Integrated Science Education Journal
Integrated Science Education Journal

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

6.1

Impact

GScholar

18

H-Index

Integrated Science Education Journal

an Open Access Journal


Practicum Activity: Analysis of Science Process Skills and Students' Critical Thinking Skills:

Share
  • Purpose of the study: The purpose of this study was to determine how the science process and critical thinking skills of VII grade junior high school students were carried out through practicum activities.

    Methodology: This type of research is qualitative research. The data collection technique used in this research is the interview instrument. The informants in this study came from Batanghari 2 Junior High School, Batanghari 8 Junior High School, and Batanghari 25 Junior High School, with the sample informants being 3 teachers and 6 students. Data analysis techniques use the Miles and Huberman methods.

    Main Findings: The results of this study are that science teachers in the three schools have implemented practicum activities, and there has been an assessment of science process skills in practicum activities. Students have been trained and assessed for their science process skills and critical thinking skills but have not been trained optimally.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: The novelty of this research is to analyze practicum activities in improving science process skills and critical thinking skills in three direct schools. Suggestions for further research are finding learning innovations or selecting learning models to improve students' science process skills and critical thinking abilities to make them even better.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “Practicum Activity: Analysis of Science Process Skills and Students’ Critical Thinking Skills: ”, In. Sci. Ed. J, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 54–61, May 2023, doi: 10.37251/isej.v4i2.322.
  • 3292
    Abstract views
    2372
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. U. Rosidin, N. Kadaritna, and N. Hasnunidah, “Can Argument Driven Inquiry Models Have Impact on Critical Thinking Skills for Students With Different Personlity Types?,” Cakrawala Pendidik., vol. 38, no. 03, pp. 511–526, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i3.24725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i3.24725
    2. F. T. Aldila and E. F. S. Rini, “Teacher’s Strategy in Developing Practical Values of the 5th Pancasila Preepts in Thematic Learning in Elementary School,” J. Basic Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 1, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jber.v4i1.301
    3. Kholilah, A. Ramadhanti, R. Fitriani, E. Febri, and M. R. Pratiwi, “Hubungan Kerja Keras Dan Hasil Belajar Fisika Di Sma Negeri 1 Kota Jambi,” J. Sci. Educ. Pract., vol. 4, pp. 41–48, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://journal.unpak.ac.id/index.php/jsep. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33751/jsep.v4i1.2829
    4. E. F. Setiya Rini, D. Darmaji, and D. A. Kurniawan, “Identifikasi Kegiatan Praktikum dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains di SMPN Se-Kecamatan Bajubang,” Edukatif J. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 2476–2481, 2022.
    5. R. H. Ennis, “A Logical Basis for Measuring Critical Thinking Skills,” Educ. Leadersh., vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 44–48, 1985, [Online]. Available: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/80a7/c7d4a98987590751df4b1bd9adf747fd7aaa.pdf.
    6. Astalini et al., “Impact of Science Process Skills on Thinking Skills in Rural and Urban Schools,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 803–822, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16242a
    7. I. Mukhbitah, E. Mulyasari, and B. Robandi, “Penerapan Metode Eksperimen Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Ipa Di Kelas V Sekolah Dasar,” J. Pendidik. Guru Sekol. Dasar, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 312–321, 2019, doi: 10.17509/jpgsd.v4i2.20561.
    8. D. Darmaji, D. A. Kurniawan, A. Astalini, and E. F. S. Rini, “Science Processing Skill and Critical Thinking: Reviewed Based on the Gender,” Juenal Pendidik. Indones., vol. 11, no. 1, 2022, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v11i1.35116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v11i1.35116
    9. M. M. Matondang, E. F. Setiya Rini, N. D. Putri, and F. Yolvianysah, “Uji Perbandingan Motivasi Belaajar Siswa Kelas XI MIPA 2 dan XII MIPA 2 di SMA Negeri 1 Muaro Jambi,” J. Sains dan Pendidik. Fis., vol. 16, no. 03, pp. 218–227, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.35580/jspf.v16i3.15553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35580/jspf.v16i3.15553
    10. J. Jufrida, F. R. Basuki, E. Sawitri, and E. Afriani, “Need Analysis of Science Textbook Based Jambi Local Wisdom to Improve Science Literacy of SMPN 7 Muaro Jambi,” Form. J. Ilm. Pendidik. MIPA, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 151–160, 2019, doi: 10.30998/formatif.v9i2.3340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v9i2.3340
