains dan Apl., vol. 7, no. 1, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35508/fisa.v7i1.6575
  6. A. Akbar, “Correlation Study of Student Learning Motivation in Civics Subjects in High School,” J. Soc. Knowl. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.37251/jske.v4i2.428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jske.v4i2.428
  7. M. Maison et al., “Comparison of student attitudes towards natural sciences,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 54–61, 2020, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v9i1.20394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i1.20394
  8. L. Hasibuan and A. Nugraha, “Development of Scientific and Constructivism-Based Handouts on Social Arithmetic Materials,” Indones. J. Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 28–31, 2023, doi: 10.37251/ijoer.v4i2.578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/ijoer.v4i2.578
  9. M. Iqbal and R. O. Sandra, “Analisis Sikap Mandiri Siswa SMAN 2 Kota Jambi,” J. Eval. Educ., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 77–81, 2022, doi: 10.37251/jee.v3i3.238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v3i3.238
  10. B. Retni S, K. Dwi Agus, T. Elza, and P. Rahmat, “Evaluation of the Results of Attitudes and Self-Efficacy of Middle School Students in Science Subjects,” J. Educ. Res. Eval., vol. 5, no. 4, p. 525, 2021, doi: 10.23887/jere.v5i4.36409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v5i4.36409
  11. C. Hidayati, E. W. P. Thet, and P. Nouanthong, “Evaluation: Media Booklet About Education on Prevention of Flour Albus for Teenage Girl,” J. Eval. Educ., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 50–60, 2024, doi: 10.37251/jee.v5i2.928. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v5i2.928
  12. E. N. Setiyani, Z. Hazmi, Z. Baharin, and S. N. Jesse, “Development of POE-Based Student Worksheets ( Predict , Observe , And Explain ) for Students ’ Mathematical Representation Abilities,” J. Educ. Technol. Learn. Creat., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 78–87, 2023, doi: 10.37251/jetlc.v1i2.792. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jetlc.v1i2.792
  13. A. R. Wulan, A. Isnaeni, and R. Solihat, “Penggunaan Asesmen Elektronik Berbasis Edmodo Sebagai Assessment for Learning Keterampilan Abad 21,” Indones. J. Educ. Assesment, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 1, 2019, doi: 10.26499/ijea.v1i2.7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26499/ijea.v1i2.7
  14. A. B. Rifqi, “Pengaruh Implementasi Asesmen Projek Terhadap Karakter Dan Literasi Sains Siswa Kelas Iv Sd Gugus 2 Kecamatan Buleleng,” J. Pendidik. Dasar Flobamorata, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 96–102, 2021, doi: 10.51494/jpdf.v2i1.412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51494/jpdf.v2i1.412
  15. D. R. Retnani, R. Royani, C. Beccles, and A. Afras, “Improving Science Learning Outcomes on Light and Optical Instruments Through Visual Methods in Junior High Schools,” Schrödinger J. Phys. Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 32–38, 2024, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v5i1.883. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v5i1.883
  16. A. Asrial, S. Syahrial, D. A. Kurniawan, R. Perdana, and R. O. Sandra, “E-Assessment: Character of Students in Elementary School,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 17, no. 05, pp. 117–142, 2023, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v17i05.34205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i05.34205
  17. J. Marzal, E. Saputra, T. Suratno, and E. Elisa, “The use of ADDIE model to re-create academic information systems to improve user satisfaction The use of ADDIE model to re-create academic information systems to improve user satisfaction,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1567, no. 032033, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1567/3/032033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/3/032033
  18. Asrial et al., “Digital E-Assessment Technology in Assessing Students’ Tolerance Character,” J. Ilm. Sekol. Dasar, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 558–567, 2022, doi: 10.23887/jisd.v6i4.47302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v6i4.47302
  19. K. A. Mudanta, I. G. Astawan, and I. N. L. Jayanta, “Instrumen Penilaian Motivasi Belajar dan Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa Kelas V Sekolah Dasar,” Mimb. Ilmu, vol. 25, no. 2, p. 101, 2020, doi: 10.23887/mi.v25i2.26611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/mi.v25i2.26611
  20. A. N. Nugroho and G. S. Airlanda, “Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Pembelajaran IPA Kelas 4 SD,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Profesi Guru, vol. 3, no. 3, p. 400, 2020, doi: 10.23887/jippg.v3i3.29712. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jippg.v3i3.29712
  21. K. Trimawati, T. Kirana, and R. Raharjo, “Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Ipa Terpadu Dalam Pembelajaran Model Project Based Learning (PjBL) Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dan Kreatif Siswa SMP,” Quantum J. Inov. Pendidik. Sains, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 36, 2020, doi: 10.20527/quantum.v11i1.7606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/quantum.v11i1.7606
  22. M. M. Asad, R. B. Khan Soomro, A. Shamsy, and P. Churi, “Students’ Satisfaction towards E-Assessment for Academic Achievement in ESL at Public Schools and Colleges,” Educ. Res. Int., vol. 2021, 2021, doi: 10.1155/2021/4576750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4576750
