https://cahaya-ic.com/index.php/JSKE <p style="text-align: justify;">Journal of Social Knowledge Education (JSKE) is a <strong>double-blind peer-reviewed</strong> journal dedicated to advancing knowledge and research, assessment, teaching, and learning in the field of social science education both in Indonesia and in the global context of developing countries. The Journal of Social Sciences Education (JSKE) publishes research studies that use various qualitative and/or quantitative methods and approaches in the field of Social Sciences at the formal school, vocational school and college levels. Recent advances in research in teaching, learning and assessment can thus contribute to social studies education policy and practice. This journal encompasses original research articles, including Integrated Social Science Education, Geography Education, Economic Education, History Education, Accounting Education, Ethno-social pedagogy, Tourism and Hospitality Education, and Character Education.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> Cahaya Ilmu Cendekia Publisher en-US Journal of Social Knowledge Education (JSKE) 2722-0451 <div> <p>Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:</p> </div> <ol> <li class="show">Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Journal of social knowledge education (JSKE) is the first publisher licensed under a <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</a>.</li> <li class="show">Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.</li> <li class="show">Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.</li> </ol> https://cahaya-ic.com/index.php/JSKE/article/view/2647 <p><strong>Purpose of the study: </strong>This study investigates the influence of entrepreneurship education on the entrepreneurial intention of college business students at Kalinga State University. The research examined students’ perceptions of four dimensions of entrepreneurship education: entrepreneurial university climate, entrepreneurship curricula, entrepreneurial knowledge, and entrepreneurial skills.</p> <p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This study employed a quantitative research approach, particularly a descriptive–correlational design. Data were collected from 48 graduating Bachelor of Science in Entrepreneurship students using total population sampling. A standardized questionnaire with established validity and reliability was administered to gather responses from the students.</p> <p><strong>Main Findings: </strong>Entrepreneurial knowledge (M = 4.38, SD = 0.575) and entrepreneurship curricula (M = 4.32, SD = 0.653) received the highest ratings, followed by entrepreneurial skills (M = 4.24, SD = 0.657). Entrepreneurial university climate, while rated lowest, still obtained a positive evaluation (M = 4.01, SD = 0.740). Entrepreneurial intention was likewise high (M = 4.28, SD = 0.690), reflecting strong entrepreneurial aspirations among students. Pearson correlation analysis revealed that entrepreneurship curricula (r = 0.443, p = 0.002) and entrepreneurial skills (r = 0.431, p = 0.002) were significantly and positively associated with entrepreneurial intention. In contrast, the entrepreneurial university climate and entrepreneurial knowledge were not statistically significant.</p> <p><strong>Novelty/Originality of this study: </strong>Previous studies primarily examined entrepreneurship education as a single construct influencing entrepreneurial intention. The author has not found research that simultaneously tests entrepreneurial university climate, curricula, knowledge, and skills within Economic Education and social learning frameworks. This study integrates these dimensions to explain how educational processes shape economic behavior and entrepreneurial intention.</p> Gretchen Bangguiyac Copyright (c) 2026 Gretchen Bangguiyac https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2026-03-03 2026-03-03 7 2 10.37251/jske.v7i2.2647 https://cahaya-ic.com/index.php/JSKE/article/view/2668 <p><strong>Purpose of the study: </strong>This study aims to analyze the effect of carbon emission disclosure and the environmental performance ratings of the corporate environmental performance rating program on firm value, both partially and simultaneously, in companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2022–2024.</p> <p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This study employs a quantitative causal-comparative approach using secondary data from corporate and regulatory disclosures. Carbon emission disclosure is treated as a form of corporate social accountability, reflecting firms’ responses to environmental expectations. Firm value is measured using Tobin’s Q, while environmental performance is represented by the environmental performance ratings, which function as a public policy instrument implemented by the Indonesian government. Statistical analysis is used to examine how public regulation shapes market responses to corporate environmental accountability.</p> <p><strong>Main Findings: </strong>The results indicate that carbon emission disclosure does not have a significant effect on firm value. The environmental performance have a negative and significant effect on firm value. Simultaneously, carbon emission disclosure and the environmental performance ratings do not have a significant effect on firm value, indicating that environmental information is not yet a major consideration for investors.</p> <p><strong>Novelty/Originality of this study: </strong>This study offers novelty by re-examining the effect of carbon emission disclosure and the environmental performance ratings on firm value using the most recent data from the 2022–2024 period. It assesses whether environmental aspects have been utilized by investors as signals in firm valuation and provides empirical contributions to environmental accounting literature and the formulation of sustainable business policies.</p> Linda Dwi Puspita Sari Syahriar Abdullah Supartini Supartini Susilaningtyas Budiana Kurniawati Copyright (c) 2026 Linda Dwi Puspita Sari, Syahriar Abdullah, Supartini Supartini, Susilaningtyas Budiana Kurniawati https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2026-03-03 2026-03-03 7 2 10.37251/jske.v7i2.2668