    11. H. Anwar, Jamaluddin, and J. A W, “Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran IPA Model 5E dI SMP,” Cakrawala Pendidik., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 142–151, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v1i1.8385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v1i1.8385
    12. W. A. Putri, R. Fitrini, E. F. S. Rini, F. T. Aldila, and T. Ratnawati, “Pengaruh Motivasi Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa IPA di SMAN 6 Muaro Jambi,” SAP (Susunan Artik. Pendidikan), vol. 5, no. 3, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/sap.v5i3.7760
    13. E. F. Setiya Rini, R. Fitriani, W. A. Putri, A. A. Br. Ginting, and M. M. Matondang, “Analisis Kerja Keras dalam Mata Pelajaran Fisika di SMAN 1 Kota Jambi,” SAP (Susunan Artik. Pendidikan), vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 221–226, 2021, doi: 10.30998/sap.v5i3.7764.
    14. I. H. Wenno, K. Esomar, and V. Sopacua, “Analisis Kesulitan Belajar dan Pencapaian Hasil Belajar Siswa melalui Strategi Pembelajaran Inkuiri,” Cakrawala Pendidik., vol. Oktober, no. 3, pp. 378–385, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v35i3.10706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v35i3.10706
    15. Sarwanto, L. E. W. Fajari, and Chumdari, “Critical Thinking Skills and Their Impacts on Elementary School Students,” Malaysian J. Learn. Instr., vol. 18, no. 2, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2021.18.2.6
    16. Maison, Darmaji, D. A. Kurniawan, Astalini, U. P. Dewi, and L. Kartina, “Analysis Of Science Process Skills In Physics Education Students,” J. Penelit. dan Eval. Pendidik., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 197–205, 2019, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pep.v23i2.28123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v23i2.28123
    17. Darmaji, Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, and E. F. Setiya Rini, “Gender analysis in measurement materials : Critical thinking ability and science processing skills,” JIPF Al-Biruni, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 113–128, 2022, doi: 10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v11i1.11509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v11i1.11509
    18. F. Yolvianysah, Suryanti, E. F. Setiya Rini, S. Wahyuni, and M. M. Matondang, “Hubungan Minat Belajar Siswa Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika di SMAN 3 Muaro Jambi,” Tunjuk Ajar J. Penelit. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 1, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31258/jta.v4i1.16-25
    19. E. F. Setiya Rini, R. Fitriani, W. A. Putri, A. A. B. Ginting, and M. M. Matondang, “Analisis Kerja Keras dalam Mata Pelajaran Fisika di SMAN 1 Kota Jambi,” SAP (Susunan Artik. Pendidikan), vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 221–226, 2021, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/sap.v5i3.7764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/sap.v5i3.7764
    20. Gunawan, A. Harjono, Hermansyah, and L. Herayanti, “Guided Inquiry Model Through Virtual Laboratory to Enhance Students’ Science Process Skills on Heat Concept,” Cakrawala Pendidik., vol. 38, no. 02, pp. 259–268, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i2.23345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i2.23345
    21. S. R. Manurung and D. D. Panggabean, “Improvinng Students’ Thinking Ability in Physics Using Interactive Multimedia Based Problem Solving,” Cakrawala Pendidik., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 460–470, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i2.28205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i2.28205
    22. Sukarmin, D. Ratnasari, and Suparmi, “The Instrument Implementation of Two-tier Multiple Choice to Analyze Students’ Science Process Skill Profile,” Int. J. Pedagog. Teach. Educ., vol. 2, no. January, pp. 61–70, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v2i0.19820
    23. D. Ratnasari, S. Sukarmin, S. Suparmi, and D. Harjunowibowo, “Analysis of science process skills of summative test items in physics of grade X in Surakarta,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 41–47, 2018, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v7i1.10439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i1.10439
    24. A. Ramadhanti, N. N. Simamora, E. Febri, S. Rini, and R. Fitriani, “Deskripsi Motivasi Belajar Fisika Siswa Kelas X MIPA di SMAN 1 Kota Jambi,” J. Eval. Educ., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 82–86, 2022, doi: 10.37251/jee.v3i3.245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v3i3.245
    25. R. Puspitorini, A. K. Prodjosantoso, B. Subali, and Jumadi, “Penggunaan Media Komik dan Pembelajaran IPA untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar Kognitif dan Afektif,” Cakrawala Pendidik., no. 3, pp. 413–420, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v3i3.2385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v3i3.2385