  23. M. Maison, D. Darmaji, A. Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, Sumaryanti, and R. Perdana, “Supporting assessment in education: E-assessment interest in physics,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 89–97, 2020, doi: 10.13189/ujer.2020.080110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080110
  24. C. K. Y. Chan and W. Hu, “Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 20, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
  25. B. Pratiwi, I. Budiharto, and S. Fauzan, “Hubungan Kecerdasan Emosional dengan Kenakalan Remaja pada Remaja Madya: Literature Review,” Tanjungpura J. Nurs. Pract. Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, 2020, doi: 10.26418/tjnpe.v2i2.46145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26418/tjnpe.v2i2.46145
  26. W. Mengist, T. Soromessa, and G. Legese, “Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis for environmental science research,” MethodsX, vol. 7, p. 100777, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2019.100777. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.100777
  27. A. Laksono and A. Widiyatmoko*, “Development of Science Digital Scrapbook as Authentic Assessment to Measure Learning Outcome of Junior High School Students,” J. Pendidik. Sains Indones., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 451–467, 2022, doi: 10.24815/jpsi.v10i3.24100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v10i3.24100
  28. I. Nurhidayah and Ardi, “Instrumen E-Assessment Berbasis Quizizz tentang Materi Sistem Koordinasi untuk Kelas XI SMA/MA,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Profesi Guru, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 67–76, 2022, doi: 10.23887/jippg.v5i1.44006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jippg.v5i1.44006
  29. I. D. Pursitasari, A. Permanasari, and D. Jaenudin, “Pelatihan Penyusunan E-Asesmen Literasi Sains Berbasis AKM Bagi Guru IPA SMP di Kabupaten Bogor,” J. Pemberdaya. Masy., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 26–33, 2022, doi: 10.46843/jmp.v1i1.265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46843/jmp.v1i1.265
  30. I. W. Widiana, “Dampak Penggunaan E-learning Berbasis Asesmen Proyek Terhadap Kemandirian Belajar dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Selama Pandemi Covid-19,” J. Penelit. dan Pengemb. Pendidik., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 162–172, 2022, doi: 10.23887/jppp.v6i2.48850. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jppp.v6i2.48850
  31. A. A. Dewi, “Pengembangan Instrumen E-Quiz pada Pembelajaran Daring Materi Ejosistem Kelas VII SMP,” J. Pendidik. Sains dan Mat., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 199–212, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23971/eds.v10i2.3279
  32. H. Sahidu, Gunawan, and L. Herayanti, “Persepsi Calon Guru Terhadap Model E-Assessment Dalam Pembelajaran Fisika,” J. Pendidik. Fis. dan Teknol., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 58–66, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v5i1.1164
  33. A. Astalini, D. Darmaji, D. A. Kurniawan, L. Anggraini, and R. Perdana, “E-Assessment on Student’s Self-Concept for Physics Learning,” J. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 25, no. 2, p. 73, 2020, doi: 10.17977/um048v25i2p73-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17977/um048v25i2p73-81
  34. S. A. P. Syaninditha and P. E. Setiawan, “Pengaruh Persepsi Kegunaan, Persepsi Kemudahan, Faktor Sosial, Dan Kondisi Yang Memfasilitasi Terhadap Minat Penggunaan E-Filing,” E-Jurnal Akunt., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 86–115, 2017.
  35. C. Ozan, “The effect of authentic assessment on academic achievement and attitude towards educational measurement and opinions of prospective teachers,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 299–312, 2019, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v8i2.18564. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i2.18564
  36. A. K. Bansah and D. Darko Agyei, “Perceived convenience, usefulness, effectiveness and user acceptance of information technology: evaluating students’ experiences of a Learning Management System,” Technol. Pedagog. Educ., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 431–449, 2022, doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2022.2027267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2022.2027267
  37. M. Rojas-Osorio and A. Alvarez-Risco, “Intention to use smartphones among Peruvian university students,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 40–52, 2019, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v13i03.9356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i03.9356
  38. F. R. Winda, W. Kurniawan, and Darmaji, “Analisis Respon Pengguna Terhadap Penerapan Web-based Assessment pada Praktikum Fisika Dasar,” EDUMASPUL J. Pendidik., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 208–215, 2021, doi: 10.33487/edumaspul.v5i1.1140.
  39. T. H. Wang, “Developing a web-based assessment system for evaluating examinee’s understanding of the procedure of scientific experiments,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1791–1801, 2018, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/85170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/85170
  40. A. Wijayanti and M. A. Khairul Basyar, “Pengembangan E-portofolio Tematik-Terpadu Berbasis Web Blog untuk Menanamkan Karakter Kritis dan Kreatif melalui Pembelajaran IPA,” Phenom. J. Pendidik. MIPA, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 30–39, 2017, doi: 10.21580/phen.2017.7.1.1499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21580/phen.2017.7.1.1499
  41. Peprizal and N. Syah, “Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Web Pada Mata Pelajaran Instalasi Penerangan Listrik,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran, vol. 4, no. 3, p. 455, 2020, doi: 10.23887/jipp.v4i3.28217.

Categories

• Education