    26. T. Widodo and S. Kadarwati, “High Order Thinking Berbasis Pemecahan Masalah untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Berorientasi Pembentukan Karakter Siswa,” Cakrawala Pendidik., no. 1, pp. 161–171, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v5i1.1269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v5i1.1269
    27. R. W. Dari and N. R. Nasih, “Analisis Keterampilan Proses Sains Mahasiswa Pada Praktikum Menggunakan E-Modul,” Edu Sains J. Pendidik. Sains Mat., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 12–21, 2020, doi: 10.23971/eds.v8i2.1626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23971/eds.v8i2.1626
    28. E. Eliyarti and C. Rahayu, “Deskripsi Efektivitas Kegiatan Praktikum Dalam Perkuliahan Kimia Dasar Mahasiswa Teknik,” Edu Sains J. Pendidik. Sains Mat., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 51–60, 2019, doi: 10.23971/eds.v7i2.1476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23971/eds.v7i2.1476
    29. B. Panjaitan, “Metakognisi Calon Guru Bergaya Kognitif Reflektif dan Kognitif Impulsif dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika,” Cakrawala Pendidik., vol. Juni, no. 2, pp. 244–253, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v15i2.9463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v15i2.9463
    30. D. Chen, R. Fitriani, S. Maryani, E. F. Setiya Rini, W. A. Putri, and A. Ramadhanti, “Deskripsi Keterampilan Proses Sains Dasar Siswa Kelas VIII Pada Materi Cermin Cekung,” PENDIPA J. Sci. Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 50–55, 2021, doi: 10.33369/pendipa.5.1.50-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.5.1.50-55
    31. S. Syahrial, D. A. Kurniawan, A. Asrial, H. Sabil, S. Maryani, and E. F. S. Rini, “Professional teachers: Study of ICT capabilities and research competencies in urban and rural?,” Cypriot J. Educ. Sci., vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 2247–2261, 2022, doi: 10.18844/cjes.v17i7.7590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i7.7590
    32. A. Ramadhanti, K. Kholilah, R. Fitriani, E. F. S. Rini, and M. R. Pratiwi, “Hubungan Motivasi Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Kelas X MIPA di SMAN 1 Kota Jambi,” J. Eval. Educ., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 60–65, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v3i2.246
    33. A. Anas and R. Firmansyah, “Deskripsi Sikap Siswa Terhadap Pelajaran IPA Berdasarkan Adopsi Sikap Siswa, Kesenangan belajar IPA, dan Ketertarikan Belajar IPA di SMPN 16 Kota Jambi,” Integr. Sci. Educ. J., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 94–100, 2020, doi: 10.37251/isej.v1i3.114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v1i3.114
    34. N. I. S. Pratiwi, “Deskripsi Keaktifan Belajar Siswa Terhadap Mata Pelajaran IPA di SMP Negeri 18 Kota Jambi,” Integr. Sci. Educ. J., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 101–108, 2020, doi: 10.37251/isej.v1i3.77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v1i3.77
    35. A. Witri and R. S. Fitriani, “Deskripsi Sikap Kedisiplinan Peserta Didik pada Mata Pelajaran IPA di SMPN 19 Kota Jambi,” Integr. Sci. Educ. J., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 89–93, 2020, doi: 10.37251/isej.v1i3.123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v1i3.123
    36. W. Kurniawan et al., “Relationship of science process skills and critical thinking of students in physics subject,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 5581–5588, 2020, doi: 10.13189/ujer.2020.081162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081162
    37. Darmaji, Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, N. Sari, O. H. Wiza, and Y. E. Putri, “Investigation of students’ psychology: The relationship among students’ attitudes, persistence, creativity, and tolerance toward natural science subjects,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1155–1166, 2020, doi: 10.13189/ujer.2020.080405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080405
    38. E. F. Setiya Rini, D. Darmaji, and D. A. Kurniawan, “Identifikasi Kegiatan Praktikum dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains di SMPN Se-Kecamatan Bajubang,” Edukatif J. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 2476–2481, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i2.2360
    39. F. T. Aldila, R. P. W. Yuda, M. Wulandari, and A. P. Ningsi, “Deskripsi Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa SMAN 10 Muaro Jambi pada Materi Kesetimbangan pada Tali,” J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 112–119, 2021.
    40. M. Asy’ari and H. Fitriani, “Literatur Review Keterampilan Proses Sains sebagai Dasar Pengembangan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi,” Prism. Sains J. Pengkaj. Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Mat. dan IPA IKIP Mataram, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v5i1.1114
    41. T. E. Andini, S. Hidayat, E. N. Fadillah, and T. I. Perrmana, “Scientific process skills: Preliminary study towards senior high school student in Palembang,” J. Pendidik. Biol. Indones., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 43–250, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i3.6784
    42. O. Akani, “Levels of possession of science process skills by final year students of colleges of education in South Eastern States of Nigeria,” J. Educ. Pract., vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 94–102, 2015.
    43. D. Daniah, “Pentingnya inkuiri ilmiah pada praktikum dalam pembelajaran IPA untuk peningkatan literasi sains mahasiswa,” Pionir J. Pendidik., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 144–153, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22373/pjp.v9i1.7178
    44. M. M. Sari, R. Yulinda, and S. Zubaidah, “Analysis of Sciences Process Skills of Science Education Students in Microbiology Practice,” Asian J. Sci. Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 83–89, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/ajse.v5i1.31393
    45. A. Sujarittham, T Tanamatayarat, J Kittiravechote, “Investigating the Students’ Experimental Design Ability toward Guided Inquiry Based Learning in the Physics Laboratory,” TOJET (The Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol., vol. 8, no. 11, 2019.
    46. Darmaji, Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, and W. A. Putri, “Rural Student Analysis : Correlation Science Process Skills and Critical Thinking at a State Senior High School in Jambi Province,” J. Ta’dib, vol. 24, no. 2, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v24i2.3645
    47. W. A. Putri, Astalini, and Darmaji, “Analisis Kegiatan Praktikum untuk Dapat Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis,” Edukatif J. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 3361–3368, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i3.2638
    48. F. T. Aldila, E. F. S. Rini, S. W. Oktavia, N. N. Khaidah, F. P. Sinaga, and N. Sinaga, “The Relationship of Teacher Teaching Skills and Learning Interests of Physics Students of Senior High School,” EduFisika J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 8, no. 1, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v8i1.24864
    49. H. M. Taleb and C. Chadwick, “Enhancing Student Critical And Analytical Thinking Skills At A Higher Education Level In Developing Countries: Case Study Of The British University In Dubai,” J. Educ. Instr. Stud. World, vol. 6, no. 2, 2016.
    50. C. Abdullah, J. Parris, R. Lie, A. Guzdar, and E. Tour, “Critical analysis of primary literature in a master’s-level class: Effects on self-efficacy and science-process skills,” CBE Life Sci. Educ., vol. 14, pp. 1–3, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-10-0180
    51. A. J. Nugraha, H. Suyitno, and E. Susilaningsih, “Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Ditinjau dari Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Motivasi Belajar melalui Model PBL Abstrak,” J. Prim. Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 35–43, 2017.
    52. I. S. Shalihat, S. Y. L. Nanih, and U. S. Alamsyah, “Creative Character Training (CCT): Dampaknya terhadap Karakter Kreatif Guru Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini,” J. Obs. J. Pendidik. Anak Usia Dini, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 565–578, 2022, doi: 10.31004/obsesi.v6i2.1352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v6i2.1352
    53. H. Siswono, “Analisis Pengaruh Keterampilan Proses Sains Terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Fisika Siswa,” Momentum Phys. Educ. J., vol. 1, no. 2, p. 83, 2017, doi: 10.21067/mpej.v1i2.1967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v1i2.1967
    54. Darmaji, A. Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, A. P. Ningsi, D. D. Romadona, and R. W. Dari, “Regression of Science Process Skills On Critical Thinking Skills In Two Junior High Schools In Jambi City,” JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidik. Fis., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 177–186, 2020, doi: 10.26737/jipf.v5i3.1788. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v5i3.1788
    55. J. Nugraha, H. Suyitno, and E. Susilaningsih, “Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Ditinjau dari Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Motivasi Belajar melalui Model PBL,” J. Prim. Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 35–43, 2017.
    56. E. Ediansyah, D. A. Kurniawan, R. Perdana, and S. Salamah, “Using Problem-based Learning in College: Mastery Concepts Subject Statistical Research and Motivation,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 446–454, 2019, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v8i3.20243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i3.20243